Mark C. Swanson

Quantification of occupational latex aeroallergens in a medical center

To determine the quantity, variability, and mean aerodynamic diameter of latex aeroallergens in a large medical center, we collected air samples from work sites by using area and personal breathing zone air samplers, and we measured latex allergens by an inhibition assay with IgE antibodies from latex-sensitive individuals. Latex aeroallergen concentrations in 11 areas where powdered latex gloves were frequently used ranged from 13 to 208 ng/m3, and in areas where powdered latex gloves were never or seldom used, concentrations ranged from 0.3 to 1.8 ng/m3. Installation and use of a laminar flow glove changing station in one work area did not reduce latex aeroallergen levels. Large quantities of allergen were recovered from used laboratory coats and anesthesia scrub suits and from laboratory surfaces. Latex allergen concentrations in personal breathing zone samplers worn by health care workers in areas where powdered gloves were frequently used ranged from 8 to 974 ng/m3. Exposure likely occurs when gloves are changed and as a result of resuspension from reservoirs of powder in the room and clothing. Latex allergens were found in all particle sizes but were predominant in particles greater than 7 microns in mass median aerodynamic diameter. Results of electrophoretic immunoblotting showed that the aeroallergens are primarily the higher molecular mass components of the latex glove proteins. Measures to control exposure can be monitored by both area and personal air sampling with this immunochemical approach. Use of gloves with low allergen content or powder-free gloves appears to be more effective than use of a laminar flow glove changing station in reducing aeroallergen levels.

Control of airborne latex by use of powder-free latex gloves ☆ ☆☆ ★ ★★

OBJECTIVE Our objective was to assess airborne latex allergen exposure in the workplace of a hospital laboratory technician with occupational latex sensitization and repeated anaphylactic episodes from this. Her allergic manifestations had cleared only when coworkers changed to powder-free latex gloves. Therefore a laboratory still using powdered latex gloves was selected for comparative airborne latex sampling. DESIGN The design was a survey. SETTING We used a hospital hematology laboratory, and a biochemistry laboratory was used for comparison. PARTICIPANTS The index case with latex allergy is described. An average of 10 employees worked on the day shift in the same laboratory, and 10 employees worked in the biochemistry laboratory studied. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Airborne latex allergen levels obtained by high airflow area sampling were compared in the laboratory using powder-free latex gloves and in the laboratory using powdered latex gloves. RESULTS Levels were below the level of detection (< 0.02 ng/m3 of latex allergen) in the laboratory using powder-free latex gloves but ranged from 39 to 311 ng/m3 in the laboratory using powdered gloves. CONCLUSIONS Airborne latex allergen is produced with use of powdered latex gloves. Such usage by coworkers may provoke respiratory and anaphylactic response to latex in sensitized subjects. Use of powder-free gloves by coworkers may enable such patients to continue work in their trained profession and may prevent measurable airborne latex exposure. Affected patients, however, still need to avoid direct latex contact.

A prospective, controlled study showing that rubber gloves are the major contributor to latex aeroallergen levels in the operating room☆☆☆★★★

BACKGROUND Although protocols have been published for reducing natural rubber latex exposure in medical environments, there are no objective data documenting their effectiveness. OBJECTIVE We prospectively studied the impact of a single intervention, substitution of low-allergen-containing latex gloves for high-allergen-containing latex gloves, on latex aeroallergen levels in a single operating room (OR). METHODS We sampled OR air on 52 consecutive days, including 33 surgery days and 19 nonsurgery days. On each surgery day all personnel wore either high-allergen gloves (n = 18 days) or low-allergen gloves (n = 15 days). Latex aeroallergen levels (in nanograms per cubic meter) and extractable latex glove allergen contents (in allergen units per milliliter) were measured by inhibition immunoassays. An on-site study monitor recorded the number of gloves used, the total time spent by all patients in the OR each day (OR time), and the total time of all procedures for each day (operating procedure time). RESULTS Latex aeroallergen levels during low-allergen glove use days (mean, 1.1 ng/m3; median, 0.9 ng/m3; range, 0.1 to 3.5 ng/m3) were significantly lower than on high-allergen glove use days (mean, 13.7 ng/m3; median, 7.7 ng/m3; range, 2.2 to 56.4 ng/m3) (p < 0.001) but not significantly different from that on nonsurgery days (mean, 0.6 ng/m3; median, 0.3 ng/m3; range, 0.1 to 3.6 ng/m3). Latex aeroallergen levels were strongly correlated with the total number of gloves used on designated high-allergen glove days (r = 0.66, p = 0.003). There was no appreciable day-to-day carryover of latex aeroallergen. CONCLUSIONS The substitution of low-allergen-containing latex gloves for high-allergen-containing latex gloves can reduce levels of latex aeroallergen by more than 10-fold in an OR environment.

