Martin Hiscock

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Women: In-Hospital Clinical Outcome: Experience from a Single Private Institution in Melbourne

BACKGROUND Differences in outcome between women and men treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have decreased. This study was aimed at assessing the demographic, clinical, and angiographic features, procedural characteristics and in-hospital results of women undergoing PCI and comparing their results with those of a group of men undergoing PCI throughout the same period of time. METHODS AND RESULTS All consecutive PCI procedures performed at Epworth Hospital from November 2004 to January 2007 were analysed. Women and men were compared according to baseline clinical, angiographic and procedural characteristics, angiographic success rates and in-hospital outcomes. A total of 1699 consecutive PCI procedures were performed; of these, 405 PCI (23.8%) were performed in women. Women were older (73.9+/-10 years versus 66.1+/-11.9 years, p<0.0001), had a higher prevalence of hypertension (78% versus 63%, p<0.0001), had lower prevalence of prior myocardial infarction (21% versus 27%, p=0.026), and had less history of prior coronary artery by-pass surgery (13% versus 18%, p=0.023) than men. A greater proportion of women presented with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) to PCI than men (63.7% versus 52.9%, p<0.0001). Women had more complex lesions B2/C (78% versus 74%, p=0.049), a higher proportion of ostial lesions (10.5% versus 5.5%, p<0.0001) and less multivessel disease (48% versus 54% p=0.028) than men. Angiographic lesion success rates were similar in both groups. Total unadjusted in-hospital mortality was higher in women than in men (1.97% versus 0.54%, respectively, p=0.013). This difference in mortality was only at the expense of a higher unadjusted mortality in women presenting with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) than men (17.5% versus 1.87%, p=0.002). No women with a stable coronary syndrome or non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) died in hospital. There were no differences in in-hospital myocardial infarction, new revascularisation or stroke between both groups. CONCLUSIONS PCI in women has good results but carries an increased unadjusted mortality than in men. This mortality difference between genders in our study, however, was solely at the expense of a higher unadjusted mortality in women than in men undergoing PCI for STEMI.

Percutaneous coronary intervention or prehospital thrombolysis? What is the preferred treatment in S-T elevation myocardial infarction?

There is no situation in medicine where outcome is so utterly dependent on time than in the treatment of patients with S‐T elevation myocardial infarction. This life‐threatening situation accounts for 30% of acute coronary syndromes. Prompt myocardial reperfusion saves lives, but health services need to be thoroughly organised to achieve this outcome. Unfortunately, a minority of patients in Australia present within 2 h of symptom onset and most patients receive reperfusion 3–4 h after. So health professionals begin at a disadvantage.

Very Late Drug-Eluting Stent Thrombosis Post Exercise Stress Echocardiogram

Stent thrombosis, although a rare event, has been the object of considerable interest because of its attendant morbidity and mortality and has come into focus with the advent of drug-eluting stents. We report a case of very late drug-eluting stent thrombosis occurring immediately after an exercise stress echocardiogram, in a patient who, 2 years earlier, had undergone primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Similar cases reported in the literature and the possible mechanisms of stent thrombosis associated with exercise testing are reviewed.

Massive coronary artery aneurysm with acute myocardial infarction

Abstract An elderly man presenting with acute inferior myocardial infarction had a giant right coronary artery aneurysm which was identified at angiography. The patient was successfully treated with emergency coronary bypass surgery after failure of medical therapy. The case was remarkable for the large size of the aneurysm and the rather dramatic presentation. With improvement in clinical recognition of this problem, the natural history, prognosis and appropriate therapy may become better defined.