Martin Malina

Endovascular repair of descending thoracic aortic aneurysms: an early experience with intermediate-term follow-up

PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to report an initial experience with the endovascular repair of descending thoracic aortic aneurysm. Complications and intermediate-term morphologic changes were identified with the intent of altering patient selection and device design. METHODS Endografts were placed into 25 patients at high-risk for conventional surgical repair over a 3(1/2)-year period. Devices were customized on the basis of preoperative imaging information. Follow-up computed tomography scans were obtained at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months and yearly thereafter. Additional interventions occurred in the setting of endoleaks, migration, and aneurysm growth. RESULTS The overall 30-day mortality rate was 20% (12.5% for elective cases; 33% for emergent cases). There were 3 conversions to open repair. Neurologic deficits developed in 3 patients; 1 insult resulted in permanent paraplegia. Neurologic deficits were associated with longer endografts (P =.019). Three endoleaks required treatment, and 1 fatal rupture of the thoracic aneurysm treated occurred 6 months after the initial repair. Migrations were detected in 4 patients. The maximal aneurysm size decreased yearly by 9.15% (P =.01) or by 13.5% (P =.0005) if patients with endoleaks (n = 3 patients) were excluded. Both the proximal and distal neck dilated slightly over the course of follow-up (P =.019 and P =.001, respectively). The length of the proximal neck was a significant predictor of the risk for endoleakage (P =.02). CONCLUSION The treatment of descending thoracic aortic aneurysms with an endovascular approach is feasible and may, in some patients, offer the best means of therapy. Early complications were primarily related to device design and patient selection. All aneurysms without endoleaks decreased in size after treatment. Late complications were associated with changing aneurysm morphologic features and device migration. The morphologic changes remain somewhat unpredictable; however, alterations in device design may result in improved fixation and more durable aneurysm exclusion.

The chimney graft: a technique for preserving or rescuing aortic branch vessels in stent-graft sealing zones.

Purpose: To report an alternative to the fenestrated stent-graft for preserving blood flow to side branches in the sealing zones of aortic stent-grafts. Technique: A covered stent is deployed parallel to the main aortic stent-graft, protruding somewhat proximally, like a chimney, to preserve flow to a vital side branch covered by the aortic stent-graft. Use of a chimney graft makes it possible to use standard off-the-shelf stent-grafts to instantly treat lesions with inadequate fixation zones, providing an alternative to fenestrated stent-grafts in urgent cases, in aneurysms with challenging neck morphology, and for reconstituting an aortic side branch unintentionally compromised during endovascular repair. This technique has been used successfully in 10 patients, combining chimney grafts in the renal, superior mesenteric, left subclavian, left common carotid, and innominate arteries with stent-grafts in the abdominal (n=6) or thoracic (n=4) aorta. There has been no late chimney graft—related endoleak on imaging studies up to 8 months. Conclusion: The use of chimney grafts is feasible in the renal and superior mesenteric arteries, as well as in the supra-aortic branches, to facilitate stent-graft repair of thoracic or abdominal aortic lesions with inadequate fixation zones.

Collected world and single center experience with endovascular treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms

Background:Case and single center reports have documented the feasibility and suggested the effectiveness of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (RAAAs), but the role and value of such treatment remain controversial. Objective:To clarify these we examined a collected experience with use of EVAR for RAAA treatment from 49 centers. Methods:Data were obtained by questionnaires from these centers, updated from 13 centers committed to EVAR treatment whenever possible and included treatment details from a single center and information on 1037 patients treated by EVAR and 763 patients treated by open repair (OR). Results:Overall 30-day mortality after EVAR in 1037 patients was 21.2%. Centers performing EVAR for RAAAs whenever possible did so in 28% to 79% (mean 49.1%) of their patients, had a 30-day mortality of 19.7% (range: 0%–32%) for 680 EVAR patients and 36.3% (range: 8%–53%) for 763 OR patients (P < 0.0001). Supraceliac aortic balloon control was obtained in 19.1% ± 12.0% (±SD) of 680 EVAR patients. Abdominal compartment syndrome was treated by some form of decompression in 12.2% ± 8.3% (±SD) of these EVAR patients. Conclusion:These results indicate that EVAR has a lower procedural mortality at 30 days than OR in at least some patients and that EVAR is better than OR for treating RAAA patients provided they have favorable anatomy; adequate skills, facilities, and protocols are available; and optimal strategies, techniques, and adjuncts are employed.

