Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Marquis D. Foreman is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Marquis D. Foreman.


Journal of the American Geriatrics Society | 1994

Delirium in hospitalized older persons : outcomes and predictors

Peter Pompei; Marquis D. Foreman; Mark A. Rudberg; Sharon K. Inouye; Victoria Braund; Christine K. Cassel

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was fourfold: to determine the rate of delirium among hospitalized older persons, to contrast the clinical outcomes of patients with and without delirium, to identify clinical predictors of delirium, and to validate the predictive model in an independent sample of patients.


Journal of the American Geriatrics Society | 2001

A Nurse-Led Interdisciplinary Intervention Program for Delirium in Elderly Hip-Fracture Patients

Koen Milisen; Marquis D. Foreman; Ivo Abraham; Sabina De Geest; Jan Godderis; Erik Vandermeulen; Benjamin Fischler; Herman Delooz; Bart Spiessens; Paul Broos

OBJECTIVES: To develop and test the effect of a nurse‐led interdisciplinary intervention program for delirium on the incidence and course (severity and duration) of delirium, cognitive functioning, functional rehabilitation, mortality, and length of stay in older hip‐fracture patients.


Journal of Gerontological Nursing | 2000

Consequences of Not Recognizing Delirium Superimposed on Dementia in Hospitalized Elderly Individuals

Donna M. Fick; Marquis D. Foreman

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to describe the recognition and management of delirium in hospitalized patients with and without dementia. DESIGN A descriptive, exploratory design was used with a convenience sample of 20 hospitalized older patients who were observed indepth using qualitative interviews and observations of 13 family members and 11 staff members. SETTING This research was conducted on the medical-surgical units of a 550-bed, nonprofit, state-supported teaching hospital in the southeastern United States. The facility provides primary and tertiary care with five intensive care units and eight medical-surgical units. PARTICIPANTS This study did not exclude individuals with dementia or pre-existing delirium. Subjects were not excluded on the basis of race or gender. Twenty patients in the sample underwent observation and mental and functional status testing. Thirteen family members and 11 staff members were interviewed and observed. MEASUREMENTS In Phase 1 of the study, patients had daily mental status testing performed by the investigator. In Phase 2, family members and staff members were interviewed about the confusion event. For each patient, demographics and information regarding their health status and current diagnosis and treatment were obtained. The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Confusion Assessment Method were completed on each subject within 36 hours of being admitted to the hospital. The Cornell Depression Scale and Katz Activities of Daily Living scale were completed within 48 hours of admission. RESULTS The prevalence of delirium in this study was 60%. The incidence, or new onset of delirium, was 30%. The presence of delirium was associated with new onset incontinence, lower baseline MMSE scores, depression, weight loss, and comorbidity. Of the eight individuals with delirium superimposed on dementia, 63% (n = 5) were re-admitted to the hospital within 30 days, compared to none of the individuals with delirium in the absence of dementia. Delirium superimposed on dementia also was less likely to be recognized by nurses and physicians. CONCLUSIONS Delirium in individuals with dementia should be assessed and treated routinely because the failure to recognize delirium superimposed on dementia promptly has significant negative personal, social and financial consequences.


Journal of the American Geriatrics Society | 2006

Detection of delirium by bedside nurses using the confusion assessment method

Joke Lemiengre; Tine Nelis; Etienne Joosten; Tom Braes; Marquis D. Foreman; Chris Gastmans; Koen Milisen

A prospective, descriptive study was used to assess the diagnostic validity of the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) administered at the bedside by nurses in daily practice. Two different scoring methods of the CAM (the specific (SPEC) and sensitive (SENS) methods) were compared with a criterion standard (CAM completed by trained research nurses). During a 5‐month period, all patients consecutively admitted to an acute geriatric ward of the University Hospitals of Leuven (Belgium) were enrolled in the study. The 258 elderly inpatients who were included underwent 641 paired but independent ratings of delirium by bedside and trained research nurses.


Journal of Gerontological Nursing | 2002

Documentation of delirium in elderly patients with hip fracture.

