Mark L. Francis

Health Literacy Skills in Rural and Urban Populations.

OBJECTIVE To determine whether health literacy is lower in rural populations. METHOD We analyzed health, prose, document, and quantitative literacy from the National Assessment of Adult Literacy study. Metropolitan Statistical Area designated participants as rural or urban. RESULTS Rural populations had lower literacy levels for all literacy types (P<0.001 for each). After adjusting for known confounders, there was no longer a difference in health or prose literacy (P>0.05). However, rural populations had higher document (P=0.04) and quantitative (P=0.01) literacy. CONCLUSION Health literacy is lower in the rural population although this difference is explained by known confounders.

Outcomes in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Myocardial Infarction

BACKGROUND Patients with rheumatoid arthritis have an increased risk for accelerated atherosclerosis. It is unknown, however, whether rheumatoid arthritis also increases in-hospital mortality after a myocardial infarction or influences the therapy patients receive. METHODS A cross-sectional analysis of 1,112,676 patients with myocardial infarction in the 2003-2005 Nationwide Inpatient Sample was performed. RESULTS Patients with rheumatoid arthritis were 39% more likely to receive medical therapy (odds ratio [OR], 1.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.30-1.49) than interventional therapy. By using logistic regression, we adjusted for confounding variables to determine the effect of rheumatoid arthritis on the selection of therapy and found that rheumatoid arthritis itself was associated with a 38% increased likelihood of undergoing thrombolysis (OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.10-1.71) and a 27% increased likelihood of undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.17-1.39). For the primary outcome measure, we determined that patients with rheumatoid arthritis overall had a 24% better in-hospital mortality compared with other patients with a myocardial infarction (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.68-0.86), which was 34% better after adjusting for confounding variables (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.59-0.74). This better in-hospital mortality was seen in patients with rheumatoid arthritis undergoing medical therapy (adjusted OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.59-0.75) and percutaneous coronary intervention (adjusted OR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.32-0.70), but not in patients undergoing thrombolysis or coronary artery bypass grafting. CONCLUSIONS Among patients with myocardial infarction, rheumatoid arthritis was associated with an increased use of thrombolysis and percutaneous coronary intervention. Moreover, patients with rheumatoid arthritis had an in-hospital survival advantage, particularly those undergoing medical therapy and percutaneous coronary intervention.

Rural-urban differences in behaviors to prevent skin cancer: an analysis of the Health Information National Trends Survey.

BACKGROUND There is concern that rural residents may be less likely to engage in behaviors to reduce their risk for skin cancer compared with urban residents. OBJECTIVES First, we sought to determine whether rural residents are less likely to use sunscreen and engage in other skin cancer preventive measures. Second, we sought to determine whether such actions are sufficiently explained by factors known to affect these behaviors or whether such actions are affected by rurality. METHODS We analyzed the 2005 Health Information National Trends Survey, a survey of the noninstitutionalized, adult population performed by the National Cancer Institute. We used logistic regression analysis to adjust for confounding by age, race, income, education, health insurance, smoking, sex, marital status, and region. RESULTS Compared with urban residents, rural residents were 33% less likely (odds ratio = 0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.57-0.80) to wear sunscreen when exposed to the sun for more than 1 hour. After adjusting for the above confounding variables, however, rural individuals were just as likely as urban individuals to use sunscreen with sun exposure. LIMITATIONS Inability to adjust for unmeasured confounding variables, such as occupational sun exposure, is a limitation. CONCLUSION Rural residents were less likely to use sunscreen. This decreased use of sunscreen, however, was explained by differences in age, race, income, education, and other confounding factors that negatively influence the use of sunscreen.

Joint replacement surgeries among medicare beneficiaries in rural compared with urban areas

OBJECTIVE People in rural areas live farther away from hospitals than do people in urban areas. Thus, there is concern that people living in rural areas may be less willing or able to undergo elective surgical procedures. This study was undertaken to determine whether Medicare beneficiaries in rural areas were less likely to have elective total knee or hip replacement surgeries compared with their urban counterparts. METHODS We performed a cross-sectional study of Medicare beneficiaries, controlling for age, sex, race/ethnicity, and economic status. Beneficiaries were assigned to rural versus urban areas based on their zip code of residence and the 10-point Rural-Urban Commuting Area designation. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated. RESULTS Compared with urban beneficiaries, rural beneficiaries were 27% more likely to have total knee or hip replacement surgeries (OR 1.27 [95% CI 1.26-1.28]). After adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, median household income, average house value, mean poverty ratio, and state of residence, rural beneficiaries were still 14% more likely to have total joint replacement surgeries (OR 1.14 [95% CI 1.13-1.16]). Differential use of surgery before and after receiving Medicare eligibility did not explain the findings. While significant sex, racial, and ethnic disparities were present in both rural and urban areas, for the most part these disparities were ameliorated rather than accentuated in rural areas. CONCLUSION Contrary to expectations, our findings indicate that Medicare beneficiaries living in rural areas are more likely to undergo total knee or hip replacement surgeries.

