Martin Emert

Radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with mitral or aortic mechanical prosthetic valves: A feasibility, safety, and efficacy study

BACKGROUND Patients with prosthetic valves have a high prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF). We report a multicenter experience of performing pulmonary vein antral isolation (PVAI) in this challenging, high-risk cohort of patients. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of radiofrequency (RF) ablation for sinus rhythm restoration in AF patients with mitral or aortic mechanical prosthetic valves. METHODS A total of 50 patients with prosthetic valves (group I) who underwent RF ablation for AF between January 1, 2007, and April 30, 2009, were identified prospectively at four tertiary care centers. A matched group of 50 patients (group II) acted as controls. RESULTS Total procedural time (199.4 ± 49 minutes vs 166.6 ± 27.5 minutes, P <.001) and fluoroscopy time (60 ± 17 minutes vs 53.8 ± 6.8 minutes, P <.01) were prolonged, with a higher incidence of atrial flutter at 3 months in group I (18% vs 6%, P = .1) compared to group II. At 12 months, 80% of patients in the valve group were in sinus rhythm after an average of 1.3 procedures, and 82% of controls were in sinus rhythm after an average 1.2 procedures (P = .9). There was a trend toward a higher nonfatal complication rate in the valve group than in the control group (8% vs 4%, P = .1). CONCLUSION In patients with prosthetic valves, RF ablation for AF is feasible, safe, and efficacious, with a trend toward a higher nonfatal complication rate and an increased rate of postablation atrial flutter.

Differences in Outcomes Between Patients Treated with Single- versus Dual-Chamber Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators: A Substudy of the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial II

Objectives: We sought to evaluate the influence of single‐ versus dual‐chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) on the occurrence of heart failure and mortality as well as appropriate and inappropriate ICD therapy in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial II (MADIT‐II).

Risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmias following improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with implantable cardiac defibrillators implanted for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death

PurposeIn patients who undergo implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) implantation for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD), data is unclear whether their ICD generator needs to be replaced at end of life if their left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) improves. Despite improvement in EF, the underlying scar may represent a potential substrate for ventricular arrhythmias.MethodsData on 280 patients who underwent ICD implantation for primary prevention of SCD was obtained from two centers. Patients were followed for any improvement in EF to ≥35%. All arrhythmic events during follow-up, including appropriate and inappropriate shocks/ATP, were recorded.ResultsThirty percent (n = 86/280) of patients improved their EF to >35% of which 41% (n = 37) underwent a generator change by the study ending period with the rest not yet at ERI. Mean baseline EF in patients with and without target EF improvement was 26 ± 7 and 23 ± 7% (p = 0.2). After excluding patients whose arrhythmic events data were unavailable, the final sample consisted of 62 patients in the EF improvement group and 156 patients in the group without EF improvement. In the group with EF improvement, appropriate events (shock + ATP) were noted in 19% of patients (n = 12/62) and inappropriate shocks and ATP in 6% of (n = 4/62) patients after their EF improved to >35%. Four patients received appropriate therapies when their EF was low prior to improvement. In contrast, in patients who had no improvement in EF, 27% (n = 43/156) received an appropriate therapy (p = 0.6) while 11% (n = 18/156) (p = 0.2) received inappropriate shocks and ATP. All-cause mortality was higher in patients without subsequent improvement in EF versus those with EF improvement (31 vs. 15% (p = .005).ConclusionsThere was no significant difference in the number of appropriate therapies received by each group. Patients continue to be at high risk for sudden cardiac death despite improvement in EF.

REAL-WORLD PRACTICE PATTERNS OF DOFETILIDE AND SOTALOL UTILIZATION FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION: A MULTI-NATIONAL SURVEY

To evaluate the real-world practice patterns of utilization of dofetilide for treating Atrial Fibrillation (AF). We performed an online survey of cardiologists and cardiac electrophysiologists in US and Europe. Participation was voluntary. 31 specific questions were included in the study, primarily

USE OF ORAL STEROID AND ITS EFFECTS ON ATRIAL FIBRILLATION RECURRENCE AND INFLAMMATORY CYTOKINES POST ABLATION - THE STEROID AF STUDY: A RANDOMIZED CONTROL TRIAL

To evaluate the impact of pre-procedural oral prednisone on inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, Interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6, and IL-8) levels and outcomes of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation in patients with paroxysmal AF. A total of 60 patients with paroxysmal AF undergoing AF ablation were randomized (

Under-Utilization of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators in Patients with Heart Failure - The Current State of Sudden Cardiac Death Prophylaxis.