Koen Milisen; Marquis D. Foreman; Bert Wouters; Ronny Driesen; Jan Godderis; Ivo Abraham; Paul Broos

This study determined the accuracy of diagnosis and documentation of delirium in the medical and nursing records of 55 elderly patients with hip fracture (mean age = 78.4, SD = 8.4). These records were reviewed retrospectively on a patients discharge for diagnosis of delirium, and for description of clinical indicators or symptoms of delirium. Additionally, all patients were monitored by one of the research members on days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 12 postoperatively for signs of delirium, as measured by the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM). Clinicians were blinded to the purpose of the study. According to the CAM criteria, the incidence of delirium was 14.5% on postoperative Day 1; 9.1% on postoperative Day 3; 10.9% on postoperative Day 5; 7.7% on postoperative Day 8; and 5.6% on postoperative Day 12. For those same days, no formal diagnosis of delirium or a description of clinical indicators was found in the medical records. In the nursing records, a false-positive documentation of 8.5%, 4%, 4.1%, 4.2%, and 5.9%, respectively was noted. False-negative documentation was found in 87.5%, 80%, 66.7%, 75%, and 50% of the cases on the respective days. Documentation of essential symptoms--namely onset and course of the syndrome--and disturbances in consciousness, attention, and cognition, were seldom or never found in the nursing records. However, behaviors of the hyperactive variant of delirium and which are known to interfere with nursing care were documented more often (e.g., 13.4% restless, 10.3% fidget with materials, 7.2% annoying behavior). Both medical and nursing records showed poor documentation and under-diagnosis of delirium. However, a correct diagnosis and early recognition of delirium may enhance the management of this syndrome.


Journal of Gerontological Nursing | 2001

Delirium in elderly patients: an overview of the state of the science

Marquis D. Foreman; Bonnie Wakefield; Kennith Culp; Koen Milisen

Delirium is a common and potentially preventable and reversible cause of functional disability, morbidity, mortality, and increased health care use among elderly individuals. Much has been learned about delirium in the past decade. Highlighted in this article are recent advances in the diagnosis of delirium, delirium in long-term care, use of health care resources, outcomes of delirium, etiologies, and interventions to prevent and treat delirium. Suggestions for future research also are proposed.


Heart & Lung | 1996

Problems associated with underrecognition of delirium in critical care: A case study

Brenda M. Eden; Marquis D. Foreman

Delirium, a syndrome that results in high morbidity and mortality rates in the elderly, continues to be underrecognized by physicians and nurses. Factors influencing the underrecognition of delirium are specific to individual institutions and their health care providers. The factors leading to the underrecognition of delirium must be identified so that changes can be made to increase early recognition. A case study conducted in a critical care unit in a midwestern hospital from interviews of nurses, chart audit, and patient observation, identified two major problems associated with the lack of recognition of delirium in that institution: (1) lack of knowledge on the part of nurses about the criteria and methods of detecting delirium, and (2) ineffective communication between all staff members in relaying symptoms of onset of the disorder. As a result of this study, staff education, assessment protocols, and improved communication and documentation techniques are indicated as targeted methods for improving recognition and treatment of delirium in this setting. Similar case studies can be performed to evaluate institutional practice, and thereby identify barriers to early recognition of delirium.


Nursing Research | 1986

Acute Confusional States In Hospitalized Elderly: A Research Dilemma

Marquis D. Foreman

This article reviews the literature on acute confusional states, including classification, incidence and prevalence, etiology, psychogenetic theories, and implications for nursing.


Geriatric Nursing | 1999

Standard of Practice Protocol: Acute Confusion/Delirium

Marquis D. Foreman; Lorraine C. Mion; Lark Tryostad; Kathleen Fletcher

Acute confusion, also known as delirium, is a prevalent disorder that contributes to poor outcomes of care. Because of their inability to think clearly, delirious patients are unable to care for themselves and often exhibit unsafe behaviors, resulting in an increased use of physical and pharmacologic restraints. Consequently, the goal of this article is to delineate prevention and treatment guidelines for acutely confused patients and thereby improve nursing care for this vulnerable patient population.


Journal of Gerontological Nursing | 1992

DIAGNOSTIC DILEMMA: Cognitive Impairment in the Elderly

Marquis D. Foreman; Regina Grabowski

Cognitive impairment is a significant health problem for the elderly and is associated with severe negative consequences: higher morbidity and mortality and a diminished capacity to care for self. The accurate diagnosis of acute confusion, dementia, and depression depends on the routine, systematic, and comprehensive assessment of cognition, best achieved through the use of a mental status questionnaire and a behavioral rating scale. Nonspecific clinical features, atypical and variable presentations of symptomatology, and the frequent coexistence of acute confusion, dementia, and depression make an accurate diagnosis of the specific form of cognitive impairment difficult. The primary cognition disorder in acute confusion is that of attention, memory with dementia, and mood with depression.

Collaboration


Dive into the Marquis D. Foreman's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Koen Milisen

Catholic University of Leuven

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Paul Broos

Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sabina De Geest

Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jan Godderis

Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mary Ann Anderson

University of Illinois at Chicago

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Donna M. Fick

Pennsylvania State University

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge