Markus W. Haun
Heidelberg University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Markus W. Haun.
Cancer | 2015
Halina Sklenarova; Arne Krümpelmann; Markus W. Haun; Hans-Christoph Friederich; Johannes Huber; Michael Thomas; Eva C. Winkler; Wolfgang Herzog; Mechthild Hartmann
Cancer not only affects patients but also their caregivers. The objective of the current study was to assess the unmet needs of cancer caregivers and to identify possible predictors of their supportive care needs.
Lung Cancer | 2014
Markus W. Haun; Halina Sklenarova; Matthias Villalobos; Michael Thomas; Anette Brechtel; Bernd Löwe; Wolfgang Herzog; Mechthild Hartmann
OBJECTIVES Lung cancer patients and their partners are prone to high levels of depression and anxiety or severe distress related to the poor prognosis of the illness. However, there remain doubts regarding the extent to which this distress exceeds levels in the general population. This study explored levels of depression and generalized anxiety for comparison with matched data of a representative sample from the general population. Additionally, covariance of distress between the two partners, together with disease-specific components and differences were investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS In a cross-sectional survey, 54 pairs of lung cancer patients and their partners (n=108) were assessed for depression and anxiety, cancer-related distress, unmet needs and disclosure in communication. Comparisons between distress levels of participating couples and matched community-comparisons (n=162) were conducted. Additionally, multilevel analysis for estimating intra-dyadic associations of anxiety and depression was computed. Components of distress, needs and aspects of communication were explored via item mean values. RESULTS Lung cancer patients as well as their partners exhibited significantly higher levels of depression and anxiety when compared to community-based comparison subjects (patients: mean difference of 1.01 for depression with a relative risk (RR) of 4.5 and 0.84 for anxiety with RR=6.1; partners: 1.17 for depression with RR=4.6 and 1.59 for anxiety with RR=7.6). Partial intraclass correlations between patients and partners were weak (PIC=.29 for depression; PIC=.21 for anxiety). Fear of progression emerged as main component of distress for both patients and partners, although differing stressors were described. CONCLUSION Lung cancer-affected couples exhibit levels of depression and anxiety far exceeding those of the general community. In clinical practice, patients and partners should be assessed separately for distress against the background of weak intra-dyadic associations. In cases of significant depression or anxiety, referral for psychosocial treatment is indicated and has been shown to improve quality of life.
Oncologist | 2017
Verena Zimmermann-Schlegel; Mechthild Hartmann; Halina Sklenarova; Wolfgang Herzog; Markus W. Haun
BACKGROUND As persons of trust, community-based physicians providing survivorship care (e.g., general practitioners [GPs]) often serve as the primary contacts for cancer survivors disclosing distress. From the perspective of physicians providing survivorship care for cancer patients, this study explores (a) the accessibility, availability, and potential benefits of psycho-oncology services; (b) whether physicians themselves provide psychosocial support; and (c) predictors for impeded referrals of survivors to services. METHODS In a cross-sectional survey, all GPs and community-based specialists in a defined region were interviewed. In addition to descriptive analyses, categorical data were investigated by applying chi-square tests. Predictors for impeded referrals were explored through logistic regression. RESULTS Of 683 responding physicians, the vast majority stated that survivors benefit from psycho-oncology services (96.8%), but the physicians also articulated that insufficient coverage of psycho-oncology services (90.9%) was often accompanied by impeded referrals (77.7%). A substantial proportion (14.9%) of physicians did not offer any psychosocial support. The odds of physicians in rural areas reporting impeded referrals were 1.91 times greater than the odds of physicians in large urban areas making a similar report (95% confidence interval [1.07, 3.40]). CONCLUSION Most community-based physicians providing survivorship care regard psycho-oncology services as highly beneficial. However, a large number of physicians report tremendous difficulty referring patients. Focusing on those physicians not providing any psychosocial support, health policy approaches should specifically (a) raise awareness of the role of physicians as persons of trust for survivors, (b) highlight the effectiveness of psycho-oncology services, and (c) encourage a proactive attitude toward the assessment of unmet needs and the initiation of comprehensive care. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Community-based physicians providing survivorship care for cancer patients regard psycho-oncology services as a highly reasonable and beneficial addition to medical care. In light of insufficient local coverage with services, difficulties with seamless referrals constitute a major challenge for physicians. Apart from emphasizing the effectiveness of psycho-oncology services and proactive attitudes toward the assessment of unmet needs, future policies should focus on the integration of medical and psychosocial follow-up of cancer survivors, especially in rural areas.
Psychiatrische Praxis | 2012
Markus W. Haun; Henrike Kordy; Matthias Ochs; Jochen Schweitzer; Julika Zwack
OBJECTIVE Assessing long-term effects of a family systems therapy approach (systems therapy methods in acute psychiatry, SYMPA) on occupational stress and interdisciplinary cooperation of team members in three German psychiatric hospitals. METHODS Pre-post-follow-up survey using the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) and Team Climate Inventory (TCI) questionnaires complemented by semi-structured in-depth interviews (N = 56). RESULTS Three years after implementing a family systems therapy approach, experienced work load and staff burnout remain significantly lower than before. Interdisciplinary cooperation was intensified and nursing staff status increased. Following systemic case conceptualisations and interventions the therapeutic alliance moved towards a need-adapted treatment approach. CONCLUSIONS Seven years after implementation, the family systems therapy approach still included significantly lower workload burden, an intensified interdisciplinary cooperation, and a need-adapted treatment orientation that strengthens the alliance between staff and client system.
Family Process | 2013
Kirsten von Sydow; Ruediger Retzlaff; Stefan Beher; Markus W. Haun; Jochen Schweitzer
Family Process | 2013
Ruediger Retzlaff; Kirsten von Sydow; Stefan Beher; Markus W. Haun; Jochen Schweitzer
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews | 2017
Markus W. Haun; Stephanie Estel; Gerta Rücker; Hans-Christoph Friederich; Matthias Villalobos; Michael Thomas; Mechthild Hartmann
European Journal of Cancer Care | 2015
Halina Sklenarova; Markus W. Haun; A. Krümpelmann; Hans-Christoph Friederich; J. Huber; Michael Thomas; E.C. Winkler; Afaf Girgis; Andreas Dinkel; Wolfgang Herzog; Mechthild Hartmann
Onkologie | 2014
Markus W. Haun; Halina Sklenarova; Anette Brechtel; Wolfgang Herzog; Mechthild Hartmann
The Cochrane Library | 2014
Markus W. Haun; Stephanie Estel; Gerta Rücker; Hans-Christoph Friederich; Michael Thomas; Mechthild Hartmann