Mark G. McKenney

Early coagulopathy predicts mortality in trauma.

BACKGROUND Coagulopathy and hemorrhage are known contributors to trauma mortality; however, the actual relationship of prothrombin time (PT) and partial thromboplastin time (PTT) to mortality is unknown. Our objective was to measure the predictive value of the initial coagulopathy profile for trauma-related mortality. METHODS We reviewed prospectively collected data on trauma patients presenting to a Level I trauma center. A logistic regression analysis was performed of PT, PTT, platelet count, and confounders to determine whether coagulopathy is a predictor of all-cause mortality. RESULTS From a trauma registry cohort of 20103 patients, 14397 had complete disposition data for initial analysis and 7638 had complete data for all variables in the final analysis. The total cohort was 76.2% male, the mean age was 38 years (range, 1-108 years), and the median Injury Severity Score was 9. There were 1276 deaths (all-cause mortality, 8.9%). The prevalence of coagulopathy early in the postinjury period was substantial, with 28% of patients having an abnormal PT (2994 of 10790) and 8% of patients having an abnormal PTT (826 of 10453) on arrival at the trauma bay. In patients with disposition data and a normal PT, 489 of 7796 died, as compared with 579 of 2994 with an abnormal PT (6.3% vs. 19.3%; chi2 = 414.1, p < 0.001). Univariate analysis generated an odds ratio of 3.6 (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.15-4.08; p < 0.0001) for death with abnormal PT and 7.81 (95% CI, 6.65-9.17; p < 0.001) for deaths with an abnormal PTT. The PT and PTT remained independent predictors of mortality in a multiple regression model, whereas platelet count did not. The model also included the independent risk factors age, Injury Severity Score, scene and trauma-bay blood pressure, hematocrit, base deficit, and head injury. The model generated an adjusted odds ratio of 1.35 for PT (95% CI, 1.11-1.68; p < 0.001) and 4.26 for PTT (95% CI, 3.23-5.63; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION The incidence of coagulation abnormalities, early after trauma, is high and they are independent predictors of mortality even in the presence of other risk factors. An initial abnormal PT increases the adjusted odds of dying by 35% and an initial abnormal PTT increases the adjusted odds of dying by 326%.

1,000 Consecutive Ultrasounds for Blunt Abdominal Trauma

Diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL) and computed tomography (CT) are the primary diagnostic modalities used in the evaluation of patients with suspected blunt abdominal trauma (BAT). DPL is fast and accurate but is associated with complications. CT is also accurate, yet requires stability and transportability of the patients. Ultrasound (US) has been suggested as an aid in evaluating BAT. We evaluated US in the initial assessment of BAT in 1000 patients. Patients were eligible for the study if they met specified trauma criteria and had suspected BAT. We then followed the outcome of the patients and their further work-up. US showed a sensitivity of 88%, a specificity of 99%, and an accuracy of 97% for detecting intraabdominal injuries. We conclude that emergency ultrasound may be used as the initial diagnostic modality for suspected blunt abdominal trauma.

Open Versus laparoscopic appendectomy : a prospective randomized comparison

ObjectiveThe authors compare open and laparoscopic appendectomy in a randomized fashion with regard to length of operation, complications, hospital stay, and recovery time. MethodsAdult patients (older than 14 years of age) with the diagnosis of acute appendicitis were randomized to either open or laparoscopic appendectomy over a 9-month period. All patients received preoperative antibiotics. The operative time was calculated as beginning with the incision and ending when the wound was fully closed. Patients that were converted from laparoscopic to open appendectomy were considered a separate group. Return to normal activity and work were determined by questioning during postoperative clinic, telephone, or mailed questionnaire. ResultsThere was a total of 169 patients randomized, 88 to the open and 81 to the laparoscopic group. The groups were similar demographically. Of the 81 laparoscopic patients, 13 (16%) were converted to open. In the open group, 70 patients (79.5%) had acute appendicitis and 21 (23.9%) had perforative appendicitis. In the laparoscopic group, 62 patients (76.5%) had acute appendicitis and 10 (12.3%) had perforative appendicitis. There was no statistical difference in the return to activity or work between the laparoscopic and open groups. The operative time was significantly longer in the laparoscopic group (102.2 minutes vs. 81.7 minutes, p < 0.01). The hospital stay of 2.2 days in the laparoscopic group and 4.3 days in the open group was statistically different (p = 0.007). There was no difference in the hospital stay for those with acute appendicitis (1.89 days vs. 2.61 days, p = 0.067) compared with those with a normal appendix but with pelvic inflammatory disease (1.1 days vs. 2.3 days, p = 0.11). There was a significant difference in patients with perforative appendicitis (1.5 days vs. 9.5 days, p < 0.01). The hospital cost for patients having laparoscopic appendectomy was

2,576 Ultrasounds for blunt abdominal trauma

6077 and for an open appendectomy

Can ultrasound replace diagnostic peritoneal lavage in the assessment of blunt trauma

7227 (p = 0.164). There were no increased complications associated with the laparoscopic technique. ConclusionLaparoscopic appendectomy is comparable to open appendectomy with regard to complications, hospital stay, cost, return to activity, and return to work. There was a greater operative time involved with the laparoscopic technique. Laparoscopic appendectomy does not offer any significant benefit over the open approach for the routine patient with appendicitis.

Incidence and Susceptibility of Pathogenic Bacteria Vary between Intensive Care Units within a Single Hospital: Implications for Empiric Antibiotic Strategies

BACKGROUND Determination of intra-abdominal injury following blunt abdominal trauma (BAT) continues to be a diagnostic challenge. Ultrasound (US) has been described as a potentially useful diagnostic tool in this setting and is being used with increasing frequency in trauma centers. We determined the diagnostic capability of US in the evaluation of BAT. METHODS A retrospective analysis of our trauma US database was performed over a 30-month period. Computed tomographic scan, diagnostic peritoneal lavage, or exploratory laparotomy confirmed the presence of intra-abdominal injury. RESULTS During the study period, 8,197 patients were evaluated at the Ryder Trauma Center. Of this group, 2,576 (31%) had US in the evaluation of BAT. Three hundred eleven (12%) US exams were considered positive. Forty-three patients (1.7%) had a false-negative US; of this group, 10 (33%) required exploratory laparotomy. US had a sensitivity of 86%, a specificity of 98%, and an accuracy of 97% for detection of intra-abdominal injuries. Positive predictive value was 87% and negative predictive value was 98%. CONCLUSION Emergency US is highly reliable and may replace computed tomographic scan and diagnostic peritoneal lavage as the initial diagnostic modality in the evaluation of most patients with BAT.

Trauma scoring systems : A review

Diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL) and computed tomography (CT) are the primary diagnostic modalities in the evaluation of patients with suspected blunt abdominal trauma (BAT). Diagnostic peritoneal lavage is fast and accurate but associated with complications. Computed tomography is also accurate, yet requires that patients be stable and transportable. A prospective study was designed to determine the utility of emergency ultrasound (US) studies in the initial assessment of BAT. Two hundred acutely injured patients with suspected BAT were evaluated with US. Patients were eligible for the study if they met trauma criteria and had suspected BAT. Subsequently, without knowledge of the US results, DPL or CT was performed. Ultrasound showed a sensitivity of 83%, a specificity of 100%, and an accuracy of 97% in detecting intra-abdominal injuries. Six injuries were missed but only one was felt to be significant. If US had been used in all 200 patients, 199 would have had appropriate care. We conclude US is reliable in the detection of free intraperitoneal fluid and may be used in place of DPL or CT.

Utility of near-infrared spectroscopy in the diagnosis of lower extremity compartment syndrome.

BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to determine whether the incidence of recovery and patterns of antibiotic susceptibility of pathogenic bacteria vary between intensive care units (ICUs) in a single teaching hospital. METHODS Culture and susceptibility results were collected prospectively for a 3-month period (April through June 1999) in each of the surgical, trauma, and medical ICUs. The number of unique isolates and susceptibility patterns were determined. Susceptibility of isolates among ICUs was compared with chi2. RESULTS Statistically significant differences between ICUs in susceptibility to various antibiotics were found for Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus sp, Acinetobacter sp, Enterobacter sp, Klebsiella sp, and Pseudomonas sp. Notably, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus was not seen in the medical ICU, whereas it was seen in both the surgical and trauma ICUs. Klebsiella spp resistant to ceftazidime were seen only in the trauma ICU. The aminoglycosides and quinolones had attenuated activity against Pseudomonas sp in the surgical ICU, whereas they remained highly effective in the trauma ICU. Cefazolin had no activity against the Enterobacter sp in either of the surgical ICUs, but was highly effective in the medical ICU. CONCLUSION Although the microbiologic results of this study should not be extrapolated to other institutions, the principle is of value. There is variability between ICUs in a single large teaching hospital in susceptibility of bacterial pathogens to various antibiotics. This may have implications in the design of empiric antibiotic strategies and the planning of the hospital formulary. Hospital wide or composite ICU antibiograms are inadequate for planning empiric therapy in the ICU.

Secondary ultrasound examination increases the sensitivity of the FAST exam in blunt trauma.

Since West and colleagues showed clear benefits in outcomes for patients treated at specialized trauma centers in the 1970s, patients could no longer be simply transported to the nearest hospital. Scoring systems were initially created for the purposes of field triage. Of necessity these systems must be straightforward and user-friendly for prehospital personnel. Scoring systems should accurately assess severity of injury both anatomically and physiologically. The mechanism of injury is critical. Comorbid factors, age, and clinical judgment also factor into the accuracy of field triage systems. With all these factors incorporated, a scoring system should reliably predict injury severity and patient outcomes. Beside field triage, scoring systems have found a number of other uses. Because large numbers of patients are quantifiable by scoring systems, these data can be used for quality assurance. Review of records may provide details of proper care, possible areas of preventable morbidity and mortality, and treatment center specific deficiencies or strengths. Another area where scoring systems have proved valuable is in evaluating trauma care delivery and trauma research. By providing a quantifiable number for groups of trauma patients, comparisons are possible. Researchers can compare different hospitals, different regions, different practice environments, and different modes of therapy. It has become standard in all forms of trauma research to include an injury severity score in the data collection. Scoring systems can also aid in determining entry criteria for prospective research protocols. Using these systems for research has greatly advanced communication among trauma surgeons, health care workers, and researchers by enabling them to speak in similar terms. Last, trauma scoring systems have the potential to be used in reimbursement assessment. It is generally recognized that trauma and critical care are under-reimbursed. So, although the thought of controlled reimbursement is anathema for most, the era of cost-contained health care delivery is here to stay, and if a quantifiable system proves reliable, it may be that health care regulators should use it. What follows is a discussion of the current trauma severity scoring systems, and their areas of strength, weakness, and applicability.

Management Of Lower Extremity Arterial Trauma

OBJECTIVE To determine the utility of near-infrared spectroscopy in the diagnosis of lower extremity compartment syndrome (CS). METHODS Nine patients with CS confirmed by physical examination and elevated compartment pressures (64 +/- 17 mm Hg) were evaluated before and after fasciotomy. Control readings were also performed on 33 surgical patients who had no evidence of CS. The deltoid muscle was used as a reference value. RESULTS The deltoid muscle oxygen saturation (StO2) readings revealed a mean = 84 +/- 17% prefasciotomy and mean = 83 +/- 12% postfasciotomy in the CS group. The control group had a mean StO2 of 83 +/- 11%. In the CS group, the leg compartment with the highest pressure had a StO2 mean = 56 +/- 27% before fasciotomy. This value was statistically significantly lower (p < 0.05) than either the postfasciotomy mean StO2 in that compartment (82 +/- 16%) or the values found in matched control patients with no evidence of CS (87 +/- 7%). CONCLUSION Near-infrared spectroscopy-derived StO2 values in the lower extremities of trauma patients with CS were diminished relative to the control patients and usually normalized after fasciotomy. Near-infrared spectroscopy evaluation may offer a rapid, noninvasive method of assessing extremities at risk for CS.