Background Despite ACC/AHA guidelines indicating implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) as class I therapy for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death in patients with EF≤35%, ICD utilization rates in real world practice have been low. Objective To determine the rate of ICD implantation at a tertiary care academic center and to assess the reasons for under-utilization of the same. Methods Review of a prospectively collected database which included all patients diagnosed with an EF≤35% was performed to assess the rate of ICD implantation and mortality. Reasons for non-implantation of ICD were then assessed from detailed chart review. Results A total of 707 patients (age 69.4 ± 14.1 years) with mean EF of 26±7% were analyzed. Only 28% (200/707) of patients had ICDs implanted. Mortality was lower in the group with ICD (25% vs 37%, p=0.004). When patients who either died or were lost to follow-up prior to 2005 were excluded, ICD utilization rate was still low at 37.6%. The most common reason for non-implantation of ICD was physicians not discussing this option with their patients. Patient refusal was the second most common reason. Conclusions ICD Implantation rates for primary prevention of SCD in patients with EF≤35% is low. Physician and patient education should be addressed to improve the utilization rates.BACKGROUND Despite ACC/AHA guidelines indicating implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) as class I therapy for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death in patients with EF≤35%, ICD utilization rates in real world practice have been low. OBJECTIVE To determine the rate of ICD implantation at a tertiary care academic center and to assess the reasons for under-utilization of the same. METHODS Review of a prospectively collected database which included all patients diagnosed with an EF≤35% was performed to assess the rate of ICD implantation and mortality. Reasons for non-implantation of ICD were then assessed from detailed chart review. RESULTS A total of 707 patients (age 69.4 ± 14.1 years) with mean EF of 26±7% were analyzed. Only 28% (200/707) of patients had ICDs implanted. Mortality was lower in the group with ICD (25% vs 37%, p=0.004). When patients who either died or were lost to follow-up prior to 2005 were excluded, ICD utilization rate was still low at 37.6%. The most common reason for non-implantation of ICD was physicians not discussing this option with their patients. Patient refusal was the second most common reason. CONCLUSIONS ICD Implantation rates for primary prevention of SCD in patients with EF≤35% is low. Physician and patient education should be addressed to improve the utilization rates.

EXTERNALIZATION OF CONDUCTOR CABLES IN QUICKSITE AND QUICKFLEX LEFT VENTRICULAR LEADS

We intended to evaluate the incidence of electrical and mechanical failure of QuickSite (QS) and QuickFlex (QF) left ventricular (LV) leads which are a part of a lead advisory. We invited all 154 alive patients who had the QS and QF leads implanted at our center to participate in this prospective

Perioperative hematoma with subcutaneous ICD implantation: Impact of anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapies

The safety of perioperative anticoagulation (AC) and antiplatelet (AP) therapy with subcutaneous implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator (S‐ICD) implantation is unknown. The purpose of this study was to identify the risk factors associated with hematoma complicating S‐ICD implantation.

REAL WORLD BATTERY LONGEVITY OF ST. JUDE MEDICAL IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER-DEFIBRILLATORS INCLUDED IN THE ADVISORY FOR PREMATURE BATTERY DEPLETION

Background: Very recently St Jude Medical (SJM) released an advisory regarding premature battery depletion in a family of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) including biventricular cardiac defibrillators (CRTDs). There have been reported cases of loss of pacing and inability to

Use of oral steroid and its effects on atrial fibrillation recurrence and inflammatory cytokines post ablation - The steroid af study

Background Use of corticosteroids before and after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation can decrease acute inflammation and reduce AF recurrence. Purpose To assess the efficacy of oral prednisone in improving the outcomes of pulmonary vein isolation with radiofrequency ablation and its effect on inflammatory cytokine. Methods A total of 60 patients with paroxysmal AF undergoing radiofrequency ablation were randomized (1:1) to receive either 3 doses of 60 mg daily of oral prednisone or a placebo. Inflammatory cytokine levels (TNF-α, IL-1, IL6, IL-8) were measured at baseline, prior to ablation, immediately after ablation, and 24 hours post ablation. Patients underwent 30 day event monitoring at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months post procedure. Results Immediate post ablation levels of inflammatory cytokines were lower in the steroid group when compared to the placebo group; IL-6: 9.0 ±7 vs 15.8 ±13 p=0.031; IL-8: 10.5 ±9 vs 15.3 ±8; p=0.047 respectively. Acute PV reconnection rates during the procedure (7/23% vs 10/36%; p = 0.39), and RF ablation time (51±13 vs 56±11 min, p = 0.11) trended to be lower in the placebo group than the steroid group. There was no difference in the incidence of early recurrence of AF during the blanking period and freedom from AF off AAD at 12 months between both groups (5/17% vs 8/27%; p = 0.347 and 21/70% vs 18/60%; p=0.417 in placebo and steroid groups respectively). Conclusion Although oral corticosteroids have significant effect in lowering certain cytokines, it did not impact the clinical outcomes of AF ablation.