Mark Slade
Papworth Hospital
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Mark Slade.
Chest | 2013
Michael Simoff; Brian E. Lally; Mark Slade; Wendy G. Goldberg; Pyng Lee; Gaetane Michaud; Momen M. Wahidi; Mohit Chawla
BACKGROUNDnMany patients with lung cancer will develop symptoms related to their disease process or the treatment they are receiving. These symptoms can be as debilitating as the disease progression itself. To many physicians these problems can be the most difficult to manage.nnnMETHODSnA detailed review of the literature using strict methodologic review of article quality was used in the development of this article. MEDLINE literature reviews, in addition to Cochrane reviews and other databases, were used for this review. The resulting article lists were then reviewed by experts in each area for quality and finally interpreted for content.nnnRESULTSnWe have developed recommendations for the management of many of the symptom complexes that patients with lung cancer may experience: pain, dyspnea, airway obstruction, cough, bone metastasis, brain metastasis, spinal cord metastasis, superior vena cava syndrome, hemoptysis, tracheoesophageal fistula, pleural effusions, venous thromboembolic disease, depression, fatigue, anorexia, and insomnia. Some areas, such as dyspnea, are covered in considerable detail in previously created high-quality evidence-based guidelines and are identified as excellent sources of reference. The goal of this guideline is to provide the reader recommendations based on evidence supported by scientific study.nnnCONCLUSIONSnImproved understanding and recognition of cancer-related symptoms can improve management strategies, patient compliance, and quality of life for all patients with lung cancer.
Chest | 2013
Edward T.H. Fysh; Alain Tremblay; David Feller-Kopman; Mark Slade; Luke Garske; Amelia O Clive; Carla Lamb; Rogier Boshuizen; Benjamin J. Ng; Andrew Rosenstengel; Lonny Yarmus; Najib M. Rahman; Nick A Maskell; Y. C. Gary Lee
BACKGROUNDnIndwelling pleural catheters (IPCs) offer effective control of malignant pleural effusions (MPEs). IPC-related infection is uncommon but remains a major concern. Individual IPC centers see few infections, and previous reports lack sufficient numbers and detail. This study combined the experience of 11 centers from North America, Europe, and Australia to describe the incidence, microbiology, management, and clinical outcomes of IPC-related pleural infection.nnnMETHODSnThis was a multicenter retrospective review of 1,021 patients with IPCs. All had confirmed MPE.nnnRESULTSnOnly 50 patients (4.9%) developed an IPC-related pleural infection; most (94%) were successfully controlled with antibiotics (62% IV). One death (2%) directly resulted from the infection, whereas two patients (4%) had ongoing infectious symptoms when they died of cancer progression. Staphylococcus aureus was the causative organism in 48% of cases. Infections from gram-negative organisms were associated with an increased need for continuous antibiotics or death (60% vs 15% in gram-positive and 25% mixed infections, P = .02). The infections in the majority (54%) of cases were managed successfully without removing the IPC. Postinfection pleurodesis developed in 31 patients (62%), especially those infected with staphylococci (79% vs 45% with nonstaphylococcal infections, P = .04).nnnCONCLUSIONSnThe incidence of IPC-related pleural infection was low. The overall mortality risk from pleural infection in patients treated with IPC was only 0.29%. Antibiotics should cover S aureus and gram-negative organisms until microbiology is confirmed. Postinfection pleurodesis is common and often allows removal of IPC. Heterogeneity in management is common, and future studies to define the optimal treatment strategies are needed.
Chest | 2015
David E. Ost; Armin Ernst; Horiana B. Grosu; Xiudong Lei; Javier Diaz-Mendoza; Mark Slade; Thomas R. Gildea; Michael Machuzak; Carlos A. Jimenez; Jennifer Toth; Kevin L. Kovitz; Cynthia Ray; Sara Greenhill; Roberto F. Casal; Francisco Almeida; Momen M. Wahidi; George A. Eapen; David Feller-Kopman; Rodolfo C. Morice; Sadia Benzaquen; Alain Tremblay; Michael Simoff
BACKGROUNDnThere is significant variation between physicians in terms of how they perform therapeutic bronchoscopy, but there are few data on whether these differences impact effectiveness.nnnMETHODSnThis was a multicenter registry study of patients undergoing therapeutic bronchoscopy for malignant central airway obstruction. The primary outcome was technical success, defined as reopening the airway lumen to > 50% of normal. Secondary outcomes were dyspnea as measured by the Borg score and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) as measured by the SF-6D.nnnRESULTSnFifteen centers performed 1,115 procedures on 947 patients. Technical success was achieved in 93% of procedures. Center success rates ranged from 90% to 98% (P = .02). Endobronchial obstruction and stent placement were associated with success, whereas American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score > 3, renal failure, primary lung cancer, left mainstem disease, and tracheoesophageal fistula were associated with failure. Clinically significant improvements in dyspnea occurred in 90 of 187 patients measured (48%). Greater baseline dyspnea was associated with greater improvements in dyspnea, whereas smoking, having multiple cancers, and lobar obstruction were associated with smaller improvements. Clinically significant improvements in HRQOL occurred in 76 of 183 patients measured (42%). Greater baseline dyspnea was associated with greater improvements in HRQOL, and lobar obstruction was associated with smaller improvements.nnnCONCLUSIONSnTechnical success rates were high overall, with the highest success rates associated with stent placement and endobronchial obstruction. Therapeutic bronchoscopy should not be withheld from patients based solely on an assessment of risk, since patients with the most dyspnea and lowest functional status benefitted the most.
Chest | 2015
David E. Ost; Armin Ernst; Horiana B. Grosu; Xiudong Lei; Javier Diaz-Mendoza; Mark Slade; Thomas R. Gildea; Michael Machuzak; Carlos A. Jimenez; Jennifer Toth; Kevin L. Kovitz; Cynthia Ray; Sara Greenhill; Roberto F. Casal; Francisco Almeida; Momen M. Wahidi; George A. Eapen; Lonny Yarmus; Rodolfo C. Morice; Sadia Benzaquen; Alain Tremblay; Michael Simoff
BACKGROUNDnThere are significant variations in how therapeutic bronchoscopy for malignant airway obstruction is performed. Relatively few studies have compared how these approaches affect the incidence of complications.nnnMETHODSnWe used the American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST) Quality Improvement Registry, Evaluation, and Education (AQuIRE) program registry to conduct a multicenter study of patients undergoing therapeutic bronchoscopy for malignant central airway obstruction. The primary outcome was the incidence of complications. Secondary outcomes were incidence of bleeding, hypoxemia, respiratory failure, adverse events, escalation in level of care, and 30-day mortality.nnnRESULTSnFifteen centers performed 1,115 procedures on 947 patients. There were significant differences among centers in the type of anesthesia (moderate vs deep or general anesthesia, P < .001), use of rigid bronchoscopy (P < .001), type of ventilation (jet vs volume cycled, P < .001), and frequency of stent use (P < .001). The overall complication rate was 3.9%, but significant variation was found among centers (range, 0.9%-11.7%; P = .002). Risk factors for complications were urgent and emergent procedures, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score > 3, redo therapeutic bronchoscopy, and moderate sedation. The 30-day mortality was 14.8%; mortality varied among centers (range, 7.7%-20.2%, P = .02). Risk factors for 30-day mortality included Zubrod score > 1, ASA score > 3, intrinsic or mixed obstruction, and stent placement.nnnCONCLUSIONSnUse of moderate sedation and stents varies significantly among centers. These factors are associated with increased complications and 30-day mortality, respectively.
Thorax | 2012
Paul Beckett; Matthew Callister; Laila J. Tata; Richard Harrison; Michael D Peake; Roz Stanley; Ian Woolhouse; Mark Slade; Richard Hubbard
Data for 25261 patients with non-small cell lung cancer whose details were submitted to the National Lung Cancer Audit in England were analysed to assess the effect of age at diagnosis on their clinical management, after accounting for sex, stage, performance status and comorbidity. Multivariate logistic regression showed the odds of having histocytological confirmation and anticancer treatment decreased progressively with age, and was also lower in women. It is likely that these results have a multifactorial explanation, and further research into the attitudes of patients, carers and healthcare professionals, and clinical trials of treatment in older populations, are necessary.
Chest | 2015
Anna C. Bibby; Amelia O Clive; Gerry C. Slade; Anna J Morley; Janet Fallon; Ioannis Psallidas; Justin Pepperell; Mark Slade; Andrew Stanton; Najib M. Rahman; Nick A Maskell
OBJECTIVEnMalignant pleural effusion (MPE) incidence is increasing, and prognosis remains poor. Indwelling pleural catheters (IPCs) relieve symptoms but increase the risk of pleural infection. We reviewed cases of pleural infection in patients with IPCs for MPE from six UK centers between January 1, 2005, and January 31, 2014.nnnMETHODSnSurvival in patients with pleural infection was compared with 788 patients with MPE (known as the LENT [pleural fluid lactate dehydrogenase, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, serum neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, and tumor type] cohort) and with national statistics.nnnRESULTSnOf 672 IPCs inserted, 25 (3.7%) became infected. Most patients (20 of 25) had mesothelioma or lung cancer. Median survival in the pleural infection cohort appeared longer than in the LENT cohort, although this result did not achieve significance (386 days vs 132 days; hazard ratio, 0.67; P = .07). Median survival with mesothelioma and pleural infection was twice as long as national estimates for mesothelioma survival (753 days vs < 365 days) and double the median survival of patients with mesothelioma in the LENT cohort (339 days; 95% CI, nonoverlapping). Survival with lung and breast cancer did not differ significantly between the groups. Sixty-one percent of patients experienced early infection. There was no survival difference between patients with early and late infection (P = .6).nnnCONCLUSIONSnThis small series of patients with IPCs for MPE suggests pleural infection may be associated with longer survival, particularly in patients with mesothelioma. Results did not achieve significance, and a larger study is needed to explore this relationship further and investigate whether the local immune response, triggered by infection, is able to modulate mesothelioma progression.
