Mark D. Bearden
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Mark D. Bearden.
Energy and Environmental Science | 2011
Phillip K. Koech; James E. Rainbolt; Mark D. Bearden; Feng Zheng; David J. Heldebrant
Natural gas purifications using chemically selective hydrogen sulfide (H2S) sorbents could be more efficient if chemical selectivity for H2S could be maintained without thermal regeneration of the sorbent. We used tertiary alkanolamines to reversibly capture H2S in the absence of water to produce hydrosulfide-based ionic liquids in high yield. These alkanolammonium hydrosulfide ionic liquids release H2S by exposure to inert gas or by mild heating. H2S can be rapidly and nearly quantitatively released at ambient temperature from the alkanolammonium hydrosulfide ionic liquids by the addition of nonpolar antisolvents, some of which naturally phase separate from the spent alkanolamine. The antisolvent-induced regeneration of the alkanolamine potentially allows an efficient H2S gas scrubbing process that is chemically selective and can be operated continuously at or near ambient temperature.
Chemsuschem | 2015
Paul M. Mathias; Feng Zheng; David J. Heldebrant; Andy Zwoster; Greg A. Whyatt; Charles M. Freeman; Mark D. Bearden; Phillip K. Koech
The kinetics of the absorption of CO2 into two nonaqueous CO2-binding organic liquid (CO2 BOL) solvents were measured at T=35, 45, and 55u2009°C with a wetted-wall column. Selected CO2 loadings were run with a so-called first-generation CO2 BOL, comprising an independent base and alcohol, and a second-generation CO2 BOL, in which the base and alcohol were conjoined. Liquid-film mass-transfer coefficient (kg ) values for both solvents were measured to be comparable to values for monoethanolamine and piperazine aqueous solvents under a comparable driving force, in spite of far higher solution viscosities. An inverse temperature dependence of the kg value was also observed, which suggests that the physical solubility of CO2 in organic liquids may be making CO2 mass transfer faster than expected. Aspen Plus software was used to model the kinetic data and compare the CO2 absorption behavior of nonaqueous solvents with that of aqueous solvent platforms. This work continues our development of the CO2 BOL solvents. Previous work established the thermodynamic properties related to CO2 capture. The present paper quantitatively studies the kinetics of CO2 capture and develops a rate-based model.
Archive | 2014
Richard D. Boardman; Kara G. Cafferty; Corrie Nichol; Erin Searcy; Tyler L. Westover; Richard A. Wood; Mark D. Bearden; James E. Cabe; Corinne Drennan; Susanne B. Jones; Jonathan L. Male; George G. Muntean; Lesley J. Snowden-Swan; Sarah H. Widder
This report presents the results of an evaluation of utility-scale biomass cofiring in large pulverized coal power plants. The purpose of this evaluation is to assess the cost and greenhouse gas reduction benefits of substituting relatively high volumes of biomass in coal. Two scenarios for cofiring up to 20% biomass with coal (on a lower heating value basis) are presented; (1) woody biomass in central Alabama where Southern Pine is currently produced for the wood products and paper industries, and (2) purpose-grown switchgrass in the Ohio River Valley. These examples are representative of regions where renewable biomass growth rates are high in correspondence with major U.S. heartland power production. While these scenarios may provide a realistic reference for comparing the relative benefits of using a high volume of biomass for power production, this evaluation is not intended to be an analysis of policies concerning renewable portfolio standards or the optimal use of biomass for energy production in the U.S.
