Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Mark H. Klein is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Mark H. Klein.


international conference on engineering of complex computer systems | 1998

The architecture tradeoff analysis method

Rick Kazman; Mark H. Klein; Thomas A. Longstaff; Howard F. Lipson; S. Jeromy Carrière

This paper presents the Architecture Tradeoff Analysis Method (ATAM), a structured technique for understanding the tradeoffs inherent in the architectures of software-intensive systems. This method was developed to provide a principled way to evaluate a software architectures fitness with respect to multiple competing quality attributes: modifiability, security, performance, availability, and so forth. These attributes interact-improving one often comes at the price of worsening one or more of the others-as is shown in the paper, and the method helps us to reason about architectural decisions that affect quality attribute interactions. The ATAM is a spiral model of design: one of postulating candidate architectures followed by analysis and risk mitigation, leading to refined architectures.


Archive | 1993

A practitioner's handbook for real-time analysis

Mark H. Klein; Thomas Ralya; Bill Pollak; Ray Obenza; Michael González Harbour

Preface. Part 1: Introduction. 1. About this Handbook. 2. Fundamentals of RMA. Part 2: Concepts and Techniques. 3. A Framework for Describing Real-Time Systems. 4. Techniques for Analyzing Timing Behavior. Part 3: Analyzing Real-Time Systems. 5. Basic Real-Time Situations. 6. Advanced Real-Time Situations. 7. Effects of Operating System and Runtime Services on Timing Analysis. Part 4: Using the Handbook on Realistic Systems. 8. Analyzing Complex Systems. 9. Designing with Rate Monotonic Analysis. Part 5: Appendices. A. Rules of Thumb. B. Notation Used in this Handbook. C. Bibliography. D. Glossary. E. Index.


international conference on software engineering | 2001

Quantifying the costs and benefits of architectural decisions

Rick Kazman; Jai Asundi; Mark H. Klein

The benefits of a software system are assessable only relative to the business goals the system has been developed to serve. In turn, these benefits result from interactions between the systems functionality and its quality attributes (such as performance, reliability and security). Its quality attributes are, in most cases, dictated by its architectural design decisions. Therefore, we argue that the software architecture is the crucial artifact to study in making design tradeoffs and in performing cost-benefit analyses. A substantial part of such an analysis is in determining the level of uncertainty with which we estimate both costs and benefits. We offer an architecture-centric approach to the economic modeling of software design decision making called CBAM (Cost Benefit Analysis Method), in which costs and benefits are traded off with system quality attributes. We present the CBAM, the early results from applying this method in a large-scale case study, and discuss the application of more sophisticated economic models to software decision making.


international conference on software engineering | 1999

Experience with performing architecture tradeoff analysis

Rick Kazman; Mark H. Klein; S. Jeromy Carrière; Steven Woods

Software architectures, like complex designs in any field, embody tradeoffs made by the designers. However, these tradeoffs are not always made explicitly by the designers and they may not understand the impacts of their decisions. This paper describes the use of a scenario-based and model-based analysis technique for software architectures-called ATAM-that not only analyzes a software architecture with respect to multiple quality attributes, but explicitly considers the tradeoffs inherent in the design. This is a method aimed at illuminating risks in the architecture through the identification of attribute trends, rather than at precise characterizations of measurable quality attribute values. In this paper, the operationalization of ATAM is illustrated via a specific example in which we analyzed a U.S. Army system for battlefield management.


IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering | 1994

Timing analysis for fixed-priority scheduling of hard real-time systems

Michael González Harbour; Mark H. Klein; John P. Lehoczky

This paper presents a timing analysis for a quite general hard real-time periodic task set on a uniprocessor using fixed-priority methods. Periodic tasks are composed of serially executed subtasks, where each subtask is characterized by an execution time, a fixed priority and a deadline. A method for determining the schedulability of each task and subtask is presented along with its theoretical underpinnings. This method can be used to analyze the schedulability of any task set on a uniprocessor whose priority structure can be modeled as serially executed subtasks, which can lead to a very complex priority structure. Important examples include task sets that involve interrupts, certain synchronization protocols, certain precedence constraints, nonpreemptible sections, and some message-passing systems. The method is illustrated by a robotics example. >


real-time systems symposium | 1991

Fixed priority scheduling periodic tasks with varying execution priority

Michael González Harbour; Mark H. Klein; John P. Lehoczky

The problem of fixed priority scheduling of periodic tasks where each tasks execution priority may vary is considered. Periodic tasks are decomposed into serially executed subtasks, where each subtask is characterized by an execution time and a fixed priority and is permitted to have a deadline. A method for determining the schedulability of each task is presented along with its theoretical underpinnings. This method can be used to analyze the schedulability of complex task sets which involve interrupts, certain synchronization protocols, nonpreemptible sections and, in general, any mechanism that contributes to a complex priority structure. The authors introduce a simple but realistic real-time robotics application and illustrate how one uses the schedulability equations presented.<<ETX>>


working ieee ifip conference on software architecture | 1999

Attribute-Based Architecture Styles

Mark H. Klein; Rick Kazman; Leonard J. Bass; S. Jeromy Carrière; Howard F. Lipson

Architectural styles have enjoyed widespread popularity in the past few years, and for good reason: they represent the distilled wisdom of many experienced architects and guide less experienced architects in designing their architectures. However, architectural styles employ qualitative reasoning to motivate when and under what conditions they should be used. In this paper we present the concept of an ABAS (Attribute-Based Architectural Style) which includes a set of components and connectors along with their topology, but which adds to this a quality attribute specific model that provides a method of reasoning about the behavior of component types that interact in the defined pattern. We will define ABASs in this paper, show how they are used, and argue for why this extension to the notion of architectural style is an important step toward creating a true engineering discipline of architectural design.


IEEE Computer | 1994

Rate-monotonic analysis for real-time industrial computing

Mark H. Klein; John P. Lehoczky; Ragunathan Rajkumar

Issues of real-time resource management are pervasive throughout industrial computing. The underlying physical processes of many industrial computing applications impose explicit timing requirements on the tasks processed by the computer system. These timing requirements are an integral part of the correctness and safety of a real-time system. It is tempting to think that speed (for example, processor speeds or higher communication bandwidths) is the sole ingredient in meeting system timing requirements, but speed alone is not enough. Proper resource-management techniques also must be used to prevent, for example, situations in which long, low priority tasks block higher priority tasks with short deadlines. One guiding principle in real-time system resource management is predictability, the ability to determine for a given set of tasks whether the system will be able to meet all of the timing requirements of those tasks. Predictability calls for the development of scheduling models and analytic techniques to determine whether or not a real-time system can meet its timing requirements. The author illustrates an analysis methodology, rate monotonic analysis, for managing real-time requirements in a distributed industrial computing situation. The illustration is based on a comprehensive robotics example drawn from a typical industrial application.<<ETX>>


real time technology and applications symposium | 2014

Bounding memory interference delay in COTS-based multi-core systems

Hyoseung Kim; Dionisio de Niz; Björn Andersson; Mark H. Klein; Onur Mutlu; Ragunathan Rajkumar

In commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) multi-core systems, a task running on one core can be delayed by other tasks running simultaneously on other cores due to interference in the shared DRAM main memory. Such memory interference delay can be large and highly variable, thereby posing a significant challenge for the design of predictable real-time systems. In this paper, we present techniques to provide a tight upper bound on the worst-case memory interference in a COTS-based multi-core system. We explicitly model the major resources in the DRAM system, including banks, buses and the memory controller. By considering their timing characteristics, we analyze the worst-case memory interference delay imposed on a task by other tasks running in parallel. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work bounding the request re-ordering effect of COTS memory controllers. Our work also enables the quantification of the extent by which memory interference can be reduced by partitioning DRAM banks. We evaluate our approach on a commodity multi-core platform running Linux/RK. Experimental results show that our approach provides an upper bound very close to our measured worst-case interference.


Foundations of Real-Time Computing-Scheduling and Resource Management | 1991

Rate Monotonic Analysis for Real-Time Systems

Lui Sha; Mark H. Klein; John B. Goodenough

As a mathematical discipline travels far from its empirical source, or still more, if it is a second and third generation only indirectly inspired by the ideas coming from ‘reality,’ it is besetwith very grave dangers. It becomes more and more pure aestheticizing, more and more purely more and more purely l’art pour l’art....

Collaboration


Dive into the Mark H. Klein's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Len Bass

Software Engineering Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Felix Bachmann

Software Engineering Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Thomas Ralya

Software Engineering Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bill Pollak

Software Engineering Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kurt C. Wallnau

Carnegie Mellon University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ray Obenza

Software Engineering Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Dionisio de Niz

Carnegie Mellon University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gabriel A. Moreno

Carnegie Mellon University

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge