Mark L. Messonnier
National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Mark L. Messonnier.
American Journal of Preventive Medicine | 2000
Vilma G Carande-Kulis; Michael V. Maciosek; Peter A. Briss; Steven M. Teutsch; Stephanie Zaza; Benedict I. Truman; Mark L. Messonnier; Marguerite Pappaioanou; Jeffrey R. Harris; Jonathan E. Fielding
OBJECTIVES This paper describes the methods used in the Guide to Community Preventive Services: Systematic Reviews and Evidence-Based Recommendations (the Guide) for conducting systematic reviews of economic evaluations across community health-promotion and disease-prevention interventions. The lack of standardized methods to improve the comparability of results from economic evaluations has hampered the use of data on costs and financial benefits in evidence-based reviews of effectiveness. The methods and instruments developed for the Guide provide an explicit and systematic approach for abstracting economic evaluation data and increase the usefulness of economic information for policy making in health care and public health. METHODS The following steps were taken for systematic reviews of economic evaluations: (1) systematic searches were conducted; (2) studies using economic analytic methods, such as cost analysis or cost-effectiveness, cost-benefit or cost-utility analysis, were selected according to explicit inclusion criteria; (3) economic data were abstracted and adjusted using a standardized abstraction form; and (4) adjusted summary measures were listed in summary tables. RESULTS These methods were used in a review of 10 interventions designed to improve vaccination coverage in children, adolescents and adults. Ten average costs and 14 cost-effectiveness ratios were abstracted or calculated from data reported in 24 studies and expressed in 1997 USD. The types of costs included in the analysis and intervention definitions varied extensively. Gaps in data were found for many interventions.
Pediatrics | 2014
Fangjun Zhou; Abigail Shefer; Jay Wenger; Mark L. Messonnier; Li Yan Wang; Adriana S. Lopez; Matthew R. Moore; Trudy V. Murphy; Margaret M. Cortese; Lance E. Rodewald
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the economic impact of the 2009 routine US childhood immunization schedule, including diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and acellular pertussis, Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate, inactivated poliovirus, measles/mumps/rubella, hepatitis B, varicella, 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate, hepatitis A, and rotavirus vaccines; influenza vaccine was not included. METHODS: Decision analysis was conducted using population-based vaccination coverage, published vaccine efficacies, historical data on disease incidence before vaccination, and disease incidence reported during 2005 to 2009. Costs were estimated using the direct cost and societal (direct and indirect costs) perspectives. Program costs included vaccine, administration, vaccine-associated adverse events, and parent travel and work time lost. All costs were inflated to 2009 dollars, and all costs and benefits in the future were discounted at a 3% annual rate. A hypothetical 2009 US birth cohort of 4 261 494 infants over their lifetime was followed up from birth through death. Net present value (net savings) and benefit-cost ratios of routine childhood immunization were calculated. RESULTS: Analyses showed that routine childhood immunization among members of the 2009 US birth cohort will prevent ∼42 000 early deaths and 20 million cases of disease, with net savings of
PharmacoEconomics | 2008
Lisa A. Prosser; Megan A. O'Brien; Noelle Angelique M. Molinari; Katherine H. Hohman; Kristin L. Nichol; Mark L. Messonnier; Tracy A. Lieu
13.5 billion in direct costs and
Pediatrics | 2013
Andrew Terranella; Garrett R. Beeler Asay; Mark L. Messonnier; Thomas A. Clark; Jennifer L. Liang
68.8 billion in total societal costs, respectively. The direct and societal benefit-cost ratios for routine childhood vaccination with these 9 vaccines were 3.0 and 10.1. CONCLUSIONS: From both direct cost and societal perspectives, vaccinating children as recommended with these vaccines results in substantial cost savings.
American Journal of Agricultural Economics | 2000
Mark L. Messonnier; John C. Bergstrom; Christopher Cornwell; R. Jeff Teasley; H. Ken Cordell
ObjectiveInfluenza vaccination rates remain far below national goals in the US. Expanding influenza vaccination in non-traditional settings such as worksites and pharmacies may be a way to enhance vaccination coverage for adults, but scant data exist on the cost effectiveness of this strategy. The aims of this study were to (i) describe the costs of vaccination in non-traditional settings such as pharmacies and mass vaccination clinics; and (ii) evaluate the projected health benefits, costs and cost effectiveness of delivering influenza vaccination to adults of varying ages and risk groups in non-traditional settings compared with scheduled doctor’s office visits. All analyses are from the US societal perspective.MethodsWe evaluated the costs of influenza vaccination in non-traditional settings via detailed telephone interviews with representatives of organizations that conduct mass vaccination clinics and pharmacies that use pharmacists to deliver vaccinations. Next, we constructed a decision tree to compare the projected health benefits and costs of influenza vaccination delivered via non-traditional settings or during scheduled doctor’s office visits with no vaccination. The target population was stratified by age (18–49, 50–64 and ≥65 years) and risk status (high or low risk for influenza-related complications). Probabilities and costs (direct and opportunity) for uncomplicated influenza illness, outpatient visits, hospitalizations, deaths, vaccination and vaccine adverse events were derived from primary data and from published and unpublished sources.ResultsThe mean cost (year 2004 values) of vaccination was lower in mass vaccination (
Clinical Infectious Diseases | 2008
Ismael R. Ortega Sanchez; Martin I. Meltzer; Colin W. Shepard; Elizabeth R. Zell; Mark L. Messonnier; Oleg O. Bilukha; Xinzhi Zhang; David S. Stephens; Nancy E. Messonnier
US17.04) and pharmacy (
American Journal of Preventive Medicine | 1999
Mark L. Messonnier; Phaedra S. Corso; Steven M. Teutsch; Anne C. Haddix; Jeffrey R. Harris
US11.57) settings than in scheduled doctor’s office visits (
Pediatrics | 2007
Noelle-Angelique Molinari; Maureen S. Kolasa; Mark L. Messonnier; Richard A. Schieber
US28.67). Vaccination in non-traditional settings was projected to be cost saving for healthy adults aged ≥50 years, and for high-risk adults of all ages. For healthy adults aged 18–49 years, preventing an episode of influenza would cost
Vaccine | 2012
Courtney A. Gidengil; Tracy A. Lieu; Katherine Payne; Donna Rusinak; Mark L. Messonnier; Lisa A. Prosser
US90 if vaccination were delivered via the pharmacy setting,
Drugs | 2012
Justin Gatwood; Martin I. Meltzer; Mark L. Messonnier; Ismael R. Ortega-Sanchez; Rajesh Balkrishnan; Lisa A. Prosser
US210 via the mass vaccination setting and
Collaboration
Dive into the Mark L. Messonnier's collaboration.
National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases
View shared research outputs