Martin Grabenwoger

Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair (TEVAR) for the treatment of aortic diseases: a position statement from the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), in collaboration with the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is an emerging treatment modality, which has been rapidly embraced by clinicians treating thoracic aortic disease.1–4 Fundamentally, it is a far less invasive approach than open surgery and its availability and relative ease of application has changed and extended management options in thoracic aortic disease, including in those patients deemed unfit or unsuitable for open surgery. In the operating room, this requires considerable perceptual, cognitive and psychomotor demands on the operators. The dramatic expansion of TEVAR activity has necessarily prompted a requirement to systematically consider the indications, appropriateness, limitations and delivery of this treatment, which has been adopted by many specialties including cardiologists, cardiovascular surgeons, radiologists and vascular surgeons.5 Our task has been to generate a multidisciplinary position statement that supports and advises all clinicians utilizing this technological advance. This document focuses on the main diagnoses—thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA), thoracic aortic dissection (TAD) of the descending aorta (type B according to the Stanford classification) and thoracic aortic injury (TAI)—indications and applicability of TEVAR and includes information regarding its limitations and complications. It acts as a position statement for both societies that reflects current understanding of thoracic aortic endovascular therapy. ### Evaluation of symptoms and patient status Symptoms in patients with TAA and chronic dissection are rare and non-specific.6,7 New onset of hoarseness or dysphagia may suggest a developing aneurysm in the distal aortic arch and proximal descending aorta. Most asymptomatic cases are discovered incidentally, while symptomatic patients have usually developed complications. Even in patients with acute aortic syndromes, chest pain, back pain and signs of malperfusion are often misinterpreted due to lack of awareness. In cases of clinical suspicion, a computed tomography (CT)-angiography is the diagnostic modality of first choice. ### Multidisciplinary consultation Patient selection should be performed on an individual basis according to anatomy, pathology, comorbidity and …

The vacuum-assisted closure system for the treatment of deep sternal wound infections after cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND The VAC system (vacuum-assisted wound closure) is a noninvasive active therapy to promote healing in difficult wounds that fail to respond to established treatment modalities. The system is based on the application of negative pressure by controlled suction to the wound surface. The method was introduced into clinical practice in 1996. Since then, numerous studies proved the effectiveness of the VAC System on microcirculation and the promotion of granulation tissue proliferation. METHODS Eleven patients (5 men, 6 women) with a median age of 64.4 years (range 50 to 78 years) with sternal wound infection after cardiac surgery (coronary artery bypass grafting = 5, aortic valve replacement = 5, ascending aortic replacement = 1) were fitted with the VAC system by the time of initial surgical debridement. RESULTS Complete healing was achieved in all patients. The VAC system was removed after a mean of 9.3 days (range 4 to 15 days), when systemic signs of infection resolved and quantitative cultures were negative. In 6 patients (54.5%), the VAC system was used as a bridge to reconstructive surgery with a pectoralis muscle flap, and in the remaining 5 patients (45.5%), primary wound closure could be achieved. Intensive care unit stay ranged from 1 to 4 days (median 1 day). Duration of hospital stay varied from 13 to 45 days (median 30 days). In-hospital mortality was 0%, and 30-day survival was 100%. CONCLUSIONS The VAC system can be considered as an effective and safe adjunct to conventional and established treatment modalities for the therapy of sternal wound infections after cardiac surgery.

Thoracic aortic aneurysms: treatment with endovascular self-expandable stent grafts ☆

BACKGROUND This study was performed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of endovascular stent graft placement in the treatment of descending thoracic aortic aneurysms. METHODS Between November 1996 and February 1999, endovascular stent graft repair was used in 21 patients. There were 5 women and 16 men with a mean age of 67 years (range, 41 to 87 years). An atherosclerotic aneurysm with a diameter of more than 6 cm was the indication for intervention in 19 patients (90.5%). In 2 patients (9.5%), a localized aortic dissection with a diameter of more than 6 cm was treated. In 71.4% (15 of 21) of patients, multiple stents were necessary for aneurysm exclusion. To allow safe deployment of the stent graft, preliminary subclavian-carotid artery transposition was performed in 9 patients (42.9%). Vascular access was achieved through a small incision in the abdominal aorta (n = 6), an iliac artery (n = 8), or a femoral artery (n = 7). Talent and Prograft stent grafts were used. RESULTS Successful deployment of the endovascular stent grafts was achieved in all patients. Two patients died postoperatively (mortality rate, 9.5%), 1 of aneurysmal rupture and the other of impaired perfusion of the celiac axis. Repeat stenting was done in 3 patients because of intraoperative leakage. CONCLUSIONS Endovascular stent graft repair is a promising and less invasive alternative to exclude the aneurysm from blood flow. This technique allows treatment of patients who are unsuitable for conventional surgical procedures. An exact definition of inclusion criteria and technical development of stent grafts should contribute to further improvements in clinical results.

Evidence, lack of evidence, controversy, and debate in the provision and performance of the surgery of acute type A aortic dissection

Acute type A aortic dissection is a lethal condition requiring emergency surgery. It has diverse presentations, and the diagnosis can be missed or delayed. Once diagnosed, decisions with regard to initial management, transfer, appropriateness of surgery, timing of operation, and intervention for malperfusion complications are necessary. The goals of surgery are to save life by prevention of pericardial tamponade or intra-pericardial aortic rupture, to resect the primary entry tear, to correct or prevent any malperfusion and aortic valve regurgitation, and if possible to prevent late dissection-related complications in the proximal and downstream aorta. No randomized trials of treatment or techniques have ever been performed, and novel therapies-particularly with regard to extent of surgery-are being devised and implemented, but their role needs to be defined. Overall, except in highly specialized centers, surgical outcomes might be static, and there is abundant room for improvement. By highlighting difficulties and controversies in diagnosis, patient selection, and surgical therapy, our over-arching goal should be to enfranchise more patients for treatment and improve surgical outcomes.

Endovascular stent graft placement in patients with acute thoracic aortic syndromes.

OBJECTIVE In the present study, the effectiveness of endovascular stent grafts (ESG) in the treatment of acute aortic complications, such as acute dissection type B, penetrating ulcer and traumatic aortic rupture is evaluated. PATIENTS AND METHODS From June 1997 to February 2002, 66 patients were treated with ESG. Out of this cohort, 19 patients (28.8%) were subjected to stent grafting due to acute aortic syndromes. Acute dissection type B was present in 11 patients (16.6%), a penetrating ulcer was diagnosed in six patients (9%) and in 2 patients (3%) a traumatic aneurysm was the indication for operation. There were 16 male and three female patients with a mean age of 60 years (20-85 years). Excluder stent grafts (Gore) were used in 15 patients, the Talent device (Medtronic) was implanted in four patients. RESULTS Stent graft placement was technically successful in all patients. Hospital mortality was 0%. Paraparesis occurred in one patient (5.2%), which could be managed successfully without remaining neurological deficit after installation of cerebrospinal fluid drainage for 72h. In another patient, overstenting of the left subclavian artery caused ischemia of the left arm and left subclavian to carotid artery bypass had to be performed. ICU-stay ranged from 1 to 6 days (mean 2.4 days) and the patients could be discharged after an average hospital stay of 8 days. In the follow-up period, one patient died due to myocardial infarction and one patient had to be re-operated due to contained rupture of the thoracic aorta caused by an endoleak. CONCLUSIONS The study suggests that endovascular stent grafting is an excellent and effective treatment modality for the acute aortic accident, which can be recommended for high-risk patients too. However, close follow-up examination is indicated and long-term results have to be awaited to evaluate the real effectiveness of this method.

Stent-graft placement in atherosclerotic descending thoracic aortic aneurysms: midterm results.

