Mark Konijnenberg

68Ga-labeled DOTA-Peptides and 68Ga-labeled Radiopharmaceuticals for Positron Emission Tomography: Current Status of Research, Clinical Applications, and Future Perspectives

In this review we give an overview of current knowledge of (68)Ga-labeled pharmaceuticals, with focus on imaging receptor-mediated processes. A major advantage of a (68)Ge/(68)Ga generator is its continuous source of (68)Ga, independently from an on-site cyclotron. The increase in knowledge of purification and concentration of the eluate and the complex ligand chemistry has led to (68)Ga-labeled pharmaceuticals with major clinical impact. (68)Ga-labeled pharmaceuticals have the potential to cover all todays clinical options with (99m)Tc, with the concordant higher resolution of positron emission tomography (PET) in comparison with single photon emission computed tomography. (68)Ga-labeled analogs of octreotide, such as DOTATOC, DOTANOC, and DOTA-TATE, are in clinical application in nuclear medicine, and these analogs are now the most frequently applied of all (68)Ga-labeled pharmaceuticals. All the above-mentioned items in favor of successful application of (68)Ga-labeled radiopharmaceuticals for imaging in patients are strong arguments for the development of a (68)Ge/(68)Ga generator with Marketing Authorization and thus to provide pharmaceutical grade eluate. Moreover, now not one United States Food and Drug Administration-approved or European Medicines Agency-approved (68)Ga-radiopharmaceutical is available. As soon as these are achieved, a whole new radiopharmacy providing PET radiopharmaceuticals might develop.

MIRD pamphlet no. 20: The effect of model assumptions on kidney dosimetry and response - Implications for radionuclide therapy

Renal toxicity associated with small-molecule radionuclide therapy has been shown to be dose-limiting for many clinical studies. Strategies for maximizing dose to the target tissues while sparing normal critical organs based on absorbed dose and biologic response parameters are commonly used in external-beam therapy. However, radiopharmaceuticals passing though the kidneys result in a differential dose rate to suborgan elements, presenting a significant challenge in assessing an accurate dose–response relationship that is predictive of toxicity in future patients. We have modeled the multiregional internal dosimetry of the kidneys combined with the biologic response parameters based on experience with brachytherapy and external-beam radiation therapy to provide an approach for predicting radiation toxicity to the kidneys. Methods: The multiregion kidney dosimetry model of MIRD pamphlet no. 19 has been used to calculate absorbed dose to regional structures based on preclinical and clinical data. Using the linear quadratic model for radiobiologic response, we computed regionally based surviving fractions for the kidney cortex and medulla in terms of their concentration ratios for several examples of radiopharmaceutical uptake and clearance. We used past experience to illustrate the relationship between absorbed dose and calculated biologically effective dose (BED) with radionuclide-induced nephrotoxicity. Results: Parametric analysis for the examples showed that high dose rates associated with regions of high activity concentration resulted in the greatest decrease in tissue survival. Higher dose rates from short-lived radionuclides or increased localization of radiopharmaceuticals in radiosensitive kidney subregions can potentially lead to greater whole-organ toxicity. This finding is consistent with reports of kidney toxicity associated with early peptide receptor radionuclide therapy and 166Ho-phosphonate clinical investigations. Conclusion: Radionuclide therapy dose–response data, when expressed in terms of biologically effective dose, have been found to be consistent with external-beam experience for predicting kidney toxicity. Model predictions using both the multiregion kidney and linear quadratic models may serve to guide the investigator in planning and optimizing future clinical trials of radionuclide therapy.

EANM procedure guideline for the treatment of liver cancer and liver metastases with intra-arterial radioactive compounds

Primary liver cancers (i.e. hepatocellular carcinoma or cholangiocarcinoma) are worldwide some of the most frequent cancers, with rapidly fatal liver failure in a large majority of patients. Curative therapy consists of surgery (i.e. resection or liver transplantation), but only 10–20% of patients are candidates for this. In other patients, a variety of palliative treatments can be given, such as chemoembolization, radiofrequency ablation or recently introduced tyrosine kinase inhibitors, e.g. sorafenib. Colorectal cancer is the second most lethal cancer in Europe and liver metastases are prevalent either at diagnosis or in follow-up. These patients are usually treated by a sequence of surgery, chemotherapy and antibody therapy [Okuda et al. (Cancer 56:918–928, 1985); Schafer and Sorrell (Lancet 353:1253–1257, 1999); Leong et al. (Arnold, London, 1999)]. Radioembolization is an innovative therapeutic approach defined as the injection of micron-sized embolic particles loaded with a radioisotope by use of percutaneous intra-arterial techniques. Advantages of the use of these intra-arterial radioactive compounds are the ability to deliver high doses of radiation to small target volumes, the relatively low toxicity profile, the possibility to treat the whole liver including microscopic disease and the feasibility of combination with other therapy modalities. Disadvantages are mainly due to radioprotection constraints mainly for 131I-labelled agents, logistics and the possibility of inadvertent delivery or shunting [Novell et al. (Br J Surg 78:901–906, 1991)]. The Therapy, Oncology and Dosimetry Committees have worked together in order to revise the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) guidelines on the use of the radiopharmaceutical 131I-Lipiodol (Lipiocis®, IBA, Brussels, Belgium) and include the newer medical devices with 90Y-microspheres. 90Y is either bound to resin (SIR-Spheres®, Sirtex Medical, Lane Cove, Australia) or embedded in a glass matrix (TheraSphere®, MDS Nordion, Kanata, ON, Canada). Since 90Y-microspheres are not metabolized, they are not registered as unsealed sources. However, the microspheres are delivered in aqueous solution: radioactive contamination is a concern and microspheres should be handled, like other radiopharmaceuticals, as open sources. The purpose of this guideline is to assist the nuclear medicine physician in treating and managing patients undergoing such treatment.

