Martin Empelmann
Braunschweig University of Technology
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Martin Empelmann.
Archive | 2018
Georg Brachmann; Martin Empelmann
Experimental investigations on the material behaviour of concrete show, that the concrete compressive strength under sustained loads is lower than the short-term compressive strength. The effects of sustained loads are considered in EN 1992-1-1 (EC2) by the factor α cc for the design values of concrete compressive strength.
Archive | 2018
Florian Wolfgang Held; Vincent Oettel; Martin Empelmann
According to Model Code 2010 (2011) and EN 1992-1-1 (2011) the longitudinal reinforcement ratio of reinforced concrete columns should not exceed a value of 8%. Several national annexes to EN 1992-1-1 (2011) allow the use of higher longitudinal reinforcement ratios up to 12%. Concrete columns with reinforcement ratios larger than 8% offer new opportunities. On the one hand they permit higher load-bearing capacities with constant cross-sectional areas, on the other hand they allow smaller cross-sectional areas with constant load-bearing capacities. Examples from practice and research prove that detailing and casting of such highly reinforced concrete columns can be contrived. In order to review present limitations and to enhance the existing construction methods, experiments on highly reinforced concrete columns with bundled bars and large diameter bars are currently carried out at the iBMB, Division of Concrete Construction of the TU Braunschweig. This paper reflects the current state of research and covers the results of six column tests with longitudinal reinforcement ratios up to 25.6%. Test specimens and test setup are going to be presented, as well as the backgrounds that led to their determination. Furthermore the most important test results, such as load-deformation and post-fracture behaviour, are going to be illustrated and discussed.
Archive | 2012
Martin Empelmann; Marco Wichers; Christian Unger
Nachrechnungen bestehender Bruckenbauwerke auf Basis des aktuellen Normenstands zeigen in vielen Fallen, dass die rechnerischen Querkrafttragwiderstande entscheidend fur die Belastbarkeit des Tragwerks sind. Zur Ermittlung der wahren Tragreserven sind die normativ vorgegebenen Ansatze zur Bestimmung der Querkrafttragfahigkeit jedoch nur bedingt geeignet, da verschiedene bruckenbauspezifische Randbedingungen, insbesondere bei vorgespannten Brucken, nicht erfasst werden. In objektspezifischen Untersuchungen ist die Bestimmung der Querkrafttragwiderstande mit erweiterten Ansatzen moglich. Im vorliegenden Beitrag werden hierzu verschiedene rechnerische Ansatze vorgestellt und Unterschiede anhand eines typischen Beispiels aufgezeigt.
Beton- Und Stahlbetonbau | 2014
Guido Steven; Martin Empelmann
Beton- Und Stahlbetonbau | 2015
Vincent Oettel; Martin Empelmann
Beton- Und Stahlbetonbau | 2007
Volker Henke; Martin Empelmann
Beton- Und Stahlbetonbau | 2009
Martin Empelmann; Marco Wichers
Beton- Und Stahlbetonbau | 2015
Martin Empelmann; Waldemar Krakowski
Beton- Und Stahlbetonbau | 2013
Vincent Oettel; Martin Empelmann
Beton- Und Stahlbetonbau | 2012
Corinna Müller; Martin Empelmann; Florian Hude; Thomas Adam