Marlís González-Fernández

Does Patient Perception of Pain Control Affect Patient Satisfaction Across Surgical Units in a Tertiary Teaching Hospital

In this study, the relationship between patients’ perceptions of pain control during hospitalization and their overall satisfaction with care was examined. Satisfaction data were collected from the federally mandated Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey for 4349 adult patients admitted to any surgical unit over an 18-month period. Patients’ perceptions of pain control and staff’s efforts to control pain were associated with their overall satisfaction scores. These perceptions varied widely among services and nursing units. Interestingly, patient satisfaction was more strongly correlated with the perception that caregivers did everything they could to control pain than with pain actually being well controlled. The odds of a patient being satisfied were 4.86 times greater if pain was controlled and 9.92 times greater if the staff performance was appropriate. Hospitals may improve their patients’ satisfaction by focusing on improving the culture of pain management.

Supratentorial Regions of Acute Ischemia Associated With Clinically Important Swallowing Disorders. A Pilot Study

Background and Purpose— Dysphagia is a common problem after stroke associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Except for patients with brain stem strokes, particularly lateral medullary strokes, it is difficult to predict which cases are likely to develop swallowing dysfunction based on their neuroimaging. Clear models of swallowing control and integration of cortico-bulbar input have not been defined and the role of subcortical structures is unclear. The purpose of this study was to identify supratentorial regions of interest (ROIs) that might be related to clinically important dysphagia in acute stroke patients, focusing on subcortical structures. Methods— We studied 29 acute supratentorial ischemic stroke cases admitted to our institution between 2001 and 2005 diagnoses with first ischemic stroke and without history of swallowing dysfunction. Subjects had MRI within 24 hours. Cases were defined as those subjects who were diagnosed as dysphagic after clinical evaluation by a speech language pathologist (SLP) and whose dysphagia was considered clinically significant, ie, requiring treatment by diet modification. Controls were defined as those patients who: (1) passed the stroke unit’s dysphagia screening, (2) had a clinical evaluation by SLP that did not result in a diagnosis of dysphagia or diet modifications, or (3) had no documented evidence of dysphagia evaluation or treatment during hospitalization and were discharged on a regular diet. A trained technician, blinded to case–control status, examined 12 ROIs for dysfunctional tissue in diffusion and perfusion-weighted images. The odds ratio (OR) of dysphagia was calculated for each ROI. Logistic regression models were used to adjust for stroke severity (NIHSS) and volume. Results— Analysis of data on 14 cases and 15 controls demonstrated significant differences in the unadjusted odds of dysphagia for the following ROIs: (1) primary somatosensory, motor, and motor supplementary areas (PSSM; OR=10, P=0.009); (2) orbitofrontal cortex (OFC; OR=6.5, P=0.04); (3) putamen, caudate, basal ganglia (PCBG; OR=5.33, P=0.047); and (4) internal capsule (IC; OR=26; P=0.005). Nonsignificant differences were found in the insula and temporopolar cortex. Adjusted OR of dysphagia for subjects with strokes affecting the IC was 17.8 (P=0.03). Adjusted odds ratios for the PSSM, OFC, and PCBG were not statistically significant. Conclusion— Significantly increased odds of dysphagia were found in subjects with IC involvement. Other supratentorial areas that may be associated with dysphagia include the PSSM, OFC, and PCBG. Analysis of additional areas was limited by the number of subjects in our sample. Future studies with larger sample size are feasible and will contribute to the development of a full swallowing control model.Background—Dysphagia is a common problem after stroke associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Except for patients with brain stem strokes, particularly lateral medullary strokes, it is difficult to predict which cases are likely to develop swallowing dysfunction based on their neuroimaging. Clear models of swallowing control and integration of cortico-bulbar input have not been defined and the role of subcortical structures is unclear. Objective—To identify supratentorial regions of interest (ROIs) that might be related to clinically important dysphagia in acute stroke patients, focusing on subcortical structures. Methods—We studied 29 acute supratentorial ischemic stroke cases admitted to our institution between 2001 and 2005 diagnoses with first ischemic stroke and without history of swallowing dysfunction. Subjects had magnetic resonance imaging within 24 hours. Cases were defined as those subjects who were diagnosed as dysphagic after clinical evaluation by a speech language pathologist (SLP) and whose dysphagia was considered clinically significant i.e., requiring treatment by diet modification. Controls were defined as those patients who: (1) passed the stroke unit’s dysphagia screening, (2) had a clinical evaluation by SLP that did not result in a diagnosis of dysphagia or diet modifications, or (3) had no documented evidence of dysphagia evaluation or treatment during hospitalization and were discharged on a regular diet. A trained technician, blinded to case-control status, examined 12 ROIs for dysfunctional tissue in diffusion and perfusion-weighted images. The odds ratio (OR) of dysphagia was calculated for each ROI. Logistic regression models were used to adjust for stroke severity (NIHSS) and volume. Results—Analysis of data on 14 cases and 15 controls demonstrated significant differences in the unadjusted odds of dysphagia for the following ROIs: 1) primary somatosensory, motor and motor supplementary areas (PSSM) (OR=10, p=0.009); 2) orbitofrontal cortex (OFC)(OR=6.5, p=0.04); 3) putamen, caudate, basal ganglia (PCBG)(OR=5.33, p=0.047); and 4) internal capsule (IC)(OR=26; p=0.005). Non-significant differences were found in the insula and temporopolar cortex. Adjusted OR of dysphagia for subjects with strokes affecting the IC was 17.8 (p=0.03). Adjusted odds ratios for the PSSM, OFC, and PCBG were not statistically significant. Conclusion—Significantly increased odds of dysphagia were found in subjects with IC involvement. Other supratentorial areas that may be associated with dysphagia include the PSSM, OFC, and PCBG. Analysis of additional areas was limited by the number of subjects in our sample. Future studies with larger sample size are feasible and will contribute to the development of a full swallowing control model.

Human Hyolaryngeal Movements Show Adaptive Motor Learning During Swallowing

The hyoid bone and larynx elevate to protect the airway during swallowing. However, it is unknown whether hyolaryngeal movements during swallowing can adjust and adapt to predict the presence of a persistent perturbation in a feed-forward manner (adaptive motor learning). We investigated adaptive motor learning in nine healthy adults. Electrical stimulation was administered to the anterior neck to reduce hyolaryngeal elevation, requiring more strength to swallow during the perturbation period of this study. We assessed peak hyoid bone and laryngeal movements using videofluoroscopy across thirty-five 5-ml water swallows. Evidence of adaptive motor learning of hyolaryngeal movements was found when (1) participants showed systematic gradual increases in elevation against the force of electrical stimulation and (2) hyolaryngeal elevation overshot the baseline (preperturbation) range of motion, showing behavioral aftereffects, when the perturbation was unexpectedly removed. Hyolaryngeal kinematics demonstrates adaptive, error-reducing movements in the presence of changing and unexpected demands. This is significant because individuals with dysphagia often aspirate due to disordered hyolaryngeal movements. Thus, if rapid motor learning is accessible during swallowing in healthy adults, patients may be taught to predict the presence of perturbations and reduce errors in swallowing before they occur.

A Multi-Center Analysis Evaluating Factors Associated with Spinal Cord Stimulation Outcome in Chronic Pain Patients

BACKGROUND In addition to its conventional use as a treatment for refractory neuropathic extremity pain, spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has recently emerged as a possible treatment for visceral and arthritic pain. But concurrent with the expansion of possible conditions amenable to SCS, other studies have questioned the long-term efficacy of SCS for traditional indications. These disparate findings argue strongly for the refinement of selection criteria. The purpose of this study is to identify correlates of outcome for SCS. METHODS Data were retrospectively collected on 244 patients who underwent a SCS trial at two academic medical centers. Success was predefined as ≥50% pain relief sustained for ≥6 months. Variables analyzed for their association with outcome included demographics, location of pain, diagnosis, presence of coexisting diseases, pain descriptors, opioid and adjuvant medication use, duration and pain relief during trial, and complications. RESULTS The presence of allodynia and/or hyperalgesia correlated with both a positive SCS trial (P = 0.01) and long-term implantation outcome (P = 0.05). History of substance abuse was associated with a negative permanent SCS outcome (P = 0.05) but bore no relationship to trial results. The variable most strongly associated with an SCS outcome was experiencing <50% pain relief during the trial, which strongly presaged a negative result (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Although weak associations with outcome were noted for several clinical variables, none was strongly associated with trial and permanent implantation results. The strongest predictor of a negative SCS outcome was obtaining <50% pain relief during the trial period.

Dysphagia in Stroke and Neurologic Disease

Dysphagia is a common problem in neurologic disease. The authors describe rates of dysphagia in selected neurologic diseases, and the evaluation and treatment of dysphagia in this population. Applicable physiology and aspects of neural control are reviewed. The decision-making process to determine oral feeding versus alternative means of alimentation is examined.

A Lean Six Sigma Quality Improvement Project to Increase Discharge Paperwork Completeness for Admission to a Comprehensive Integrated Inpatient Rehabilitation Program

Lean Six Sigma (LSS) process analysis can be used to increase completeness of discharge summary reports used as a critical communication tool when a patient transitions between levels of care. The authors used the LSS methodology as an intervention to improve systems process. Over the course of the project, 8 required elements were analyzed in the discharge paperwork. The authors analyzed the discharge paperwork of patients (42 patients preintervention and 143 patients postintervention) of a comprehensive integrated inpatient rehabilitation program (CIIRP). Prior to this LSS project, 61.8% of required discharge elements were present. The intervention improved the completeness to 94.2% of the required elements. The percentage of charts that were 100% complete increased from 11.9% to 67.8%. LSS is a well-established process improvement methodology that can be used to make significant improvements in complex health care workflow issues. Specifically, the completeness of discharge documentation required for transition of care to CIIRP can be improved.

Racial Disparities in the Development of Dysphagia After Stroke: Analysis of the California (MIRCal) and New York (SPARCS) Inpatient Databases

OBJECTIVES To determine whether the proportion of patients with stroke experiencing dysphagia differs among racial groups and whether this relation can be explained by stroke type or severity. DESIGN Case-control study using Californias Medical Information Reporting and New Yorks Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System databases for 2002. Cases had primary diagnosis of cerebrovascular disease (International Classification of Disease, 9th Revision [ICD-9] codes 430-438.9, excluding transient [435-435.9] and late-effects [438-438.9]), and self-identified race was white, black, or Asian. Two comparison groups were selected: (1) Parkinsons disease (ICD-9 codes 332-332.1) and (2) oral cancer (ICD-9 codes 141-149). SETTING Inpatient admissions in the respective states. PARTICIPANTS Cases with primary diagnosis of cerebrovascular disease whose self-identified race was white, black, or Asian. INTERVENTIONS Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Dysphagia, defined by ICD-9 codes 787.2 (dysphagia), 507.0 (aspiration pneumonia), or presence of a feeding tube in the absence of a diagnosis of coma (Current Procedural Terminology codes 432.46 or 437.50 without ICD-9 code 780.01). RESULTS In the stroke group, the adjusted odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for dysphagia was significantly higher for Asians than whites in New York (OR=1.64; 95% CI, 1.50-1.79) and California (OR=1.69; 95% CI, 1.34-2.13). The adjusted OR was slightly but significantly higher for blacks than whites in New York (OR=1.15; 95% CI, 1.03-1.28), but not in California (OR=1.08; 95% CI, 0.97-1.19). No statistically significant differences among racial groups were found in patients with Parkinsons disease or oral cancer. Other factors strongly associated with dysphagia included hemiplegia (OR=2.19; 95% CI, 2.07-2.32) and aphasia (OR=1.97; 95% CI, 1.83-2.11). CONCLUSIONS Asians were more likely to have dysphagia after stroke. This association was statistically significant after adjusting for age, sex, stroke severity indicators, comorbidities, and stroke type.

Formal Education, Socioeconomic Status, and the Severity of Aphasia After Stroke

OBJECTIVE To determine the role of education and socioeconomic status on the severity of aphasia after stroke. DESIGN Cross-sectional study. SETTING Stroke units of 2 affiliated medical centers. PARTICIPANTS Stroke patients (n=173) within 24 hours of symptom development and hospitalized controls (n=62) matched for age, education, and socioeconomic status (SES) with normative brain magnetic resonance imaging. INTERVENTIONS Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Percent error on 9 language tasks (auditory and written comprehension, naming [oral, written, and tactile], oral reading, oral spelling, written spelling, and repetition). Education was recorded in years and dichotomized as less than 12 years or 12 years and above for data analysis. Demographic characteristics (age, sex, race) and stroke volume were recorded for adjustment. SES was obtained from census tract data as 2 variables: mean neighborhood household income and family income. RESULTS The percentage of errors for participants with 12 or more years of education was significantly lower for auditory and written comprehension, written naming, oral reading, oral spelling, and written spelling of fifth grade vocabulary words, even after adjusting for age, sex, stroke volume, and SES. CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest that even once learned, access to written word forms may become less vulnerable to disruption by stroke with increasing years of education.

Validation of ICD-9 Code 787.2 for Identification of Individuals with Dysphagia from Administrative Databases

The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of dysphagia coding using the International Classification of Diseases version 9 (ICD-9) code 787.2. We used the administrative database of a tertiary hospital and sequential videofluorographic swallowing study (VFSS) reports for patients admitted to the same hospital from January to June 2007. The VFSS reports were abstracted and the hospital’s database was queried to abstract the coding associated with the admission during which the VFSS was performed. The VFSS and administrative data were merged for data analysis. Dysphagia was coded (using code 787.2) in 36 of 168 cases that had a VFSS. Of these, 34 had dysphagia diagnosed by VFSS (our gold standard) and one had a prior history of dysphagia. Code 787.2 had sensitivity of 22.8, specificity of 89.5, and positive and negative predictive values of 94.4 and 12.9, respectively. Dysphagia was largely undercoded in this database, but when the code was present those individuals were very likely to be dysphagic. Selection of dysphagic cases using the ICD-9 code is appropriate for within-group comparisons. Absence of the code, however, is not a good predictor of the absence of dysphagia.

Factors associated with swallowing assessment after oral endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation for acute lung injury

RATIONALE Endotracheal intubation is associated with postextubation swallowing dysfunction, but no guidelines exist for postextubation swallowing assessments. OBJECTIVES We evaluated the prevalence, patient demographic and clinical factors, and intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital organizational factors associated with swallowing assessment after oral endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation in patients with acute lung injury (ALI). METHODS We performed a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study in which investigators evaluated 178 eligible patients with ALI who were mechanically ventilated via oral endotracheal tube. The patients were recruited from 13 ICUs at four teaching hospitals in Baltimore, Maryland. Patient demographic and clinical factors, types of ICU, and hospital study sites were evaluated for their association with completion of a swallowing assessment both in the ICU and after the ICU stay before hospital discharge. Factors significantly associated with a swallow assessment were evaluated in a multivariable logistic regression model. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Before hospital discharge, 79 (44%) patients completed a swallowing assessment, among whom 59 (75%) had their assessments initiated in ICU and 20 (25%) had their assessments initiated on the hospital ward. Female sex (odds ratio [OR] = 2.01; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 1.03-3.97), orotracheal intubation duration (OR = 1.13 per day; 95% CI = 1.05-1.22), and hospital study site (Site 3: OR = 2.41; 95% CI = 1.00-5.78) were independently associated with swallowing assessment. Although Site 3 had a twofold increase in swallowing assessments in the ICU, there was no significant difference between hospitals in the frequency of swallowing assessments completed after ICU discharge (P = 0.287) or in the proportion of patients who failed a swallowing assessment conducted in the ICU (P = 0.468) or on the ward (P = 0.746). CONCLUSIONS In this multisite prospective study, female sex, intubation duration, and hospital site were associated with postextubation swallowing assessment. These results demonstrate variability in practice patterns between institutions and highlight the need to determine the appropriate timing and indications for swallowing assessment and to more fully understand swallowing dysfunction after intubation.