Martin J. Quinn

Ticlopidine and Clopidogrel

The thienopyridines ticlopidine and clopidogrel are inhibitors of platelet function in vivo. Their mode of action has not been defined, but it appears that they require conversion to as yet unidentified metabolites that are noncompetitive antagonists of the platelet ADP receptor. Inhibition of platelet aggregation with these compounds is delayed until 24 to 48 hours after administration. Maximum inhibition occurs after 3 to 5 days, and recovery is slow after drug withdrawal. Ticlopidine is effective in preventing cardiovascular events in cerebrovascular, cardiovascular, and peripheral vascular disease, with an efficacy that is similar to aspirin. However, its use is associated with significant and sometimes fatal adverse reactions, specifically neutropenia and bone marrow aplasia. Gastrointestinal side effects and skin rashes are common and result in discontinuation of therapy in up to 10% of patients. Clopidogrel is at least as effective as aspirin in preventing cardiovascular events in patients with a history of vascular disease. It appears to be safer than ticlopidine, although its efficacy in acute coronary syndromes or post-coronary-stent insertion has not been reported. Important outstanding issues are whether clopidogrel adds to the benefit of aspirin and whether the combination of these agents is safe. If so, this combination may become the standard for antithrombotic therapy in cardiovascular disease.

Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors Recognition of a Two-Edged Sword?

Glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa antagonists are potent inhibitors of platelet aggregation that provide marked protection from ischemic events in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).1,2⇓ Abciximab, the prototypic GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor, has been studied in >8000 patients undergoing elective or high-risk PCI.2,3,4⇓⇓ In these patients, it produces a consistent 35% to 56% reduction in ischemic end points at 30 days, with a significant 22% reduction in the risk of death, as shown in a combined analysis of long-term (3-year minimum) follow-up of the Evaluation of 7E3 for the Prevention of Ischemic Complications (EPIC), Evaluation in PTCA to Improve Long-term Outcome with abciximab GP IIb/IIIa blockade (EPILOG), and Evaluation of Platelet IIb/IIIa Inhibitor for Stenting (EPISTENT) trials.5 Similar results, albeit of a smaller magnitude, have been seen with the small-molecule antagonists tirofiban and eptifibatide, with a 16% to 35% reduction in ischemic events in patients undergoing PCI.1,6⇓ Attempts to expand the therapeutic indication of GP IIb/IIIa antagonists to other conditions associated with platelet-mediated thrombosis, however, have been less fruitful than expected. Instead of reducing major ischemic events, long-term oral GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor therapy7 has uniformly increased the fatality rate. Furthermore, the overall efficacy of a number of the intravenous antagonists in non–ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (ACS), or in combination with thrombolysis in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (MI), has been less than anticipated.8 Of particular concern is the fact that there has been a paradoxical increase in adverse events in 2 of the trials of intravenous therapy in ACS.9,10⇓ Platelets are known to play an important role in the pathogenesis of ACS, yet the high levels of platelet inhibition attainable with GP IIb/IIIa antagonists have failed to dramatically improve clinical outcomes outside of PCI. In this article, we discuss these …

Evidence of platelet activation during treatment with a GPIIb/IIIa antagonist in Patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes

OBJECTIVES The study was done to determine the role of partial agonist activity in the lack of effectiveness of the oral GPIIb/IIIa antagonist orbofiban. BACKGROUND Orbofiban, an oral GPIIb/IIIa antagonist, was found to increase the mortality of patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in the OPUS-TIMI-16 trial, despite the fact that it is a very potent anti-platelet agent and that IV agents have proven very effective. METHODS Patients (n = 520) with ACS were randomized to orbofiban 30 mg, 40 mg or 50 mg twice daily or 50 mg once daily or placebo. Platelet activity was assessed in 175 patients by examining GPIIb/IIIa receptor conformation, expression of CD63 antigen, and platelet aggregation. RESULTS Plasma concentrations of orbofiban at the highest dose (74 +/- 6 ng/ml peak, 61 +/- 5 ng/ml trough) exceeded the IC50 for platelet aggregation to adenosine diphosphate (ADP) (29 +/- 6 ng/ml) and thrombin-activating peptide (61 +/- 18 ng/ml). Orbofiban induced a conformational change in GPIIb/IIIa detected as the displacement of the monoclonal antibody mAb2; such conformational changes have been linked to partial agonist activity. Consistent with this, platelet expression of CD63 ex vivo was significantly increased at five time points during the study. In vitro, orbofiban increased platelet aggregation to a submaximal concentration of epinephrine (67 +/- 19% vs. 27 +/- 9%, n = 5) and increased thromboxane formation when the platelet GPIIb/IIIa were clustered using monoclonal antibodies to the receptor. CONCLUSIONS Orbofiban is both an antagonist and a partial agonist of platelet GPIIb/IIIa. At low concentrations of the drug, this partial agonist activity may enhance platelet aggregation. Along with suboptimal plasma drug levels, these findings may help explain the lack of efficacy seen with orbofiban in patients with ACS.

Quantifying GPIIb/IIIa receptor binding using 2 monoclonal antibodies: discriminating abciximab and small molecular weight antagonists.

BACKGROUND Dosing of glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists is frequently based on the inhibition of platelet aggregation, which may be influenced by the agonist used or concurrent medications. Here we describe a monoclonal antibody-based technique to quantify total and ligand-occupied GPIIb/IIIa receptors. METHODS AND RESULTS In vitro binding of monoclonal antibodies, LYP18 (Mab1) and 4F8 (Mab2), to the GPIIb/IIIa complex, was characterized using purified receptor and to platelets by flow cytometry. Patients undergoing coronary angioplasty received a single 20 mg dose of the oral GPIIb/IIIa antagonist, xemilofiban, or matching placebo, and antibody binding was compared with inhibition of platelet aggregation. Mab1 and Mab2 were bound to purified GPIIb/IIIa and to unoccupied, inactivated receptor on platelets. Mab2 identified the beta3 subunit, whereas Mab1 was complex-specific. Neither antibody interfered with the others binding, suggesting that they identified distinct sites. Mab1 identified 53 300+/-5423 GPIIb/IIIa sites per platelet, whereas Mab2 identified 50 120+/-5066 sites per platelet. Mab1 binding was inhibited by abciximab in a dose dependent manner (IC50, 0.85+/-0.1 microg/mL), whereas Mab2 binding was unaffected. In contrast, the 2 small molecular weight antagonists, SC-57101A (IC50, 0.22+/-0.06 micromol/L) and eptifibatide (IC50, 0.35+/-0.14 micromol/L) inhibited Mab2 but not Mab1 binding. In patients treated with xemilofiban, Mab1 binding was unaltered but Mab2 binding decreased from 37 930+/-2061 sites per platelet at baseline to 8318+/-870 sites per platelet 6 hours after dosing (P<0.0001). Platelet aggregation to adenosine diphosphate (20 micromol/L) fell to 3+/-3% of baseline in line with the inhibition of Mab2 binding (correlation coefficient 0.8, P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Mab1 and Mab2 bind to GPIIb/IIIa and are differentially displaced by abciximab and small molecular weight antagonists. These antibodies may be used to monitor receptor number and occupancy during administration of a GPIIb/IIIa antagonist.

Integrin αIIbβ3 and Its Antagonism

AlphaIIbbeta3, the major membrane protein on the surface of platelets, is a member of the integrin family of heterodimeric adhesion receptors. The alphaIIb and beta3 subunits are each composed of a short cytoplasmic tail, a single transmembrane domain, and a large, extracellular region that consists of a series of linked domains. Recent structural analyses have provided insights into the organization of this and other integrins and how a signal is initiated at its cytoplasmic tail to transform the extracellular domain of alphaIIbbeta3 into a functional receptor for fibrinogen or von Willebrand factor to support platelet aggregation and thrombus formation. These functions of alphaIIbbeta3 have been targeted for antithrombotic therapy, and intravenous alphaIIbbeta3 antagonists have been remarkably effective in the setting of percutaneous coronary interventions, showing both short-term and long-term mortality benefits. However, the development of oral antagonists has been abandoned on the basis of excess of mortality in clinical trials, and the extension of therapy with existing alphaIIbbeta3 antagonists to broadly treat acute coronary syndromes has not fully met expectations. An in-depth understanding of how antagonists engage and influence the function of alphaIIbbeta3 and platelets in the context of the new structural insights may explain its salutary and potential deleterious effects.

Common variations in platelet glycoproteins: pharmacogenomic implications

Atherosclerosis and its complications are the result of complex interactions between the environment and genetic factors. Platelets play an important role in this disease process and antiplatelet agents are an essential part of its treatment. However, individual response to antiplatelet therapy is variable and agents that are safe and effective in one individual may be ineffective or harmful in another. It is likely that genetic factors are involved in this variance as platelet, and platelet-associated proteins are highly polymorphic. Up to 30% of natural variation in platelet reactivity is related to genetic inheritance. Rare inherited defects of platelet function due to the absence or reduced surface expression of platelet adhesion receptors have long been recognised. These cause minor bleeding defects and are usually clinically apparent. Antiplatelet agents should be avoided in these situations. The importance of the more common genetic variations or polymorphisms, which result in minor changes in the expressed protein and are often clinically silent, is unknown. Investigations are ongoing into the role of this variation in platelet physiology. A number of polymorphisms in platelet surface glycoproteins have received particular attention; the (A1/2) polymorphism resulting in conformational change at the amino terminus of the beta-3 chain of the platelet fibrinogen receptor glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa and polymorphisms in the platelet collagen (GPIa/IIa and GPVI) and von Willebrand receptors (GPIb-IX). The (A2) allele has been associated with resistance to the antiplatelet agent aspirin and increased platelet responsiveness. The GPIa polymorphism has been associated with increased surface expression of GPIa and increased platelet adhesion to collagen. Recently, conflicting reports of the association of these polymorphisms with coronary artery disease (CAD) and its complications have been described. Mutations have also been identified in other platelet surface receptors including the recently identified G(i)-linked platelet adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor (P2Y(12)), targeted by the antiplatelet agents ticlopidine and clopidogrel. These discoveries have stimulated interest in the role of genetic factors in platelet physiology. In this article, the current knowledge of the influence of genetic make-up on antiplatelet therapy is discussed.