Giant Cell Arteritis Presenting as Small Bowel Infarction

Giant cell arteritis predominantly affects cranial arteries and rarely involves other sites. We report a patient who presented with small bowel obstruction because of infarction from mesenteric giant cell arteritis. She had an unusual cause of her obstruction and a rare manifestation of giant cell arteritis. In spite of aggressive therapy with steroids, she died a month later because of multiple complications. We discuss the diagnosis and management of small bowel obstruction and differential diagnosis of vasculitis of the gastrointestinal tract. We were able to find 11 cases of bowel involvement with giant cell arteritis in the English literature. This case report illustrates that giant cell arteritis can be a cause of small bowel obstruction and bowel infarction. In the proper clinical setting, vasculitides need to be considered early in the differential diagnosis when therapy may be most effective.

Rural-Urban Differences in Surgical Procedures for Medicare Beneficiaries

OBJECTIVE To determine whether Medicare beneficiaries in rural areas were less likely to undergo a variety of surgical procedures compared with their urban counterparts. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS Cross-sectional study of Medicare beneficiaries. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Any incidence of the surgical procedures studied. RESULTS Compared with urban Medicare beneficiaries, rural Medicare beneficiaries were more likely to undergo a broad array of surgical procedures: 35% more likely for carotid endarterectomy (odds ratio [OR] = 1.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.33-1.38), 32% for lumbar spine fusion (OR = 1.32; 95% CI, 1.29-1.35), 30% for knee replacement surgery (OR = 1.30; 95% CI, 1.28-1.31), 28% for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (OR = 1.28; 95% CI, 1.24-1.31), 22% for prostatectomy (OR = 1.22; 95% CI, 1.19-1.24), 19% for hip replacement surgery (OR = 1.19; 95% CI, 1.17-1.21), 18% for aortic valve replacement (OR = 1.18; 95% CI, 1.14-1.21), 16% for open reduction and internal fixation of the femur (OR = 1.16; 95% CI, 1.14-1.18), and 15% for appendectomy (OR = 1.15; 95% CI, 1.11-1.19). To determine whether these differences could be explained by known confounding variables, we then used logistic regression to adjust for age, sex, race/ethnicity, median household income, average house value, mean poverty ratio, and state of residence. Rural beneficiaries were still more likely to undergo all of these surgical procedures. CONCLUSIONS Medicare beneficiaries living in rural areas were more likely to undergo a broad array of surgical procedures compared with those living in urban areas. While allaying some concern about rural access to surgical procedures, the uniformity of these results raises concern that people living in rural areas may have an overall poorer quality of health.

Mortality after coronary artery revascularization of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE Patients with rheumatoid arthritis have an increased risk for accelerated atherosclerosis. It is not known, however, whether this disorder is associated with a higher risk of complications after coronary artery revascularization. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional study of patients in the 2003-2005 Nationwide Inpatient Sample. To determine whether patients with rheumatoid arthritis had higher in-hospital mortality after coronary artery revascularization, we used logistic regression to adjust for age, sex, race/ethnicity, income, rural-urban residency, diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, Charlson comorbidities (including myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, and diabetes), elective admission, weekend admission, and primary payer. RESULTS Among patients undergoing coronary artery revascularization, those with rheumatoid arthritis were 49% less likely to die while hospitalized compared with those without rheumatoid arthritis (odds ratio, 0.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.40-0.65) after adjusting for the above confounders. In subgroup analyses that adjusted for the same confounders, patients with rheumatoid arthritis also had a 61% improvement of in-patient mortality when they underwent percutaneous coronary interventions (odds ratio, 0.39; 95% confidence interval, 0.29-0.54) along with a median of 0.32 less days hospitalized (95% confidence interval, 0.28-0.34 days). Similarly, patients with rheumatoid arthritis undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting had a 31% improvement of in-patient mortality (odds ratio, 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.48-0.99), with a median of 1.36 less days hospitalized (95% confidence interval, 0.72-1.12 days). CONCLUSION Among patients undergoing coronary artery revascularization, patients with rheumatoid arthritis have an in-hospital survival advantage along with reduced days of hospitalization compared with patients without rheumatoid arthritis.

Effect of Number of Clinics and Panel Size on Patient Continuity for Medical Residents

BACKGROUND Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education program requirements for internal medicine residency training include a longitudinal, continuity experience with a panel of patients. OBJECTIVE To determine whether the number of resident clinics, the resident panel size, and the supervising attending physician affect patient continuity. To determine the number of clinics and the panel size necessary to maximize patient continuity. DESIGN We used linear regression modeling to assess the effect of number of attended clinics, the panel size, and the attending physician on patient continuity. PARTICIPANTS Forty medicine residents in an academic medicine clinic. MEASUREMENTS Percent patient continuity by the usual provider of care method. RESULTS Unadjusted linear regression analysis showed that patient continuity increased 2.3% ± 0.7% for each additional clinic per 9 weeks or 0.4% ± 0.1% for each additional clinic per year (P  =  .003). Conversely, patient continuity decreased 0.7% ± 0.4% for every additional 10 patients in the panel (P  =  .04). When simultaneously controlling for number of clinics, panel size, and attending physician, multivariable linear regression analysis showed that patient continuity increased 3.3% ± 0.5% for each additional clinic per 9 weeks or 0.6% ± 0.1% for each additional clinic per year (P < .001). Conversely, patient continuity decreased 2.2% ± 0.4% for every additional 10 patients in the panel (P < .001). Thus, residents who actually attend at least 1 clinic per week with a panel size less than 106 patients can achieve 50% patient continuity. Interestingly, the attending physician accounted for most of the variability in patient continuity (51%). CONCLUSIONS Patient continuity for residents significantly increased with increasing numbers of clinics and decreasing panel size and was significantly influenced by the attending physician.

Introduction of the chronic care model into an academic rheumatology clinic

Background While the chronic care model has been extensively used for the management of patients with diabetes in non-academic, primary care settings, it is not clear whether this model can be used effectively in academic, specialty clinics for other chronic disorders. Methods Through the Academic Chronic Care Collaborative, the chronic care model was introduced to help manage patients with osteoarthritis in an academic rheumatology service with seven prespecified goals. These goals included measurements of Western Ontario MacMaster (WOMAC) osteoarthritis scores, self-efficacy scores and exercise time. Results Five a priori goals were achieved in this study: average WOMAC scores less than 1000 mm as measured on a visual analogue scale, average self-efficacy score of less than 5 mm, average exercise time greater than 90 min, more than 40% of patients exercising at least 60 min per week and a 20% improvement in self-efficacy scores. However, a 20% improvement in WOMAC scores and a 60% completion of documented self-management goals in our patients were not achieved. Our inability to achieve our self-management goal underscores the fact that we have not yet fully implemented the chronic care model into our practice. The inability to detect a 20% improvement in WOMAC scores in the context of having reached our absolute WOMAC goal at baseline suggests a probable ceiling effect for this measure. Conclusions The chronic care model can be effectively introduced into an academic specialty service and can be used effectively in the management of patients with non-diabetic disorders, in this case osteoarthritis.

Continuity Clinic Model and Diabetic Outcomes in Internal Medicine Residencies: Findings of the Educational Innovations Project Ambulatory Collaborative.

BACKGROUND Efforts to improve diabetes care in residency programs are ongoing and in the midst of continuity clinic redesign at many institutions. While there appears to be a link between resident continuity and improvement in glycemic control for diabetic patients, it is uncertain whether clinic structure affects quality measures and patient outcomes. METHODS This multi-institutional, cross-sectional study included 12 internal medicine programs. Three outcomes (glycemic control, blood pressure control, and achievement of target low-density lipoprotein [LDL]) and 2 process measures (A1C and LDL measurement) were reported for diabetic patients. Traditional, block, and combination clinic models were compared using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). Analysis was adjusted for continuity, utilization, workload, and panel size. RESULTS No significant differences were found in glycemic control across clinic models (P = .06). The percentage of diabetic patients with LDL < 100 mg/dL was 60% in block, compared to 54.9% and 55% in traditional and combination models (P = .006). The percentage of diabetic patients with blood pressure < 130/80 mmHg was 48.4% in block, compared to 36.7% and 36.9% in other models (P < .001). The percentage of diabetic patients with HbA1C measured was 92.1% in block compared to 75.2% and 82.1% in other models (P < .001). Also, the percentage of diabetic patients with LDL measured was significantly different across all groups, with 91.2% in traditional, 70.4% in combination, and 83.3% in block model programs (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS While high scores on diabetic quality measures are achievable in any clinic model, the block model design was associated with better performance.