PURPOSE To determine midterm durability and need for reinterventions after stent-graft placement in atherosclerotic descending thoracic aortic aneurysms. METHODS Fifty-four patients (38 men; mean age 68 years, range 33-87) underwent stent-graft repair of chronic atherosclerotic aneurysms of the descending thoracic aorta between November 1996 and December 2002. Acute aortic syndromes (type B aortic dissections, perforating ulcers, and traumatic dissections) were excluded from analysis. Two types of commercially available stent-grafts were used (Talent and Excluder). RESULTS The primary technical success rate was 94.4%. In-hospital mortality was 3.7% (2/54). No adverse neurological events were encountered. Of 3 (5.6%) early type I endoleaks, 2 (3.7%) required reintervention; the other type I endoleak closed spontaneously. Mean follow-up was 38 months (range 1-72) in the 52 surviving patients. Four (7.7%) type I, 7 (13.5%) type II, and 4 (7.7%) type III endoleaks were seen. Three 3 patients had additional treatment for endoleaks (proximal stenting [type Ia], open thoracoabdominal repair [type Ib], and embolization [type II]). Two of the 3 reinterventions were performed in the first year of follow-up. One additional patient with a type Ia endoleak not suitable for reintervention is under close observation. There were no differences in the number of endoleaks between the 2 types of stent-grafts. Three-year event-free survival was 63%. CONCLUSIONS Midterm durability of endovascular stent-graft placement in atherosclerotic descending aortic aneurysms seems promising, as the rate of endoleaks requiring reintervention is acceptably low. In our series, endoleak formation occurred during the first year after stent-graft placement, so close follow-up of patients after aortic aneurysm repair is crucial. Further studies are warranted to evaluate long-term durability of this new treatment modality.

Prospective clinical study with in vitro endothelial cell lining of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene grafts in crural repeat reconstruction

A nonrandomized prospective clinical study was undertaken to evaluate the technique and efficacy of in vitro endothelial cell lining of synthetic grafts. Twenty-six patients (10 men and 16 women with a mean age of 68.4 years; range, 49 to 80 years) with end stage chronic peripheral vascular disease requiring reoperation were entered into the study. In 13 patients venous endothelial cells were harvested 4 to 7 weeks before operation, grown to confluency in culture flasks, and seeded onto the inner surface of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene grafts. Thirteen patients received untreated expanded polytetrafluoroethylene grafts and served as a control. A scoring system with use of intraarterial angiography was used to assess disease severity. No statistically significant differences in angiographic score were seen between the two groups, indicating comparable severity of disease. Early secondary graft patency (0 to 30 days) was 92% for the in vitro endothelial cell lining group and 53% for control patients. The amputation rate after 18 months for the in vitro endothelial cell lining group was 15%, with a 31% rate in the control group. The functional performance of the in vitro endothelial cell lining bypasses was superior to that of untreated bypass grafts during the observed follow-up period. These early results suggest that in vitro endothelial cell lining is a method that can reduce the early occlusion rate now seen after repeat reconstruction of crural vessels.

Risk factors of mortality and permanent neurologic injury in patients undergoing ascending aortic and arch repair

OBJECTIVES To analyze outcome in elderly patients after surgical repair of the ascending aorta and the aortic arch as compared with their younger counterparts and to determine risk factors of mortality and permanent neurologic injury. Patients and methods Between January 1995 and February 2003, a total of 369 patients underwent ascending aortic and arch repair. Indications for surgical intervention were acute type A dissections in 174 (47%) patients (<75 years, n = 147; > or =75 years, n = 27) and chronic atherosclerotic aneurysms in 195 (53%) patients (<75 years, n = 168; > or =75 years, n = 27). Emergency surgery was performed in 167 (45%) patients; 202 patients (54.7%) underwent surgery requiring deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. Pre- and intraoperative factors were evaluated by means of stepwise logistic regression analysis to determine risk factors of mortality and permanent neurologic injury. RESULTS Overall in-hospital mortality was 11.6%. In-hospital mortality with regard to indication for surgical intervention was comparable in both age groups (type A dissection: <75 years, 15.6%; > or =75 years, 18.5%; P =.731; chronic atherosclerotic aneurysm: <75 years, 7.7%; > or =75 years, 7.4%; P =.933). Permanent neurologic injury was observed in 5.0%. Permanent neurologic injury with regard to surgical intervention was comparable in both age groups (type A dissection: <75 years, 8.8%; > or =75 years, 3.7%; P =.359; chronic atherosclerotic aneurysm: <75 years, 3.0%; > or =75 years, 3.7%; P =.843). Stepwise logistic regression analysis revealed preoperative hemodynamic instability (odds ratio 4.3; P =.000), duration of cardiopulmonary bypass (odds ratio 2.1; P =.001), and permanent neurologic injury (odds ratio 1.7; P =.033) but not age as independent predictors affecting mortality. Utilization of but not duration of deep hypothermic circulatory arrest was the only independent predictor of permanent neurologic injury (odds ratio 2.8; P =.019). CONCLUSIONS Age shows a trend toward a higher risk of mortality but does not predict a higher incidence of permanent neurologic injury after ascending aortic and arch repair. As utilization of deep hypothermic circulatory arrest remains the only independent predictor of permanent neurologic injury, alternative approaches to maintain cerebral perfusion during ascending aortic and arch repair are warranted.

