Mark M. Hall
Edge Hill University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Mark M. Hall.
cross language evaluation forum | 2013
Vivien Petras; Toine Bogers; Elaine G. Toms; Mark M. Hall; Jacques Savoy; Piotr Malak; Adam Pawłowski; Nicola Ferro; Ivano Masiero
The Cultural Heritage in CLEF 2013 lab comprised three tasks: multilingual ad-hoc retrieval and semantic enrichment in 13 languages Dutch, English, German, Greek, Finnish, French, Hungarian, Italian, Norwegian, Polish, Slovenian, Spanish, and Swedish, Polish ad-hoc retrieval and the interactive task, which studied user behavior via log analysis and questionnaires. For the multilingual and Polish sub-tasks, more than 170,000 documents were assessed for relevance on a tertiary scale. The multilingual task had 7 participants submitting 30 multilingual and 41 monolingual runs. The Polish task comprised 3 participating groups submitting manual and automatic runs. The interactive task had 4 participating research groups and 208 user participants in the study. For the multilingual task, results show that more participants are necessary in order to provide comparative analyses. The interactive task created a rich data set comprising of questionnaire of log data. Further analysis of the data is planned in the future.
cross language evaluation forum | 2015
Marijn Koolen; Toine Bogers; Maria Gäde; Mark M. Hall; Hugo C. Huurdeman; Jaap Kamps; Mette Skov; Elaine G. Toms; David Walsh
The Social Book Search SBS Lab investigates book search in scenarios where users search with more than just a query, and look for more than objective metadata. Real-world information needs are generally complex, yet almost all research focuses instead on either relatively simple search based on queries or recommendation based on profiles. The goal is to research and develop techniques to support users in complex book search tasks. The SBS Lab has two tracks. The aim of the Suggestion Track is to develop test collections for evaluating ranking effectiveness of book retrieval and recommender systems. The aim of the Interactive Track is to develop user interfaces that support users through each stage during complex search tasks and to investigate how users exploit professional metadata and user-generated content.
international acm sigir conference on research and development in information retrieval | 2016
Ben Carterette; Paul D. Clough; Mark M. Hall; Evangelos Kanoulas; Mark Sanderson
Information Retrieval (IR) research has traditionally focused on serving the best results for a single query - so-called ad hoc retrieval. However, users typically search iteratively, refining and reformulating their queries during a session. A key challenge in the study of this interaction is the creation of suitable evaluation resources to assess the effectiveness of IR systems over sessions. This paper describes the TREC Session Track, which ran from 2010 through to 2014, which focussed on forming test collections that included various forms of implicit feedback. We describe the test collections; a brief analysis of the differences between datasets over the years; and the evaluation results that demonstrate that the use of user session data significantly improved effectiveness.
International Journal of Human-computer Studies \/ International Journal of Man-machine Studies | 2018
Heather O’Brien; Paul A. Cairns; Mark M. Hall
User engagement (UE) and its measurement have been of increasing interest in human-computer interaction (HCI). The User Engagement Scale (UES) is one tool developed to measure UE, and has been used in a variety of digital domains. The original UES consisted of 31-items and purported to measure six dimensions of engagement: aesthetic appeal, focused attention, novelty, perceived usability, felt involvement, and endurability. A recent synthesis of the literature questioned the original six-factors. Further, the ways in which the UES has been implemented in studies suggests there may be a need for a briefer version of the questionnaire and more effective documentation to guide its use and analysis. This research investigated and verified a four-factor structure of the UES and proposed a Short Form (SF). We employed contemporary statistical tools that were unavailable during the UES’ development to re-analyze the original data, consisting of 427 and 779 valid responses across two studies, and examined new data (N=344) gathered as part of a three-year digital library project. In this paper we detail our analyses, present a revised long and short form (SF) version of the UES, and offer guidance for researchers interested in adopting the UES and UES-SF in their own studies.
theory and practice of digital libraries | 2012
Mark M. Hall; Paul D. Clough; Mark Stevenson
Large digital libraries have become available over the past years through digitisation and aggregation projects. These large collections present a challenge to the new user who wishes to discover what is available in the collections. Subject classification can help in this task, however in large collections it is frequently incomplete or inconsistent. Automatic clustering algorithms provide a solution to this, however the question remains whether they produce clusters that are sufficiently cohesive and distinct for them to be used in supporting discovery and exploration in digital libraries. In this paper we present a novel approach to investigating cluster cohesion that is based on identifying instruders in a cluster. The results from a human-subject experiment show that clustering algorithms produce clusters that are sufficiently cohesive to be used where no (consistent) manual classification exists.
