Mark F. O’Reilly

Assessing preferences for AAC options in communication interventions for individuals with developmental disabilities: A review of the literature

We synthesized studies that assessed preference for using different augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) options. Studies were identified via systematic searches of electronic databases, journals, and reference lists. Studies were evaluated in terms of: (a) participants, (b) setting, (c) communication options assessed, (d) design, (e) communication skill(s) taught to the participant, (f) intervention procedures, (g) outcomes of the intervention and outcome of the preference assessment, (h) follow-up and generalization, and (i) reliability of data collection and treatment integrity. Seven studies, involving 12 participants, met the inclusion criteria. In these studies, individuals were taught to use either speech-generating devices (SGD), (b) picture exchange (PE) systems, and/or (c) manual signs. Assessments to identify preferences for using each AAC option were conducted in each study. Sixty-seven percent (n=8) of participants demonstrated some degree (≥55%) of preference for using SGD compared to 33% (n=4) of participants who demonstrated some degree (≥55%) of preference for PE. The results indicate that individuals with developmental disabilities often show a preference for different AAC options. Incorporating an assessment of such preferences might therefore enable individuals to exert some degree of self-determination with respect to AAC intervention.

Speech-generating devices versus manual signing for children with developmental disabilities.

We compared speed of acquisition and preference for using a speech-generating device (SGD) versus manual signing (MS) as augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) options. Four children with developmental disabilities (DD), aged 5-10 years, were taught to request preferred objects using an iPod(®)-based SGD and MS. Intervention was introduced in a multiple-probe across participants design and SGD and MS conditions were compared in an alternating treatments design. A systematic choice-making paradigm was implemented to determine if the children showed a preference for using SGD or MS. All participants showed increased use of SGD when intervention was introduced, but only three learned under the MS condition. Three participants exhibited a preference for the SGD while the remaining participant demonstrated a preference for using MS. Results support previous studies showing that individuals with DD often show a preference for different AAC options and extend previous data by suggesting that acquisition and maintenance was better for the preferred option.

Promoting Independent Task Performance by Persons with Severe Developmental Disabilities through a New Computer-Aided System:

This study involved two experiments. In Experiment 1, a computer-aided system for promoting task performance by 6 persons with severe developmental disabilities was compared with a card system. The computer-aided system was portable and presented pictorial task instructions (one instruction per step) and prompts. In Experiment 2, the same systemwas used, but the number of instruction occasions was reduced. In one condition, the system presented all the instructions used in Experiment 1 but mostly in clusters rather than individually. In another, the system presented part of the Experiment 1 instructions. Three Experiment 1 participants also served in Experiment 2. Experiment 1 results indicated all 6 participants had higher percentages of correct steps with the computer system and preferred it to the card system. Experiment 2 results indicated that the condition in which the instructions were clusteredwas more effective for maintaining correct task performance. Implications of the findings were discussed.

Comparing two types of augmentative and alternative communication systems for children with autism

This study compared acquisition and preference for two types of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) systems in three pre-schoolers with autism. Acquisition of requesting behaviour using a picture-exchange system vs a voice-output communication aide (VOCA) was compared in an alternating treatments design. Following acquisition, both ACC systems were simultaneously available and the child could select which one of the two systems to use. There was little difference between picture-exchange and VOCA in terms of acquisition rates. Two children demonstrated a consistent preference for picture-exchange and the third showed a preference for the VOCA. Both speed of acquisition and system preference should be considered when designing AAC interventions for children with autism and related developmental disabilities. Comparamos la adquisición y preferencia en relación a dos tipos de sistemas (AAC) de comunicación alternativa y aumentativa en 3 preescolares con autismo. Se comparó la adquisición de un comportamiento solicitado a través del uso de un sistema de intercambio de dibujos contra una ayuda de comunicación de producción de voz (VOCA), en un diseño de tratamiento alternativo. Después de la adquisición ambos sistemas AAC estuvieron disponibles en forma simultánea, y el niño podía seleccionar cuál de los dos sistemas usar. Hubo poca diferencia entre el intercambio de dibujos y VOCA en término de tasas de adquisición. Dos niños demostraron una preferencia consistente para el intercambio de dibujos y el tercero demostró una preferencia por la VOCA. Tanto la velocidad de adquisición como la preferencia por un sistema deberán ser consideradas cuando se diseñen intervenciones con AAC para niños con autismo y discapacidades en el desarrollo relacionadas. Palabras Clave: comunicación alternativa y aumentativa, intercambio de dibujos, ayudas de comunicación de producción de la voz, adquisición, autismo.

A Review of Peer-Mediated Social Interaction Interventions for Students with Autism in Inclusive Settings

This review addresses the use of peer-mediated interventions (PMI) to improve the social interaction skills of students with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in inclusive settings. The purpose of this review is to (a) identify the characteristics and components of peer-mediated social interaction interventions, (b) evaluate the effectiveness of PMI by offering an analysis of intervention results and research design, and (c) suggest directions for future research. Overall, results suggest that PMI is a promising treatment for increasing social interaction in children, adolescents, and young adults with ASD in inclusive settings, with positive generalization, maintenance, and social validity outcomes. Findings also suggest that participant characteristics and the type of social deficit an individual exhibits are important considerations when choosing the optimal configuration of PMI strategies.

Technology-based intervention options for post-coma persons with minimally conscious state and pervasive motor disabilities

Background: Intervention strategies, based on learning principles and assistive technology, were assessed with four post-coma persons with minimally conscious state and pervasive motor disabilities. Method: The first study taught a man to access environmental stimulation through a response-microswitch combination and another man to access environmental stimulation and request social contact through responses combined with a microswitch or a Voice Output Communication Aid (VOCA). The second study taught a man to access two forms of environmental stimulation via two response-microswitch combinations and another man to request two forms of contact via two response-VOCA combinations. Results: Data showed that all participants had significant increases in response levels (independent of whether the responses were combined with microswitch or VOCA devices) during the intervention phases of the studies. Conclusion: Intervention strategies based on learning principles and technology may be largely helpful for persons with minimally conscious state and pervasive motor disabilities.

Comparing acquisition of and preference for manual signs, picture exchange, and speech-generating devices in nine children with autism spectrum disorder

Abstract Objective: To compare how quickly children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) acquired manual signs, picture exchange, and an iPad®/iPod®-based speech-generating device (SGD) and to compare if children showed a preference for one of these options. Method: Nine children with ASD and limited communication skills received intervention to teach requesting preferred stimuli using manual signs, picture exchange, and a SGD. Intervention was evaluated in a non-concurrent multiple-baseline across participants and alternating treatments design. Results: Five children learned all three systems to criterion. Four children required fewer sessions to learn the SGD compared to manual signs and picture exchange. Eight children demonstrated a preference for the SGD. Conclusion: The results support previous studies that demonstrate children with ASD can learn manual signs, picture exchange, and an iPad®/iPod®-based SGD to request preferred stimuli. Most children showed a preference for the SGD. For some children, acquisition may be quicker when learning a preferred option.

Teaching multi-step requesting and social communication to two children with autism spectrum disorders with three AAC options.

Abstract The present study involved comparing the acquisition of multi-step requesting and social communication across three AAC options: manual signing (MS), picture exchange (PE), and speech-generating devices (SGDs). Preference for each option was also assessed. The participants were two children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) who had previously been taught to use each option to request preferred items. Intervention was implemented in an alternating-treatments design. During baseline, participants demonstrated low levels of correct communicative responding. With intervention, both participants learned the target responses (two- and three-step requesting responses, greetings, answering questions, and social etiquette responses) to varying levels of proficiency with each communication option. One participant demonstrated a preference for using the SGD and the other preferred PE. The importance of examining preferences for using one AAC option over others is discussed.

Micro-switch programmes for students with multiple disabilities and minimal motor behaviour: Assessing response acquisition and choice

This study assessed (a) whether three girls with multiple disabilities and minimal motor behaviour could acquire pairs of responses taught through micro-switch-based programmes and (b) how the girls would eventually choose between those responses. In relation to the choice issue, a response-choice analysis was conducted to find out whether possible differences in performance rates for the two responses were due to the stimuli linked to them and/or to potential response preferences. Results indicated that all three girls succeeded in the acquisition of the two responses programmed for them and showed clear response choices. The choices seemed to be largely motivated by the stimuli linked to the responses. Implications of these findings were discussed, including the need to assess their generality and extend the scope of the work in this area.

Three children with autism spectrum disorder learn to perform a three-step communication sequence using an iPad®-based speech-generating device.

Many children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) have limited or absent speech and might therefore benefit from learning to use a speech‐generating device (SGD). The purpose of this study was to evaluate a procedure aimed at teaching three children with ASD to use an iPad®‐based SGD to make a general request for access to toys, then make a specific request for one of two toys, and then communicate a thank‐you response after receiving the requested toy.