Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Martin H. Huber is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Martin H. Huber.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 1995

Phase II study of docetaxel for advanced or metastatic platinum-refractory non-small-cell lung cancer.

Frank V. Fossella; J. Lee; Dong M. Shin; Maria Calayag; Martin H. Huber; Roman Perez-Soler; William K. Murphy; Scott M. Lippman; Steve Benner; Bonnie S. Glisson

PURPOSE We conducted a phase II study to determine the response to and toxicity of docetaxel (Taxotere; Rhône-Poulenc Rorer Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Collegeville, PA) in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer refractory to prior platinum-containing chemotherapy (PCC) regimens. PATIENTS AND METHODS Forty-four patients with stage IIIb or IV platinum-refractory non-small-cell lung cancer were treated with 100 mg/m2 of docetaxel intravenously over 1 hour every 3 weeks. The responses of 42 of 44 patients were assessable. Most patients had a Zubrod performance status of 1; the predominant histologic type was adenocarcinoma (61%), and 91% of patients had stage IV disease. RESULTS Nine of 42 assessable patients (21%) achieved a partial response to treatment. The median response duration (from response to progression) was 17 weeks, and the projected median survival duration of all patients is 42 weeks (51 weeks for adenocarcinoma and 22 weeks for nonadenocarcinoma). Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 85% of patients and was associated with fever that required intravenous antibiotics in 16% of patients (3% of cycles). Other acute side effects included easily treated hypersensitivity reactions and dermatitis. Cumulative side effects included fluid retention and neuropathy. CONCLUSION Docetaxel administered at 100 mg/m2 intravenously every 3 weeks has notable activity against platinum-refractory non-small-cell lung cancer, with a 21% major response rate. Primary side effects were neutropenia, hypersensitivity, and fluid retention.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 1994

Phase II study of docetaxel for recurrent or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer.

Frank V. Fossella; Jin Soo Lee; William K. Murphy; Scott M. Lippman; Maria Calayag; Arlita Pang; Marvin H. Chasen; Dong M. Shin; Bonnie S. Glisson; Steven E. Benner; Martin H. Huber; Roman Perez-Soler; Waun Ki Hong; Martin N. Raber

PURPOSE We conducted a phase II study to determine the response and toxicity of docetaxel (Taxotere; Rhône-Poulenc Rorer Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Collegeville, PA) in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS We treated 41 chemotherapy-naive patients who had stage IIIb or IV non-small-cell lung cancer with 100 mg/m2 of docetaxel intravenously over 1 hour every 3 weeks. Responses were assessed after every one to two treatment courses. Responses of 39 of 41 patients were assessable. The patients median age was 63 years; 90% of patients had a Zubrod performance status of 0 or 1. The predominant histology was adenocarcinoma (54%), and 90% of patients had stage IV disease. RESULTS Thirteen patients (33%) achieved a partial response to treatment, and the median response duration was 14 weeks. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred in 97% of patient; this was usually of brief duration and was associated with serious infection in 17% of patients. Other acute toxic effects included easily treated hypersensitivity reactions (36% of patients) and dermatitis (74%). We also observed fluid retention (with peripheral edema or pleural effusion or both) in 54% of patients. This was a cumulative side effect that generally occurred late in treatment. CONCLUSION Docetaxel administered at 100 mg/m2 intravenously every 3 weeks has significant activity against non-small-cell lung cancer, with a 33% major response rate. Primary toxicities were neutropenia, hypersensitivity, and fluid retention.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 1996

Phase II study of topotecan in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer previously untreated with chemotherapy.

Roman Perez-Soler; Frank V. Fossella; Bonnie S. Glisson; J. Lee; William K. Murphy; Dong M. Shin; Bonnie L. Kemp; J. Jack Lee; John M. Kane; R. A. Robinson; Scott M. Lippman; Jonathan M. Kurie; Martin H. Huber; Martin N. Raber; Waun Ki Hong

PURPOSE This study was designed to assess the anti-tumor activity of topotecan (TPT) in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously untreated with chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC with measurable disease in nonradiated fields were eligible. Other eligibility criteria were Zubrod performance status (PS) < or = 2 and adequate renal and liver function. TPT was administered at a dose of 1.5 mg/m2/d for 5 days over 30 minutes every 21 days. Of 48 registered patients, 40 were fully assessable. Nineteen patients had adenocarcinoma (AD), 14 squamous carcinoma (SCC), and seven poorly differentiated carcinoma. RESULTS Six patients (15%) achieved a partial remission (PR) (durations: 8, 14, 18, 28, 56, and 61 weeks) and four patients a minor response; 10 patients had stable disease and 20 patients progressive disease. The PR rate was 36% (five of 14 patients) in patients with SCC versus 4% (one of 26 patients) in those with other histologies (P = .014). The overall median survival time was 38 weeks and 30% of patients were alive at 1 year. Grade 3 to 4 granulocytopenia and thrombocytopenia occurred after 76% and 10% of courses administered, respectively. No grade 3 to 4 nonhematologic toxicities were observed. Grade 1 or 2 nonhematologic toxicities consisted of nausea (46% and 5%), vomiting (31% and 7%), and fatigue (53% and 16%). CONCLUSION TPT at the dose and schedule used has moderate antitumor activity in NSCLC; its activity is mostly limited to patients with SCC. TPT is well tolerated, with myelosuppression of short duration being the most common and limiting toxicity.


Current Opinion in Oncology | 1995

STRATEGIES FOR CHEMOPREVENTION STUDY OF PREMALIGNANCY AND SECOND PRIMARY TUMORS IN THE HEAD AND NECK

Scott M. Lippman; Margaret R. Spitz; Martin H. Huber; Waun Ki Hong

Recent strides in epidemiology (mutagen sensitivity assays) and basic molecular study of head and neck carcinogenesis are advancing chemoprevention in the head and neck. The clinical preventive activity of retinoids, the most studied and most active chemopreventive agents in this region, has been established in six randomized head and neck trials. Ongoing translational study of the p53 gene, nuclear retinoid receptors, and other cellular and molecular biomarkers will be necessary to achieve continuing progress in head and neck cancer chemoprevention.


Seminars in Oncology | 2010

Chemoprevention of head and neck cancer

Martin H. Huber; Scott M. Lippman; Waun Ki Hong

It is not a coincidence that the aerodigestive tract has proven such a fertile ground for the evaluation of chemoprevention. The incidence of second primaries and the concept of field cancerization made the need for prevention acute and showed the limitations of even the most curative of treatments. New and presumably less toxic agents are being evaluated; chemoprevention is being applied to asymptomatic populations at higher risk for lung, colon, breast, and other neoplasias. Biomarkers may be instrumental in rapid development of these new clinical applications, but much is still to be done. Yet unanswered is whether suppression of premalignant lesions will ultimately decrease cancer incidence. Survival in the second primary prevention trial has not thus far shown a significant improvement and toxicities were significant. Many questions remain in the study of chemoprevention; head and neck cancer provides a conducive model in which these answers might be found.


American Journal of Clinical Oncology | 1996

A phase II study of ifosfamide in recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

Martin H. Huber; Scott M. Lippman; Steven E. Benner; Mihran Shirinian; Isaiah W. Dimery; Joel S. Dunnington; Waun Ki Hong

Chemotherapy has not significantly altered the overall survival of patients with recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck; therefore, the development of new agents is essential. The purpose of the current phase II study was to define the efficacy of ifosfamide in the treatment of recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. All patients were required to have squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck that had recurred following surgery or radiotherapy or both. Patients may have received prior chemotherapy. Patients were initially treated with ifosfamide 2 g/m2/day for 4 days (dose level 0). Dose level-1 was 2 g/m2/day for 3 days, and dose level-2 was 2 g/m2/day for 2 days. All patients received mesna 400 mg/m2/day prior to and 1,200 mg/m2/day as a continuous infusion after ifosfamide. Thirty-eight patients were enrolled in the study. Five patients were inevaluable for toxicity or response. Overall, the regimen was well tolerated, with grade 4 granulocytopenia the only significant toxicity occurring in 16 patients. Overall, eight of 31 evaluable patients (25.8%) had a major response. Only one of the 10 patients (10%) with prior chemotherapy responded, but seven of the 21 patients (33.3%) with no prior chemotherapy had major responses. Ifosfamide is an active agent in recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Further studies of ifosfamide in combination with other agents, particularly as induction therapy in patients with locally advanced disease, are warranted.


Current Problems in Cancer | 1994

Biology and chemoprevention of head and neck cancer

Martin H. Huber; Waun Ki Hong

Head and neck cancer remains a common cause of mortality and morbidity in the United States and throughout the world. In spite of advances in the management of patients with advanced disease, overall survival in this group remains poor. Furthermore, although cancer mortality is lower in patients with early-stage disease, treatment results in significant morbidity, and these patients also face the risk of developing a second primary tumor. Chemoprevention is an innovative approach to decrease overall cancer morbidity and mortality using substances that are capable of preventing cancer progression. Head and neck cancer is an excellent model for chemoprevention, as its biology is consistent with the two concepts important for the development of chemoprevention strategies: field cancerization and multistep carcinogenesis. Several classes of compounds have been evaluated in chemoprevention trials. The most frequently studied agents, the retinoids, were found frequently to induce remissions in patients with oral leukoplakia. Furthermore, retinoids prevented progression to malignancy in one randomized maintenance study. Other agents, including beta-carotene and vitamin E, have been found also to have activity in the management of oral leukoplakia. However, the clinical role of chemopreventive agents in reducing cancer mortality remains to be defined. Two studies, one in head and neck cancer and one in lung cancer, have shown the ability of retinoids to prevent the development of second primary tumors. Current large randomized trials are defining the effectiveness of these agents in reducing the mortality of aerodigestive tract tumors in individuals at high risk.


Investigational New Drugs | 1998

Phase I study of paclitaxel administered by ten-day continuous infusion

Ronald J. Shade; Katherine M. Pisters; Martin H. Huber; Frank V. Fossella; Roman Perez-Soler; Dong M. Shin; Jonathan M. Kurie; Bonnie S. Glisson; Scott M. Lippman; Jin Soo Lee

Purpose: Pre-clinical data have suggested that prolonged exposure to paclitaxel enhances its cytotoxicity, but various clinical trials utilizing long-term infusions of paclitaxel have been limited by unacceptable hematologic toxicity, most notably significant neutropenia. A phase I study of paclitaxel administered over 10 days, was performed to evaluate the hematologic and non-hematologic toxicities as well as to determine the maximum-tolerated dose for the 10-day infusion duration.Patients and methods: Twenty-nine solid tumor patients (predominantly non-small cell lung cancer and head and neck cancer) were treated with paclitaxel at doses ranging from 5 mg/m2/day to 25 mg/m2/day administered as a 10-day continuous infusion via a pump every 21 days. Dose escalation was permitted within individual patients. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicity, ANC ≤ 500 or platelet count ≤ 25,000 for ≥ 7 days or febrile neutropenia. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was defined as the highest dose level at which less than two out of six patients developed DLT. All of the patients had received prior chemotherapy; approximately two-thirds had received prior radiation as well. All patients received standard pre-medications for paclitaxel, including anti-histamines and corticosteroids. Prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was not used.Results: A total of 110 courses of paclitaxel were administered to 29 patients. The incidence of hematologic and non-hematologic toxicity was quite low among the patients treated at dose levels below 17 mg/m2/day. At higher doses, non-hematologic toxicities including arthralgias, myalgias, fatigue, nausea, stomatitis, and peripheral neuropathy were seen, although nearly all of the toxicities were less than grade 3 (NCI toxicity criteria). Hematologic toxicity mostly consisted of neutropenia and was more common at dose levels of 17 mg/m2/day or higher. Nevertheless, even at the highest dose levels (21 mg/m2/day and 25 mg/m2/day) grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred in only 50% of patients. Dose-limiting hematologic toxicity occurred in 2 of 4 patients treated at the 25 mg/m2/day dose level.Conclusion: Paclitaxel can be safely administered as a 10-day infusion. The MTD for this schedule is 210 mg/m2. Unlike the 96-hour paclitaxel infusions, dose-reduction for myelosuppression may not be necessary because the MTD of paclitaxel when administered over a 10-day infusion is similar to the MTD of paclitaxel when infused over 3 or 24 hours.


Investigational New Drugs | 1994

Phase I/II study of cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil and α-interferon for recurrent carcinoma of the head and neck

Martin H. Huber; Mihran Shirinian; Scott M. Lippman; Isaiah W. Dimery; Robert A. Frankenthaler; Waun Ki Hong

SummaryCurrent chemotherapy regimens have failed to demonstrate a significant impact on the overall survival of patients with recurrent head and neck cancer; therefore, new agents or combinations of agents are necessary to improve outcome. Alpha-interferon potentiates the activity in vitro of both agents of one of the most active regimens currently available, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy in patients with recurrent head and neck cancer of adding α-interferon to cisplatin 14 mg/m2 daily and 5-fluorouracil 700 mg/m2 daily for 5 days. No significant toxicity occurred with α-interferon at dose level 0,1 × 106 units/m2 daily for five days. Of four patients treated at dose level +1, α-interferon 3 × 106 units/m2, two developed prolonged grade III neutropenic following the fourth course. One of three patients developed grade IV thrombocytopenia and 6 of 13 courses at this dose level resulted in grade III neutropenia. A phase II study was performed in 19 patients with cisplatin 17 mg/m2/ day, 5-fluoruracil 700 mg/m2/day and a-interferon 3 × 106 units/m2/day. During the phase II study grade III neutropenia occurred in 6 patients and grade IV neutropenia in another patient during at least one course. Grade III and IV thrombocytopenia occurred in one patient each during the phase II study. Overall, major responses occurred in 7 or 23 patients (30%): 5 in phase I and 2 in phase II.In conclusion, the addition of α-interferon to cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil is feasible, but does not appear to increase response rates in recurrent head and neck cancer.


Cancer treatment and research | 1995

Biology and reversal of aerodigestive tract carcinogenesis

Scott M. Lippman; Gary L. Clayman; Martin H. Huber; Steven E. Benner; Waun Ki Hong

Squamous cell carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract is a cosmetically, functionally, and economically devastating class of diseases yet to come under control with standard approaches to prevention, early detection, or therapy [1,2]. Three principle modalities are currently used to control this disease: tobacco/alcohol cessation programs, surgery and radiotherapy for early and local-regional advanced disease, and chemotherapy in advanced, recurrent, and metastatic disease.

Collaboration


Dive into the Martin H. Huber's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Scott M. Lippman

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Waun Ki Hong

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Roman Perez-Soler

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Steven E. Benner

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bonnie S. Glisson

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Frank V. Fossella

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Isaiah W. Dimery

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

J. Lee

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mihran Shirinian

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge