Mark Lakshmanan

Teriparatide for acceleration of fracture repair in humans: A prospective, randomized, double‐blind study of 102 postmenopausal women with distal radial fractures

Animal experiments show a dramatic improvement in skeletal repair by teriparatide. We tested the hypothesis that recombinant teriparatide, at the 20 µg dose normally used for osteoporosis treatment or higher, would accelerate fracture repair in humans. Postmenopausal women (45 to 85 years of age) who had sustained a dorsally angulated distal radial fracture in need of closed reduction but no surgery were randomly assigned to 8 weeks of once‐daily injections of placebo (n = 34) or teriparatide 20 µg (n = 34) or teriparatide 40 µg (n = 34) within 10 days of fracture. Hypotheses were tested sequentially, beginning with the teriparatide 40 µg versus placebo comparison, using a gatekeeping strategy. The estimated median time from fracture to first radiographic evidence of complete cortical bridging in three of four cortices was 9.1, 7.4, and 8.8 weeks for placebo and teriparatide 20 µg and 40 µg, respectively (overall p = .015). There was no significant difference between the teriparatide 40 µg versus placebo groups (p = .523). In post hoc analyses, there was no significant difference between teriparatide 40 µg versus 20 µg (p = .053); however, the time to healing was shorter in teriparatide 20 µg than placebo (p = .006). The primary hypothesis that teriparatide 40 µg would shorten the time to cortical bridging was not supported. The shortened time to healing for teriparatide 20 µg compared with placebo still may suggest that fracture repair can be accelerated by teriparatide, but this result should be interpreted with caution and warrants further study.

Efficacy and Safety of Dulaglutide Added Onto Pioglitazone and Metformin Versus Exenatide in Type 2 Diabetes in a Randomized Controlled Trial (AWARD-1)

OBJECTIVE To compare the efficacy and safety of dulaglutide, a once-weekly GLP-1 receptor agonist, with placebo and exenatide in type 2 diabetic patients. The primary objective was to determine superiority of dulaglutide 1.5 mg versus placebo in HbA1c change at 26 weeks. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS This 52-week, multicenter, parallel-arm study (primary end point: 26 weeks) randomized patients (2:2:2:1) to dulaglutide 1.5 mg, dulaglutide 0.75 mg, exenatide 10 μg, or placebo (placebo-controlled period: 26 weeks). Patients were treated with metformin (1,500–3,000 mg) and pioglitazone (30–45 mg). Mean baseline HbA1c was 8.1% (65 mmol/mol). RESULTS Least squares mean ± SE HbA1c change from baseline to the primary end point was −1.51 ± 0.06% (−16.5 ± 0.7 mmol/mol) for dulaglutide 1.5 mg, −1.30 ± 0.06% (−14.2 ± 0.7 mmol/mol) for dulaglutide 0.75 mg, −0.99 ± 0.06% (−10.8 ± 0.7 mmol/mol) for exenatide, and −0.46 ± 0.08% (−5.0 ± 0.9 mmol/mol) for placebo. Both dulaglutide doses were superior to placebo at 26 weeks (both adjusted one-sided P < 0.001) and exenatide at 26 and 52 weeks (both adjusted one-sided P < 0.001). Greater percentages of patients reached HbA1c targets with dulaglutide 1.5 mg and 0.75 mg than with placebo and exenatide (all P < 0.001). At 26 and 52 weeks, total hypoglycemia incidence was lower in patients receiving dulaglutide 1.5 mg than in those receiving exenatide; no dulaglutide-treated patients reported severe hypoglycemia. The most common gastrointestinal adverse events for dulaglutide were nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. Events were mostly mild to moderate and transient. CONCLUSIONS Both once-weekly dulaglutide doses demonstrated superior glycemic control versus placebo and exenatide with an acceptable tolerability and safety profile.

Design and baseline characteristics of participants in the Researching cardiovascular Events with a Weekly INcretin in Diabetes (REWIND) trial on the cardiovascular effects of dulaglutide

The aim was to determine the effects of dulaglutide, a synthetic once‐weekly, injectable human glucagon‐like peptide 1 analogue that lowers blood glucose, body weight, appetite and blood pressure, on cardiovascular outcomes. People with type 2 diabetes, aged ≥50 years, with glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) ≤9.5%, and either a previous cardiovascular event, evidence of cardiovascular disease or ≥2 cardiovascular risk factors were randomly allocated to a weekly subcutaneous injection of either dulaglutide (1.5 mg) or placebo and followed within the ongoing Researching cardiovascular Events with a Weekly INcretin in Diabetes (REWIND) trial every 3 to 6 months. The primary cardiovascular outcome is the first occurrence of the composite of cardiovascular death or non‐fatal myocardial infarction or non‐fatal stroke. Secondary outcomes include each component of the primary composite cardiovascular outcome, a composite clinical microvascular outcome comprising retinal or renal disease, hospitalization for unstable angina, heart failure requiring hospitalization or an urgent heart failure visit, and all‐cause mortality. Follow‐up will continue until the accrual of 1200 confirmed primary outcomes. Recruitment of 9901 participants (mean age 66 years, 46% women) occurred in 370 sites located in 24 countries over a period of 2 years. The mean duration of diabetes was 10 years, mean baseline HbA1c was 7.3%, and 31% had prior cardiovascular disease. The REWIND trials international scope, high proportion of women, high proportion of people without prior cardiovascular disease and inclusion of participants whose mean baseline HbA1c was 7.3% suggests that its cardiovascular and safety findings will be directly relevant to the typical middle‐aged patient seen in general practice throughout the world.

The reversible effects of raloxifene on luteinizing hormone levels and ovarian morphology in mice.

Raloxifene is a selective estrogen receptor modulator that has estrogen agonist effects on bone and serum lipids and estrogen antagonist effects on breast and uterine tissues. This study assessed the effects of raloxifene hydrochloride (HCl) treatment on circulating luteinizing hormone (LH) levels and ovarian morphology in sexually mature, 15-week-old, female CD-1 mice. Mice were maintained on diets providing average daily doses of 0 or 233 mg/kg raloxifene for 2 weeks (Study 1) or 0, 7.9, or 236 mg/kg raloxifene for 4 weeks (Study 2). At the end of the treatment period, blood samples were collected every 2 hours for 24 h in Study 1 (5 mice per group) and at 10:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. in Study 2 (8 mice per group). Serum LH levels were measured by radioimmunoassay. Ovarian histomorphology was evaluated in the 10 mice per group (Study 1) and the 8 mice per group (Study 2). For the reversibility phase (Study 2), mice were fed untreated diets for 3 weeks; serum LH levels and ovarian histomorphology were then assessed. Raloxifene treatment at 233 mg/kg/day for 2 weeks (Study 1) significantly elevated circulating LH levels by 4- to 7-fold compared with control. Raloxifene-treated mice had elevated LH levels sustained over the 24-h sampling period and did not exhibit the preovulatory LH surge evident in some control mice at the 4:00 p.m., 6:00 p.m., and 8:00 p. m. time points. Mice treated with 236 mg/day raloxifene for 4 weeks (Study 2) had elevated LH levels (4.4-fold compared to control), whereas mice exposed to 7.9 mg/kg/day raloxifene had a slight, nonsignificant increase in LH (2-fold compared to control). In both dose groups, LH levels were indistinguishable from controls 3 weeks after raloxifene treatment was discontinued. The ovaries in six of the eight mice treated with 7.9 mg/kg/day raloxifene had dilated and/or anovulatory follicles. One mouse in this group had a single hemorrhagic follicle; however, corpora lutea distribution was normal, indicating that ovulation was occurring. Raloxifene-treated mice in Study 1 and mice treated with a comparable raloxifene dose (236 mg/day) in Study 2 had histomorphological changes in the ovary indicative of arrested follicular maturation, including anovulatory hemorrhagic follicles, some developing follicles, and very few corpora lutea. At the end of the reversibility phase, hemorrhagic follicles were no longer evident and follicular maturation and corpora lutea distribution were normal. Raloxifene treatment in mice produces a dose-dependent, sustained elevation in serum LH levels and is associated with changes in ovarian follicular morphology. These changes are reversible upon discontinuation of raloxifene treatment.

Treatment satisfaction in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with once-weekly dulaglutide: data from the AWARD-1 and AWARD-3 clinical trials.

To compare treatment satisfaction among people with type 2 diabetes receiving dulaglutide 1.5 mg and dulaglutide 0.75 mg (a once‐weekly, long‐acting, glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonist) with those receiving either exenatide or placebo (AWARD‐1 study) or metformin (AWARD‐3 study) over 52 weeks.

Dulaglutide versus insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes and moderate-to-severe chronic kidney disease (AWARD-7): a multicentre, open-label, randomised trial

