Martin J. Humphries

Integrin ligands at a glance

Integrins are one of the major families of cell adhesion receptors ([Humphries, 2000][1]; [Hynes, 2002][2]). All integrins are non-covalently linked, heterodimeric molecules containing an α and a β subunit. Both subunits are type I transmembrane proteins, containing large extracellular domains and

Vinculin controls focal adhesion formation by direct interactions with talin and actin.

Focal adhesions (FAs) regulate cell migration. Vinculin, with its many potential binding partners, can interconnect signals in FAs. Despite the well-characterized structure of vinculin, the molecular mechanisms underlying its action have remained unclear. Here, using vinculin mutants, we separate the vinculin head and tail regions into distinct functional domains. We show that the vinculin head regulates integrin dynamics and clustering and the tail regulates the link to the mechanotransduction force machinery. The expression of vinculin constructs with unmasked binding sites in the head and tail regions induces dramatic FA growth, which is mediated by their direct interaction with talin. This interaction leads to clustering of activated integrin and an increase in integrin residency time in FAs. Surprisingly, paxillin recruitment, induced by active vinculin constructs, occurs independently of its potential binding site in the vinculin tail. The vinculin tail, however, is responsible for the functional link of FAs to the actin cytoskeleton. We propose a new model that explains how vinculin orchestrates FAs.

Synergistic control of cell adhesion by integrins and syndecans.

The ability of cells to adhere to each other and to their surrounding extracellular matrices is essential for a multicellular existence. Adhesion provides physical support for cells, regulates cell positioning and enables microenvironmental sensing. The integrins and the syndecans are two adhesion receptor families that mediate adhesion, but their relative and functional contributions to cell–extracellular matrix interactions remain obscure. Recent advances have highlighted connections between the signalling networks that are controlled by these families of receptors. Here we survey the evidence that synergistic signalling is involved in controlling adhesive function and the regulation of cell behaviour in response to the external environment.

Demonstration of catch bonds between an integrin and its ligand

Binding of integrins to ligands provides anchorage and signals for the cell, making them prime candidates for mechanosensing molecules. How force regulates integrin–ligand dissociation is unclear. We used atomic force microscopy to measure the force-dependent lifetimes of single bonds between a fibronectin fragment and an integrin α5β1-Fc fusion protein or membrane α5β1. Force prolonged bond lifetimes in the 10–30-pN range, a counterintuitive behavior called catch bonds. Changing cations from Ca2+/Mg2+ to Mg2+/EGTA and to Mn2+ caused longer lifetime in the same 10–30-pN catch bond region. A truncated α5β1 construct containing the headpiece but not the legs formed longer-lived catch bonds that were not affected by cation changes at forces <30 pN. Binding of monoclonal antibodies that induce the active conformation of the integrin headpiece shifted catch bonds to a lower force range. Thus, catch bond formation appears to involve force-assisted activation of the headpiece but not integrin extension.

PKCα regulates β1 integrin-dependent cell motility through association and control of integrin traffic

Protein kinase C (PKC) has been implicated in integrin‐mediated spreading and migration. In mammary epithelial cells there is a partial co‐localization between β1 integrin and PKCα. This reflects complexes between these proteins as demonstrated by fluorescense resonance energy transfer (FRET) monitored by fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy and also by coprecipitation. Constitutive complexes are observed for the intact PKCα and also form with the regulatory domain in an activation‐dependent manner. Expression of PKCα causes upregulation of β1 integrin on the cell surface, whereas stimulation of PKC induces internalization of β1 integrin. The integrin initially traffics to an endosomal compartment in a Ca2+/PI 3‐kinase/dynamin I‐dependent manner and subsequently enters an endocytic recycling pathway. This induction of endocytosis by PKCα is a function of activity and is not observed for the regulatory domain. PKCα, but not PKCα regulatory domain expression stimulates migration on β1 integrin substrates. This PKCα‐enhanced migratory response is inhibited by blockade of endocytosis.

Proteomic Analysis of Integrin-Associated Complexes Identifies RCC2 as a Dual Regulator of Rac1 and Arf6

Regulator of chromosome condensation–2 is a component of fibronectin-activated signaling pathways that regulate cell migration. Integrin Interactors Integrins mediate cell-cell adhesion, as well as cell adhesion to the extracellular matrix. Identification of the intracellular signaling networks associated with integrins is of interest because integrins are involved in processes such as invasion of tumor cells during metastasis and leukocyte infiltration during inflammation. Humphries et al. developed a method of isolating protein complexes associated with α5β1 integrin, which binds to fibronectin, and with α4β1 integrin, which binds to vascular cell adhesion molecule–1. Although a subset of proteins was detected in both the α5β1 and α4β1 networks, there were several receptor-specific proteins. In particular, regulator of chromosome condensation–2 (RCC2) was identified as a component of the α5β1 integrin–associated signaling network. RCC2 promoted fibronectin-dependent migration by inhibiting two different subnetworks (Rac1 and Arf6). These techniques provide the means to investigate the composition and function of adhesion complexes under different physiological conditions. The binding of integrin adhesion receptors to their extracellular matrix ligands controls cell morphology, movement, survival, and differentiation in various developmental, homeostatic, and disease processes. Here, we report a methodology to isolate complexes associated with integrin adhesion receptors, which, like other receptor-associated signaling complexes, have been refractory to proteomic analysis. Quantitative, comparative analyses of the proteomes of two receptor-ligand pairs, α4β1–vascular cell adhesion molecule–1 and α5β1–fibronectin, defined both core and receptor-specific components. Regulator of chromosome condensation–2 (RCC2) was detected in the α5β1–fibronectin signaling network at an intersection between the Rac1 and adenosine 5′-diphosphate ribosylation factor 6 (Arf6) subnetworks. RCC2 knockdown enhanced fibronectin-induced activation of both Rac1 and Arf6 and accelerated cell spreading, suggesting that RCC2 limits the signaling required for membrane protrusion and delivery. Dysregulation of Rac1 and Arf6 function by RCC2 knockdown also abolished persistent migration along fibronectin fibers, indicating a functional role for RCC2 in directional cell movement. This proteomics workflow now opens the way to further dissection and systems-level analyses of adhesion signaling.