Incidence of latex sensitization among latex glove users

BACKGROUND Although there are several reports of the prevalence of latex sensitization among health care workers, the incidence of sensitization is unknown. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to estimate the incidence of sensitization among latex glove users at a hospital in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. METHODS Workers with negative results to the skin test at baseline were followed prospectively over 1 year, some wearing powdered gloves and others using powder-free gloves. They were reevaluated in 1995 with a questionnaire and skin prick test (SPT) sensitivity to latex reagents, three common inhalants, and six foods. A conversion was defined as a (new) latex SPT with wheal diameter at least 4 mm greater than saline control. Glove extracts were assayed for antigenic protein, and air samples were obtained to estimate exposure to airborne latex protein. RESULTS During powdered glove use, personal exposures ranged from 5 to 616 ng/m3, whereas during powder-free glove use, all but two results for air samples were below the limit of detection (about 0.1 ng/m3). During the study period, the protein concentration in the powdered gloves, initially mean 557 microg/gm of sample, declined at a rate of 295 microg/gm per year (p < 0.0001). Of the 1075 SPT-negative participants at baseline, 479 were working in eligible wards, and of these, 435 (91%) participated in follow-up, 227 using powder-free gloves and 208 using powdered gloves. We identified four conversions, two (1.0%) in the powdered glove group and two (0.9%) in the powder-free group. The two participants using powdered gloves were the only converters who were symptomatic. The significance of skin test conversions identified in the powder-free group, both asymptomatic patients, is unclear. The limitations of the study are discussed, including the limited power, the declines in latex protein concentrations, and the possibility of information (observer) bias. CONCLUSION To our knowledge, this represents the first reported estimate (about 1%) of incidence of sensitization in hospital personnel using latex gloves.

An epidemic of occupational allergy to latex involving health care workers.

IgE-mediated sensitivity to natural rubber latex is being recognized more frequently among health care workers. Between January 1990 and June 1993, we evaluated 342 consecutive Mayo Medical Center employees who reported symptoms suggestive of latex allergy. All were interviewed and underwent puncture skin testing with extracts of rubber gloves. In some cases, latex-specific IgE antibodies were measured by immunoassay. One hundred four of the 342 employees evaluated (30%) were latex-allergic. Risk factors for sensitization included frequent use of disposable gloves, presence of prior a topic disease, and prior or current hand dermatitis. The peak onset of symptoms occurred in late 1989 and early 1990 and did not correlate with a peak in glove usage at our medical center, which continued to rise. Most sensitized employees (78%) reported contact urticaria from rubber gloves, and over two thirds also experienced allergic rhinitis, conjunctivitis, or asthma when working in areas where large numbers of gloves were being used. Sixteen episodes of rubber-induced anaphylaxis were documented in 12 employees; six episodes occurred after latex skin testing and were easily reversed with appropriate therapy. Our findings substantiate a local epidemic of latex allergy among medical center employees. Epidemiologic studies are needed to assess the effects of various interventions to reduce occupational exposure to latex allergens. Although prick skin testing with concentrated latex glove extracts presents some risk of systemic reaction, pending availability of commercial diagnostic extracts, such testing is generally safe when performed by skilled laboratory personnel. Skin testing is warranted to investigate health care workers suspected of being latex-sensitive.

Identification and partial characterization of the soybean-dust allergens involved in the Barcelona asthma epidemic

Asthma epidemics in Barcelona, Spain, have been attributed to dust generated by the unloading of soybeans in the harbor. Sera of four different groups of 10 subjects in each group were studied: (1) patients attending an emergency room in Barcelona for an asthma attack on epidemic days, group A, (2) patients attending an emergency room for an attack on nonepidemic days, group B, (3) patients with asthma from other cities, group C, and (4) patients without asthma from Barcelona matched by age and sex with group A, group D. All subjects in group A had IgE to allergens in extracts of various soybean samples. In contrast, only one of the 10 subjects in each of groups B and C and none of those subjects in group D had IgE to uncleaned bean and hull extracts. Radioimmunoassay demonstrated that in sera from patients with asthma during an asthma outbreak reacted primarily to soybean hull and dust extracts. Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide and gel electrophoresis thin-layer isoelectrofocusing demonstrated protein bands of 97.4 to less than 14.4 kd and isoelectric point between 6 and 3.5. By Western blot and thin layer isoelectrofocusing/blotted radioimmunoisoelectrofocusing, IgE of patients with asthma during an asthma outbreak reacted weakly to two protein bands of molecular weight ranging from 42 to 21 kd, strongly to glycoprotein bands with molecular weight less than 14.4 kd, and isoelectric point less than 6, which appeared to be the major allergens.