Archive | 2015
Casie L. Davidson; Mark D. Bearden; Jacob A. Horner; James E. Cabe; Delphine Appriou; B. Peter McGrail
Previous work by McGrail et al. (2013, 2015) has evaluated the possibility of pairing compressed air energy storage with geothermal resources in lieu of a fossil-fired power generation component, and suggests that such applications may be cost competitive where geology is favorable to siting both the geothermal and CAES components of such a system. Those studies also note that the collocation of subsurface resources that meet both sets of requirements are difficult to find in areas that also offer infrastructure and near- to mid-term market demand for energy storage. This study examines a novel application for the compressed air storage portion of the project by evaluating the potential to store compressed air in disused wells by amending well casings to serve as subsurface pressure vessels. Because the wells themselves would function in lieu of a geologic storage reservoir for the CAES element of the project, siting could focus on locations with suitable geothermal resources, as long as there was also existing wellfield infrastructure that could be repurposed for air storage. Existing wellfields abound in the United States, and with current low energy prices, many recently productive fields are now shut in. Should energy prices remain stagnant, these idle fields willmorexa0» be prime candidates for decommissioning unless they can be transitioned to other uses, such as redevelopment for energy storage. In addition to the nation’s ubiquitous oil and gas fields, geothermal fields, because of their phased production lifetimes, also may offer many abandoned wellbores that could be used for other purposes, often near currently productive geothermal resources. These existing fields offer an opportunity to decrease exploration and development uncertainty by leveraging data developed during prior field characterization, drilling, and production. They may also offer lower-cost deployment options for hybrid geothermal systems via redevelopment of existing well-field infrastructure. This project assessed the technical and economic feasibility of implementing geothermally coupled well-based CAES for grid-scale energy storage. Based on an evaluation of design specifications for a range of casing grades common in U.S. oil and gas fields, a 5-MW CAES project could be supported by twenty to twenty-five 5,000-foot, 7-inch wells using lower-grade casing, and as few as eight such wells for higher-end casing grades. Using this information, along with data on geothermal resources, well density, and potential future markets for energy storage systems, The Geysers geothermal field was selected to parameterize a case study to evaluate the potential match between the proven geothermal resource present at The Geysers and the field’s existing well infrastructure. Based on calculated wellbore compressed air mass, the study shows that a single average geothermal production well could provide enough geothermal energy to support a 15.4-MW (gross) power generation facility using 34 to 35 geothermal wells repurposed for compressed air storage, resulting in a simplified levelized cost of electricity (sLCOE) estimated at 11.2 ¢/kWh (Table S.1). Accounting for the power loss to the geothermal power project associated with diverting geothermal resources for air heating results in a net 2-MW decrease in generation capacity, increasing the CAES project’s sLCOE by 1.8 ¢/kWh.«xa0less
Energy & Fuels | 2016
Feng Zheng; David J. Heldebrant; Paul M. Mathias; Phillip K. Koech; Mukund Bhakta; Charles J. Freeman; Mark D. Bearden; Andy Zwoster
Archive | 2015
Sonja Salmon; Charles J. Freeman; Reynolds A. Frimpong; Alan House; Jonathan Slater; Andrew Jones; Novozymes Sonja Salmon; Pm; Erin Yarborough; Megan Beckner Whitener; Uk-Caer Kunlei Liu; Kun Liu; Guojie Qi; Balraj Ambedkar Joe Remias; Pnnl Charles Freeman; Tl; Greg A. Whyatt; Mark D. Bearden; Kayte Denslow; Richard Zheng; Doosan David Fitzgerald; Rafael Vidal; Tania Russell; Scott Hume; Vinay Mulgundmath; Saravanan Swaminathan; Agnieszka Magdalena Kuczynska
Energy Procedia | 2014
David J. Heldebrant; Vassiliki Alexandra Glezakou; Phillip K. Koech; Paul M. Mathias; David C. Cantu; Roger Rousseau; Deepika Malhotra; Mukund Bhakta; Mark D. Bearden; Charles J. Freeman; Feng Zheng
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research | 2013
Paul M. Mathias; Louis V. Jasperson; David VonNiederhausern; Mark D. Bearden; Phillip K. Koech; Charles J. Freeman; David J. Heldebrant
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering | 2018
Jennifer B. Dunn; Mary J. Biddy; Susanne B. Jones; Hao Cai; Pahola Thathiana Benavides; Jennifer Markham; Ling Tao; Eric Tan; Christopher Kinchin; Ryan Davis; Abhijit Dutta; Mark D. Bearden; Christopher K. Clayton; Steven Phillips; Kenneth G. Rappe; Patrick Lamers
Energy Procedia | 2017
Casie L. Davidson; David J. Heldebrant; Mark D. Bearden; Jake A. Horner; Charles J. Freeman