Mark Dovey

A Phase I Study of Aerosolized Administration of tgAAVCF to Cystic Fibrosis Subjects with Mild Lung Disease

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is one of the most common autosomal recessive disorders in North America, leading to significant morbidity and early mortality. The defect in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator protein (CFTR) function can be corrected in vitro by gene replacement with a wild-type gene. A Phase I, single administration, dose escalation trial was designed and executed to assess safety and delivery of tgAAVCF, an adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector encoding the human CFTR cDNA, by nebulization to the lungs of CF subjects. Four cohorts of three subjects each were administered increasing doses of the study agent, beginning with 10(10) DNase-resistant particles (DRP) and escalating in log increments up to 10(13) DRP. Sequential bronchoscopies were performed to gather analytical samples throughout the study. All 12 subjects completed the study. There were a total of 242 adverse events (AEs), six of which were defined as serious and three of which were defined as possibly being related to the study drug. A clear dose-response relationship was observed in vector gene transfer. A maximum of 0.6 and 0.1 vector copies per brushed cell were observed 14 days and 30 days, respectively, following nebulization of 10(13) DRP tgAAVCF, and this declined to nearly undetectable levels by day 90. Vector gene transfer was evenly distributed throughout the fourth airway generation following single-dose administration. RNA-specific PCR did not detect vector-derived mRNA. This Phase I trial shows that aerosolized tgAAVCF is safe and widely delivered to the proximal airways of CF subjects by nebulization.

Do Patients of Subspecialist Physicians Benefit from Written Asthma Action Plans

RATIONALE Asthma clinical guidelines suggest written asthma action plans are essential for improving self-management and outcomes. OBJECTIVES To assess the efficacy of written instructions in the form of a written asthma action plan provided by subspecialist physicians as part of usual asthma care during office visits. METHODS A total of 407 children and adults with persistent asthma receiving first-time care in pulmonary and allergy practices at 4 urban medical centers were randomized to receive either written instructions (n = 204) or no written instructions other than prescriptions (n = 203) from physicians. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Using written asthma action plan forms as a vehicle for providing self-management instructions did not have a significant effect on any of the primary outcomes: (1) asthma symptom frequency, (2) emergency visits, or (3) asthma quality of life from baseline to 12-month follow-up. Both groups showed similar and significant reductions in asthma symptom frequency (daytime symptoms [P < 0.0001], nocturnal symptoms [P < 0.0001], β-agonist use [P < 0.0001]). There was also a significant reduction in emergency visits for the intervention (P < 0.0001) and control (P < 0.0006) groups. There was significant improvement in asthma quality-of-life scores for adults (P < 0.0001) and pediatric caregivers (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that using a written asthma action plan form as a vehicle for providing asthma management instructions to patients with persistent asthma who are receiving subspecialty care for the first time confers no added benefit beyond subspecialty-based medical care and education for asthma. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 00149461).