Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Markus Weiten is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Markus Weiten.


Spine | 2016

Utility of the LevelCheck Algorithm for Decision Support in Vertebral Localization.

Tharindu De Silva; Sheng Fu L Lo; Nafi Aygun; Daniel M. Aghion; Akwasi Boah; Rory J. Petteys; Ali Uneri; M. D. Ketcha; Thomas Yi; Sebastian Vogt; Gerhard Kleinszig; Wei Wei; Markus Weiten; Xiaobu Ye; Ali Bydon; Daniel M. Sciubba; Timothy F. Witham; Jean Paul Wolinsky; Jeffrey H. Siewerdsen

Study Design. An automatic radiographic labeling algorithm called “LevelCheck” was analyzed as a means of decision support for target localization in spine surgery. The potential clinical utility and scenarios in which LevelCheck is likely to be the most beneficial were assessed in a retrospective clinical data set (398 cases) in terms of expert consensus from a multi-reader study (three spine surgeons). Objective. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential utility of the LevelCheck algorithm for vertebrae localization. Summary of Background Data. Three hundred ninety-eight intraoperative radiographs and 178 preoperative computed tomographic (CT) images for patients undergoing spine surgery in cervical, thoracic, lumbar regions. Methods. Vertebral labels annotated in preoperative CT image were overlaid on intraoperative radiographs via 3D-2D registration. Three spine surgeons assessed the radiographs and LevelCheck labeling according to a questionnaire evaluating performance, utility, and suitability to surgical workflow. Geometric accuracy and registration run time were measured for each case. Results. LevelCheck was judged to be helpful in 42.2% of the cases (168/398), to improve confidence in 30.6% of the cases (122/398), and in no case diminished performance (0/398), supporting its potential as an independent check and assistant to decision support in spine surgery. The clinical contexts for which the method was judged most likely to be beneficial included the following scenarios: images with a lack of conspicuous anatomical landmarks; level counting across long spine segments; vertebrae obscured by other anatomy (e.g., shoulders); poor radiographic image quality; and anatomical variations/abnormalities. The method demonstrated 100% geometric accuracy (i.e., overlaid labels within the correct vertebral level in all cases) and did not introduce ambiguity in image interpretation. Conclusion. LevelCheck is a potentially useful means of decision support in vertebral level localization in spine surgery. Level of Evidence: N/A


Proceedings of SPIE | 2014

On the Accuracy of a Video-Based Drill-Guidance Solution for Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery: Preliminary Results

Jessica Magaraggia; Gerhard Kleinszig; Wei Wei; Markus Weiten; Rainer Graumann; Elli Angelopoulou; Joachim Hornegger

Over the last years, several methods have been proposed to guide the physician during reduction and fixation of bone fractures. Available solutions often use bulky instrumentation inside the operating room (OR). The latter ones usually consist of a stereo camera, placed outside the operative field, and optical markers directly attached to both the patient and the surgical instrumentation, held by the surgeon. Recently proposed techniques try to reduce the required additional instrumentation as well as the radiation exposure to both patient and physician. In this paper, we present the adaptation and the first implementation of our recently proposed video camera-based solution for screw fixation guidance. Based on the simulations conducted in our previous work, we mounted a small camera on a drill in order to recover its tip position and axis orientation w.r.t our custom-made drill sleeve with attached markers. Since drill-position accuracy is critical, we thoroughly evaluated the accuracy of our implementation. We used an optical tracking system for ground truth data collection. For this purpose, we built a custom plate reference system and attached reflective markers to both the instrument and the plate. Free drilling was then performed 19 times. The position of the drill axis was continuously recovered using both our video camera solution and the tracking system for comparison. The recorded data covered targeting, perforation of the surface bone by the drill bit and bone drilling. The orientation of the instrument axis and the position of the instrument tip were recovered with an accuracy of 1:60 +/- 1:22° and 2:03 +/- 1:36 mm respectively.


medical image computing and computer assisted intervention | 2015

A Portable Intra-Operative Framework Applied to Distal Radius Fracture Surgery

Jessica Magaraggia; Wei Wei; Markus Weiten; Gerhard Kleinszig; Sven Y. Vetter; Jochen Franke; Karl Barth; Elli Angelopoulou; Joachim Hornegger

Fractures of the distal radius account for about 15% of all extremity fractures. To date, open reduction and internal plate fixation is the standard operative treatment. During the procedure, only fluoroscopic images are available for the planning of the screw placement and the monitoring of the instrument trajectory. Complications arising from malpositioned screws can lead to revision surgery. With the aim of improving screw placement accuracy, we present a prototype framework for fully intra-operative guidance that simplifies the planning transfer. Planning is performed directly intra-operatively and expressed in terms of screw configuration w.r.t the used implant plate. Subsequently, guidance is provided solely by a combination of locally positioned markers and a small camera placed on the surgical instrument that allows real-time position feedback. We evaluated our framework on 34 plastic bones and 3 healthy forearm cadaver specimens. In total, 146 screws were placed. On bone phantoms, we achieved an accuracy of 1.02i¾?±i¾?0.57mm, 3.68i¾?±i¾?4.38i¾? and 1.77i¾?±i¾?1.38i¾? in the screw tip position and orientation azimuth and elevation respectively. On forearm specimens, we achieved a corresponding accuracy of 1.63i¾?±i¾?0.91mm, 5.85i¾?±i¾?4.93i¾? and 3.48i¾?±i¾?3.07i¾?. Our analysis shows that our framework has the potential for improving the accuracy of the screw placement compared to the state of the art.


Archive | 2015

MOBILE MEDICAL APPARATUS

Karl Barth; Alexander Gemmel; Sultan Haider; Gerhard Kleinszig; Wei Wei; Markus Weiten


computer assisted radiology and surgery | 2017

Design and evaluation of a portable intra-operative unified-planning-and-guidance framework applied to distal radius fracture surgery

Jessica Magaraggia; Wei Wei; Markus Weiten; Gerhard Kleinszig; Sven Y. Vetter; Jochen Franke; Adrian John; Adrian Egli; Karl Barth; Elli Angelopoulou; Joachim Hornegger


Archive | 2017

Mobile x-ray machine

Alexander Gemmel; Gerhard Kleinszig; Wei Wei; Markus Weiten


Archive | 2017

MEDICAL APPARATUS AND METHOD OF CONTROLLING A MEDICAL APPARATUS

Alexander Gemmel; Hans Schweizer; Wei Wei; Markus Weiten


Archive | 2017

Röntgenbilddetektor und Röntgenbildgebungsgerät mit einer Kollisionserkennungseinheit sowie Verfahren zum Erkennen einer Kollision

Alexander Gemmel; Gerhard Kleinszig; Verena Schmidt; Markus Weiten


Archive | 2017

Steuern eines medizintechnischen Geräts

Alexander Gemmel; Hans Schweizer; Wei Wei; Markus Weiten


Archive | 2014

Mobiles medizinisches Gerät Portable medical device

Sultan Haider; Karl Barth; Alexander Gemmel; Gerhard Kleinszig; Wei Wei; Markus Weiten

Collaboration


Dive into the Markus Weiten's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Elli Angelopoulou

University of Erlangen-Nuremberg

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Joachim Hornegger

University of Erlangen-Nuremberg

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge