Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Marshall M. Joffe is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Marshall M. Joffe.


Kidney International | 2009

Factors other than glomerular filtration rate affect serum cystatin C levels.

Lesley A. Stevens; Christopher H. Schmid; Tom Greene; Liang Li; Gerald J. Beck; Marshall M. Joffe; Marc Froissart; John W. Kusek; Yaping (Lucy) Zhang; Josef Coresh; Andrew S. Levey

Cystatin C is an endogenous glomerular filtration marker hence its serum level is affected by the glomerular filtration rate (GFR). To study what other factors might affect it blood level we performed a cross-sectional analysis of 3418 patients which included a pooled dataset of clinical trial participants and a clinical population with chronic kidney disease. The serum cystatin C and creatinine levels were related to clinical and biochemical parameters and errors-in-variables models were used to account for errors in GFR measurements. The GFR was measured as the urinary clearance of 125I-iothalamate and 51Cr-EDTA. Cystatin C was determined at a single laboratory while creatinine was standardized to reference methods and these were 2.1+/-1.1 mg/dL and 1.8+/-0.8 mg/L, respectively. After adjustment for GFR, cystatin C was 4.3% lower for every 20 years of age, 9.2% lower for female gender but only 1.9% lower in blacks. Diabetes was associated with 8.5% higher levels of cystatin C and 3.9% lower levels of creatinine. Higher C-reactive protein and white blood cell count and lower serum albumin were associated with higher levels of cystatin C and lower levels of creatinine. Adjustment for age, gender and race had a greater effect on the association of factors with creatinine than cystatin C. Hence, we found that cystatin C is affected by factors other than GFR which should be considered when the GFR is estimated using serum levels of cystatin C.


Journal of The American Society of Nephrology | 2003

The Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC) Study: Design and Methods

Harold I. Feldman; Lawrence J. Appel; Glenn M. Chertow; Denise Cifelli; Borut Cizman; John T. Daugirdas; Jeffrey C. Fink; Eunice Franklin-Becker; Alan S. Go; L. Lee Hamm; Jiang He; Tom Hostetter; Chi-yuan Hsu; Kenneth Jamerson; Marshall M. Joffe; John W. Kusek; J. Richard Landis; James P. Lash; Edgar R. Miller; Emile R. Mohler; Paul Muntner; Akinlolu Ojo; Mahboob Rahman; Raymond R. Townsend; Jackson T. Wright

Insights into end-stage renal disease have emerged from many investigations but less is known about the epidemiology of chronic renal insufficiency (CRI) and its relationship to cardiovascular disease (CVD). The Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC) Study was established to examine risk factors for progression of CRI and CVD among CRI patients and develop models to identify high-risk subgroups, informing future treatment trials, and increasing application of preventive therapies. CRIC will enroll approximately 3000 individuals at seven sites and follow participants for up to 5 yr. CRIC will include a racially and ethnically diverse group of adults aged 21 to 74 yr with a broad spectrum of renal disease severity, half of whom have diagnosed diabetes mellitus. CRIC will exclude subjects with polycystic kidney disease and those on active immunosuppression for glomerulonephritis. Subjects will undergo extensive clinical evaluation at baseline and at annual clinic visits and via telephone at 6 mo intervals. Data on quality of life, dietary assessment, physical activity, health behaviors, depression, cognitive function, health care resource utilization, as well as blood and urine specimens will be collected annually. (125)I-iothalamate clearances and CVD evaluations including a 12-lead surface electrocardiogram, an echocardiogram, and coronary electron beam or spiral CT will be performed serially. Analyses planned in CRIC will provide important information on potential risk factors for progressive CRI and CVD. Insights from CRIC should lead to the formulation of hypotheses regarding therapy that will serve as the basis for targeted interventional trials focused on reducing the burden of CRI and CVD.


Kidney International | 2009

Original ArticleFactors other than glomerular filtration rate affect serum cystatin C levels

Lesley A. Stevens; Christopher H. Schmid; Tom Greene; Liang Li; Gerald J. Beck; Marshall M. Joffe; Marc Froissart; John W. Kusek; Yaping (Lucy) Zhang; Josef Coresh; Andrew S. Levey

Cystatin C is an endogenous glomerular filtration marker hence its serum level is affected by the glomerular filtration rate (GFR). To study what other factors might affect it blood level we performed a cross-sectional analysis of 3418 patients which included a pooled dataset of clinical trial participants and a clinical population with chronic kidney disease. The serum cystatin C and creatinine levels were related to clinical and biochemical parameters and errors-in-variables models were used to account for errors in GFR measurements. The GFR was measured as the urinary clearance of 125I-iothalamate and 51Cr-EDTA. Cystatin C was determined at a single laboratory while creatinine was standardized to reference methods and these were 2.1+/-1.1 mg/dL and 1.8+/-0.8 mg/L, respectively. After adjustment for GFR, cystatin C was 4.3% lower for every 20 years of age, 9.2% lower for female gender but only 1.9% lower in blacks. Diabetes was associated with 8.5% higher levels of cystatin C and 3.9% lower levels of creatinine. Higher C-reactive protein and white blood cell count and lower serum albumin were associated with higher levels of cystatin C and lower levels of creatinine. Adjustment for age, gender and race had a greater effect on the association of factors with creatinine than cystatin C. Hence, we found that cystatin C is affected by factors other than GFR which should be considered when the GFR is estimated using serum levels of cystatin C.


Journal of The American Society of Nephrology | 2004

Administration of Parenteral Iron and Mortality among Hemodialysis Patients

Harold I. Feldman; Marshall M. Joffe; Bruce M. Robinson; Jill S. Knauss; Borut Cizman; Wensheng Guo; Eunice Franklin-Becker; Gerald Faich

The objective of this study was to evaluate whether the apparent relationship demonstrated in prior studies between iron dosing and mortality in hemodialysis (HD) patients was confounded by incomplete representation of iron dosing and morbidity over time. A cohort study was conducted among 32,566 patients who received at least 1 yr of HD at the Fresenius Medical Corporation dialysis centers during 1996 to 1997. The outcome measure was all-cause mortality through mid-1998. A total of 19 demographic, comorbidity, and laboratory characteristics were available. By proportional hazards analysis, no adverse effect on 2-year survival was found for baseline iron dose over 6 mo of < or = 1000 mg, but statistically significant elevated mortality was demonstrated for iron doses >1000 mg to 1800 mg (adjusted hazards ratio [HR] = 1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01 to 1.17) and >1800 mg (adjusted HR = 1.18; 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.27). However, fitting multivariable models that appropriately account for time-varying measures of iron administration as well as other fixed and time-varying measures of morbidity, the authors found no statistically significant association between any level of iron administration and mortality. This study suggests that previously observed associations between iron administration and higher mortality may have been confounded, and it provides cautious support for the safety of the judicious administration of cumulative iron doses >1000 mg over 6 mo if needed to maintain target hemoglobin levels among patients treated with maintenance HD.


Journal of The American Society of Nephrology | 2007

Hemoglobin Variability and Mortality in ESRD

Wei Yang; Rubeen K. Israni; Steven M. Brunelli; Marshall M. Joffe; Steven Fishbane; Harold I. Feldman

Hemoglobin levels vary substantially over time in hemodialysis patients, and this variability may portend poor outcomes. For a given patient, hemoglobin concentration over time can be described by absolute levels, rate of change, or by the difference between observed level and expected level based on the preceding trend (i.e., seemingly random variability). We investigated the independent associations of these different methods of describing hemoglobin over time with mortality in a retrospective cohort of 34,963 hemodialysis patients. Hemoglobin concentration over time was modeled with linear regression for each subject, and the model was then used to define the subjects absolute level of hemoglobin (intercept), temporal trend in hemoglobin (slope), and hemoglobin variability (residual standard deviation). Survival analyses indicated that each 1g/dl increase in the residual standard deviation was associated with a 33% increase in rate of death, even after adjusting for multiple covariates. Patient characteristics accounted for very little of the variation in our hemoglobin variability metric (R2 = 0.019). We conclude that greater hemoglobin variability is independently associated with higher mortality.