Detection and quantitation of raw fish aeroallergens from an open-air fish market

BACKGROUND IgE-mediated hypersensitivity to fish is a clinically relevant problem, particularly in several European countries. Although most allergic reactions to fish are caused by ingestion, occupational exposures to seafood allergens by inhalation have been correlated with respiratory symptoms. In Madrid, patients with fish allergy have exhibited respiratory symptoms after visits to an open-air fish market. OBJECTIVE We sought to study the possibility of passively aerosolized fish allergen in an open-air fish market through air sampling and a competitive IgE immunoassay. METHODS Air samples were collected on polytetrafluoroethylene filters by using air samplers. Samples were collected on 41 different days from both an open-air fish market and an outdoor residential area. Fish allergens were specifically quantified by competitive IgE immunoassay by using pooled sera from fish-sensitive individuals. A raw fish extract (10 mg of dry weight/mL) was used as the reference standard. RESULTS Allergen was quantified in all 39 fish market air samples (2-25 ng/m(3)). The residential air samples contained no detectable allergen. The analytic limit of detection was 2 ng, allowing detection of 0.4 ng/m(3) for the air volumes collected. A concentrated (30-fold) pool of fish market air samples was tested in serial dilutions and demonstrated an identical regression line to that of the raw fish standard. CONCLUSION By using air sampling and an immunochemical analytic technique, fish allergen is detectable in the air of an open-air fish market. Avoidance of a food allergen, such as fish, should include preventing exposure to aerosolized particles through inhalation in relevant environments.

Inhalation challenge testing of latex-sensitive health care workers and the effectiveness of laminar flow HEPA–filtered helmets in reducing rhinoconjunctival and asthmatic reactions

BACKGROUND There are few data relating latex aeroallergen concentrations to biologic responses in latex-sensitized persons. OBJECTIVES We sought to investigate acceptable latex aeroallergen concentrations below which latex-sensitive health care workers do not experience symptoms and to study the effect of high-efficiency particle arrest (HEPA)-filtered laminar flow helmets in preventing latex-induced symptoms. METHODS Under challenge chamber conditions, latex-sensitive health care workers underwent 7 sequential inhalation challenge tests by donning and discarding either vinyl gloves (challenge 1), low latex-allergen powder-free gloves (challenge 2), or high latex-allergen powdered gloves (challenges 3 to 7) for up to 1 hour. Volunteers wore a laminar flow helmet during all challenges; HEPA filters in the helmet were in place only during challenges 3 and 4. Flow-volume loops, symptom scores, and latex aeroallergen concentrations were measured before and during each test. RESULTS At 60 minutes, latex aeroallergen concentrations during challenges 3 to 7 (mean, 7600 ng/m3; range, 93 to 54,000 ng/m3 ) were significantly higher than during challenges 1 or 2 (mean, 65 ng/m3; range, nondetectable to 100 ng/m3 ) (P <.001). During challenges 5 and 6, mean maximum percent falls in FEV1 (-16% and -11%, respectively) were significantly greater compared with those measured during challenges 3 and 4 (-3% and -1%, respectively) (P =.03). Mean maximum change from baseline symptom scores during challenges 5 and 6 was significantly higher than that during challenges 3 and 4 (P =.006). During challenges with high latex-allergen gloves, 4 volunteers had reproducible FEV1 falls of 20% or greater at cumulative inhaled latex aeroallergen doses ranging from less than 100 ng to 1500 ng. CONCLUSION The laminar flow helmets were effective in reducing latex-induced symptoms. Only 1 volunteer exhibited a fall in FEV1 of 20% or greater after a cumulative inhaled latex aeroallergen dose of less than 100 ng, and no volunteer showed a decline in FEV1 after exposure to powder-free low allergen gloves.

A medical-center-wide, multidisciplinary approach to the problem of natural rubber latex allergy

Latex is a common cause of occupational allergy in health care workers; latex-sensitized patients are at increased risk of allergic reactions in medical environments. Skin test reagents and latex-specific immunoglobulin E immunoassays were established for diagnosis of latex allergy. Inhibition immunoassays were developed for measuring latex aeroallergens and latex allergens in rubber products. A registry of latex-sensitive employees was established. High-allergen gloves were removed from the medical center inventory; latex aeroallergen levels subsequently declined. Despite an increasing number of gloves used annually, expenditures for gloves in 1994 were lower than in previous years. Latex-sensitive individuals can be identified using skin tests or immunoassays. Latex aeroallergen levels in medical environments can be reduced substantially at lower cost by using powder-free rubber gloves with lower allergen content.

Source of the aeroallergen of soybean dust: A low molecular mass glycopeptide from the soybean tela

Airborne soybean allergens in the dust generated during the unloading of soybeans in the harbor caused asthma epidemics in Barcelona, Spain. The major allergen causing the epidemics was a glycopeptide less than 14 kd molecular mass abundant in soybean dust. This allergen occurs in all parts of the soybean plant at all stages of growth, but the telae (hulls) and pods are by far the richest source. Small amounts of a similar cross-reacting allergen are found in some other grain dusts. The botanical function and significance of this soybean plant component is not known nor is the potential for airborne dispersion of this allergen at other grain-handling sites.