Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Mark Meeder is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Mark Meeder.


97th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board (TRB 2018) | 2018

Defining the time component of the pedestrian LOS concept

Ernst Bosina; Mark Meeder; Ulrich Weidmann

1 For pedestrians, a number of density-based Level of Service (LOS) schemes exist in the 2 literature. Although their values differ substantially, several common principles can be identified 3 as necessary assumptions of this LOS concept. From these assumptions follows the importance 4 of the time aspect of the LOS. Pedestrian flows are typically characterized by strong, often short5 term, fluctuations. The LOS thus depends strongly on the chosen measurement interval. This link 6 is highly relevant when designing infrastructures, as time-aggregated pedestrian counting data 7 are often used in practice. Despite this fact, the time-dependency of LOS is hardly discussed in 8 the literature. 9 This paper attempts to provide a conceptual basis for the pedestrian LOS based on a 10 comprehensive review of the literature. With the increasing availability of continuous counting 11 data, the time component of the pedestrian LOS concept can be examined in more detail. A case 12 study described in this paper, together with a recently published LOS concept, illustrates the 13 influence of flow variations on the LOS and the perceived quality of the flow. Results show that 14 the time interval can be incorporated into an LOS scheme in a meaningful way, although certain 15 limitations remain. It is furthermore argued that facility design should be based on ensuring a 16 certain minimum LOS for a defined share of users, provided that detailed continuous counting 17 data is available. Such an approach would best enable the construction of cost efficient as well as 18 comfortable pedestrian facilities. 19 20 21


Conference on Traffic and Granular Flow (TGF15) | 2016

Avoiding walls: what distance do pedestrians keep from walls and obstacles?

Ernst Bosina; Mark Meeder; Beda Büchel; Ulrich Weidmann

To avoid colliding with walls and obstacles, pedestrians keep a certain distance to them. This so-called separation distance or wall clearance distance was documented in early literature on pedestrian transport. For modelling purposes, it can be subtracted from a walkway’s width to obtain an effective width. Literature on this topic is scarce and the values that can be found are often contradictory, largely due to a lack of data. This work aims at contributing to the knowledge about the pedestrian wall distance by applying several high-resolution measurement techniques. Measurements were carried out using ultrasonic transducers and laser scanners at locations where high numbers of pedestrians move in a unidirectional flow. The results confirm that pedestrians keep a minimum distance to walls and that the effect of obstacles is noticeable several metres downstream of the cross section in which they occur. Furthermore, it was found that the kept distance depends on the pedestrian density. Lastly, this paper suggests a method for determining the effective width of walkways that can be used in pedestrian facility design.


17th Swiss Transport Research Conference (STRC 2017) | 2017

Autonomous vehicles: Pedestrian heaven or pedestrian hell?

Mark Meeder; Ernst Bosina; Ulrich Weidmann


Journal of Urban Planning and Development-asce | 2018

Measuring Neighborhood Walkability Using Detour Factor Distributions

Mark Meeder; Ulrich Weidmann


Transportation research procedia | 2017

The influence of slope on walking activity and the pedestrian modal share

Mark Meeder; Tobias Aebi; Ulrich Weidmann


20th EURO Working Group on Transportation Meeting (EWGT 2017) | 2017

The influence of slopes on walking activity

Mark Meeder; Tobias Aebi; Ulrich Weidmann


2017 Polis Conference | 2017

Autonomous vehicles: What about the pedestrians?

Mark Meeder


17th Swiss Transport Research Conference (STRC 2017) | 2017

Autonomous vehicles: Pedestrian heaven or pedestrian hell?; 17th Swiss Transport Research Conference (STRC 2017)

Mark Meeder; Ernst Bosina; Ulrich Weidmann


17th Swiss Transport Research Conference (STRC 2017) | 2017

Pedestrian flows on railway platforms; 17th Swiss Transport Research Conference (STRC 2017)

Ernst Bosina; Mark Meeder; Ulrich Weidmann


17th Swiss Transport Research Conference (STRC 2017) | 2017

Pedestrian flows on railway platforms

Ernst Bosina; Mark Meeder; Ulrich Weidmann

Collaboration


Dive into the Mark Meeder's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge