Martin G. Kees

Via β-adrenoceptors, stimulation of extrasplenic sympathetic nerve fibers inhibits lipopolysaccharide-induced TNF secretion in perfused rat spleen

Using a spleen slice microsuperfusion technique in mice, we have previously characterized the role of norepinephrine (NE) and other neurotransmitters for sympathetic modulation of IL-6 and TNF secretion of splenic macrophages. Since experiments in spleen slices do not reflect the situation of an entire perfused organ, we investigated sympathetic modulation of lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced secretion of IL-6 and TNF in perfusion experiments of rat spleen. In an organ bath, perfusion was performed in explanted whole spleens, and catecholamines and cytokines were measured by HPLC and ELISA, respectively. Release of NE depended on stimulation frequency (maximum at 10 Hz). Apart from NE, perfusates also contained significant amounts of dopamine and epinephrine. Furthermore, perfusate epinephrine levels correlated positively with perfusate NE levels (RRank=0.750, p<0.001) but not with plasma epinephrine concentrations. This indicates that epinephrine is a conversion product of sympathetically released NE. Early electrical stimulation of extrasplenic splenic nerves, 20 min after administration of LPS, significantly inhibited TNF secretion. This electrically induced effect was abrogated by simultaneous administration of propranolol (10(-6) M) but it was not influenced by administration of either an alpha1- or alpha2-adrenergic antagonist. Late electrical stimulation of splenic nerves, 2.5 h after administration of LPS, did not change TNF secretion. Interestingly, no influence of early or late sympathetic nerve fiber stimulation on IL-6 secretion was observed. In conclusion, this is the first perfusion study of the entire spleen that demonstrates that early electrical stimulation of sympathetic splenic nerve fibers directly inhibits LPS-induced TNF secretion. This study corroborates the idea that splenic sympathetic nerves are able to inhibit important activators of the innate immune system when stimulation happens very early or even prior to their induction by LPS.

Unbound fraction of vancomycin in intensive care unit patients

Published data on the unbound fraction of vancomycin in patient samples exhibit high variability. In the present study, a robust ultrafiltration method was developed and applied to 102 clinical samples from 22 intensive care unit patients who were treated with continuous infusion of vancomycin. A validated HPLC method was used for determination of total and unbound concentrations. The mean unbound fraction was 67.2% (standard deviation 7.5%, range 47.2–92.1%) and independent of total concentration of vancomycin or of albumin. The unbound fraction was significantly correlated (r = +0.67, P = .0009) with the renally filtered fraction (drug clearance/creatinine clearance), providing functional evidence for the validity of the measurements. Ultrafiltration proved to be susceptible to variations in the experimental conditions such as pH, temperature and centrifugal force. The measured unbound fraction increased from 60% at pH 6 to 100% at pH 9, from 57% at 4°C to 80% at 37°C, and was 76% at 1,000 g compared with 45% at 10,000 g. Lack of standardization may therefore partly explain the variable results reported in the literature.

Protein binding characteristics and pharmacokinetics of ceftriaxone in intensive care unit patients

AIMS The aim of the present study was to assess the pharmacokinetics of total and unbound ceftriaxone in intensive care unit (ICU) patients and its protein binding characteristics. METHODS Twenty patients (m/f 15/5, age 25-86 years, body weight 60-121 kg, APACHE II 7-40, estimated glomerular filtration rate 19-157 ml min(-1) , albumin 11.7-30.1 g l(-1) , total bilirubin <0.1-36.1 mg dl(-1) ) treated with intravenous ceftriaxone were recruited from two ICUs. Timed plasma samples were obtained using an opportunistic study protocol. Ceftriaxone concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography; unbound concentrations were determined after ultrafiltration using a new method which maintains physiological pH and temperature. The pharmacokinetics was described by a one-compartment model, the protein-binding characteristics by Michaelis-Menten kinetics. RESULTS For total drug, the volume of distribution was 20.2 l (median; interquartile range 15.6-24.5 l), the half-life 14.5 h (10.0-25.5 h) and the clearance 0.96 l h(-1) (0.55-1.28 l h(-1) ). The clearance of unbound drug was 1.91 l h(-1) (1.46-6.20 l h(-1) ) and linearly correlated with estimated glomerular filtration rate (slope 0.85, y-intercept 0.24 l h(-1) , r(2)  = 0.70). The unbound fraction was higher in ICU patients (33.0%; 20.2-44.5%) than reported in healthy volunteers, particularly when renal impairment or severe hyperbilirubinaemia was present. In all patients, unbound concentrations during treatment with ceftriaxone 2 g once daily remained above the EUCAST susceptibility breakpoint (≤1 mg l(-1) ) throughout the whole dosing interval. CONCLUSIONS Protein binding of ceftriaxone is reduced and variable in ICU patients due to hypoalbuminaemia, but also to altered binding characteristics. Despite these changes, the pharmacokinetics of unbound ceftriaxone is governed by renal function. For patients with normal or reduced renal function, standard doses are sufficient.

Population pharmacokinetics of meropenem during continuous infusion in surgical ICU patients

Continuous infusion of meropenem is a candidate strategy for optimization of its pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile. However, plasma concentrations are difficult to predict in critically ill patients. Steady‐state concentrations of meropenem were determined prospectively during continuous infusion in 32 surgical ICU patients (aged 21‐85 years, body weight 55‐125 kg, APACHE II 5‐29, measured creatinine clearance 22.7‐297 mL/min). Urine was collected for the quantification of renal clearance of meropenem and creatinine. Cystatin C was measured as an additional marker of renal function. Population pharmacokinetic models were developed using NONMEM®, which described total meropenem clearance and its relationship with several estimates of renal function (measured creatinine clearance CLCR, Cockcroft‐Gault formula CLCG, Hoek formula, 1/plasma creatinine, 1/plasma cystatin C) and other patient characteristics. Any estimate of renal function improved the model performance. The strongest association of clearance was found with CLCR (typical clearance = 11.3 L/h × [1 + 0.00932 × (CLCR – 80 mL/min)]), followed by 1/plasma cystatin C; CLCG was the least predictive covariate. Neither age, weight, nor sex was found to be significant. These models can be used to predict dosing requirements or meropenem concentrations during continuous infusion. The covariate CLCR offers the best predictive performance; if not available, cystatin C may provide a promising alternative to plasma creatinine.

Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic evaluation of intravenous and enteral moxifloxacin in surgical intensive care unit patients

OBJECTIVES To describe the plasma concentration-time profile of moxifloxacin after intravenous and enteral administration in intensive care unit (ICU) patients and to provide a pharmacodynamic (PD) evaluation with regard to pneumonia. PATIENTS AND METHODS Twenty-five adult patients from a cardiothoracic/mixed surgical ICU were enrolled. Moxifloxacin was given as a standard dose (400 mg once daily). Therapy was successfully switched to enteral administration on day 5 in 16 patients. A rich data sampling schedule was performed after intravenous (day 4) and enteral (day 8) administration. Moxifloxacin concentrations were analysed by HPLC. A population pharmacokinetic (PK) model was developed using NONMEM VII. Simulated concentration-time profiles were evaluated for their probability of attaining PK/PD target values relevant for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP). RESULTS A linear-elimination two-compartment model described the data adequately. Parameter estimates (coefficient of variation of inter-individual variability) were: absorption rate constant, 1.09/h (135%); enteral bioavailability, 76% (20.0%); central volume of distribution, 55.6 L; peripheral volume of distribution, 59.6 L (15.3%); inter-compartmental clearance, 47.7 L/h; and clearance, 11.3 L/h (23.7%). Both intravenously and enterally administered standard-dose moxifloxacin reliably attained the PK/PD target values for pathogens with MICs ≤ 0.25 mg/L for CAP and ≤ 0.125 mg/L for HAP. CONCLUSIONS Drug exposure to moxifloxacin in ICU patients was more variable than in healthy volunteers. The standard dosing provides sufficient drug exposure for treatment of CAP but for HAP it does so only when a highly susceptible pathogen is present. Intravenous/enteral sequential therapy may be considered for cautiously selected cases in ICU patients.

Unbound fraction of ertapenem in intensive care unit patients

OBJECTIVES To determine unbound ertapenem concentrations in plasma and to describe the pharmacokinetics of unbound ertapenem in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS For assessing the influence of experimental conditions and for development of the ultrafiltration protocol, plasma from healthy volunteers was used. Concentrations of total and unbound ertapenem were determined by HPLC in 29 plasma samples from six ICU patients treated with 1 g of ertapenem once daily. The concentration-time courses were described by a one-compartment model. Ertapenem binding to albumin was assessed by Michaelis-Menten kinetics in solutions of human serum albumin, in plasma from healthy volunteers and in plasma from ICU patients. RESULTS The unbound fraction (fu) of ertapenem was highly susceptible to pH and temperature during ultrafiltration and was ∼20% in plasma from healthy volunteers at clinically relevant concentrations. In ICU patients, fu was substantially higher (range 30.9%-53.6%). The unbound concentrations of ertapenem exceeded 2 mg/L for 72% (median; range 39%-100%) of the 24 h dosing interval and 0.25 mg/L for 100% (range 79%-100%). The number of binding sites per albumin molecule was 1.22 (95% CI 1.07-1.38) in plasma from healthy volunteers and 0.404 (95% CI 0.158-0.650) in samples from ICU patients. CONCLUSIONS Determination of unbound ertapenem by ultrafiltration is susceptible to experimental conditions. When determined at physiological pH and temperature, fu of ertapenem is 2- to 4-fold higher than previously reported and even higher in ICU patients. Binding studies indicate that hypoalbuminaemia alone does not explain these differences. This issue should be further investigated for its clinical relevance.

Catechol conjugates are in vivo metabolites of Salicis cortex.

After oral administration of 100 mg/kg b. w. (235.8 µmol/kg) salicortin to Wistar rats, peak serum concentrations of 1.43 mg/L (13.0 µM) catechol were detected after 0.5 h in addition to salicylic acid by HPLC-DAD after serum processing with β-glucuronidase and sulphatase. Both metabolites could also be detected in the serum of healthy volunteers following oral administration of a willow bark extract (Salicis cortex, Salix spec., Salicaceae) corresponding to 240 mg of salicin after processing with both enzymes. In humans, the cmax (1.46 mg/L, 13.3 µM) of catechol was reached after 1.2 h. The predominant phase-II metabolite in humans and rats was catechol sulphate, determined by HPLC analysis of serum samples processed with only one kind of enzyme. Without serum processing with glucuronidase and sulphatase, no unconjugated catechol could be detected in human and animal serum samples. As catechol is described as an anti-inflammatory compound, these results may contribute to the elucidation of the mechanism of the action of willow bark extract.

Population pharmacokinetics and target attainment analysis of moxifloxacin in patients with diabetic foot infections.

The objective of this study was to provide a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) analysis of moxifloxacin in patients with diabetic foot infections (DFI). The plasma concentration‐time courses were determined in 50 DFI patients on day 1 and 3 after intravenous moxifloxacin 400 mg once‐daily. A two‐compartment population pharmacokinetic model was developed, identifying as covariates total body weight on central and peripheral volume of distribution (V1, V2) and ideal body weight on clearance (CL), respectively. For a 70 kg patient V1 was 68.1 L (interindividual variability, CV: 27.4%), V2 44.6 L, and CL 12.1 L/h (25.6%). Simulations were performed to calculate the probability of target attainment (PTA) for Gram‐positive and Gram‐negative pathogens with fAUC/MIC targets of ≥30 and ≥100, respectively. PTA was 0.68–1 for susceptible (MIC ≤0.5 mg/L according to EUCAST) Gram‐positive, but <0.25 for Gram‐negative pathogens with MIC ≥0.25 mg/L. With the exception of the first 24 hours of therapy, obesity affected PTA only marginally. Pharmacokinetic parameters in DFI patients were similar to those reported for healthy volunteers, indicating the appropriateness of the standard dose of moxifloxacin. Overall clinical efficacy has been shown previously, but PTA is limited in a subpopulation infected with formally susceptible Gram‐negative pathogens close to the EUCAST breakpoint.

Variable linezolid exposure in ICU patients-possible role of drug-drug interactions.