Regulation of integrin alpha 5 beta 1-fibronectin interactions by divalent cations. Evidence for distinct classes of binding sites for Mn2+, Mg2+, and Ca2+

Integrin-ligand interactions are known to be dependent on divalent cations, although the precise role of cations in ligand binding is still unclear. Using the interaction between α5β1 and fibronectin as a model system, we have performed a comprehensive analysis of the effects of Mn2+, Mg2+, and Ca2+ on ligand binding. Each cation had distinct effects on the ligand-binding capacity of α5β1: Mn2+ promoted high levels of ligand binding, Mg2+ promoted low levels of binding, and Ca2+ failed to support binding. Studies of the effects of different combinations of cations on ligand binding indicated that the cation-binding sites within α5β1 are not all identical, or of broad specificity, but instead each site shows a distinct preference for one or more cations. Ca2+ strongly inhibited Mn2+-supported ligand binding, but this inhibition was noncompetitive, suggesting that Ca2+ recognizes different cation-binding sites to Mn2+. In contrast, Ca2+ acted as a direct competitive inhibitor of Mg2+-supported ligand binding, implying that Ca2+ can displace Mg2+ from the integrin. However, low concentrations of Ca2+ greatly increased the apparent affinity of Mg2+ for its binding site, suggesting the existence of a distinct high affinity Ca2+-binding site. Taken together, our results imply that the ligand-binding capacity of α5β1 can be regulated in a complex manner through separate classes of binding sites for Mn2+, Mg2+, and Ca2+.

Linking integrin conformation to function

Integrins are αβ heterodimeric adhesion receptors that relay signals bidirectionally across the plasma membrane between the extracellular matrix and cell-surface ligands, and cytoskeletal and signalling effectors. The physical and chemical signals that are controlled by integrins are essential for intercellular communication and underpin all aspects of metazoan existence. To mediate such diverse functions, integrins exhibit structural diversity, flexibility and dynamism. Conformational changes, as opposed to surface expression or clustering, are central to the regulation of receptor function. In recent years, there has been intense interest in determining the three-dimensional structure of integrins, and analysing the shape changes that underpin the interconversion between functional states. Considering the central importance of the integrin signalling nexus, it is perhaps no surprise that obtaining this information has been difficult, and the answers gained so far have been complicated. In this Commentary, we pose some of the key remaining questions that surround integrin structure-function relationships and review the evidence that supports the current models.

Integrin activation: the link between ligand binding and signal transduction

A major function of the integrin family of receptors is to provide a physical connection between extracellular adhesion proteins and intracellular cytoskeletal/signalling molecules. These linkages are dynamic and are influenced in a bidirectional manner by changes in the microenvironment of the plasma membrane that occur both inside and outside of cells. The mechanisms employed by integrins to transduce information are complex, but a series of recent studies has clarified their molecular basis. In particular, explanations for the interdependence of ligand binding, occupancy by divalent cations and receptor conformation have been obtained, and some of the key sites responsible for each property have been localized within the integrin heterodimer. These insights now permit a better visualization of the intricate molecular switch that controls the adhesive phenotype.

Heparin-II domain of fibronectin is a vascular endothelial growth factor-binding domain: enhancement of VEGF biological activity by a singular growth factor/matrix protein synergism.

We describe extracellular interactions between fibronectin (Fn) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) that influence integrin-growth factor receptor crosstalk and cellular responses. In previous work, we found that VEGF bound specifically to fibronectin (Fn) but not vitronectin or collagens. Herein we report that VEGF binds to the heparin-II domain of Fn and that the cell-binding and VEGF-binding domains of Fn, when physically linked, are necessary and sufficient to promote VEGF-induced endothelial cell proliferation, migration, and Erk activation. Using recombinant Fn domains, the C-terminal heparin-II domain of Fn (type III repeats 13 to 14) was identified as a key VEGF-binding site. Mutation of the heparin-binding residues on FnIII13–14 abolished VEGF binding, and peptides corresponding to the heparin-binding sequences in FnIII13–14 inhibited VEGF binding to Fn. Fn fragments containing both the α5β1 integrin-binding domain (III 9 to 10) and the VEGF-binding domain (III 13 to 14) significantly enhanced VEGF-induced EC migration and proliferation and induced strong phosphorylation of the VEGF receptor and Erk. Neither the cell-binding or VEGF-binding fragment of Fn alone had comparable VEGF-promoting effects. These results suggest that the mechanism of VEGF/Fn synergism is mediated extracellularly by the formation of a novel VEGF/Fn complex requiring both the cell-binding and VEGF-binding domains linked in a single molecular unit. These data also highlight a new function for the Fn C-terminal heparin-binding domain that may have important implications for angiogenesis and tumor growth.