Mark S. Litwin

Quality of Life and Satisfaction with Outcome among Prostate-Cancer Survivors

BACKGROUND We sought to identify determinants of health-related quality of life after primary treatment of prostate cancer and to measure the effects of such determinants on satisfaction with the outcome of treatment in patients and their spouses or partners. METHODS We prospectively measured outcomes reported by 1201 patients and 625 spouses or partners at multiple centers before and after radical prostatectomy, brachytherapy, or external-beam radiotherapy. We evaluated factors that were associated with changes in quality of life within study groups and determined the effects on satisfaction with the treatment outcome. RESULTS Adjuvant hormone therapy was associated with worse outcomes across multiple quality-of-life domains among patients receiving brachytherapy or radiotherapy. Patients in the brachytherapy group reported having long-lasting urinary irritation, bowel and sexual symptoms, and transient problems with vitality or hormonal function. Adverse effects of prostatectomy on sexual function were mitigated by nerve-sparing procedures. After prostatectomy, urinary incontinence was observed, but urinary irritation and obstruction improved, particularly in patients with large prostates. No treatment-related deaths occurred; serious adverse events were rare. Treatment-related symptoms were exacerbated by obesity, a large prostate size, a high prostate-specific antigen score, and older age. Black patients reported lower satisfaction with the degree of overall treatment outcomes. Changes in quality of life were significantly associated with the degree of outcome satisfaction among patients and their spouses or partners. CONCLUSIONS Each prostate-cancer treatment was associated with a distinct pattern of change in quality-of-life domains related to urinary, sexual, bowel, and hormonal function. These changes influenced satisfaction with treatment outcomes among patients and their spouses or partners.

Development and validation of the expanded prostate cancer index composite (EPIC) for comprehensive assessment of health-related quality of life in men with prostate cancer

OBJECTIVES Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is an increasingly important endpoint in prostate cancer care. However, pivotal issues that are not fully assessed in existing HRQOL instruments include irritative urinary symptoms, hormonal symptoms, and multi-item scores quantifying bother between urinary, sexual, bowel, and hormonal domains. We sought to develop a novel instrument to facilitate more comprehensive assessment of prostate cancer-related HRQOL. METHODS Instrument development was based on advice from an expert panel and prostate cancer patients, which led to expanding the 20-item University of California-Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Index (UCLA-PCI) to the 50-item Expanded Prostate Index Composite (EPIC). Summary and subscale scores were derived by content and factor analyses. Reliability and validity were assessed by test-retest correlation, Cronbachs alpha coefficient, interscale correlation, and EPIC correlation with other validated instruments. RESULTS Test-retest reliability and internal consistency were high for EPIC urinary, bowel, sexual, and hormonal domain summary scores (each r >/=0.80 and Cronbachs alpha >/=0.82) and for most domain-specific subscales. Correlations between function and bother subscales within domains were high (r >0.60). Correlations between different primary domains were consistently lower, indicating that these domains assess distinct HRQOL components. EPIC domains had weak to modest correlations with the Medical Outcomes Study 12-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12), indicating rationale for their concurrent use. Moderate agreement was observed between EPIC domains relevant to the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Prostate module (FACT-P) and the American Urological Association Symptom Index (AUA-SI), providing criterion validity without excessive overlap. CONCLUSIONS EPIC is a robust prostate cancer HRQOL instrument that complements prior instruments by measuring a broad spectrum of urinary, bowel, sexual, and hormonal symptoms, thereby providing a unique tool for comprehensive assessment of HRQOL issues important in contemporary prostate cancer management.

The UCLA Prostate Cancer Index: development, reliability, and validity of a health-related quality of life measure.

OBJECTIVES The need for accurate measures of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in men treated for prostate cancer is of paramount importance because patients may survive for many years after their diagnosis. Hence, interest has increased in choosing treatments that optimize both the quality and quantity of life in patients with this disease. This study sought to develop and evaluate a self-administered, multiitem, disease-specific instrument to capture the health concerns central to the quality of life of men treated for early stage prostate cancer. METHODS After focus group analysis and pilot testing, the instrument was tested with a large retrospective, cross-sectional survey. Exploratory factor analysis and multitrait scaling analysis were used to facilitate the formation of six scales containing 20 disease-targeted items that address impairment in the urinary, bowel, and sexual domains. The psychometric properties of the new scales were assessed by measuring test-retest reliability, internal consistency reliability, and construct validity. Performance on the new scales was compared with scores on other established cancer-related health-related quality of life instruments. Two hundred fifty-five long-term survivors of prostate cancer treatment and 273 age-matched and ZIP code-matched comparison subjects without prostate cancer from a large managed care population in California were studied. Mean age was 72.7 years. In addition to the new scales, the RAND 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36) was used as a generic core measure, and a cancer-related health-related quality of life instrument (the Cancer Rehabilitation System-Short Form) was used to provide construct validity. RESULTS For the new scales, test-retest reliability ranged from 0.66 to 0.93, and internal consistency ranged from 0.65 to 0.93. Disease-targeted measures of function and bother in the three domains correlated substantially with one another. Scale scores correlated well with related, established scales. Men undergoing prostatectomy or pelvic irradiation demonstrated the expected differences in performance on the disease-specific health-related quality of life scales when compared with each other or with comparison subjects. Age was inversely related to sexual and bowel function. CONCLUSIONS The UCLA Prostate Cancer Index performed well in this population of older men with and without prostate cancer. It demonstrated good psychometric properties and appeared to be well understood and easily completed. The high response among patients suggests that these men especially are interested in addressing both the general and disease-specific concerns that impact their daily quality of life.

THE NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH CHRONIC PROSTATITIS SYMPTOM INDEX: DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF A NEW OUTCOME MEASURE

AbstractPurpose: Chronic abacterial prostatitis is a syndrome characterized by pelvic pain and voiding symptoms, which is poorly defined, poorly understood, poorly treated and bothersome. Research and clinical efforts to help men with this syndrome have been hampered by the absence of a widely accepted, reliable and valid instrument to measure symptoms and quality of life impact. We developed a psychometrically valid index of symptoms and quality of life impact for men with chronic prostatitis.Materials and Methods: We conducted a structured literature review of previous work to provide a foundation for the new instrument. We then conducted a series of focus groups comprising chronic prostatitis patients at 4 centers in North America, in which we identified the most important symptoms and effects of the condition. The results were used to create an initial draft of 55 questions that were used for formal cognitive testing on chronic prostatitis patients at the same centers. After expert panel review formal...

Evaluation of asymptomatic microscopic hematuria in adults : The American Urological Association Best Practice Policy-Part II : Patient evaluation, cytology, voided markers, imaging, cystoscopy, nephrology evaluation, and follow-up

P I of this report (preceding article) addressed the definition, detection, prevalence, and etiology of asymptomatic microscopic hematuria. This section of the best practice policy (Part II) is intended to serve as guidance to urologists and primary care physicians with respect to the evaluation of adult patients who may have asymptomatic microscopic hematuria. Recommendations for a nephrology evaluation and for patient follow-up are provided.

Comprehensive Comparison of Health-Related Quality of Life After Contemporary Therapies for Localized Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE Health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) concerns are pivotal in choosing prostate cancer therapy. However, concurrent HRQOL comparison between brachytherapy, external radiation, radical prostatectomy, and controls is hitherto lacking. HRQOL effects of hormonal adjuvants and of cancer control after therapy also lack prior characterization. PATIENTS AND METHODS A cross-sectional survey was administered to patients who underwent brachytherapy, external-beam radiation, or radical prostatectomy during 4 years at an academic medical center and to age-matched controls. HRQOL among controls was compared with therapy groups. Comparison between therapy groups was performed using regression models to control covariates. HRQOL effects of cancer progression were evaluated. RESULTS One thousand fourteen subjects participated. Compared with controls, each therapy group reported bothersome sexual dysfunction; radical prostatectomy was associated with adverse urinary HRQOL; external-beam radiation was associated with adverse bowel HRQOL; and brachytherapy was associated with adverse urinary, bowel, and sexual HRQOL (P < or =.0002 for each). Hormonal adjuvant symptoms were associated with significant impairment (P <.002). More than 1 year after therapy, several HRQOL outcomes were less favorable among subjects after brachytherapy than after external radiation or radical prostatectomy. Progression-free subjects reported better sexual and hormonal HRQOL than subjects with increasing prostate-specific antigen (P <.0001). CONCLUSION Long-term HRQOL after prostate brachytherapy showed no benefit relative to radical prostatectomy or external-beam radiation and may be less favorable in some domains. Hormonal adjuvants can be associated with significant impairment. Progression-free survival is associated with HRQOL benefits. These findings facilitate patient counseling regarding HRQOL expectations and highlight the need for prospective studies sensitive to urinary irritative and hormonal concerns in addition to incontinence, sexual, and bowel HRQOL domains.

Androgen deprivation therapy increases cardiovascular morbidity in men with prostate cancer

The use of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in the treatment of men with prostate cancer has risen sharply. Although cardiovascular disease is the most common reason for death among men with prostate cancer who do not die of the disease itself, data regarding the effect of ADT on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in men with prostate cancer are limited. In the current study, the authors attempted to measure the risk for subsequent cardiovascular morbidity in men with prostate cancer who received ADT.

