Marnie MacKinnon

Increasing participation in colorectal cancer screening: results from a cluster randomized trial of directly mailed gFOBT kits to previous nonresponders.

Regular screening using guaiac fecal occult blood test (gFOBT) reduces mortality from colorectal cancer (CRC). The objective of this study was to determine whether the addition of a gFOBT kit to a second mailed invitation compared to a second mailed invitation alone increases CRC screening among eligible persons who did not respond to an initial mailed invitation. We conducted a cluster randomized controlled trial, with the physician as the unit of randomization. Participants were persons who had been invited but who had not responded to an invitation for CRC screening in an earlier pilot project. The intervention group received a mailed gFOBT kit and second mailed CRC screening invitation (n = 2,008) while the control group received a second mailed CRC screening invitation alone (n = 1,586). The primary outcome was the uptake of gFOBT within 6 months of the second mailing. We found that the uptake of gFOBT was more than twice as high in the intervention group (20.1%) compared to the control group (9.6%). The absolute difference between the two groups was 10.5% (95% CI: 7.5–13.4%, p ≤ 0.0001). In a subsequent adjusted analysis, participants in the intervention group were twice as likely to complete the test as those in the control group (OR = 2.1; 95% CI: 1.6–2.6). These findings suggest that directly mailed gFOBT kits increase CRC screening participation among previous nonresponders to a mailed invitation and that approximately 10 gFOBT kits would have to be sent by mail in order to screen 1 additional person. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01629004).

Cost trajectories for cancer patients

BACKGROUND Health care spending is known to be highly skewed, with a small subset of the population consuming a disproportionate amount of health care resources. Patients with cancer are high-cost users because of high incremental health care costs for treatment and the growing prevalence of cancer. The objectives of the present study included characterizing cancer-patient trajectories by cost, and identifying the patient and health system characteristics associated with high health system costs after cancer treatment. METHODS This retrospective cohort study identified Ontario adults newly diagnosed with cancer between 1 April 2009 and 30 September 2010. Costs of health care use before, during, and after cancer episodes were used to develop trajectories of care. Descriptive analyses examined differences between the trajectories in terms of clinical and health system characteristics, and a logistic regression approach identified predictors of being a high-cost user after a cancer episode. RESULTS Ten trajectories were developed based on whether patients were high- or low-cost users before and after their cancer episode. The most common trajectory represented patients who were low-cost in the year before cancer, survived treatment, and continued to be low-cost in the year after cancer (31.4%); stage ii cancer of the male genital system was the most common diagnosis within that trajectory. Regression analyses identified increases in age and in multimorbidity and low continuity of care as the strongest predictors of high-cost status after cancer. CONCLUSIONS Findings highlight an opportunity to proactively identify patients who might transition to high-cost status after cancer treatment and to remediate that transition.

Bridging silos: Delivering integrated care to patients with cancer in Ontario, Canada

The Temmy Latner Centre for Palliative Care, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Canada Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada Enhanced Program Evaluation Unit, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Canada 4 Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada 5 Integrated Care, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Canada Department of Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada Odette Cancer Research Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

Home Palliative Service Utilization and Care Trajectory Among Ontario Residents Dying on Chronic Dialysis

Background: Many patients who receive chronic hemodialysis have a limited life expectancy comparable to that of patients with metastatic cancer. However, patterns of home palliative care use among patients receiving hemodialysis are unknown. Objectives: We aimed to undertake a current-state analysis to inform measurement and quality improvement in palliative service use in Ontario. Methods: We conducted a descriptive study of outcomes and home palliative care use by Ontario residents maintained on chronic dialysis using multiple provincial healthcare datasets. The period of study was the final year of life, for those died between January 2010 and December 2014. Results: We identified 9611 patients meeting inclusion criteria. At death, patients were (median [Q1, Q3] or %): 75 (66, 82) years old, on dialysis for 3.0 (1.0-6.0) years, 41% were women, 65% had diabetes, 29.6% had dementia, and 13.9% had high-impact neoplasms, and 19.9% had discontinued dialysis within 30 days of death. During the last year of life, 13.1% received ⩾1 home palliative services. Compared with patients who had no palliative services, those who received home palliative care visits had fewer emergency department and intensive care unit visits in the last 30 days of life, more deaths at home (17.1 vs 1.4%), and a lower frequency of deaths with an associated intensive care unit stay (8.1 vs 37.8%). Conclusions: Only a small proportion of patients receiving dialysis in Ontario received support through the home palliative care system. There appears to be an opportunity to improve palliative care support in parallel with dialysis care, which may improve patient, family, and health-system outcomes.

Integrated Care Planning for Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review

Introduction: There has been a growing emphasis on the use of integrated care plans to deliver cancer care. However little is known about how integrated care plans for cancer patients are developed including featured core activities, facilitators for uptake and indicators for assessing impact. Methods: Given limited consensus around what constitutes an integrated care plan for cancer patients, a scoping review was conducted to explore the components of integrated care plans and contextual factors that influence design and uptake. Results: Five types of integrated care plans based on the stage of cancer care: surgical, systemic, survivorship, palliative and comprehensive (involving a transition between stages) are described in current literature. Breast, esophageal and colorectal cancers were common disease sites. Multi-disciplinary teams, patient needs assessment and transitional planning emerged as key features. Provider buy-in and training alongside informational technology support served as important facilitators for plan uptake. Provider-level measurement was considerably less robust compared to patient and system-level indicators. Conclusions: Similarities in design features, components and facilitators across the various types of integrated care plans indicates opportunities to leverage shared features and enable a management lens that spans the trajectory of a patient’s journey rather than a phase-specific silo approach to care.

Multidisciplinary cancer conferences as a forum for early identification of patients who can benefit from palliative care.

148 Background: Introducing palliative care early in the cancer journey results in a better quality of life, less aggressive care and longer survival compared to patients receiving standard care. The INTEGRATE Project goal is to identify and manage patients who can benefit from palliative care using the UK Gold Standards Framework Surprise Question (would you be surprised if this person died within the next year?). Multidisciplinary cancer conferences (MCCs) are scheduled meetings for oncology teams to prospectively discuss patient diagnostic tests and treatment options, which were leveraged for the INTEGRATE Project. METHODS A pilot study to test the efficacy of the Surprise Question at MCCs and implementation of a palliative model of care has been implemented in 3 academic and 1 non-academic cancer centres. A survey was completed to identify provider comfort levels in providing palliative care. All sites completed Pallium Canadas LEAP Onco module, which equips providers with skills to provide primary level palliative care. Patients identified at MCCs received advance care planning, symptom management, referrals and standardized reporting to primary care. RESULTS Four disease sites (Lung, GI, CNS and Head & Neck) are participating. A baseline survey showed over 50% of providers had no training in palliative care. 161 providers participated in LEAP Onco. Implementation of the Surprise Question at MCCs began in February 2015. Two months of implementation identified 39 patients at the CNS, Lung and GI disease sites out of 108 of patients reviewed. At the CNS MCC, 100% glioblastoma patients were identified. The Lung and GI disease sites had lower identification rates (27% and 10%, respectively). Identified patients will have their healthcare utilization (referrals to community providers, billing patterns, ER visits) analyzed to determine impact of this project. Implementation continues until 2016. CONCLUSIONS MCCs appear to be an excellent forum for identifying patients who can benefit from a palliative approach to care within the CNS, Lung and GI site groups. Further data is being collected to inform provincial recommendations for broader implementation of palliative care in Ontario.