Current status and recommendations for use of the frozen elephant trunk technique: a position paper by the Vascular Domain of EACTS

The implementation of new surgical techniques offers chances but carries risks. Usually, several years pass before a critical appraisal and a balanced opinion of a new treatment method are available and rely on the evidence from the literature and experts opinion. The frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique has been increasingly used to treat complex pathologies of the aortic arch and the descending aorta, but there still is an ongoing discussion within the surgical community about the optimal indications. This paper represents a common effort of the Vascular Domain of EACTS together with several surgeons with particular expertise in aortic surgery, and summarizes the current knowledge and the state of the art about the FET technique. The majority of the information about the FET technique has been extracted from 97 focused publications already available in the PubMed database (cohort studies, case reports, reviews, small series, meta-analyses and best evidence topics) published in English.

Endoluminal stent-graft placement in patients with acute aortic dissection type B.

OBJECTIVES This study was performed to evaluate the feasibility, safety and effectiveness of endovascular stent-grafting in treating Stanford type B acute aortic dissection. We describe our first clinical experiences and initial results with stent-grafting across the primary entry tear in patients with acute aortic dissection type B. METHODS Between March 2000 and August 2001, nine patients with acute type B dissection were treated endoluminally by stent-graft implantation. There were seven male and two female patients with a mean age of 63 years (between 48 and 85 years). In all nine patients aortic dissection was diagnosed by multislice computed tomography (CT) angiography. All nine patients had a maximal aortic diameter of 5.5 cm or more and recurrent pain, one patient showed hemoptysis. This patient with signs of a contained rupture was treated under emergency condition, the eight remaining patients were in hemodynamic stabile condition at the time of intervention. The GORE Excluder stent-graft system was used in eight patients (mean 1.8 stents/patient) and the TALENT stent-graft system in one patient, which were introduced transfemorally. RESULTS The primary entry tear could be sealed successfully in all nine patients. Complete thrombosis of the false thoracic aortic lumen was obtained in two patients, in the remaining seven patients the false lumen was obliterated in the area of the thoracic aorta but perfused via re-entries in the abdominal region. No severe intraoperative complications occurred. One patient developed bilateral incomplete paraplegia with motor and sensory deficits affecting completely the right leg and partially the left leg, 14 h after intervention. A cerebrospinal fluid drainage was initiated by inserting a lumbar catheter. All nine patients, including the patient with the transient paraplegia, could be discharged from the hospital in excellent condition and without remaining neurologic deficits. Control CT scans showed a reduction of the false lumen from 2.34+/-0.58 to 0.7+/-0.44 cm and an increase of the true lumen from 1.56+/-0.5 to 4.10+/-0.6 cm in the thoracic aortic region. Mean ICU stay was 1.8 days, mean postoperative hospital stay was 7.6 days. CONCLUSIONS Stent-grafting of acute type B dissections may represent a very effective and promising new method by closure of the primary entry tear, thereby minimizing the risk of rupture of the thoracic aorta and optimizing distal perfusion by decompression of the true lumen.