Mark D. Joffe

Forensic Evidence Findings in Prepubertal Victims of Sexual Assault

Objective. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends forensic evidence collection when sexual abuse has occurred within 72 hours, or when there is bleeding or acute injury. It is not known whether these recommendations are appropriate for prepubertal children, because few data exist regarding the utility of forensic evidence collection in cases of child sexual assault. This study describes the epidemiology of forensic evidence findings in prepubertal victims of sexual assault. Methods. The medical records of 273 children <10 years old who were evaluated in hospital emergency departments in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and had forensic evidence processed by the Philadelphia Police Criminalistics Laboratory were retrospectively reviewed for history, physical examination findings, forensic evidence collection, and forensic results. Results. Some form of forensic evidence was identified in 24.9% of children, all of whom were examined within 44 hours of their assault. Over 90% of children with positive forensic evidence findings were seen within 24 hours of their assault. The majority of forensic evidence (64%) was found on clothing and linens, yet only 35% of children had clothing collected for analysis. After 24 hours, all evidence, with the exception of 1 pubic hair, was recovered from clothing or linens. No swabs taken from the childs body were positive for blood after 13 hours or sperm/semen after 9 hours. A minority of children (23%) had genital injuries. Genital injury and a history of ejaculation provided by the child were associated with an increased likelihood of identifying forensic evidence, but several children had forensic evidence found that was unanticipated by the childs history. Conclusions. The general guidelines for forensic evidence collection in cases of acute sexual assault are not well-suited for prepubertal victims. The decision to collect evidence is best made by the timing of the examination. Swabbing the childs body for evidence is unnecessary after 24 hours. Clothing and linens yield the majority of evidence and should be pursued vigorously for analysis.

Nebulized dexamethasone versus oral prednisone in the emergency treatment of asthmatic children

STUDY OBJECTIVE To compare nebulized dexamethasone with oral prednisone in the treatment of children with asthma. DESIGN A randomized, double-blind, double-placebo study. SETTING An urban pediatric emergency department. PARTICIPANTS Patients aged 1 to 17 years with acute asthma. INTERVENTIONS Patients with moderate asthma exacerbation received frequent aerosolized albuterol and either 1.5 mg/kg of nebulized dexamethasone or 2 mg/kg of oral prednisone. RESULTS A total of 111 children was evaluated; 21% of those treated with dexamethasone required hospitalization, compared with 31% of those treated with prednisone (P = .26). A significantly greater proportion of dexamethasone-treated children were discharged home within 2 hours (23% versus 7%, P = .02). In the dexamethasone group, 8% who received the drug by mouthpiece were hospitalized compared with 33% who received it by face mask (P = .06). Fewer children treated with dexamethasone vomited (0% versus 15%, P = .001) and fewer relapsed within 48 hours of ED discharge (0% versus 16%, P = .008). CONCLUSION Nebulized dexamethasone was as effective as oral prednisone in the ED treatment of moderately ill children with acute asthma and was associated with more rapid clinical improvement, more reliable drug delivery, and fewer relapses.

Oral versus intravenous rehydration of moderately dehydrated children: a randomized, controlled trial.

Background. Dehydration from viral gastroenteritis is a significant pediatric health problem. Oral rehydration therapy (ORT) is recommended as first-line therapy for both mildly and moderately dehydrated children; however, three quarters of pediatric emergency medicine physicians who are very familiar with the American Academy of Pediatrics recommendations for ORT still use intravenous fluid therapy (IVF) for moderately dehydrated children. Objective. To test the hypothesis that the failure rate of ORT would not be >5% greater than the failure rate of IVF. Secondary hypotheses were that patients in the ORT group will (1) require less time initiating therapy, (2) show more improvement after 2 hours of therapy, (3) have fewer hospitalizations, and (4) prefer ORT for future episodes of dehydration. Methods. A randomized, controlled clinical trial (noninferiority study design) was performed in the emergency department of an urban children’s hospital from December 2001 to April 2003. Children 8 weeks to 3 years old were eligible if they were moderately dehydrated, based on a validated 10-point score, from viral gastroenteritis. Patients were randomized to receive either ORT or IVF during the 4-hour study. Treating physicians were masked and assessed all patients before randomization at 2 and 4 hours of therapy. Successful rehydration at 4 hours was defined as resolution of moderate dehydration, production of urine, weight gain, and the absence severe emesis (≥5 mL/kg). Results. Seventy-three patients were enrolled in the study: 36 were randomized to ORT and 37 were randomized to IVF. Baseline dehydration scores and the number of prior episodes of emesis and diarrhea were similar in the 2 groups. ORT demonstrated noninferiority for the main outcome measure and was found to be favorable with secondary outcomes. Half of both the ORT and IVF groups were rehydrated successfully at 4 hours (difference: −1.2%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: −24.0% to 21.6%). The time required to initiate therapy was less in the ORT group at 19.9 minutes from randomization, compared with 41.2 minutes for the IVF group (difference: −21.2 minutes; 95% CI: −10.3 to −32.1 minutes). There was no difference in the improvement of the dehydration score at 2 hours between the 2 groups (78.8% ORT vs 80% IVF; difference: −1.2%; 95% CI: −20.5% to 18%). Less than one third of the ORT group required hospitalization, whereas almost half of the IVF group was hospitalized (30.6% vs 48.7%, respectively; difference: −18.1%; 95% CI: −40.1% to 4.0%). Patients who received ORT were as likely as those who received IVF to prefer the same therapy for the next episode of gastroenteritis (61.3% vs 51.4%, respectively; difference: 9.9%; 95% CI: −14% to 33.7%). Conclusions. This trial demonstrated that ORT is as effective as IVF for rehydration of moderately dehydrated children due to gastroenteritis in the emergency department. ORT demonstrated noninferiority for successful rehydration at 4 hours and hospitalization rate. Additionally, therapy was initiated more quickly for ORT patients. ORT seems to be a preferred treatment option for patients with moderate dehydration from gastroenteritis.

Oral versus intravenous corticosteroids in children hospitalized with asthma.

BACKGROUND Previous studies have demonstrated that in the emergency treatment of an asthma exacerbation, corticosteroids used in conjunction with beta-agonists result in lower hospitalization rates for children and adults. Furthermore, orally administered corticosteroids have been found to be effective in the treatment of outpatients with asthma. However, similar data in inpatients is lacking. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of oral prednisone versus intravenous methylprednisolone in equivalent doses for the treatment of an acute asthma exacerbation in hospitalized children. METHODS We conducted a randomized, double-blind, double-placebo study comparing oral prednisone at 2 mg/kg/dose (maximum 120 mg/dose) twice daily versus intravenous methylprednisolone at 1 mg/kg/dose (maximum 60 mg/dose) four times daily in a group of patients 2 through 18 years of age hospitalized for an acute asthma exacerbation. All patients were assessed by a clinical asthma score 3 times a day. The main study outcome was length of hospitalization; total length of stay and time elapsed before beta-agonists could be administered at 6-hour intervals. Duration of supplemental oxygen administration and peak flow measurements were secondary outcome measures. RESULTS Sixty-six patients were evaluated. Children in the prednisone group had a mean length of stay of 70 hours compared with 78 hours for the methylprednisolone group (P =.52). Children in the prednisone group were successfully weaned to beta-agonists in 6-hour intervals after 59 hours compared with 68 hours for the methylprednisolone group (P =.47). Patients receiving prednisone required supplemental oxygen for 30 hours compared with 52 hours for the methylprednisolone group (P =.04). CONCLUSION There was no difference in length of hospital stay between asthmatic patients receiving oral prednisone and those receiving intravenous methylprednisolone. Because hospitalization charges are approximately 10 times greater for intravenous methylprednisolone compared with oral prednisone, the use of oral prednisone to treat inpatients with acute asthma would result in substantial savings.

Follow-up of patients with occult bacteremia in pediatric emergency departments

Blood cultures are frequently obtained in pediatric emergency departments (EDs) from febrile young children at risk for bacteremia and subsequent development of serious bacterial infections. This study of 105 children with occult bacteremia treated in two large urban pediatric EDs describes the follow-up of these patients and the impact that positive blood culture results have on the detection of serious illness. Seventy-seven percent of patients had a follow-up visit in the ED, 8% had follow-up by telephone alone, and 15% were not contacted. Of the patients who returned to the ED, 49% did so because they were notified of the positive blood culture result. The mean time interval for these patients from registration at the initial visit to report of positive blood culture result was 30.0 hours and, from registration at the initial visit to follow-up visit, was 42.7 hours. Thirty-seven percent of those who returned did so because a follow-up visit was scheduled at the initial encounter, and 13% returned because of persistent illness. Ten children (9.6%), five of whom had been notified of the positive blood culture, returned with serious illnesses. Patients whose diagnosis of serious illness was facilitated by blood culture results had shorter delay in identifying cultures as positive than did patients notified of positive results who did not develop serious illness (16.2 vs 31.6 hours; P < 0.05). The delay in follow-up of children with occult bacteremia limits the usefulness of blood cultures in the early detection of serious illness. In our study, most of the delay was attributable to the time it took for cultures to be identified as positive. Techniques that speed the identification of positive blood cultures will be beneficial to outpatients with bacteremia. Although patients usually return promptly after being contacted, many patients with occult bacteremia were not reached. EDs must ensure that children at risk for the complications of bacteremia have prompt follow-up.

EFFECT OF EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT IMMUNIZATION ON COMPLIANCE WITH PRIMARY CARE

The purpose of this study was to determine whether immunization of children during treatment in an Emergency Department (ED) affects subsequent compliance with primary care. This cohort study of children immunized in the ED and matched controls was conducted in the ED and the pedlatric clinic in an urban, tertiary care, pediatric hospital. Forty children were enrolled in study and control groups. There were no differences in age, race, sex, insurance status, temperature on arrival, and discharge diagnoses between groups. The immunization status by parental report and as documented in the clinic records was similar for immunized and control patients. There was no difference in attendance at health maintenance visits during the six months after the ED visit between immunized and control patients. No differences in receipt of immunizations or in immunization status were noted after six months. The sample size has adequate power to conclude that the difference in subsequent compliance with primary care between immunized and control patients is less than 50%. Parents reported their childs immunization status incorrectly in 23% of cases. Patients receiving measles immunization in the ED had already been immunized in 18% of cases. Unnecessary subsequent immunization of study patients occurred in 28% of cases. In conclusion, immunization in an ED does not have a large effect on subsequent compliance with primary care. In the ED, parents are an unreliable source of information about immunization status. An immunization database could reduce the frequency of inappropriate immunization.

Blasts in peripheral blood with intraosseous infusion

Two children who died of apparent Sudden Infant Death syndrome (SIDS) were found to have immature white blood cells, including blasts, in their peripheral blood. No cause for marrow elements in peripheral blood was found. The blood was sampled proximal to an intraosseous infusion, which may have displaced the marrow elements into the venous circulation. Physicians should be aware that patients receiving intraosseous infusions may have immature white blood cells in the peripheral circulation in the absence of malignant, infectious, or infiltrative disease of the marrow.

A two-year retrospective study of accidental pediatric albuterol ingestions

A two-year retrospective review of accidental albuterol ingestions in children less than 12 years old was performed to assess overdose toxicity and to investigate a dose-effect relationship. One hundred twelve exposures were located. Seventeen cases were excluded owing to coingestants, leaving 95 cases for evaluation. Twenty-nine children (30%) remained at home without intervention or telephone followup because of an ingestion of less than 0.6 mg/kg. Twenty-eight patients (30%) were followed at home by telephone (12 of whom received ipecac). Dosages ranged from 1 to 27 mg, with dose/ weight ratios of 0.1 to 1.9 mg/kg. Two children experienced transient mild symptoms (irritability, brief nausea, and vomiting). The remaining 26 children were asymptomatic. Thirty eight cases (40%) were treated in an emergency department. Ingestions ranged from 2 to 96 mg, with dose/weight ratios of 0.3 to 6.3 mg/kg. Ages ranged from one to 11 years. Transient restlessness or irritability was observed in 16 patients, tachycardia in 15, tremors in six, and a widened pulse pressure in one. No serious events occurred in this series, and no patient required treatment beyond gastrointestinal decontamination. For ingestions of 0.6 mg/kg or less, treatment at home with observation may be sufficient. For larger ingestions, eg, greater than 0.6 mg/kg, consideration should be given to direct medical evaluation and gastrointestinal decontamination.

Pediatric Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in the Acute Setting

Abstract Pediatric mild traumatic brain injuries, most of which are concussions, are an increasingly common reason for presentation to emergency departments. The diagnosis of concussion has increased dramatically over the past decade, necessitating the acute care provider to have up-to-date knowledge of the definition, pathophysiology, signs and symptoms, physical examination findings, and acute management of pediatric concussion. This article also addresses populations most vulnerable to prolonged recovery from pediatric concussion and referral recommendations.