Martin Brecher

Efficacy and safety of quetiapine in combination with lithium or divalproex for maintenance of patients with bipolar I disorder (international trial 126)

BACKGROUND This study examined the efficacy and safety of quetiapine in combination with lithium or divalproex compared with placebo with lithium or divalproex in the prevention of recurrent mood events in bipolar I patients, most recent episode mania, depression, or mixed. METHODS Patients received open-label quetiapine (400-800 mg/day; flexible, divided doses) with lithium or divalproex (target serum concentrations 0.5-1.2 mEq/L and 50-125 microg/mL, respectively) for up to 36 weeks to achieve at least 12 weeks of clinical stability. Patients were subsequently randomized to double-blind treatment with quetiapine (400-800 mg/day) plus lithium/divalproex or placebo plus lithium/divalproex for up to 104 weeks. The primary endpoint was time to recurrence of any mood event. RESULTS Treatment with quetiapine in combination with lithium/divalproex significantly increased the time to recurrence of any mood event compared with placebo plus lithium/divalproex. The proportion of patients having a mood event was markedly lower in the quetiapine than in the placebo group (18.5% versus 49.0%). The hazard ratio for time to recurrence of a mood event was 0.28 (P<0.001), a mania event 0.30 (P<0.001), and a depression event 0.26 (P<0.001) corresponding to risk reductions of 72%, 70%, and 74%, respectively. During the randomization phase, the most common adverse events occurring in > or =5% in the quetiapine group were somnolence, nasopharyngitis, and headache. Insomnia was more common in the placebo group. During the randomization phase, there was an increase in weight of 0.5 kg in the quetiapine group and a reduction of 1.9 kg in the placebo group. The incidence and incidence density of a single emergent fasting blood glucose value> or =126 mg/dL was higher with quetiapine than with placebo (9.3% versus 4.1%; 17.6 versus 9.5 patients per 100 patient-years). LIMITATIONS This was an enriched sample of patients with bipolar I disorder responding to treatment with quetiapine plus lithium/divalproex. CONCLUSIONS Maintenance treatment with quetiapine in combination with lithium/divalproex significantly increased time to recurrence of any event (mania, depression, or mixed) irrespective of the polarity of the index episode compared with placebo with lithium/divalproex. Long-term treatment with quetiapine was generally well-tolerated. Quetiapine with lithium/divalproex can provide an effective long-term treatment option for bipolar I disorder to prevent recurrences not only of mania but also depression.

Quetiapine monotherapy for mania associated with bipolar disorder: combined analysis of two international, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled studies

ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of quetiapine monotherapy for mania in bipolar disorder by an a priori defined combined analysis of data from two placebo-controlled studies. Method: The intent-to-treat (ITT) populations from two studies of patients with DSM-IV bipolar I disorder, manic episode, randomised to 12 weeks of double-blind treatment with quetiapine (up to 800 mg/day) or placebo were combined. The primary efficacy endpoint was change in Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) score from baseline to Day 21. Secondary endpoints included change from baseline in YMRS to Day 84, YMRS response and remission rates and change from baseline to Days 21 and 84 in the Montgomery–Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), Clinical Global Impressions (CGI), Clinical Global Impressions – Bipolar (CGI-BP) and the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). These endpoints were analysed as continuous variables, using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), with the baseline as covariate. In order to account for any difference in response between studies, the analyses were stratified by study as a fixed effect, and centre as a random effect. The Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel test was used to analyse binary variables. A chi square test was used to compare the frequency of adverse events between the treatment groups. Results: The combined analysis included a total of 403 patients from two quetiapine monotherapy studies in patients with bipolar I disorder. A significant improvement in YMRS score was observed from Day 4 ( p = 0.021) onward in the quetiapine group compared with placebo. The treatment advantage of quetiapine over placebo continued to increase to Day 21 ( p < 0.001) and Day 84 ( p < 0.001). Significantly more quetiapine-treated than placebo-treated patients achieved a response ( p < 0.001). The average quetiapine dose in responders was approximately 600 mg daily. Of adverse events occurring in ≥ 5% of patients, quetiapine-treated patients had a significantly greater incidence versus placebo of somnolence (16.3% vs. 4.0%), dry mouth (15.8% vs. 3%), weight gain (9.1% vs. 1.5%) and dizziness (6.7% vs. 2.5%). Conclusions: The data from this combined analysis support the results from the individual studies and indicate that quetiapine monotherapy is effective across a broad range of mood symptoms, fast-acting and well tolerated in the treatment of mania.

Pharmacokinetic profiles of extended release quetiapine fumarate compared with quetiapine immediate release

This 10-day, single-center, open-label, randomized, crossover study compared pharmacokinetic profiles and tolerability of extended release quetiapine fumarate (quetiapine XR) with quetiapine immediate release (quetiapine IR) in patients with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder or bipolar disorder. After a 2-day lead-in period during which patients received quetiapine XR 300 mg once daily, patients were randomized to quetiapine IR 150 mg twice daily followed by quetiapine XR 300 mg once daily, or quetiapine XR 300 mg once daily followed by quetiapine IR 150 mg twice daily. Pharmacokinetic parameters were evaluated at the end of each 4-day treatment period at steady state. Vital signs, laboratory values, and adverse events (AEs) were recorded throughout the study. The least squares means (90% confidence interval) of the ratio of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve over a 24 h dosing interval (AUC ([0-24 h])) for quetiapine XR/IR was 1.04 (0.92-1.19) and within the pre-defined range set for equivalence (0.80-1.25). Maximum plasma concentration at steady state (C(max)) was approximately 13% lower for quetiapine XR than for quetiapine IR (495.3 versus 568.1 ng/mL), time to reach C(max) (t(max)) was 5 h versus 2 h and mean concentration at the end of 24 h dosing interval (C(min)) was 95.3 versus 96.5 ng/mL, respectively. No patients withdrew from the study owing to AEs and there were no serious AEs or deaths related to study medication. No unexpected AEs, changes in vital signs or laboratory values were observed. These findings suggest that modifying the formulation does not change the overall absorption or elimination of quetiapine, and support emerging clinical evidence for the use of quetiapine XR as a once daily treatment in patients initiating therapy or those established on quetiapine IR.