BACKGROUND Many antihyperglycaemic drugs, including insulin, are primarily cleared by the kidneys, restricting treatment options for patients with kidney disease. Dulaglutide is a long-acting glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist that is not cleared by the kidneys, and confers a lower risk of hypoglycaemia than does insulin. We assessed the efficacy and safety of dulaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes and moderate-to-severe chronic kidney disease. METHODS AWARD-7 was a multicentre, open-label trial done at 99 sites in nine countries. Eligible patients were adults with type 2 diabetes and moderate-to-severe chronic kidney disease (stages 3-4), with an HbA1c of 7·5-10·5%, and who were being treated with insulin or insulin plus an oral antihyperglycaemic drug and were taking a maximum tolerated dose of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or an angiotensin receptor blocker. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1) by use of a computer-generated random sequence with an interactive response system to once-weekly injectable dulaglutide 1·5 mg, once-weekly dulaglutide 0·75 mg, or daily insulin glargine as basal therapy, all in combination with insulin lispro, for 52 weeks. Insulin glargine and lispro doses were titrated as per an adjustment algorithm; dulaglutide doses were masked to participants and investigators. The primary outcome was HbA1c at 26 weeks, with a 0·4% non-inferiority margin. Secondary outcomes included estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR). The primary analysis population was all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one post-randomisation HbA1c measurement. The safety population was all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment and had any post-dose data. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01621178. FINDINGS Between Aug 15, 2012, and Nov 30, 2015, 577 patients were randomly assigned, 193 to dulaglutide 1·5 mg, 190 to dulaglutide 0·75 mg, and 194 to insulin glargine. The effects on HbA1c change at 26 weeks of dulaglutide 1·5 mg and 0·75 mg were non-inferior to those of insulin glargine (least squares mean [LSM] -1·2% [SE 0·1] with dulaglutide 1·5 mg [183 patients]; -1·1% [0·1] with dulaglutide 0·75 mg [180 patients]; -1·1% [0·1] with insulin glargine [186 patients]; one-sided p≤0·0001 for both dulaglutide doses vs insulin glargine). The differences in HbA1c concentration at 26 weeks between dulaglutide and insulin glargine treatments were LSM difference -0·05% (95% CI -0·26 to 0·15, p<0·0001) with dulaglutide 1·5 mg and 0·02% (-0·18 to -0·22, p=0·0001) with dulaglutide 0·75 mg. HbA1c-lowering effects persisted to 52 weeks (LSM -1·1% [SE 0·1] with dulaglutide 1·5 mg; -1·1% [0·1] with dulaglutide 0·75 mg; -1·0% [0·1] with insulin glargine). At 52 weeks, eGFR was higher with dulaglutide 1·5 mg (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation by cystatin C geometric LSM 34·0 mL/min per 1·73 m2 [SE 0·7]; p=0·005 vs insulin glargine) and dulaglutide 0·75 mg (33·8 mL/min per 1·73 m2 [0·7]; p=0·009 vs insulin glargine) than with insulin glargine (31·3 mL/min per 1·73 m2 [0·7]). At 52 weeks, the effects of dulaglutide 1·5 mg and 0·75 mg on UACR reduction were not significantly different from that of insulin glargine (LSM -22·5% [95% CI -35·1 to -7·5] with dulaglutide 1·5 mg; -20·1% [-33·1 to -4·6] with dulaglutide 0·75 mg; -13·0% [-27·1 to 3·9] with insulin glargine). Proportions of patients with any serious adverse events were similar across groups (20% [38 of 192] with dulaglutide 1·5 mg, 24% [45 of 190] with dulaglutide 0·75 mg, and 27% [52 of 194] with insulin glargine). Dulaglutide was associated with higher rates of nausea (20% [38 of 192] with dulaglutide 1·5 mg and 14% [27 of 190] with 0·75 mg, vs 5% [nine of 194] with insulin glargine) and diarrhoea (17% [33 of 192] with dulaglutide 1·5 mg and 16% [30 of 190] with 0·75 mg, vs 7% [14 of 194] with insulin glargine) and lower rates of symptomatic hypoglycaemia (4·4 events per patient per year with dulaglutide 1·5 mg and 4·3 with dulaglutide 0·75 mg, vs 9·6 with insulin glargine). End-stage renal disease occurred in 38 participants: eight (4%) of 192 with dulaglutide 1·5 mg, 14 (7%) of 190 with dulaglutide 0·75 mg, and 16 (8%) of 194 with insulin glargine. INTERPRETATION In patients with type 2 diabetes and moderate-to-severe chronic kidney disease, once-weekly dulaglutide produced glycaemic control similar to that achieved with insulin glargine, with reduced decline in eGFR. Dulaglutide seems to be safe to use to achieve glycaemic control in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic kidney disease. FUNDING Eli Lilly and Company.

1.2 Efficacy and Safety of Dulaglutide versus Placebo and Exenatide in Type 2 Diabetes (AWARD-1) (66-OR)

SamenvattingThis Phase 3, randomized, parallel-arm study compared efficacy and safety of 2 doses of dulaglutide (DU), a longacting GLP-1-receptoragonist, with exenatide (EX) or placebo (PL) in patients (pts) with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin (1500-3000 mg) and pioglitazone (30-45 mg). Pts [n = 976; mean baseline (BL) characteristics: age, 55.6 years; A1C, 8.1%; weight, 96.0 kg] were randomized (2:2:2:1 ratio) openly to twice-daily EX 10 μg or in a double- blind fashion to once-weekly DU 1.5 mg, DU 0.75 mg, or PL.

Erratum. Efficacy and Safety of Dulaglutide Added Onto Pioglitazone and Metformin Versus Exenatide in Type 2 Diabetes in a Randomized Controlled Trial (AWARD-1). Diabetes Care 2014;37:2159–2167

In the print version of the article cited above, a footnote was omitted with respect to antidrug antibodies (ADAs) in Table 2. Exenatide values reported in the last row in Table 2 are not treatment-emergent ADAs; they are total reported ADAs. The last three rows of Table 2 should have appeared as …