Mark Allen

Weighing the Giants I: Weak Lensing Masses for 51 Massive Galaxy Clusters - Project Overview, Data Analysis Methods, and Cluster Images

This is the first in a series of papers in which we measure accurate weak-lensing masses for 51 of the most X-ray luminous galaxy clusters known at redshifts 0:15 . zCl . 0:7, in order to calibrate X-ray and other mass proxies for cosmological cluster experiments. The primary aim is to improve the absolute mass calibration of cluster observables, currently the dominant systematic uncertainty for cluster count experiments. Key elements of this work are the rigorous quantification of systematic uncertainties, high quality data reduction and photometric calibration, and the “blind” nature of the analysis to avoid confirmation bias. Our target clusters are drawn from X-ray catalogs based on the ROSAT All-Sky Survey, and provide a versatile calibration sample for many aspects of cluster cosmology. We have acquired widefield, high-quality imaging using the Subaru and CFHT telescopes for all 51 clusters, in at least three bands per cluster. For a subset of 27 clusters, we have data in at least five bands, allowing accurate photometric redshift estimates of lensed galaxies. In this paper, we describe the cluster sample and observations, and detail the processing of the SuprimeCam data to yield high-quality images suitable for robust weak-lensing shape measurements and precision photometry. For each cluster, we present wide-field three-color optical images and maps of the weak-lensing mass distribution, the optical light distribution, and the X-ray emission. These provide insights into the large-scale structure in which the clusters are embedded. We measure the o sets between X-ray flux centroids and the Brightest Cluster Galaxies in the clusters, finding these to be small in general, with a median of 20 kpc. For o sets . 100 kpc, weak-lensing mass measurements centered on the Brightest Cluster Galaxies agree well with values determined relative to the X-ray centroids; miscentering is therefore not a significant source of systematic uncertainty for our weak-lensing mass measurements. In accompanying papers we discuss the key aspects of our photometric calibration and photometric redshift measurements (Kelly et al.), and measure cluster masses using two methods, including a novel Bayesian weak-lensing approach that makes full use of the photometric redshift probability distributions for individual background galaxies (Applegate et al.). In subsequent papers, we will incorporate these weak-lensing mass measurements into a self-consistent framework to simultaneously determine cluster scaling relations and cosmological parameters.

Robust weak-lensing mass calibration of Planck galaxy clusters

In light of the tension in cosmological constraints reported by the Planck team between their SZ-selected cluster counts and Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) temperature anisotropies, we compare the Planck cluster mass estimates with robust, weak-lensing mass measurements from the Weighing the Giants (WtG) project. For the 22 clusters in common between the Planck cosmology sample and WtG, we find an overall mass ratio of hMPlanck=MWtGi = 0:688 0:072. Extending the sample to clusters not used in the Planck cosmology analysis yields a consistent value ofhMPlanck=MWtGi = 0:698 0:062 from 38 clusters in common. Identifying the weak-lensing masses as proxies for the true cluster mass (on average), these ratios are 1:6 lower than the default bias factor of 0.8 assumed in the Planck cluster analysis. Adopting the WtG weak-lensing-based mass calibration would substantially reduce the tension found between the Planck cluster count cosmology results and those from CMB temperature anisotropies, thereby dispensing of the need for “new physics” such as uncomfortably large neutrino masses (in the context of the measured Planck temperature anisotropies and other data). We also find modest evidence (at 95 per cent confidence) for a mass dependence of the calibration ratio and discuss its potential origin in light of systematic uncertainties in the temperature calibration of the X-ray measurements used to calibrate the Planck cluster masses. Our results exemplify the critical role that robust absolute mass calibration plays in cluster cosmology, and the invaluable role of accurate weak-lensing mass measurements in this regard.

Weighing the giants – IV. Cosmology and neutrino mass

We employ robust weak gravitational lensing measurements to improve cosmological constraints from measurements of the galaxy cluster mass function and its evolution, using X-ray selected clusters detected in the ROSAT All-Sky Survey. Our lensing analysis constrains the absolute mass scale of such clusters at the 8 per cent level, including both statistical and systematic uncertainties. Combining it with the survey data and X-ray follow-up observations, we find a tight constraint on a combination of the mean matter density and late-time normalization of the matter power spectrum,

Scalelength of disc galaxies

\sigma_8(\Omega_m/0.3)^{0.17}=0.81\pm0.03

Weighing the Giants – II. Improved calibration of photometry from stellar colours and accurate photometric redshifts

, with marginalized, one-dimensional constraints of

Weighing the giants - III. Methods and measurements of accurate galaxy cluster weak-lensing masses

\Omega_m=0.26\pm0.03

Extreme AGN Feedback and Cool Core Destruction in the X-ray Luminous Galaxy Cluster MACS J1931.8-2634

and

Cosmological calculations on the GPU

\sigma_8=0.83\pm0.04

Toward an International Virtual Observatory

. For these two parameters, this represents a factor of two improvement in precision with respect to previous work, primarily due to the reduced systematic uncertainty in the absolute mass calibration provided by the lensing analysis. Our new results are in good agreement with constraints from cosmic microwave background (CMB) data, both WMAP and Planck (plus WMAP polarization), under the assumption of a flat

Interoperability in Action: the Aladin Experience

\Lambda