Integrin alphaIIbbeta3 and its antagonism.

AlphaIIbbeta3, the major membrane protein on the surface of platelets, is a member of the integrin family of heterodimeric adhesion receptors. The alphaIIb and beta3 subunits are each composed of a short cytoplasmic tail, a single transmembrane domain, and a large, extracellular region that consists of a series of linked domains. Recent structural analyses have provided insights into the organization of this and other integrins and how a signal is initiated at its cytoplasmic tail to transform the extracellular domain of alphaIIbbeta3 into a functional receptor for fibrinogen or von Willebrand factor to support platelet aggregation and thrombus formation. These functions of alphaIIbbeta3 have been targeted for antithrombotic therapy, and intravenous alphaIIbbeta3 antagonists have been remarkably effective in the setting of percutaneous coronary interventions, showing both short-term and long-term mortality benefits. However, the development of oral antagonists has been abandoned on the basis of excess of mortality in clinical trials, and the extension of therapy with existing alphaIIbbeta3 antagonists to broadly treat acute coronary syndromes has not fully met expectations. An in-depth understanding of how antagonists engage and influence the function of alphaIIbbeta3 and platelets in the context of the new structural insights may explain its salutary and potential deleterious effects.

Mortality benefit of beta-blockade after successful elective percutaneous coronary intervention.

OBJECTIVES The goal of this study was to evaluate the mortality benefit of beta-blockers after successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND Beta-blockers reduce mortality after myocardial infarction (MI), though limited data are available regarding their role after successful PCI. METHODS Each year from 1993 through 1999, the first 1,000 consecutive patients undergoing PCI were systematically followed up. Patients presenting with acute or recent MI, shock, or unsuccessful revascularization procedures were excluded from the analysis. Clinical, procedural, and follow-up data of beta-blocker-treated and non-beta-blocker-treated patients were compared. A multivariate survival analysis model using propensity analysis was used to adjust for heterogeneity between the two groups. RESULTS Of the 4,553 patients, 2,056 (45%) were treated with beta-blockers at the time of the procedure. Beta-blocker therapy was associated with a mortality reduction from 1.3% to 0.8% at 30 days (p = 0.13) and a reduction from 6.0% to 3.9% at one year (p = 0.0014). This survival benefit of beta-blockers was independent of left ventricular function, diabetic status, history of hypertension, or history of MI. Using propensity analysis, beta-blocker therapy remained an independent predictor for one-year survival after PCI (hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.46 to 0.87; p = 0.0054). CONCLUSIONS Within this large prospective registry, beta-blocker use was associated with a marked long-term survival benefit among patients undergoing successful elective percutaneous coronary revascularization.

Helicobacter pylori serology in patients with angiographically documented coronary artery disease

We studied the relation between angiographically defined coronary artery disease and serologic evidence of Helicobacter pylori infection in 488 patients undergo ing elective coronary angiography. There was no association between Helicobacter pylori infection and coronary artery disease (odds ratio 1.3, 95% confidence interval 0.83 to 2.16).

Relation Between Previous Lipid-Lowering Therapy and Infarct Size (Creatine Kinase-MB Level) in Patients Presenting With Acute Myocardial Infarction

Animal experimental data have shown that lipid-lowering agents reduce myocardial infarct size. This association has not been well studied in humans. We compared infarct size in 10,548 patients in the GUSTO IIb and PURSUIT trials who were (n = 1,028) or were not (n = 9,520) on lipid-lowering therapy before an enrolling myocardial infarction (MI). Patients using lipid-lowering agents before their index MI had smaller infarcts than those who were not using these agents (median peak creatine kinase [CK]-MB 4.2 vs 5.2 times the upper limit of normal [ULN]; p <0.0001). Similarly, in an unadjusted model, patients on previous lipid-lowering therapy were less likely to have a peak CK-MB >3 times the ULN (620 of 1,028 [60.3%] vs 6,486 of 9,520 patients [68.1%]; p <0.001; relative risk 0.88, 95% confidence interval 0.84 to 0.93, p <0.0001). In a covariate- and propensity-adjusted multivariable model, the association between pretreatment with lipid-lowering agents and smaller infarct size persisted (relative risk for CK-MB >3 times the ULN 0.94, 95% confidence interval 0.88 to 0.99, p = 0.04). In conclusion, patients on lipid-lowering agents before an MI had significantly smaller infarcts. These findings suggest that lipid-lowering therapy may exert additional salutary effects in the setting of acute coronary syndromes.