Journal of The American Society of Nephrology | 2005

Race and Electronically Measured Adherence to Immunosuppressive Medications after Deceased Donor Renal Transplantation

Francis L. Weng; Ajay K. Israni; Marshall M. Joffe; Tracey Hoy; Christina Gaughan; Melissa Newman; John D. Abrams; Malek Kamoun; Sylvia E. Rosas; Kevin C. Mange; Brian L. Strom; Kenneth L. Brayman; Harold I. Feldman

Nonadherence to immunosuppressive medications may partly explain the worse allograft outcomes among black recipients of renal transplants. In a prospective cohort study of recipients of deceased donor renal transplants, microelectronic cap monitors were placed on bottles of one immunosuppressive medication to (1) measure average daily percentage adherence during the first posttransplantation year and (2) determine the factors associated with adherence. A total of 278 transplant recipients who provided sufficient microelectronic adherence data were grouped into four categories of average daily percentage adherence: 95 to 100% adherence (41.0% of patients), 80 to 95% adherence (32.4%), 50 to 80% adherence (12.9%), and 0 to 50% adherence (13.7%). In the unadjusted ordinal logistic regression model, black race was associated with decreased adherence (odds ratio [OR], 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.26 to 0.72; P = 0.001). Cause of renal disease, Powerful Others health locus of control, transplant center, and dosing frequency were also associated with adherence. After adjustment for transplant center and dosing frequency, the association between black race and decreased adherence was substantially attenuated (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.38 to 1.14, P = 0.13). Transplant center (P = 0.003) and increased dosing frequency (OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.22 to 0.86, for three or four times per day dosing; OR, 2.35; 95% CI, 1.01 to 5.45, for daily dosing; versus two times per day dosing; P = 0.003) remained independently associated with adherence. Other baseline demographic, socioeconomic, medical, surgical, and psychosocial characteristics were not associated with adherence. The transplant center and dosing frequencies of immunosuppressive medications are associated with adherence and explain a substantial proportion of the race-adherence relationship.


Clinical Journal of The American Society of Nephrology | 2012

Association between Albuminuria, Kidney Function, and Inflammatory Biomarker Profile in CKD in CRIC

Jayanta Gupta; Nandita Mitra; Peter A. Kanetsky; Joe Devaney; Maria R. Wing; Muredach P. Reilly; Vallabh O. Shah; Vaidyanathapura S. Balakrishnan; Nicolas J. Guzman; Matthias Girndt; Brian G. Periera; Harold I. Feldman; John W. Kusek; Marshall M. Joffe; Dominic S. Raj

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Increased risk of mortality in patients with CKD has been attributed to inflammation. However, the association between kidney function, albuminuria, and biomarkers of inflammation has not been examined in a large cohort of CKD patients. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS This study measured the plasma levels of IL-1β, IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1RA), IL-6, TNF-α, TGF-β, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), fibrinogen, and serum albumin in 3939 participants enrolled in the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort study between June 2003 and September 2008. An inflammation score was established based on plasma levels of IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, hs-CRP, and fibrinogen. Estimated GFR (eGFR) and serum cystatin C were used as measures of kidney function. Albuminuria was quantitated by urine albumin to creatinine ratio (UACR). RESULTS Plasma levels of IL-1β, IL-1RA, IL-6, TNF-α, hs-CRP, and fibrinogen were higher among participants with lower levels of eGFR. Inflammation score was higher among those with lower eGFR and higher UACR. In regression analysis adjusted for multiple covariates, eGFR, cystatin C, and UACR were strongly associated with fibrinogen, serum albumin, IL-6, and TNF-α. Each unit increase in eGFR, cystatin C, and UACR was associated with a -1.2% (95% confidence interval, -1.4, -1), 64.9% (56.8, 73.3) and 0.6% (0.4, 0.8) change in IL-6, respectively (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Biomarkers of inflammation were inversely associated with measures of kidney function and positively with albuminuria.


American Journal of Hypertension | 2010

Aortic PWV in chronic kidney disease: A CRIC ancillary study

Raymond R. Townsend; Neil J. Wimmer; Julio A. Chirinos; Afshin Parsa; Matthew R. Weir; Kalyani Perumal; James P. Lash; Jing Chen; Susan Steigerwalt; John M. Flack; Alan S. Go; Mohammed A. Rafey; Mahboob Rahman; Angela Sheridan; Crystal A. Gadegbeku; Nancy Robinson; Marshall M. Joffe

BACKGROUND Aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV) is a measure of arterial stiffness and has proved useful in predicting cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in several populations of patients, including the healthy elderly, hypertensives and those with end-stage renal disease receiving hemodialysis. Little data exist characterizing aortic stiffness in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) who are not receiving dialysis, and in particular the effect of reduced kidney function on aortic PWV. METHODS We performed measurements of aortic PWV in a cross-sectional cohort of participants enrolled in the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC) study to determine factors which predict increased aortic PWV in CKD. RESULTS PWV measurements were obtained in 2,564 participants. The tertiles of aortic PWV (adjusted for waist circumference) were <7.7 m/s, 7.7-10.2 m/s, and >10.2 m/s with an overall mean (+/- s.d.) value of 9.48 +/- 3.03 m/s (95% confidence interval = 9.35-9.61 m/s). Multivariable regression identified significant independent positive associations of age, blood glucose concentrations, race, waist circumference, mean arterial blood pressure, gender, and presence of diabetes with aortic PWV and a significant negative association with the level of kidney function. CONCLUSIONS The large size of this unique cohort, and the targeted enrollment of CKD participants provides an ideal situation to study the role of reduced kidney function as a determinant of arterial stiffness. Arterial stiffness may be a significant component of the enhanced cardiovascular risk associated with kidney failure.


Biometrics | 2009

Related Causal Frameworks for Surrogate Outcomes

Marshall M. Joffe; Tom Greene

SUMMARY Four major frameworks have been developed for evaluating surrogate markers in randomized trials: one based on conditional independence of observable variables, another based on direct and indirect effects, a third based on a meta-analysis, and a fourth based on principal stratification. The first two of these fit into a paradigm we call the causal-effects (CE) paradigm, in which, for a good surrogate, the effect of treatment on the surrogate, combined with the effect of the surrogate on the clinical outcome, allow prediction of the effect of the treatment on the clinical outcome. The last two approaches fall into the causal-association (CA) paradigm, in which the effect of the treatment on the surrogate is associated with its effect on the clinical outcome. We consider the CE paradigm first, and consider identifying assumptions and some simple estimation procedures; we then consider the CA paradigm. We examine the relationships among these approaches and associated estimators. We perform a small simulation study to illustrate properties of the various estimators under different scenarios, and conclude with a discussion of the applicability of both paradigms.


The American Statistician | 2012

Model Selection, Confounder Control, and Marginal Structural Models

Marshall M. Joffe; Thomas R. Ten Have; Harold I. Feldman; Stephen E. Kimmel

In traditional regression modeling, to control for confounding by a variable one must include it in the structural part of the statistical model. Marginal structural models are a flexible new set of causal models. The estimation methods used to estimate model parameters use weighting to control for confounding; this allows more flexibility in choosing covariates for inclusion in the structural model and allows the model to more precisely reflect the scientific questions of interest. An important example of this is in multicenter observational studies where there is confounding by cluster. We illustrate these points with data from a study of surgery to provide vascular access for hemodialysis and a study comparing different timings for coronary angioplasty.

Collaboration


Dive into the Marshall M. Joffe's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Harold I. Feldman

University of Pennsylvania

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John W. Kusek

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Wei Yang

University of Pennsylvania

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Valerie Teal

University of Pennsylvania

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Dawei Xie

University of Pennsylvania

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Dylan S. Small

University of Pennsylvania

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge