Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Marshall T. Schreeder.
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 1997
J. D. Hainsworth; Joan B. Erland; Leonard A. Kalman; Marshall T. Schreeder; F A Greco
PURPOSEnTo evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of a novel chemotherapy combination that includes paclitaxel, carboplatin, and extended-schedule etoposide in the treatment of patients with carcinoma of unknown primary tumor site.nnnPATIENTS AND METHODSnFifty-five patients with carcinoma of unknown primary tumor site were treated with the following regimen, administered every 21 days: paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 by 1-hour intravenous (I.V.) infusion on day 1, carboplatin at an estimated area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of 6.0 on day 1, and etoposide 50 mg alternated with 100 mg orally on days 1 through 10. Responding patients received a total of four courses of treatment. The following histologies were included: adenocarcinoma, 30 patients; poorly differentiated carcinoma (PDC) or poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma (PDA), 21; poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma, three; and squamous carcinoma, one.nnnRESULTSnTwenty-five of 53 assessable patients (47%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 33% to 61%) had major objective responses to treatment (seven complete responses). Response rates were similar in patients with adenocarcinoma versus PDC (45% and 48%, respectively). The actuarial median survival time for the entire group was 13.4 months. The regimen was well tolerated, with only seven hospitalizations for treatment of neutropenia and fever (4% of courses) and no treatment-related deaths.nnnCONCLUSIONnThe combination of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and extended-schedule etoposide is highly active and well tolerated in patients with carcinoma of unknown primary tumor site. Response rates and survival in this multicenter community-based trial compare favorably with all previously studied empiric regimens. In addition, this regimen is substantially less toxic and easier to administer than the cisplatin-based regimens previously used in this setting. If this level of efficacy is confirmed, this treatment should be considered standard first-line therapy in patients with carcinoma of unknown primary tumor site.
Cancer | 2008
Chandra P. Belani; Marshall T. Schreeder; Ronald G. Steis; Richard A. Guidice; Thomas A. Marsland; Elizabeth H. Butler; Suresh S. Ramalingam
Cetuximab, an immunoglobulin (Ig) G1 chimeric monoclonal antibody against the epidermal growth factor receptor, has demonstrated evidence of activity in nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). When administered in combination with carboplatin and docetaxel, a commonly used regimen for advanced NSCLC, cetuximab has exhibited synergistic interaction in preclinical studies. Therefore, a phase 2 study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of the combination of cetuximab, carboplatin, and docetaxel for the treatment of advanced NSCLC.
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | 2012
Robert C.G. Martin; Charles R. Scoggins; Dana Tomalty; Marshall T. Schreeder; Tiffany Metzger; Clifton M. Tatum; Vivek R. Sharma
PurposeThe primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety, tolerance, and pharmacokinetic profile of liver-directed therapy with drug-eluting beads irinotecan (DEBIRI) in combination with systemic modified FOLFOX in the treatment of unresectable liver metastases in chemotherapy-naive patients with colorectal cancer.DesignDEBIRI, loaded with 100xa0mg irinotecan (100–300xa0μm beads), was administered via hepatic artery during the off week of FOLFOX therapy. Primary endpoints were safety, tolerance, systemic dose-limiting toxicities, and pharmacokinetics of systemic irinotecan and its active metabolite SN-38 at each infusion at 1-, 4-, and 24-h post-DEBIRI. Secondary endpoints were response rate and survival.ResultsThe ten patients have undergone at least 12 cycles of FOLFOX in combination with at least two DEBIRI bead treatments during the patients’ off week. Pharmacokinetic data has demonstrated minimal detectable levels of irinotecan (18.6, 21, and 18.6xa0ng/ml) and SN-38 (1.06, 1.47, and 1.55xa0ng/ml) after the first, second, and third DEBIRI treatments, respectively. Currently, there has been only one severe device-related adverse event, a grade 3 hypertensive episode that required 1xa0day of observation in the hospital. The initial 9- and 12-month response rates have been 100xa0% (2 CR, 8 PR). Four (40xa0%) patients were successfully downstaged to resection and/or ablation with a median overall survival of 15.2xa0months.ConclusionConcomitant DEBIRI and FOLFOX±bevacizumab is safe, with a minimal adverse event rate, no dose-limiting toxicities, and enhanced overall response rate.
Journal of Thoracic Oncology | 2007
David R. Spigel; John D. Hainsworth; Lisa Simons; Christina Meng; Howard A. Burris; Denise A. Yardley; Richard Grapski; Marshall T. Schreeder; Padmaja V. Mallidi; F. Anthony Greco
Introduction: The tyrosine kinase KIT has variable expression in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) and may be a prognostic factor. Imatinib targets KIT expression, providing rationale for studying its role in combination with chemotherapy in SCLC in a multicenter phase II trial. Methods: Patients with untreated extensive-stage SCLC received carboplatin area under the concentration-time curve of 4 on day 1; irinotecan 60 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15; and imatinib 600 mg/day. Treatment cycles were 28 days. Patients remained on imatinib until progressive disease or significant toxicity. Results: Between September 2002 and May 2004, 68 patients were enrolled in this multicenter trial. Median age was 60 years (range, 37–81). The objective response rate was 66% (95% confidence interval: 54%–76%). Median progression-free survival was 5.4 months (95% CI: 4.3–6.0 months). Median overall survival was 8.4 months (95% CI: 6.3–10.5 months). Thirty-five percent of patients were alive at 1 year. Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity included neutropenia (43%), anemia (16%), and thrombocytopenia (9%). Grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity included diarrhea (19%), fatigue (24%), and nausea (26%). Forty-eight of 56 patients (86%) with available tumor specimens had KIT expression detected. KIT expression did not appear to correlate with progression-free survival or overall survival in a retrospective analysis. Conclusions: Irinotecan, carboplatin, and imatinib is a safe and generally well-tolerated regimen in patients with SCLC. However, the addition of imatinib did not improve results from those expected with chemotherapy alone.
Cancer | 2015
Robert C.G. Martin; Charles R. Scoggins; Marshall T. Schreeder; William S. Rilling; Christopher J. Laing; Clifton M. Tatum; Lawrence R. Kelly; Ricardo García-Mónaco; Vivek R. Sharma; Todd S. Crocenzi; Steven M. Strasberg
Reports have demonstrated the superior activity of combining both irinotecan and oxaliplatin (FOLFOXIRI) therapy. An option for gaining similar benefits with less toxicity would be the administration of irinotecan through a hepatic artery approach. The aim of this study was to assess the response and adverse event rates for irinotecan drug‐eluting beads (DEBIRI) with folinic acid, 5‐fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) and bevacizumab as a first‐line treatment for unresectable colorectal liver metastasis.
Cancer | 2008
John D. Hainsworth; David R. Spigel; John H. Barton; Cindy Farley; Marshall T. Schreeder; Jeremy K. Hon; F. Anthony Greco
The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of weekly bortezomib in the treatment of patients with recurrent/refractory multiple myeloma.
ASCO Meeting Abstracts | 2012
Richard R. Furman; Jacqueline Barrientos; Jeff Porter Sharman; Sven de Vos; John P. Leonard; Steven Coutre; Marshall T. Schreeder; Nina D. Wagner-Johnston; Thomas E. Boyd; Nathan Fowler; Ian W. Flinn; Ralph V. Boccia; Leanne Holes; Brian Joseph Lannutti; Dave Johnson; Thomas M. Jahn; Langdon L. Miller
Cancer | 2000
F. Anthony Greco; Howard A. Burris; Joan B. Erland; James R. Gray; Leonard A. Kalman; Marshall T. Schreeder; John D. Hainsworth
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2007
Chandra P. Belani; Suresh S. Ramalingam; Marshall T. Schreeder; Ronald G. Steis; R. Guidice; T. Marshland; B. Butler
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2005
Eric Raefsky; David R. Spigel; F. A. Greco; Denise A. Yardley; J. E. Bradof; D. V. Woytowitz; Marshall T. Schreeder; W. H. Liggett; J. D. Zubkus; D. Petrone; J. D. Hainsworth