Mark K. Silverman

Histopathologic Correlates of Structures Seen on Dermoscopy (epiluminescence Microscopy)

Dermoscopy (epiluminescence microscopy) is an in vivo technique that enables the clinician to visualize a variety of structures in pigmented cutaneous lesions that are not discernible by naked-eye examination. To identify the histologic correlates of these structures, a series of 71 pigmented neoplasms was documented photographically with and without dermoscopy. These lesions then underwent total excision and careful step-sectioning so that the resulting histologic slides could be correlated with the dermoscopic photographs. The histologic correlates of the pigment network, brown globules, black dots, blotches, hypopigmented areas, white areas, grey-blue areas, and whitish veil are identified. The structures seen under dermoscopy have specific histologic correlates. Understanding these histopathologic correlates will allow clinicians to better evaluate the dermoscopic features of pigmented lesions.

Risk of another basal cell carcinoma developing after treatment of a basal cell carcinoma

Background: There is an increased risk of new basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) developing in a person who has had a BCC. Objective: This study attempts to define the magnitude of this increased risk. Methods: The charts of 260 white patients with a histologically proven BCC were reviewed for the occurrence of new BCCs. The cumulative 5-year incidence (modified life-table method) for new BCCs developing in these patients was compared with the 5-year incidence in the general white population of the United States. Results: Of the 260 patients, new BCCs developed in 137 within an average of 38.3 months, a 5-year cumulative rate of one or more new BCCs of 45.2%. The yearly risk for new BCCs developing in the study population remained high during the 5-year interval. In the general white population of the United States, the maximal 5-year incidence was calculated to be 5% (p Conclusion: Patients with a history of BCC require life-long follow-up because of the high probability of new BCCs developing.

Verification of a formula for determination of preexcision surgical margins from fixed-tissue melanoma specimens

BACKGROUND Recently our group reported on the shrinkage of 199 malignant melanoma surgical-excision specimens. In that report, a multivariate analysis revealed that the age of the patient was the only factor that significantly affected the percentage shrinkage of a surgical specimen. In addition, a formula was presented that extrapolates the actual surgical margins (in vivo) from the (contracted) fixed-tissue pathology report measurement and the reported in vivo lesion diameter. OBJECTIVE The goals of this study are to verify that shrinkage of surgical specimens is approximately 20% and that the margin formula can be successfully applied to a different group of patients. METHODS Four hundred seven patients with malignant melanoma were prospectively enrolled to measure preexcision (outlined with ink) surgical margins, fixed-tissue (contracted) surgical margins, and overall specimen shrinkage. RESULTS It is verified that overall shrinkage of cutaneous surgical specimens is approximately 20%. Surgical specimens from patients younger than 50 years of age have approximately 25% shrinkage. Those specimens from patients 50 to 59 years of age have approximately 20% shrinkage and those from patients 60 years of age or older have about 15% shrinkage. The surgical margins predicted by the margin formula were within +/- 3.5 mm of the actual measured surgical margin 86.5% of the time. CONCLUSION The actual surgical margins (in vivo) of a malignant melanoma can be reasonably estimated from the fixed-tissue pathology measurement via the margin formula. The shrinkage of a surgical specimen is 15% to 25% depending on the patients age.

Influence of gender on survival in patients with stage I malignant melanoma

BACKGROUND Women with stage I malignant melanoma (MM) have a survival advantage over men as judged by univariate analysis. However, on multivariate analysis, gender was found to be an independent predictor of survival in only 8 of 14 published studies. OBJECTIVE This study attempts to explain the disparate findings for gender as a prognostic factor in different multivariate analyses. METHODS Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed on 832 patients with stage I MM in the New York University Melanoma Cooperative Group (NYU-MCG) data base. The results were compared with those of 14 similar studies. RESULTS In the NYU-MCG data base, gender, age of the patient, and number of mitoses per square millimeter were not independent factors on multivariate analysis, whereas thickness, anatomic site, and presence of ulceration were. The statistically significant difference in survival by gender on univariate analysis, in the NYU-MCG data base, could be explained by the differences in thickness and anatomic site of the MMs in the sexes. Comparison of these results with the reviewed reports from the literature consistently shows thickness and ulceration to be independent prognosticators of survival. Likewise, most authors agree that age is not an independent predictor. However, there is no consensus with respect to gender and site, each of which was found to be an independent predictor of survival in only about half the studies reviewed. CONCLUSION The disparate findings for gender in different multivariate analyses are explained by a gender-related difference in anatomic distribution of MM. Gender and site appear to have a similar influence in multivariate analysis and thus either one or the other is a dominant factor in different multivariate analyses.

Differentiation of atypical moles (dysplastic nevi) from early melanomas by dermoscopy.

Several conventional and new dermoscopic criteria are highly specific for diagnosing early melanomas. Until the reliability of the dermoscopic scoring systems has been validated, the presence of any combination of these specific features should elevate the index of suspicion for melanoma and prompt a biopsy to avoid missing this cancer.

Level of education and the risk of malignant melanoma

BACKGROUND The risk for the development of malignant melanoma has been reported to be higher in persons with more formal education than in individuals with less. OBJECTIVE To study whether those with more formal education are indeed at more risk for malignant melanoma than those with less formal education. METHODS This case-control study explores the relation between education and melanoma risk by analyzing data collected by the American Cancer Society. A total of 1.2 million people were surveyed for a history of cancer and followed up for 6 years for the development of any cancer. In total, 2780 white persons had a history of malignant melanoma or developed malignant melanoma during the study period. The controls were age-, sex-, and geographically matched white persons selected from the remaining people enrolled. RESULTS Both men and women were shown to have a statistically significant increase in the relative risk for malignant melanoma with increasing education level (p less than 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively). This relation was more striking in men when the relative risk with 95% confidence interval was calculated by sex for each education level. CONCLUSION Americans with more formal education are at greater risk for malignant melanoma than those with less education.