Changing aneurysmal morphology after endovascular grafting: relation to leakage or persistent perfusion

PURPOSE To relate changing abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) morphology after endovascular grafting to the presence of leakage, collateral perfusion, and other factors. METHODS Thirty-five patients who underwent successful AAA endovascular grafting were evaluated. Self-expanding Z-stents and Dacron grafts were applied in bifurcated and aortomonoiliac systems. Postoperative diameter changes were calculated from repeated spiral computed tomographic scans, angiograms, and ultrasonic phase-locked echo-tracking scans during a median 6-month follow-up (interquartile range [IQR] 3 to 12). RESULTS At 12 months, the diameters of completely excluded aneurysms had decreased 6 mm (IQR 2 to 11; p = 0.006). The proximal graft-anchoring stents had dilated 2 mm (IQR 0.5 to 3.3; p = 0.01). The aortic diameters immediately below the renal arteries but above the stents had not changed. Endoleakage and collateral perfusion (n = 13) were each associated with preserved aneurysm size and a 12 times higher risk of aneurysm dilation. After the leakage or the collateral perfusion had been treated, the aneurysm size decreased. Aneurysms with extensive intraluminal thrombi presented a reduced risk of leakage or perfusion. CONCLUSIONS The diameters of endovascularly excluded AAAs decrease, except in cases of leakage or perfusion. Careful follow-up of patients with aortic endografts is necessary.

Endovascular AAA Exclusion: Will Stents with Hooks and Barbs Prevent Stent-Graft Migration?

PURPOSE To investigate if stents with hooks and barbs will improve stent-graft fixation in the abdominal aorta. METHODS Sixteen- to 24-mm-diameter Dacron grafts were deployed inside cadaveric aortas. The grafts were anchored by stents as in endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. One hundred thirty-seven stent-graft deployments were carried out with modified self-expanding Z-stents with (A) no hooks and barbs (n = 75), (B) 4 5-mm-long hooks and barbs (n = 39), (C) 8 10-mm-long, strengthened hooks and barbs (n = 19), or (D) hooks only (n = 4). Increasing longitudinal traction was applied to determine the displacement force needed to extract the stent-grafts. The radial force of the stents was measured and correlated to the displacement force. RESULTS The median (interquartile range) displacement force needed to extract grafts anchored by stent A was 2.5 N (2.0 to 3.4), stent B 7.8 N (7.4 to 10.8), and stent C 22.5 N (17.1 to 27.9), p < 0.001. Both hooks and barbs added anchoring strength. During traction, the weaker barbs were distorted or caused intimal tears. The stronger barbs engaged the entire aortic wall. The radial force of the stents had no impact on fixation, while aortic calcification and graft oversizing had marginal effects. CONCLUSIONS Stent barbs and hooks increased the fixation of stent-grafts tenfold, while the radial force of stents had no impact. These data may prove important in future endograft development to prevent stent-graft migration after aneurysm exclusion.

Distal Migration of Stent-Grafts after Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

PURPOSE To analyze patients after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) with respect to distal migration of stent-grafts and its underlying causes. MATERIALS AND METHODS Sixty-five patients underwent endovascular repair between January 1994 and February 1997. There were seven women and 58 men, with a mean age of 71 years (range, 51-84 years). Three patients died in the perioperative period (one of myocardial infarction and two of multiorgan failure) and two patients died within 4 months of the procedure of non-procedure-related causes. In addition, two patients were followed at another hospital. The remaining 58 patients were followed up with spiral computed tomography scans at 1, 3, and 6 months, and biannually thereafter. Angiography was performed at 1 month and 1 year after the procedure and additionally when deemed clinically necessary. Mean follow-up was 29 months (range, 1-49). Migration more than 5 mm was considered significant. RESULTS Twenty-six patients (45%) showed distal migration of stent-grafts during follow-up. Mean follow-up time at detection of migration was 13 months (range, 1-36 months). Thirteen cases of migration were ascribed to dilatation of the proximal aneurysmal neck during follow-up. Ten cases of migration were ascribed to causes other than neck dilatation or poor patient selection. In three cases, no obvious cause for the migration was found. The migration was complete in eight cases, leading to late conversion to open surgical repair. On two of these occasions, complete migration lead to aneurysm rupture. In addition, four patients received additional stent-grafts as proximal extensions. CONCLUSIONS Distal migration of stent-grafts after endovascular AAA repair occurred frequently in this series. Dilatation of the proximal aneurysmal neck is a major cause of distal migration of stent-grafts. Improved proximal fixation is needed to secure long-term durability.

Persistent collateral perfusion of abdominal aortic aneurysm after endovascular repair does not lead to progressive change in aneurysm diameter

PURPOSE To differentiate between the phenomenon of collateral perfusion from a side branch versus graft-related endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA), with respect to aneurysm size and prognosis. METHODS We successfully treated 64 AAA patients with endovascular grafting. We followed all the patients postoperatively with spiral computed tomography at one, three, six and 12 months, and biannually thereafter. We measured aneurysm diameters preoperatively and postoperatively. We calculated preoperatively the relation of maximum aortic diameter (D) to the thrombus-free lumen diameter (L) expressed as an L/D ratio. Median follow-up was 15 months. RESULTS Sixteen patients had collateral perfusion during follow-up. We successfully treated two patients with embolization. One patient showed resolution of collateral perfusion after we stopped warfarin treatment. Two patients died of unrelated causes during follow-up. One patient was converted to surgical treatment, and two patients showed spontaneous resolution of their collateral perfusion. The group of patients with perfusion showed no statistically significant change of their aortic diameter on follow-up. The group of patients without perfusion showed a median decrease in aortic diameter of 8mm (p < 0.0001) at 18 months postoperatively. The group of patients with perfusion had significantly less thrombus in their aneurysm sac preoperatively than the group without perfusion, as expressed by the L/D ratio (mean L/D 0,61 versus 0,78, respectively; p=0.0021.) CONCLUSION There was no significant increase in aortic diameter on an average 18 months postoperatively despite persistent collateral perfusion. This may indicate a halted disease progression in the short term. Embolization of collateral vessels is associated with risk of paraplegia. We recommend a conservative approach with close observation if aneurysm diameter is stable.

