Mark Grimsley
Ohio State University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Mark Grimsley.
Journal of Southern History | 1997
Mark Grimsley
Introduction 1. The roots of a policy 2. Conciliation and its challenges 3. Early occupations 4. Conciliation abandoned 5. War in earnest 6. Emancipation: touchstone of hard war 7. From pragmatism to hard war 8. The limits of hard war 9. Gestures of mercy, pillars of fire.
Journal of Southern History | 2016
Mark Grimsley
Despite neo-Confederate claims to the contrary, only a negligible number of African Americans fought for the Confederacy—even when one includes a group usually overlooked: those who could pass as white. A former colonel acknowledged their combat participation when, as a member of the South Carolina legislature during a debate on the state’s revised constitution, he spoke in opposition to a proposal to define “Negro” as anyone with any degree of African heritage whatsoever. A few of his soldiers, the colonel testified, had a small quantum of African American blood; he did not want to see them embarrassed. But if only a handful of African Americans served in the ranks, they labored for Confederate armies in the tens of thousands, performing tasks that nowadays would be carried out by uniformed personnel in support units vital to the effectiveness of combat units. On those terms, these African Americans were soldiers in function if not in name. Exploring this phenomenon is an important dimension of Colin Edward Woodward’s Marching Masters: Slavery, Race, and the Confederate Army during the Civil War and is among its most valuable contributions. Two of the book’s eight chapters address this topic directly, providing one of the deepest explorations of the subject yet to appear. Another chapter examines the Confederate government’s eleventh-hour decision to enlist African Americans as soldiers. Although only partially implemented before the war’s end, this dramatic policy revision revealed much about the attitudes of southern whites toward the military employment of slaves, attitudes heavily influenced by their extensive experience with enslaved southerners in noncombat capacities. The remaining chapters cover different but congruent aspects of the book’s overall theme; Woodward argues that “[b]y looking at the Confederate army’s attitudes and policies toward enslaved people, we can see how the end of slavery unfolded in the United States” (p. 10). The destruction of slavery is, of course, well-trod terrain. Nevertheless, it is so central to the Civil War experience that it can withstand more treading. Woodward explores such subjects as the views of Confederate soldiers on slavery as a dimension of the southern cause; the problem of slave loyalty after the North’s addition of emancipation as a primary war aim; and the rage and murderous actions of Confederate troops when they confronted black men wearing Union blue. He also looks at the postwar period, which saw the simultaneous emergence
Naval War College Review | 2003
Johanna Mendelson Forman; Mark Grimsley; Clifford J. Rogers
Archive | 2002
Daniel E. Sutherland; Mark Grimsley
Journal of Southern History | 1996
Mark Grimsley; Daniel E. Sutherland
The Journal of Military History | 2001
Mark Grimsley; Brooks D. Simpson
Archive | 1995
Mark Grimsley
Civil War History | 2012
Mark Grimsley
The Journal of Military History | 1998
Mark Grimsley; Earl J. Hess; James M. McPherson
Civil War History | 2003
Mark Grimsley