Comparison of Clinical Tools for Measurements of Regional Stress and Rest Myocardial Blood Flow Assessed with 13N-Ammonia PET/CT

Several models for the quantitative analysis of myocardial blood flow (MBF) at stress and rest and myocardial flow reserve (MFR) with 13N-ammonia myocardial perfusion PET have been implemented for clinical use. We aimed to compare quantitative results obtained from 3 software tools (QPET, syngo MBF, and PMOD), which perform PET MBF quantification with either a 2-compartment model (QPET and syngo MBF) or a 1-compartment model (PMOD). Methods: We considered 33 adenosine stress and rest 13N-ammonia studies (22 men and 11 women). Average age was 54.5 ± 15 y, and average body mass index was 26 ± 4.2. Eighteen patients had a very low likelihood of disease, with no chest pain, normal relative perfusion results, and normal function. All data were obtained on a PET/CT scanner in list mode with CT attenuation maps. Sixteen dynamic frames were reconstructed (twelve 10-s, two 30-s, one 1-min, and one 6-min frames). Global and regional stress and rest MBF and MFR values were obtained with each tool. Left ventricular contours and input function region were obtained automatically in system QPET and syngo MBF and manually in PMOD. Results: The flow values and MFR values were highly correlated among the 3 packages (R2 ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 for global values and from 0.78 to 0.94 for regional values. Mean reference MFR values were similar for QPET, syngo MBF, and PMOD (3.39 ± 1.22, 3.41 ± 0.76, and 3.66 ± 1.19, respectively) by 1-way ANOVA (P = 0.74). The lowest MFR in very low likelihood patients in any given vascular territory was 2.25 for QPET, 2.13 for syngo MBF, and 2.23 for PMOD. Conclusion: Different implementations of 1- and 2-compartment models demonstrate an excellent correlation in MFR for each vascular territory, with similar mean MFR values.

The evidence base for the use of internal dosimetry in the clinical practice of molecular radiotherapy

Molecular radiotherapy (MRT) has demonstrated unique therapeutic advantages in the treatment of an increasing number of cancers. As with other treatment modalities, there is related toxicity to a number of organs at risk. Despite the large number of clinical trials over the past several decades, considerable uncertainties still remain regarding the optimization of this therapeutic approach and one of the vital issues to be answered is whether an absorbed radiation dose–response exists that could be used to guide personalized treatment. There are only limited and sporadic data investigating MRT dosimetry. The determination of dose–effect relationships for MRT has yet to be the explicit aim of a clinical trial. The aim of this article was to collate and discuss the available evidence for an absorbed radiation dose–effect relationships in MRT through a review of published data. Based on a PubMed search, 92 papers were found. Out of 79 studies investigating dosimetry, an absorbed dose–effect correlation was found in 48. The application of radiobiological modelling to clinical data is of increasing importance and the limited published data on absorbed dose–effect relationships based on these models are also reviewed. Based on National Cancer Institute guideline definition, the studies had a moderate or low rate of clinical relevance due to the limited number of studies investigating overall survival and absorbed dose. Nevertheless, the evidence strongly implies a correlation between the absorbed doses delivered and the response and toxicity, indicating that dosimetry-based personalized treatments would improve outcome and increase survival.

Dosimetry of yttrium-labelled radiopharmaceuticals for internal therapy: 86Y or 90Y imaging?

This paper reviews issues concerning 86Y positron emission tomography (PET), 90Y PET and 90Y bremsstrahlung imaging. Specific methods and corrections developed for quantitative imaging, for application in preclinical and clinical studies, and to assess 90Y dosimetry are discussed. The potential imaging capabilities with the radioisotopes 87Y and 88Y are also considered. Additional studies required to assess specific unaddressed issues are also identified.

MIRD Pamphlet No. 26: Joint EANM/MIRD Guidelines for Quantitative 177Lu SPECT Applied for Dosimetry of Radiopharmaceutical Therapy

The accuracy of absorbed dose calculations in personalized internal radionuclide therapy is directly related to the accuracy of the activity (or activity concentration) estimates obtained at each of the imaging time points. MIRD Pamphlet no. 23 presented a general overview of methods that are required for quantitative SPECT imaging. The present document is next in a series of isotope-specific guidelines and recommendations that follow the general information that was provided in MIRD 23. This paper focuses on 177Lu (lutetium) and its application in radiopharmaceutical therapy.

Is the Renal Dosimetry for [90Y-DOTA0, Tyr3]Octreotide Accurate Enough to Predict Thresholds for Individual Patients?

The accuracy in the dosimetry for radionuclide therapy shows a great contrast to that obtained in external beam radiotherapy. The dosimetry for [(90)Y-DOTA(0), Tyr(3)] octreotide is evaluated in patients to see whether the accuracy of the dosimetry is high enough to distinguish the probability for radiation nephropathy. The 5% threshold for late end-point nephropathy at 23 Gy with external beam radiotherapy becomes with (90)Y therapy at least 30-35 Gy, when it is given in three or more fractions. More accurate linear-quadratic (LQ) model parameters are, however, needed to predict a more precise threshold for renal damage in this dose rate region. The average MIRD-based dose to the kidneys was 27 +/- 4 Gy (N = 52) with no evidence for renal damage. The variance in the dose is only caused by the high variability in renal uptake kinetics of the compound. Using the actual kidney volumes instead of the phantom values lowered the kidney dose considerably, but the variance in the dose greatly increased. As the peptide specifically localizes in the kidney cortex, the dose to the cortex increased up to a factor 1.5 compared to the MIRD whole kidney dose. Both the sum of uncertainties of ? 40% in the actual dose to the kidneys and the unknown maximum tolerable kidney dose for internal therapy make that a fixed injected activity of 13.32 GBq together with a patient-averaged dosimetry is as good as patient-kinetics specific dosimetry using the MIRD method.

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy using radiolabeled somatostatin analogs: focus on future developments

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) has been shown to be an effective treatment for neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) if curative surgery is not an option. A majority of NETs abundantly express somatostatin receptors. Consequently, following administration of somatostatin (SST) analogs labeled with γ-emitting radionuclides, these tumors can be imaged for diagnosis, staging or follow-up purposes. Furthermore, when β-emitting radionuclides are used, radiolabeled peptides (radiopeptides) can also be used for the treatment for NET patients. Even though excellent results have been achieved with PRRT, complete responses are still rare, which means that there is room for improvement. In this review, we highlight some of the directions currently under investigation in pilot clinical studies or in preclinical development to achieve this goal. Although randomized clinical trials are still lacking, early studies have shown that tumor response might be improved by application of other radionuclides, such as α-emitters or radionuclide combinations, or by adjustment of radiopeptide administration routes. Individualized dosimetry and better insight into tumor and normal organ radiation doses may allow adjustment of the amount of administered activity per cycle or the number of treatment cycles, resulting in more personalized treatment schedules. Other options include the application of novel (radiolabeled) SST analogs with improved tumor uptake and radionuclide retention time, or a combination of PRRT with other systemic therapies, such as chemotherapy or treatment with radio sensitizers. Though promising directions appear to bring improvements of PRRT within reach, additional research (including randomized clinical trials) is needed to achieve such improvements.

Tyr3-octreotide and Tyr3-octreotate radiolabeled with 177Lu or 90Y: peptide receptor radionuclide therapy results in vitro.

Somatostatin analogs promising for peptide receptor scintigraphy (PRS) and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) are D-Phe-c(Cys-Tyr-D-Trp-Lys-Thr-Cys)-Thr(ol) (Tyr 3-octreotide) and D-Phe-c(Cys-Tyr-D-Trp-Lys-Thr-Cys)-Thr (tyr3-octreotate). For radiotherapeutic applications these peptides are being labeled with the beta(-) particle emitters 177Lu or 90Y. We evaluated the therapeutic effects of these analogs chelated with tetra-azacyclododecatatro-acetic acid (DOTA) and labeled with 90Y or 177Lu in an in vitro colony-forming assay using the rat pancreatic tumor cell line CA20948. Furthermore, we investigated the effects of incubation time, radiation dose, and specific activity of [177Lu-DOTA]-D-Phe1-c (Cys-Tyr-D-Trp-Lys-Thr-Cys)-Thr (177Lu-octreotate). 177Lu-octreotate could reduce tumor growth to 100% cell kill and effects were dependent on radiation dose, incubation time, and specific activity used. Similar concentrations of 177Lu-DOTA, which is not bound to the cells, had a less pronounced effect on the tumor cell survival. Both tyr3-octreotide and tyr3-octreotate labeled with either 177Lu or 90Y, using DOTA as chelator, were able to control tumor growth in a dose-dependent manner. In all concentrations used radiolabeled tyr3-octreotate had a higher tumor kill compared to radiolabeled tyr3-octreotide, labeled with 177Lu or 90Y. This is in accordance with the higher affinity of tyr3-octreotate for the subtype 2 (sst2)-receptor compared to tyr3-octreotide, leading to a higher amount of cell-associated radioactivity, resulting in a significantly higher tumor radiation dose. In conclusion, tyr3-octreotate labeled with 177Lu or 90Y is the most promising analog for PRRT.