Background: Standard doses of linezolid may not be suitable for all patient groups. Intensive care unit (ICU) patients in particular may be at risk of inadequate concentrations. This study investigated variability of drug exposure and its potential sources in this population. Methods: Plasma concentrations of linezolid were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography in a convenience sample of 20 ICU patients treated with intravenous linezolid 600 mg twice daily. Ultrafiltration applying physiological conditions (pH 7.4/37°C) was used to determine the unbound fraction. Individual pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were estimated by population PK modeling. As measures of exposure to linezolid, area under the concentration–time curve (AUC) and trough concentrations (Cmin) were calculated and compared with published therapeutic ranges (AUC 200–400 mg*h/L, Cmin 2–10 mg/L). Coadministered inhibitors or inducers of cytochrome P450 and/or P-glycoprotein were noted. Results: Data from 18 patients were included into the PK evaluation. Drug exposure was highly variable (median, range: AUC 185, 48–618 mg*h/L, calculated Cmin 2.92, 0.0062–18.9 mg/L), and only a minority of patients had values within the target ranges (6 and 7, respectively). AUC and Cmin were linearly correlated (R = 0.98), and classification of patients (underexposed/within therapeutic range/overexposed) according to AUC or Cmin was concordant in 15 cases. Coadministration of inhibitors was associated with a trend to higher drug exposure, whereas 3 patients treated with levothyroxine showed exceedingly low drug exposure (AUC ∼60 mg*h/L, Cmin <0.4 mg/L). The median unbound fraction in all 20 patients was 90.9%. Conclusions: Drug exposure after standard doses of linezolid is highly variable and difficult to predict in ICU patients, and therapeutic drug monitoring seems advisable. PK drug–drug interactions might partly be responsible and should be further investigated; protein binding appears to be stable and irrelevant.BACKGROUND Standard doses of linezolid may not be suitable for all patient groups. Intensive care unit (ICU) patients in particular may be at risk of inadequate concentrations. This study investigated variability of drug exposure and its potential sources in this population. METHODS Plasma concentrations of linezolid were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography in a convenience sample of 20 ICU patients treated with intravenous linezolid 600 mg twice daily. Ultrafiltration applying physiological conditions (pH 7.4/37°C) was used to determine the unbound fraction. Individual pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were estimated by population PK modeling. As measures of exposure to linezolid, area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and trough concentrations (Cmin) were calculated and compared with published therapeutic ranges (AUC 200-400 mg*h/L, Cmin 2-10 mg/L). Coadministered inhibitors or inducers of cytochrome P450 and/or P-glycoprotein were noted. RESULTS Data from 18 patients were included into the PK evaluation. Drug exposure was highly variable (median, range: AUC 185, 48-618 mg*h/L, calculated Cmin 2.92, 0.0062-18.9 mg/L), and only a minority of patients had values within the target ranges (6 and 7, respectively). AUC and Cmin were linearly correlated (R = 0.98), and classification of patients (underexposed/within therapeutic range/overexposed) according to AUC or Cmin was concordant in 15 cases. Coadministration of inhibitors was associated with a trend to higher drug exposure, whereas 3 patients treated with levothyroxine showed exceedingly low drug exposure (AUC ∼60 mg*h/L, Cmin <0.4 mg/L). The median unbound fraction in all 20 patients was 90.9%. CONCLUSIONS Drug exposure after standard doses of linezolid is highly variable and difficult to predict in ICU patients, and therapeutic drug monitoring seems advisable. PK drug-drug interactions might partly be responsible and should be further investigated; protein binding appears to be stable and irrelevant.

Catechol is a bioactive metabolite of Willow bark

It has recently been shown in a bioassay guided fractionation of a Willow bark extract (Salicis cortex, Salix spec., Salicaceae) that not the isolated compound salicortin itself but its degradation product catechol was responsible for an anti-inflammatory effect in vitro. To investigate if this in vitro effect has impact on the in vivo situation, a pharmacokinetic study was performed in humans with eight healthy volunteers. After oral administration of a Willow bark extract corresponding to 240 mg salicin, venous blood samples were taken up to 24 hours, and serum was analyzed by HPLC-DAD after processing with glucuronidase and sulfatase. Mean peak concentrations of 13.3µM catechol were observed after 1.2 hours. No free catechol could be detected without enzyme processing and the predominant phase-II-metabolite was catechol sulfate. To exclude that the detected catechol in the human serum samples was not solely absorbed as a genuine compound of the Willow bark extract, pure salicortin 100 mg/kg b.w. was orally administered to Wistar rats. In this study, catechol could definitely be proved as a metabolite of salicortin in serum with a cmax of 13.0µM after 0.5h. These findings indicate that not salicortin per se but rather catechol, which is one of its active metabolites reported in the literature to have anti-inflammatory properties, contributes towards the overall ant-inflammatory and analgesic efficacy of Willow bark.