Aslib Proceedings | 2011
Paul D. Clough; Jiayu Tang; Mark M. Hall; Amy Warner
Purpose – The National Archives (TNA) is the UK Governments official archive. It stores and maintains records spanning over a 1,000 years in both physical and digital form. Much of the information held by TNA includes references to place and frequently user queries to TNAs online catalogue involve searches for location. The purpose of this paper is to illustrate how TNA have extracted the geographic references in their historic data to improve access to the archives.Design/methodology/approach – To be able to quickly enhance the existing archival data with geographic information, existing technologies from Natural Language Processing (NLP) and Geographical Information Retrieval (GIR) have been utilised and adapted to historical archives.Findings – Enhancing the archival records with geographic information has enabled TNA to quickly develop a number of case studies highlighting how geographic information can improve access to large‐scale archival collections. The use of existing methods from the GIR doma...
advances in geographic information systems | 2008
Mark M. Hall; Christopher B. Jones
Many aspects of spatial language concerned with relationships between spatial entities are essentially vague. Current GIS technology provides very little support for dealing with this vagueness, partially because there is a lack of quantitative data and models for vague spatial relations. This paper presents an experiment that looks at quantifying spatial prepositions. In the context of image captions, the cardinal directions are analysed in an existing set of image captions, with respect to the spatial distribution of the locations of the target object (figure) and the reference object (ground). Future work will focus on using these results to improve current GIS solutions in a wide variety of scenarios.
cross-language evaluation forum | 2014
Evangelos Kanoulas; Mihai Lupu; Paul D. Clough; Mark Sanderson; Mark M. Hall; Allan Hanbury; Elaine G. Toms
INEX investigates focused retrieval from structured documents by providing large test collections of structured documents, uniform evaluation measures, and a forum for organizations to compare their results. This paper reports on the INEX 2014 evaluation campaign, which consisted of three tracks: The Interactive Social Book Search Track investigated user information seeking behavior when interacting with various sources of information, for realistic task scenarios, and how the user interface impacts search and the search experience. The Social Book Search Track investigated the relative value of authoritative metadata and user-generated content for search and recommendation using a test collection with data from Amazon and LibraryThing, including user profiles and personal catalogues. The Tweet Contextualization Track investigated tweet contextualization, helping a user to understand a tweet by providing him with a short background summary generated from relevant Wikipedia passages aggregated into a coherent summary. INEX 2014 was an exciting year for INEX in which we for the third time ran our workshop as part of the CLEF labs. This paper gives an overview of all the INEX 2014 tracks, their aims and task, the built test-collections, the participants, and gives an initial analysis of the results.
international acm sigir conference on research and development in information retrieval | 2015
Maria Gäde; Mark M. Hall; Hugo C. Huurdeman; Jaap Kamps; Marijn Koolen; Mette Skove; Elaine G. Toms; David Walsh
There is broad consensus in the field of IR that search is complex in many use cases and applications, both on theWeb and in domain specific collections, and both in our professional and in our daily life. Yet our understanding of complex search tasks, in comparison to simple look up tasks, is fragmented at best. The workshop addressed many open research questions: What are the obvious use cases and applications of complex search? What are essential features of work tasks and search tasks to take into account? And how do these evolve over time? With a multitude of information, varying from introductory to specialized, and from authoritative to speculative or opinionated, when to show what sources of information? How does the information seeking process evolve and what are relevant differences between different stages? With complex task and search process management, blending searching, browsing, and recommendations, and supporting exploratory search to sensemaking and analytics, UI and UX design pose an overconstrained challenge. How do we know that our approach is any good? Supporting complex search tasks requires new collaborations across the whole field of IR, and the proposed workshop brought together a diverse group of researchers to work together on one of the greatest challenges of our field. The workshop featured three main elements. First, a keynote on an emerging theory of task difficulty by Diane Kelly. Second, a lively boaster and poster session in which seven contributed papers were presented. Third, three breakout groups on: 1) user interfaces and user experience, 2) tasks and users, and 3) information needs on controversial topics. There was an general feeling that the discussion made progress, and built new connections between related strands of research in IR.
Information Retrieval | 2014
Mark M. Hall; Samuel Fernando; Paul D. Clough; Aitor Soroa; Eneko Agirre; Mark Stevenson
Search boxes providing simple keyword-based search are insufficient when users have complex information needs or are unfamiliar with a collection, for example in large digital libraries. Browsing hierarchies can support these richer interactions, but many collections do not have a suitable hierarchy available. In this paper we present a number of approaches for automatically creating hierarchies and mapping items into them, including a novel technique which automatically adapts a Wikipedia-based taxonomy to the target collection. These approaches are applied to a large collection of cultural heritage items which is formed through the aggregation of other collections and for which no unified hierarchy is available. We investigate a number of novel user-evaluated metrics to quantify the hierarchies’ quality and performance, showing that the proposed technique is preferred by users. From this we draw a number of conclusions as to what makes a hierarchy useful to the user.