The psychometric validation of the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) in patients with bipolar disorder.

Bipolar disorder (BD) adversely affects daily activities/functioning. The Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) assesses disability in work/school activities, family relationships, and social functioning, and it evaluates the functional impact of psychiatric disorders. BD outpatients from 21 U.S. sites completed a battery of validated instruments (including the SDS) three times over 8-12 weeks. Instrument reliability (internal consistency, test-retest), validity (construct, convergent validity, known groups) and responsiveness were measured. There were missing data for the SDS in 2% of the 225 subjects with BD. One factor explained 82% of the variance. All SDS items had rotated factor loadings on the first factor >0.90, confirming the appropriateness of the SDS total score. Item-scale correlations surpassed 0.40. There was excellent internal consistency reliability for the SDS total score (Cronbachs alpha=0.89). Test-retest reliability was acceptable for the SDS total score (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.73). Correlations with other instruments demonstrate convergent and divergent validity. The SDS total and item scores significantly discriminated between (self-rated) overall health status, clinician-rated functional status, and clinician-rated depression, evidencing known group validity. The SDS demonstrated ability to detect change over time. The SDS is a valid, reliable measure of disability and is responsive to change over time when used in subjects with BD.

Clinical value of early partial symptomatic improvement in the prediction of response and remission during short-term treatment trials in 3369 subjects with bipolar I or II depression☆

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the clinical value of early partial symptomatic improvement in predicting the probability of response during the short-term treatment of bipolar depression. METHODS Blinded data from 10 multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials in bipolar I or II depression were used to determine if early improvement (≥20% reduction in depression symptom severity after 14 days of treatment) predicted later short-term response or remission. Sensitivity, specificity, efficiency, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) were calculated using an intent to treat analysis of individual and pooled study data. RESULTS 1913 patients were randomized to active compounds (aripiprazole, lamotrigine, olanzapine/olanzapine-fluoxetine, and quetiapine), and 1456 to placebo. In the pooled positive studies, early improvement predicted response and remission with high sensitivity (86% and 88%, respectively), but rates of false positives were high (53% and 59%, respectively). Pooled negative predictive values for response/remission (i.e. confidence in knowing the drug will not result in response or remission) were 74% and 82%, respectively, with low rates of false negatives (14% and 12%, respectively). CONCLUSION Early improvement in an individual patient does not appear to be a reliable predictor of eventual response or remission due to an unacceptably high false positive rate. However, the absence of early improvement appears to be a highly reliable predictor of eventual non-response, suggesting that clinicians can have confidence in knowing when a drug is not going to work during short-term treatment. Patients who fail to demonstrate early improvement within the first two weeks of treatment may benefit from a change in therapy.

Rapid dose escalation with quetiapine: a pilot study.

Abstract: The original dosing recommendations for quetiapine in the treatment of schizophrenia suggested escalation to 400 mg/d using the following schedule, administered twice daily in divided doses: Day 1, 50 mg; Day 2, 100 mg; Day 3, 200 mg; Day 4, 300 mg; Day 5, 400 mg. In practice, however, clinicians often exceed these recommendations because of the need to obtain a therapeutic response in patients with psychosis as quickly as possible. This study was designed to determine a faster tolerable dosage-escalation schedule for quetiapine in acutely ill, hospitalized patients with schizophrenia. In this multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind pilot study, adult patients were randomly assigned to escalation schedules that would achieve a target dosage of 400 mg/d in either 5, 3, or 2 days. Safety and tolerability were assessed by interviews, physical examinations and vital signs, laboratory tests, and electrocardiograms. The enrolled population consisted of 69 patients who were randomized to 1 of the 3 dose-escalation schedules. Treatment-related adverse events were few among the 67 evaluable patients, with most rated as mild in intensity. Among 69 enrolled patients, only 3 withdrew because of an adverse event (agitation). Objective assessments and adverse events were similar between the 3 groups. In this study of patients with acute schizophrenia, quetiapine dosage was increased to 400 mg/d in 5, 3, and 2 days with similar safety and tolerability, suggesting that escalation to therapeutically effective dosages can be accomplished in less than 5 days.

The efficacy of quetiapine vs. haloperidol and placebo: A meta-analytic study of efficacy

INTRODUCTION Atypical antipsychotics form a new class of treatment for psychotic disorders that offers advantages over conventional antipsychotics, such as haloperidol. Among these advantages is a lower risk of side effects-in particular movement disorders. The atypical antipsychotics that are currently commercially available are clozapine, risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, and ziprasidone. The focus of this report is on the efficacy of quetiapine. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SELECTION A meta-analysis was performed on three placebo- and five haloperidol-controlled clinical trials of quetiapine. Efficacy was assessed using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), the Clinical Global Impression (CGI), and the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS). In addition, a responder analysis was performed assessing patients who demonstrated a 40% improvement on the BPRS total score. RESULTS The results showed that quetiapine was significantly (p<0.05) superior to placebo in improving psychotic symptoms. In addition, quetiapine was not significantly different from haloperidol on measures of efficacy measured by BPRS change score, but was superior to haloperidol in terms of response rate using observed case analysis (but not using last observation carried forward analysis). CONCLUSION This meta-analysis supports the use of quetiapine as a front-line treatment for schizophrenia.