Mark W. Dubin
University of Colorado Boulder
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Mark W. Dubin.
Visual Neuroscience | 1995
A.J. Scheetz; Robert W. Williams; Mark W. Dubin
The influence of postnatal neuronal activity on the magnitude of retinal ganglion cell death has been studied in cats. A constant blockade of activity in one eye starting just after birth does not change the severity of naturally occurring ganglion cell death, and as in normal animals, the ganglion cell population declines from 250,000 to 160,000 over a 4- to 6-week period. However, the population of retinal ganglion cells in the active untreated eye of monocularly deprived cats is increased 12% above normal (180,000 vs. 160,000 in each of four cases). This increase of 20,000 cells is permanent, and presumably reflects the competitive advantage in their target nuclei that the still active axons have over their silenced companions from the treated eye. Surprisingly, in one animal treated successfully for long duration with TTX in both from the population of ganglion cells was elevated in both eyes (200,000 and 208,000 ganglion cells). This increase matches that achieved by early unilateral enucleation (Williams et al., 1983). Our results demonstrate that the complete blockade of activity reduces the severity of naturally occurring cell death in a population of CNS sensory neurons. The effects of unilateral blockade emphasize that the activity-dependent modulation of neuron death only occurs under conditions that do not place the inactive population of neurons at a competitive disadvantage.
Brain Research | 1984
Stephen A. George; D.N. Mastronarde; Mark W. Dubin
Under normal visual stimulation, simultaneous recording from ganglion cells in the retina and from the axons of these cells in the brain revealed activity-dependent differences in the velocity of impulse propagation. In frog ganglion cells, spikes initiated 5-500 ms after a previous impulse showed supernormal increases in conduction velocity of up to 17%; spikes initiated 500-2000 ms after a previous one traveled more slowly than a spike initiated after a long period of rest. Cat ganglion cell impulses showed much smaller supernormality (maximum 3%), but exhibited pronounced slowing due to refractoriness and long-term fatigue associated with their high levels of spontaneous activity.
Brain Research | 1994
A.J. Scheetz; Mark W. Dubin
To determine the cytochemical composition of presynaptic dendrites, we have examined the distribution of synapsin 1, calcium and calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaM-II), microtubule-associated protein 2 (MAP-2) and spectrin in cat lateral geniculate (LGN) class III cells by immune-EM. Special attention was paid to the dendrites of these interneurons because they are both pre- and postsynaptic. The dendritic proteins MAP-2 and RBC spectrin were not observed in interneuron dendrites but these proteins were localized in relay cell dendrites. The synaptic vesicle-associated protein synapsin 1 was present in all synaptic vesicle containing profiles, including dendritic terminals. CaM-II, the major postsynaptic density protein, was found in all dendrites. Thus, the LGN interneuron dendritic compartment displays both axonal and dendritic cytochemical properties. The results suggest the possibility of unique molecular interactions in interneuron dendritic terminals.
Vision Research | 1986
Louisa A. Stark; Mark W. Dubin
A previous study led us to consider the implications of the types of receptive fields found in the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) of neonatal kittens. Thus, we studied cells in the A layers in the LGN of kittens aged 6-29 days using extracellular recording techniques. Peri-stimulus-time-histograms were constructed in response to flashing spots of light centered in the receptive field of each unit. All units studied showed an excitatory response only to light onset (on-center) or light offset (off-center). No units were found which had an excitatory response to both phases of the stimulus (On-Off). Possible differences in classification between this study and that of earlier workers who reported On-Off cells in young kittens are discussed.
The Journal of Neuroscience | 1986
Mark W. Dubin; Louisa A. Stark; Steven M. Archer
The Journal of Comparative Neurology | 1984
David N. Mastronarde; Marcia A. Thibeault; Mark W. Dubin
Science | 1982
Steven M. Archer; Mark W. Dubin; Louisa A. Stark
Nature | 1986
Ronald E. Kalil; Mark W. Dubin; Grayson Scott; Louisa A. Stark
The Journal of Comparative Neurology | 1979
Pamela Raymond Johns; Anne C. Rusoff; Mark W. Dubin
Comprehensive Physiology | 2011
John E. Dowling; Mark W. Dubin