Mark A. Parker

Fracture-Related Diagenesis May Impact Conductivity

Rapid loss of fracture conductivity after hydraulic fracture stimulation has often been attributed to the migration of formation fines into the proppant pack or the generation of fines derived from proppant crushing. Generation of crystalline and amorphous porosity-filling minerals can occur within the proppant pack because of chemical compositional differences between the proppant and the formation, and the compaction of the proppant bed because of proppant pressure solution reactions. Findings presented in this paper suggest that diagenesis-type reactions that can occur between proppant and freshly fractured rock surfaces can lead to rapid loss of proppant-pack porosity and loss of conductivity.

Understanding proppant flowback

Proppant production from hydraulically fractured wells can cause severe operational problems, increase safety concerns, and dramatically reduce economic returns on well-stimulation investments. Methods that have helped eliminate or minimize proppant flowback include modified completion designs, the use of controlled fracture closure for obtaining early closure on the proppant pack, and the use of materials designed to reduce proppant production. Curable resin-coated proppants, chopped fiberglass. thermoplastic strips, and chemicals that modify the surface of the proppant are all accepted methods for minimizing flowback This paper presents the results of both physical and numerical modeling of proppant flowback recorded during the development of a chemical designed for modifying the proppant surface. The goal of this study was to develop an understanding of the mecha nisms that control proppant flowback. Laboratory experiments performed in slot models with no closure stress helped establish the interaction of proppant size, proppant distribution, and fluid velocity. Additional studies of the impact of closure stress, fracture width, and fluid rate on proppant flowback were performed with modified API linear conductivity cells. Data obtained from the physical modeling were used to calibrate a numerical model that predicts proppant flowback. In this model, fluid flow in the proppant pack is described by Darcys equation for flow through porous media. The resulting velocity distribution allowed local stability to be assessed along the free surface between the proppant pack and the continuous fluid phase. Repeating these steps allowed evaluation of the interface that develops over time.

Laboratory imaging of stimulation fluid displacement from hydraulic fractures

Laboratory experiments were conducted to physically investigate the processes governing stimulation fluid displacement from hydraulic fractures. Experiments were performed on two scales: meter-scale in a 1500 cm{sup 2} sand pack and core-scale in a 65 cm{sup 2} API linear conductivity cell. High-resolution light transmission imaging was employed at the meter-scale to visualize and quantify processes governing fluid displacement. For comparison, complimentary tests were performed using an API conductivity cell under ambient test conditions and at elevated closure stress. In these experiments viscous fingering and gravity drainage were identified as the dominant processes governing fluid displacement. Fluid viscosity was found to dictate the relative importance of the competing displacement processes and ultimately determine the residual liquid saturation of the sand pack. The process by which fluid displacement occurs was seen to effect the shape of both the gas and liquid phase relative permeability functions. Knowledge of such viscosity/relative permeability relationships may prove useful in bounding predictions of post-stimulation recovery of gels from the fracture pack.

Proppant Conductivity — What Counts and Why

The emergence of accepted proppant conductivity testing methods has led to much discussion about what is needed to regain high conductivity levels, and several marketing campaigns have been based on these findings. The industry has generally accepted the principle that delivering high conductivity levels in the fracture is key to achieving high production levels. This paper does not refute this point, but modifies it. This paper presents theory, laboratory data, and case histories indicating that high initial conductivity levels can only gain high initial levels of potential or actual production. For sustained, high production levels, the proppant packs integrity must be maintained. With time, most proppant packs are damaged by fines migration, gel clogging, and geochemical precipitation. These processes can be abated with various additives and techniques. This paper discusses these techniques in detail and shows case histories in which the techniques proved cost-effective in sustaining higher levels of production than those found in comparable wells.

Controlled Viscosity Reduction and Increased Fracture Conductivity Using a High-Temperature Breaker System

High-temperature fracturing-fluid breaker systems have been used in fracturing operations for the past several years. The advantage of using these systems has been improved fracture conductivity, but there has been an increased risk of poor proppant placement and premature screenouts resulting from early viscosity reductions as the fluid is exposed to high temperatures. In many cases, this problem could only be avoided by adding breaker to the final portion of the proppant stages, essentially improving the fracture conductivity in the near-wellbore region without enhancing the conductivity of most of the proppant pack. This paper highlights innovative research for developing high-temperature breakers that work synergistically with gel stabilizers to maintain excellent gel viscosity. This viscosity allows sufficient time to place the treatment while still providing a more complete break and improved fracture conductivity. Laboratory testing has shown that this high-temperature breaker system can be used effectively at temperatures as high as 350°F without sacrificing early-time fluid viscosity or proppant placement, while still providing dramatic improvements in fracture conductivity. Field production has been analyzed and shows the combined benefits of improved proppant placement and increased fracture conductivities obtained with the application of this technology.