Reduced pulsatile wall motion of abdominal aortic aneurysms after endovascular repair

PURPOSE The reduced size of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) after endovascular repair suggests lowered intraaneurysmal pressure. In the presence of endoleaks, the size is not decreased. Although postoperative intraaneurysmal pressure is difficult to record, the pulsatile wall motion (PWM) of aneurysms can be measured noninvasively. The aim of this study was to assess the PWM of AAAs before and after endovascular repair and to relate the change in the PWM to aneurysmal size and presence of endoleaks. METHODS Forty-seven patients underwent endovascular repair of an AAA. The aneurysm diameter and PWM were measured with the use of ultrasonic echo-tracking scans preoperatively; at 1, 3, and 6 months; and thereafter biannually. Fifteen aneurysms developed endoleaks, whereas 32 were completely excluded. The leaks were characterized with the use of computed tomographic scanning and angiography. Median follow-up was 12 months (interquartile range, 5 to 24 months). RESULTS The preoperative PWM of the aneurysms was 1.0 mm (range, 0.8 to 1.3 mm). After complete endovascular exclusion, the PWM was 25% (range, 16% to 37%) of the preoperative value (p < 0.001), and aneurysm diameter decreased by 8 mm (range, 6 to 14 mm) (p < 0.001). After 18 months, no further diameter reduction occurred. In three patients without endoleaks but with enlarging aneurysms, the postoperative PWM showed less reduction (p < 0.05). Aneurysms with endoleaks showed no diameter decrease, and the postoperative PWM was 50% higher than that in the totally excluded cases (p < 0.01). In five patients with transient endoleaks, the PWM was reduced after leakage ceased (p < 0.05). Leaks of various sources displayed similar PWM. CONCLUSION The size and PWM of aneurysms are reduced after endovascular repair. The diameter reduction may cease after 1.5 years. Endoleaks are associated with higher PWM than expected. Pressure may be transmitted without evidence of leaks.

Balloon occlusion of the aorta during endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Purpose: To describe a technique of aortic clamping during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) in patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) and circulatory collapse. Technique: A balloon catheter is inserted percutaneously from the femoral artery and inflated in the suprarenal aorta. An introducer sheath must support the balloon. The stent-graft is passed from the contralateral groin and deployed beneath the balloon. The sheath makes it possible to retrieve the balloon after the endograft has been deployed. Carbon dioxide facilitates angiography while the aortic blood flow is arrested. Conclusions: The aortic stent-graft can be deployed while the aorta is continuously “clamped” from a transfemoral approach. This may allow EVAR in patients with circulatory collapse due to aneurysm rupture.

Endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: logistics and short-term results.

PURPOSE To report our experience in establishing a treatment protocol for endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAA), including an investigation of the reasons for patient exclusion and a report of our short-term results. METHODS Between 1997 and July 2002, 21 patients with rAAA underwent endovascular repair according to our protocol and were followed prospectively. A retrospective analysis was also conducted of 23 rAAA patients treated with open repair from January 2001 through June 2002. Procedural and clinical data from this sample were compared to 14 contemporaneous emergent EVAR cases and analyzed to determine why the open repair patients were not treated with an endovascular approach. RESULTS Among the 21 patients treated with emergent EVAR since the beginning of this protocol, 6 (29%) procedures were performed under local anesthesia and 6 were performed percutaneously. Thirty-day mortality was 19%. In the comparison of 14 emergent EVAR cases to 23 open rAAA repairs, the mean duration of symptoms prior to intervention was 12 hours for the EVAR patients and <1 hour for OR patients. No significant difference was found in operating time, but the EVAR group had significantly less blood loss (p=0.0001) and transfusion needs (p=0.02); duration of intensive care unit stay was significantly shorter in the EVAR group (p=0.02). Thirty-day mortality was 29% (4/14) for EVAR and 35% for OR (8/23) (p>0.05). Reasons for not performing EVAR were unavailability of adequate equipment (n=11) or trained staff (n=7), hemodynamically unstable patient (n=2), mycotic aneurysm (n=2), and unfavorable anatomy in a 60-year old patient with a <5-mm-long, sharply angled infrarenal neck. CONCLUSIONS Endovascular repair of ruptured aortic aneurysms is feasible, and short-term results are promising. Good logistics, adequate training of physicians and staff in an elective setting, and versatile endografts are prerequisites for this type of treatment program.