DIFFERENCES IN UROLOGIST AND PATIENT ASSESSMENTS OF HEALTH RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE IN MEN WITH PROSTATE CANCER: RESULTS OF THE CAPSURE DATABASE

PURPOSE We determine whether urologists caring for men with prostate cancer accurately captured the nuances of quality of life, as disclosed by patients in validated, self-administered health related quality of life instruments. MATERIALS AND METHODS We analyzed information on 2,252 patients 42 to 95 years old enrolled in CaPSURE, a large, observational cancer of the prostate strategic urological research endeavor database, in which men with all stages of prostate cancer are followed quarterly with standardized validated written surveys to assess clinical parameters, symptoms and health related quality of life. At each visit urologists recorded Karnofsky performance status rating and the presence or absence of various symptoms, such as fatigue, pain and dysfunction in the sexual, urinary and bowel domains. Within 30 days of the visit patients independently completed self-administered health related quality of life instruments, including the RAND 36-Item Health Survey and University of California, Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Index, in which scores of 80 to 100 and 0 to 79 were interpreted as absence of impairment and moderate to severe impairment, respectively. Using chi-square analysis we compared symptoms, as recorded by the urologist, with health related quality of life impairment in relevant domains, as reported by the patient. RESULTS Significant differences (p < or = 0.002) were noted between physician and patient assessment of clinical domains, such as physical, sexual, urinary and bowel function, fatigue and bone pain. In all domains urologists underestimated patient symptoms, causing health related quality of life impairment. CONCLUSIONS In men with early stage and advanced prostate cancer physician ratings of patient symptoms do not correlate well with patient self-assessments of health related quality of life. Hence, urologists should attempt to elucidate more completely the components of patient quality of life after the diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer.

Role of Surgeon Volume in Radical Prostatectomy Outcomes

PURPOSE To examine the effect of hospital and surgeon volume on postoperative outcomes and to determine whether hospital or surgeon volume is the stronger predictor. PATIENTS AND METHODS Using 1997 to 1998 claims data from a national 5% random sample of Medicare beneficiaries, we identified 2,292 men who underwent radical prostatectomy at 1,210 hospitals by 1,788 surgeons. Hospitals were classified as high (> or = 60 per year) or low (< 60 per year) volume according to radical prostatectomy experience over the 2-year period. Surgeons were classified as high (> or = 40 per year) or low (< 40 per year) volume. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to control for patient demographics and comorbidities when assessing the association of hospital and surgeon volume with in-hospital complications, length of stay, and anastomotic stricture rates. In-hospital complications included cardiac, respiratory, vascular, wound, genitourinary, and miscellaneous surgical and medical conditions. RESULTS High-volume surgeons had half the complication risk (odds ratio [OR] = 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.32 to 0.89) and shorter lengths of stay (4.1 v 5.2 days, P =.03) compared with low-volume surgeons. High-volume hospital patients tended to have fewer anastomotic strictures (OR = 0.72; 95% CI, 0.49 to 1.04). Patient age (> or = 75 years) was associated with more complications (OR = 1.9; 95% CI, 1.39 to 2.70), more anastomotic strictures (OR = 2.2; 95% CI, 1.54 to 3.15), and longer hospital stays (parameter estimate = 2.26; 95% CI, 1.75 to 2.77). CONCLUSION Surgeon volume is inversely related to in-hospital complications and length of stay in men undergoing radical prostatectomy. Hospital volume is not significantly associated with outcomes after adjusting for physician volume. Further study is necessary to elucidate the mechanism of the volume-outcome effect.

Sexual function and bother after radical prostatectomy or radiation for prostate cancer : multivariate quality-of-life analysis from CaPSURE

OBJECTIVES To measure the effect of treatment choice (pelvic irradiation [XRT] versus radical prostatectomy [RP] with or without nerve sparing) on sexual function and sexual bother during the first 2 years after treatment. METHODS We studied sexual function and sexual bother in 438 men recently diagnosed with early-stage prostate cancer and treated with XRT or RP with or without nerve sparing. Outcomes were assessed with the University of California, Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Index, a validated health-related quality-of-life instrument that includes these two domains. To minimize the influence of other factors, we adjusted for age, comorbidity, general health, and previous treatment for erectile dysfunction. All subjects were drawn from CaPSURE, a national, longitudinal data base. RESULTS Sexual function improved over time during the first year in all treatment groups; however, during the second year, sexual function began to decline in the XRT group. Older patients who received XRT showed substantial declines in sexual function throughout the 2 years, and older patients who underwent RP experienced a return of very low baseline sexual function. Sexual function was improved by the use of nerve-sparing procedures or erectile aids. Alterations in sexual bother were ameliorated by many factors, including age, general health perceptions, and sexual function. CONCLUSIONS Patients undergoing XRT or RP with or without nerve sparing all showed comparable rates of improvement in sexual function during the first year after treatment for early-stage prostate cancer. However, in the second year after treatment, patients treated with XRT began to show declining sexual function; patients treated with RP did not.