Mark Goldszmidt

Measuring Resident Well-Being: Impostorism and Burnout Syndrome in Residency

BackgroundAssessing resident well-being is becoming increasingly important from a programmatic standpoint. Two measures that have been used to assess this are the Clance Impostor Scale (CIS) and the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey (MBI-HSS). However, little is known about the relationship between the two phenomena.ObjectivesTo explore the prevalence and association between impostorism and burnout syndrome in a sample of internal medicine residents.DesignAnonymous, cross-sectional postal survey.ParticipantsForty-eight internal medicine residents (postgraduate year [PGY] 1–3) at the Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry (62.3% response rate).Measurements and Main ResultsShort demographic questionnaire, CIS and MBI-HSS. Impostorism and burnout syndrome were identified in 43.8% and 12.5% of residents, respectively. With the exception of a negative correlation between CIS scores and the MBI’s personal accomplishment subscale (r = −.30; 95% CI −.54 to −.02), no other significant relations were identified. Foreign-trained residents were more likely to score as impostors (odds ratio [OR] 10.7; 95% CI 1.2 to 98.2) while senior residents were more likely to experience burnout syndrome (OR 16.5 95% CI 1.6 to 168.5).ConclusionsBoth impostorism and burnout syndrome appear to be threats to resident well-being in our program. The lack of relationship between the two would suggest that programs and researchers wishing to address the issue of resident distress should consider using both measures. The finding that foreign-trained residents appear to be more susceptible to impostorism warrants further study.Assessing resident well-being is becoming increasingly important from a programmatic standpoint. Two measures that have been used to assess this are the Clance Impostor Scale (CIS) and the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey (MBI-HSS). However, little is known about the relationship between the two phenomena. To explore the prevalence and association between impostorism and burnout syndrome in a sample of internal medicine residents. Anonymous, cross-sectional postal survey. Forty-eight internal medicine residents (postgraduate year [PGY] 1–3) at the Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry (62.3% response rate). Short demographic questionnaire, CIS and MBI-HSS. Impostorism and burnout syndrome were identified in 43.8% and 12.5% of residents, respectively. With the exception of a negative correlation between CIS scores and the MBI’s personal accomplishment subscale (r = −.30; 95% CI −.54 to −.02), no other significant relations were identified. Foreign-trained residents were more likely to score as impostors (odds ratio [OR] 10.7; 95% CI 1.2 to 98.2) while senior residents were more likely to experience burnout syndrome (OR 16.5 95% CI 1.6 to 168.5). Both impostorism and burnout syndrome appear to be threats to resident well-being in our program. The lack of relationship between the two would suggest that programs and researchers wishing to address the issue of resident distress should consider using both measures. The finding that foreign-trained residents appear to be more susceptible to impostorism warrants further study.

Rules of engagement: residents' perceptions of the in-training evaluation process.

Background In-training evaluation reports (ITERs) often fall short of their goals of promoting resident learning and development. Efforts to address this problem through faculty development and assessment-instrument modification have been disappointing. The authors explored residents’ experiences and perceptions of the ITER process to gain insight into why the process succeeds or fails. Method Using a grounded theory approach, semistructured interviews were conducted with 20 residents. Constant comparative analysis for emergent themes was conducted. Results All residents identified aspects of “engagement” in the ITER process as the dominant influence on the success of ITERs. Both external (evaluator-driven, such as evaluator credibility) and internal (resident-driven, such as self-assessment) influences on engagement were elaborated. When engagement was lacking, residents viewed the ITER process as inauthentic. Conclusions Engagement is a critical factor to consider when seeking to improve ITER use. Our articulation of external and internal influences on engagement provides a starting point for targeted interventions.

‘I don’t have time’: issues of fragmentation, prioritisation and motivation for education scholarship among medical faculty

Objectives  Although lack of time has been frequently cited as a barrier to scholarship, there has been little inquiry into what specific factors medical faculty staff perceive as contributing to this dilemma. The purpose of the present study was to explore, in greater detail, lack of time as a barrier for faculty interested in pursuing education scholarship.

Education scholarship: it's not just a question of ‘degree’

Background: Although medical faculty are frequently encouraged to participate in education scholarship, there is a paucity of literature addressing how to support those who wish to do so. Aims: The purpose of this study was to explore faculty involvement in and support needs for pursuing education scholarship. Methods: A purposive sample of 108 medical faculty with an interest in medical education were invited to participate in a two-phase, mixed-methods study (survey and focus groups). Results: Seventy-three faculty (67.6%) completed the questionnaire with 16 subsequently participating in focus group sessions. Nearly 40% had enrolled in or completed formal education training. Although the majority had been involved in at least one education project during the past five years, few had received funding or published their work. Three support-related themes emerged: education research support; enhancing colleague interactions; and ongoing development activities. Three related barriers were identified: time, access to support staff, and knowledge of research methodology. No significant differences were identified between those with and without additional education training. Conclusions: Assisting faculty to participate in education scholarship is a complicated endeavor. Institutional supports should not be limited to those with advanced degrees nor rely on Master-level degree programs to provide all the necessary training.

Expanding the basic science debate: the role of physics knowledge in interpreting clinical findings

Current research suggests a role for biomedical knowledge in learning and retaining concepts related to medical diagnosis. However, learning may be influenced by other, non-biomedical knowledge. We explored this idea using an experimental design and examined the effects of causal knowledge on the learning, retention, and interpretation of medical information. Participants studied a handout about several respiratory disorders and how to interpret respiratory exam findings. The control group received the information in standard “textbook” format and the experimental group was presented with the same information as well as a causal explanation about how sound travels through lungs in both the normal and disease states. Comprehension and memory of the information was evaluated with a multiple-choice exam. Several questions that were not related to the causal knowledge served as control items. Questions related to the interpretation of physical exam findings served as the critical test items. The experimental group outperformed the control group on the critical test items, and our study shows that a causal explanation can improve a student’s memory for interpreting clinical details. We suggest an expansion of which basic sciences are considered fundamental to medical education.

Attending Physician Variability: A Model of Four Supervisory Styles

Purpose There is wide variability in how attending physician roles on teaching teams, including patient care and trainee learning, are enacted. This study sought to better understand variability by considering how different attendings configured and rationalized direct patient care, trainee oversight, and teaching activities. Method Constructivist grounded theory guided iterative data collection and analyses. Data were interviews with 24 attending physicians from two academic centers in Ontario, Canada, in 2012. During interviews, participants heard a hypothetical presentation and reflected on it as though it were presented to their team during a typical admission case review. Results Four supervisory styles were identified: direct care, empowerment, mixed practice, and minimalist. Driven by concerns for patient safety, direct care involves delegating minimal patient care responsibility to trainees. Focused on supporting trainees’ progressive independence, empowerment uses teaching and oversight strategies to ensure quality of care. In mixed practice, patient care is privileged over teaching and is adjusted on the basis of trainee competence and contextual features such as patient volume. Minimalist style involves a high degree of trust in senior residents, delegating most patient care, and teaching to them. Attendings rarely discussed their styles with the team. Conclusions The model adds to the literature on variability in supervisory practice, showing that the four styles reflect different ways of responding to tensions in the role and context. This model could be refined through observational research exploring the impact of context on style development and enactment. Making supervisory styles explicit could support improvement of team competence.

Progressive collaborative refinement on teams: implications for communication practices

Medical teaching teams (MTTs) must balance teaching and patient care in the face of three challenges: shifting team membership, varying levels of learners and patient complexity. To support care, MTTs rely on a combination of recurrent oral and written communication practices (genres), such as admission, progress and discharge notes. The purpose of this study was to explore how these genres influence the teams ability to collectively care for patients.

Developing a unified list of physicians' reasoning tasks during clinical encounters.

Purpose The clinical reasoning literature focuses on how physicians reason while making decisions, rather than on what they reason about while performing their clinical tasks. In an attempt to provide a common language for discussing, teaching, and researching clinical reasoning, the authors undertook the task of developing a unified list of physicians’ reasoning tasks, or what they reason about, during clinical encounters. Method The authors compiled an initial list of 20 reasoning tasks based on the literature from four content areas—clinical reasoning, communications, medical errors, and clinical guidelines. In the summer and fall of 2010, they surveyed a purposive sample of 46 international experts in clinical reasoning and communications. From the results of the first survey, the authors refined their list of reasoning tasks, then resurveyed 22 of the original participants. From the results of the second survey, they further refined their list and validated the inclusion of the reasoning tasks. Results Twenty-four of 46 (52%) and 15 of 22 (65%) participants completed the first- and second-round surveys, respectively. Following the second-round survey, the authors’ list included 24 reasoning tasks, and a clinical example corresponding to each, that fell into four broad categories: framing the encounter (3), diagnosis (8), management (11), and self-reflection (2). Conclusions The development of this unified list represents a first step in offering a vocabulary for discussing, reflecting on, teaching, and studying physicians’ reasoning tasks during clinical encounters.

Taking a detour: positive and negative effects of supervisors' interruptions during admission case review discussions.

Purpose During admission case review, teams work to develop a shared understanding of the problems they need to address during the patient’s hospitalization. However, research on the effects of the case review on patient care is limited. Informed by rhetorical genre theory, the authors explored the impact of team’s communication practices on the comprehensiveness of the case review. Method Using a multiple-case-study approach, the authors in 2010 observed in person, audio-recorded, and transcribed data from overnight and morning case review discussions for 19 patient cases in the internal medicine department of an academic medical center. They also extracted data from the corresponding admission notes. They used a constant-comparison approach to identify emerging themes within and across cases. Results The authors identified detours, which typically arose from supervisors’ interruptions, in all 19 cases. They identified five detour types: pausing the presentation, referring to a section later in the presentation, presenting sections out of sequence, skipping a section, and truncating the presentation. Although supervisors’ interruptions during case review discussions allowed for teaching and patient care, they also created detours from the usual case presentation, which then could lead to the omission of relevant case details. Conclusions Supervisors’ interruptions during case review discussions can lead to detours, which simultaneously afford valuable opportunities for teaching and threaten comprehensive information sharing. Future research should explore detours in other teaching settings to better understand their positive, negative, and unintended consequences for patient care.

Toward a common understanding: supporting and promoting education scholarship for medical school faculty

Education scholarship (ES) is integral to the transformation of medical education. Faculty members who engage in ES need encouragement and recognition of this work. Beginning with the definition of ES as ‘an umbrella term which can encompass both research and innovation in health professions education’, and which as such represents an activity that is separate and distinct from teaching and leadership, the purpose of our study was to explore how promotion policies and processes are used in Canadian medical schools to support and promote ES.