Mark Charles Adkins
Mayo Clinic
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Mark Charles Adkins.
American Journal of Roentgenology | 2007
Richard E. Scalf; Doris E. Wenger; Matthew A. Frick; Jayawant N. Mandrekar; Mark Charles Adkins
OBJECTIVE The objective of our study was to describe the MRI features of patients with Parsonage-Turner syndrome. Familiarity with the MRI features associated with this entity is important because radiologists may be the first to suggest the diagnosis. Twenty-six patients with Parsonage-Turner syndrome were treated at our institution between 1997 and 2005. We retrospectively reviewed the MR images of patients with clinical or electromyographic evidence (or both) of acute brachial neuritis without a definable cause. CONCLUSION MRI of the brachial plexus and shoulder in patients with Parsonage-Turner syndrome showed intramuscular denervation changes involving one or more muscle groups of the shoulder girdle. The supraspinatus and infraspinatus muscles were the most commonly involved. MRI is sensitive for detecting signal abnormalities in the muscles of the shoulder girdle of patients with Parsonage-Turner syndrome. MRI may be instrumental in accurately diagnosing the syndrome.
Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography | 1990
Mark Charles Adkins; Robert A. Halvorsen; Rene P. duCret
Focal fatty metamorphosis of the liver is a well-recognized entity characteristically demonstrated by a nonspherical, low-density area without mass effect. We present a case of focal fatty metamorphosis of the liver that shows multiple areas of low attenuation within the liver with mass effect. Radionuclide liver-spleen scan shows multiple focal defects corresponding to the areas of fatty metamorphosis.
Clinical Nuclear Medicine | 1991
Rene P. duCret; Mark Charles Adkins; Robert A. Halvorsen; Claudia M. Engeler; Christopher C. Kuni; Robert J. Boudreau
A 50-year-old woman with Feltys syndrome, who presented with “menopausal” symptoms, was found to have a large pelvic mass on physical exam. Computed tomography of the pelvis led to an incorrect diagnosis of malignancy, while radionuclide imaging using Tc-99m sulfur colloid confirmed the diagnosis of ectopic splenomegaly.
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics | 2018
Zaiyang Long; Michael R. Bruesewitz; David R. DeLone; Jonathan M. Morris; Kimberly K. Amrami; Mark Charles Adkins; Katrina N. Glazebrook; James M. Kofler; Shuai Leng; Cynthia H. McCollough; Joel G. Fletcher; Ahmed F. Halaweish; Lifeng Yu
Abstract Objectives Both projection and dual‐energy (DE)‐based methods have been used for metal artifact reduction (MAR) in CT. The two methods can also be combined. The purpose of this work was to evaluate these three MAR methods using phantom experiments for five types of metal implants. Materials and Methods Five phantoms representing spine, dental, hip, shoulder, and knee were constructed with metal implants. These phantoms were scanned using both single‐energy (SE) and DE protocols with matched radiation output. The SE data were processed using a projection‐based MAR (iMAR, Siemens) algorithm, while the DE data were processed to generate virtual monochromatic images at high keV (Mono+, Siemens). In addition, the DE images after iMAR were used to generate Mono+ images (DE iMAR Mono+). Artifacts were quantitatively evaluated using CT numbers at different regions of interest. Iodine contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR) was evaluated in the spine phantom. Three musculoskeletal radiologists and two neuro‐radiologists independently ranked the artifact reduction. Results The DE Mono+ at high keV resulted in reduced artifacts but also lower iodine CNR. The iMAR method alone caused missing tissue artifacts in dental phantom. DE iMAR Mono+ caused wrong CT numbers in close proximity to the metal prostheses in knee and hip phantoms. All musculoskeletal radiologists ranked SE iMAR > DE iMAR Mono+ > DE Mono+ for knee and hip, while DE iMAR Mono+ > SE iMAR > DE Mono+ for shoulder. Both neuro‐radiologists ranked DE iMAR Mono+ > DE Mono+ > SE iMAR for spine and DE Mono+ > DE iMAR Mono+ > SE iMAR for dental. Conclusions The SE iMAR was the best choice for the hip and knee prostheses, while DE Mono+ at high keV was best for dental implants and DE iMAR Mono+ was best for spine and shoulder prostheses. Artifacts were also introduced by MAR algorithms.
Bone | 2018
Jad G. Sfeir; Matthew T. Drake; Elizabeth J. Atkinson; Sara J. Achenbach; Jon J. Camp; Amanda J. Tweed; Louise K. McCready; Lifeng Yu; Mark Charles Adkins; Shreyasee Amin; Sundeep Khosla
Central quantitative computed tomography (QCT) is increasingly used in clinical trials and practice to assess bone mass or strength and to evaluate longitudinal changes in response to drug treatment. Current studies utilize single-energy (SE) QCT scans, which may be confounded both by the amount of bone marrow fat at baseline and changes in marrow fat over time. However, the extent to which marrow fat changes either underestimate volumetric BMD (vBMD) measurements at baseline or under-/overestimate longitudinal changes in vivo in humans remains unclear. To address this issue, 197 early postmenopausal women [median age (IQR) 56.7 (54.4-58.7) years] underwent spine and hip QCT scans at baseline and 3 years using a 128-slice dual-source dual-energy (DE) scanner. The scans were analyzed as either SE scans (100 kVp) or DE scans (100 kVp and 140 kVp), with the latter accounting for bone marrow fat. At baseline, vertebral trabecular vBMD was (median) 17.6% lower (P < 0.001) while femur neck (FN) cortical vBMD was only 3.2% lower (P < 0.001) when assessed by SE vs DE scanning. SE scanning overestimated the 3 year rate of bone loss for trabecular bone at the spine by 24.2% (P < 0.001 vs DE rates of loss) but only by 8.8% for changes in FN cortical vBMD (P < 0.001 vs DE rates of loss). The deviation between SE and DE rates of bone loss in trabecular vBMD became progressively greater as the rate of bone loss increased. These findings demonstrate that SE QCT scans underestimate trabecular vBMD and substantially overestimate rates of age-related bone loss due to ongoing conversion of red to yellow marrow. Further, the greater the rate of bone loss, the greater the overestimation of bone loss by SE scans. Although our findings are based on normal aging, recent evidence from animal studies demonstrates that the skeletal anabolic drugs teriparatide and romosozumab may markedly reduce marrow fat, perhaps accounting for the disproportionate increases in trabecular vBMD by SE QCT as compared to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry with these agents. As such, future studies using recently available DE scanning technology that has satisfactory precision and radiation exposure are needed to evaluate changes in trabecular vBMD independent of changes in marrow fat with aging and drugs that may alter marrow fat composition.
Gastroenterology | 1996
Edward V. Loftus; Ba Olivares-Pakzad; Kenneth P. Batts; Mark Charles Adkins; David H. Stephens; M. G. Sarr; Eugene P. DiMagno
Skeletal Radiology | 2004
Jesse A. Davila; Kimberly K. Amrami; Murali Sundaram; Mark Charles Adkins; Krishnan K. Unni
Skeletal Radiology | 2004
Scott D. Kendell; Mark S. Collins; Mark Charles Adkins; Murali Sundaram; Krishnan K. Unni
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America | 2007
Matthew A. Frick; Doris E. Wenger; Mark Charles Adkins
Radiologic Clinics of North America | 2007
Matthew A. Frick; Doris E. Wenger; Mark Charles Adkins