Markku Koskinen
University of Helsinki
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Markku Koskinen.
Science of The Total Environment | 2017
Markku Koskinen; Teemu Tahvanainen; Sakari Sarkkola; Meseret Walle Menberu; Ari Laurén; Tapani Sallantaus; Hannu Marttila; Anna Kaisa Ronkanen; Miia Parviainen; Anne Tolvanen; Harri Koivusalo; Mika Nieminen
Restoration impact of forestry-drained peatlands on runoff water quality and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and nutrient export was studied. Eight catchments were included: three mesotrophic (one undrained control, two treatments), two ombrotrophic (one drained control, one treatment) and three oligotrophic catchments (one undrained control, two treatments). Three calibration years and four post-restoration years were included in the data from seven catchments, for which runoff was recorded. For one mesotrophic treatment catchment only one year of pre-restoration and two years of post-restoration water quality data is reported. Restoration was done by filling in and damming the ditches. Water samples were collected monthly-biweekly during the snow-free period; runoff was recorded continuously during the same period. Water quality was estimated for winter using ratios derived from external data. Runoff for non-recorded periods were estimated using the FEMMA model. A high impact on DOC, nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) was observed in the mesotrophic catchments, and mostly no significant impact in the nutrient-poor catchments. The DOC load from one catchment exceeded 1000kg (restored-ha)-1 in the first year; increase of DOC concentration from 50 to 250mgl-1 was observed in the other mesotrophic treatment catchment. Impact on total nitrogen export of over 30kg (restored-ha)-1 was observed in one fertile catchment during the first year. An impact of over 5kg (restored-ha)-1 on ammonium export was observed in one year in the mesotrophic catchment. Impact on P export from the mesotrophic catchment was nearly 5kg P (restored-ha)-1 in the first year. The results imply that restoration of nutrient-rich forestry-drained peatlands poses significant risk for at least short term elevated loads degrading the water quality in receiving water bodies. Restoration of nutrient-poor peatlands poses a minor risk in comparison. Research is needed regarding the factors behind these risks and how to mitigate them.
Water Air and Soil Pollution | 2016
Annu Kaila; Zaki Asam; Markku Koskinen; Risto Uusitalo; Aino Smolander; Oili Kiikkilä; Sakari Sarkkola; Connie O’Driscoll; Veikko Kitunen; Hannu Fritze; Hannu Nousiainen; Arja Tervahauta; Liwen Xiao; Mika Nieminen
A laboratory column study with peats from four sites from south-central Finland and two sites from blanket peats in the west of Ireland was established to assess the factors contributing to P, N, Fe, and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) transfer to receiving water courses from restored forestry-drained peatlands. The study indicated that the DOC and Fe release from re-wetted peats are likely governed by the amount of Fe in peat and the degree of Fe reduction upon re-wetting. In contrast to our other hypothesis concerning DOC, high degradability of organic matter was not related to high DOC release. Nitrate release was found to largely cease along with oxygen depletion, but ammonium release was considerable from a site with high nitrification potential before wetting. The release of P from anoxic peat was complicated in the sense that it appeared to be controlled by many factors simultaneously. In the nutrient-poor sites, the P release increased following re-wetting, probably because of their high easily soluble peat P content and low Al and Fe content, resulting in high anoxic P mobilization, but limited re-sorption of the mobilized P. Among the three nutrient-rich sites, there was either no P release upon re-wetting or higher P release than from the nutrient-poor sites. Low risk for P release following re-wetting in nutrient-rich sites was associated with low content in peat of easily soluble P and a high molar Fe/P ratio.
Springer International Publishing | 2015
Mika Nieminen; Annu Kaila; Markku Koskinen; Sakari Sarkkola; Hannu Fritze; Eeva Stiina Tuittila; Hannu Nousiainen; Harri Koivusalo; Ari Laurén; Hannu Ilvesniemi; Harri Vasander; Tapani Sallantaus
One of the water quality management practices in forested catchments is to construct wetland buffers between managed areas and recipient water courses. Wetland buffers can be constructed simply by routing runoff from forested areas to natural peatlands and wetlands, or by rewetting lower sections of drained peatlands by filling in or blocking the drainage ditches. The use of natural and restored wetland buffers for reducing nutrient and sediment export from forested catchments, particularly catchments dominated by forestry-drained peatlands, has been studied actively in Finland during the last 15 years. The studies have shown highly variable retention capacity for wetland buffers with different site characteristics and under different environmental conditions. In favorable conditions, high amounts of sediments and adhered mineral elements may be deposited within peat and surface vegetation of the buffer. Dissolved nutrients can be retained biologically into plant and microbial biomasses and chemically into peat. In contrast, nitrogen can also be lost into the atmosphere in gaseous form. In this literature review, we summarize the results of the experiments established on natural and restored wetland buffers in forested catchments in Finland to clarify the different processes and factors controlling their nutrient and sediment retention capacity. We also discuss the limitations and possible negative consequences of using wetland buffers for managing water quality in forested catchments.
Forest Ecology and Management | 2009
Ilkka Korpela; Markku Koskinen; Harri Vasander; Markus Holopainen; Kari Minkkinen
Biogeosciences | 2013
Markku Koskinen; Kari Minkkinen; Paavo Ojanen; M. Kamarainen; Tuomas Laurila; Annalea Lohila
Ecological Engineering | 2011
Markku Koskinen; Tapani Sallantaus; Harri Vasander
Water Air and Soil Pollution | 2015
Mika Nieminen; Markku Koskinen; Sakari Sarkkola; Ari Laurén; Annu Kaila; Oili Kiikkilä; Tiina M. Nieminen; Liisa Ukonmaanaho
Catena | 2016
Maija Lampela; Jyrki Jauhiainen; Iida Kämäri; Markku Koskinen; Topi Tanhuanpää; Annukka Valkeapää; Harri Vasander
Biogeosciences | 2017
Mika Korkiakoski; Juha-Pekka Tuovinen; Mika Aurela; Markku Koskinen; Kari Minkkinen; Paavo Ojanen; Timo Penttilä; Juuso Rainne; Tuomas Laurila; Annalea Lohila
Archive | 2016
Markku Koskinen; Annu Kaila; Zaki-ul-Zaman Asam; Risto Uusitalo; Aino Smolander; Oili Kiikkilä; Sakari Sarkkola; Veikko Kitunen; Hannu Fritze; Hannu Nousiainen; Arja Tervahauta; Liven Xiao; Mika Nieminen