Seminars in Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine | 2014
Mark Slade
Pneumothorax refers to the presence of air within the pleural cavity, which may arise from a spontaneous defect in the visceral pleural surface, or through iatrogenic or other thoracic trauma. The most common cause in the developed world is iatrogenic pneumothorax. Most frequently, it can be managed conservatively or through simple pleural aspiration or drainage. A persistent air leak, >2 days duration, develops in one-third of patients. When patients are managed with chest drainage alone, the median time for resolution of air leak is longer in patients with a pneumothorax secondary to an underlying lung disease (11 vs. 7 days). Interventional pulmonology is not usually required for the resolution of simple pneumothorax, but offers important minimally invasive techniques for treating persistent air leak and bronchopleural fistula. Following assessment of the site of the air leak within the bronchial tree, techniques are described for the sealing of leak using tissue or fibrin glues, endobronchial devices of various kinds, and combination approaches. Bronchoscopic sealing of air leaks can often avoid the requirement for thoracic surgical intervention. They may prove life-saving in patients who are difficult to wean from mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation because of catastrophic air leaks.
European Respiratory Journal | 2011
Mark Slade; Najib M. Rahman; Andrew Stanton; L. Curry; Gerry C. Slade; Colin Clelland; Fergus V. Gleeson
Can the detection rate of flexible bronchoscopy for lung cancer be increased by a series of simple quality improvement measures? Bronchoscopy-associated clinical parameters were prospectively recorded between 2001 and 2007 in patients with suspected lung malignancy. The detection rate of bronchoscopy, diagnostic yield of each biopsy modality and the possible impact of different service-improvement measures were assessed. 746 bronchoscopies were performed in 704 patients. The detection rate of bronchoscopy for malignancy was 83.6%, and increased over time (67.3% detection rate in 2001 (95% CI 52.9–79.7), 89.7% detection rate in 2007 (95% CI 81.3–95.2); p<0.001). Detection rate increased for bronchoscopically visible (75.0% in 2001 to 94.5% in 2007) and non-visible tumours (41.7% in 2001 to 81.2% in 2007; p<0.001 for both analyses). Prior computed tomography availability was associated with a higher diagnostic yield that did not reach statistical significance. Logistic regression analysis identified tumour visibility, year of study, use of transbronchial needle aspiration and pathologist identity as independent predictors of a positive diagnosis. A significant increase in bronchoscopic detection rate for malignancy occurred in association with a number of simple improvement measures.
Thorax | 2018
Ian Woolhouse; Lesley Bishop; Liz Darlison; Duneesha de Fonseka; Anthony Edey; John R. Edwards; Corinne Faivre-Finn; Dean A. Fennell; Steve Holmes; Keith M. Kerr; Apostolos Nakas; Tim Peel; Najib M. Rahman; Mark Slade; Jeremy Steele; Selina Tsim; Nick A Maskell
Section 3: Clinical features which predict the presence of mesothelioma nnRecommendations nnSection 4: Staging systems nnRecommendation nnSection 5: Imaging modalities for diagnosing and staging nnRecommendations nnSection 6: Pathological diagnosis nnRecommendations
BMJ Open Respiratory Research | 2018
Ian Woolhouse; Lesley Bishop; Liz Darlison; Duneesha de Fonseka; Anthony Edey; John R. Edwards; Corinne Faivre-Finn; Dean A. Fennell; Steve Holmes; Keith M. Kerr; Apostolos Nakas; Tim Peel; Najib M. Rahman; Mark Slade; Jeremy Steele; Selina Tsim; Nick A Maskell
The full guideline for the investigation and management of malignant pleural mesothelioma is published in Thorax. The following is a summary of the recommendations and good practice points. The sections referred to in the summary refer to the full guideline.