Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Martin Mates is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Martin Mates.


Journal of the American College of Cardiology | 2014

ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Treated by Radial or Femoral Approach in a Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial The STEMI-RADIAL Trial

Ivo Bernat; David Horák; Josef Stasek; Martin Mates; Jan Pešek; Petr Ostadal; Vlado Hrabos; Jaroslav Dušek; Jiri Koza; Zdenek Sembera; Miroslav Brtko; Ondrej Aschermann; Michal Šmíd; Pavel Polansky; Abdul Al Mawiri; Jan Vojáček; Josef Bis; Olivier Costerousse; Olivier F. Bertrand; Richard Rokyta

OBJECTIVES This study sought to compare radial and femoral approaches in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) by high-volume operators experienced in both access sites. BACKGROUND The exact clinical benefit of the radial compared to the femoral approach remains controversial. METHODS STEMI-RADIAL (ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction treated by RADIAL or femoral approach) was a randomized, multicenter trial. A total of 707 patients referred for STEMI <12 h of symptom onset were randomized in 4 high-volume radial centers. The primary endpoint was the cumulative incidence of major bleeding and vascular access site complications at 30 days. The rate of net adverse clinical events (NACE) was defined as a composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and major bleeding/vascular complications. Access site crossover, contrast volume, duration of intensive care stay, and death at 6 months were secondary endpoints. RESULTS The primary endpoint occurred in 1.4% of the radial group (n = 348) and 7.2% of the femoral group (n = 359; p = 0.0001). The NACE rate was 4.6% versus 11.0% (p = 0.0028), respectively. Crossover from radial to femoral approach was 3.7%. Intensive care stay (2.5 ± 1.7 days vs. 3.0 ± 2.9 days, p = 0.0038) as well as contrast utilization (170 ± 71 ml vs. 182 ± 60 ml, p = 0.01) were significantly reduced in the radial group. Mortality in the radial and femoral groups was 2.3% versus 3.1% (p = 0.64) at 30 days and 2.3% versus 3.6% (p = 0.31) at 6 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS In patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI by operators experienced in both access sites, the radial approach was associated with significantly lower incidence of major bleeding and access site complications and superior net clinical benefit. These findings support the use of the radial approach in primary PCI as first choice after proper training. (Trial Comparing Radial and Femoral Approach in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [PCI] [STEMI-RADIAL]; NCT01136187).


European Journal of Heart Failure | 2014

Transcatheter treatment of heart failure with preserved or mildly reduced ejection fraction using a novel interatrial implant to lower left atrial pressure

Lars Søndergaard; Reddy; David M. Kaye; Filip Malek; A. Walton; Martin Mates; Olaf Franzen; Petr Neuzil; Nikolaj Ihlemann; Finn Gustafsson

Heart failure with preserved or mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFpEF) is common and, to date, therapeutic options are limited. Increased left atrial pressure is a key contributor to the symptoms associated with HFpEF, particularly during physical activity. We report the 30‐day outcome of patients treated with a novel device intended to lower left atrial pressure by creating an 8 mm permanent shunt in the atrial septum.


Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry | 2003

The effect of early treatment by cerivastatin on the serum level of C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, and interleukin-8 in the patients with unstable angina and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction

Petr Ostadal; David Alan; Petr Hájek; David Horák; Jiri Vejvoda; Jiri Trefanec; Martin Mates; Jan Vojáček

The aim of our study was to evaluate whether a single dose of cerivastatin at the time of admission of patients with unstable angina pectoris (UAP) or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction (NQMI) can influence the serum level of C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6) and interleukin-8 (IL-8) 24 h later. Forty-four patients with rest chest pain and subendocardial ischemia on ECG were randomized to receive cerivastatin 0.3 mg at the time of admission (group C+) to standard therapy or to remain just on standard therapy (group C−). Blood samples for determination of troponin I (TI), CRP, IL-6 and IL-8 were collected at admission (entry level) and 24 h later (final level). Patients with non-physiological baseline levels of TI, as well as patients with progression to Q wave MI were excluded. All baseline, clinical and demographic data and final values of TI were comparable in the two groups. In patients treated with cerivastatin (group C+, n = 13) we observed decrease in the CRP level (−6.73 ± 3.93 mg/L); on the other hand, in group C− (n = 17) the CRP level increased (+7.92 ± 2.77 mg/L, p = 0.004). Similar differences were observed also in IL-6: in group C+ the level was significantly reduced as compared with the increase in group C− (−0.76 ± 0.52 vs. 4.58 ± 1.49 ng/L, p = 0.005). The level of IL-8 was not affected. Our results suggest that early treatment with cerivastatin can decrease the serum level of CRP and IL-6 in patients with UAP/NQMI; this might positively influence their prognosis. Nevertheless, further studies are needed to support this hypothesis.


European Journal of Heart Failure | 2014

Transcatheter treatment of heart failure with preserved or mildly reduced ejection fraction using a novel interatrial implant to lower left atrial pressure: IASD treatment of elevated filling pressures in HFpEF

Lars Søndergaard; Vivek Y. Reddy; David M. Kaye; Filip Malek; A. Walton; Martin Mates; Olaf Franzen; Petr Neuzil; Nikolaj Ihlemann; Finn Gustafsson

Heart failure with preserved or mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFpEF) is common and, to date, therapeutic options are limited. Increased left atrial pressure is a key contributor to the symptoms associated with HFpEF, particularly during physical activity. We report the 30‐day outcome of patients treated with a novel device intended to lower left atrial pressure by creating an 8 mm permanent shunt in the atrial septum.


American Heart Journal | 2014

Real-time use of instantaneous wave–free ratio: Results of the ADVISE in-practice: An international, multicenter evaluation of instantaneous wave–free ratio in clinical practice

Ricardo Petraco; Rasha Al-Lamee; Matthias Götberg; Andrew Sharp; Farrel Hellig; Sulthjinder S. Nijjer; Mauro Echavarria-Pinto; Tim P. van de Hoef; Sayan Sen; Nobuhiro Tanaka; Eric Van Belle; Waldemar Bojara; Kunihiro Sakoda; Martin Mates; Ciro Indolfi; Salvatore De Rosa; Christian J. Vrints; Steven Haine; Hiroyoshi Yokoi; Flavio Ribichini; M. Meuwissen; Hitoshi Matsuo; Luc Janssens; Ueno Katsumi; Carlo Di Mario; Javier Escaned; Jan J. Piek; Justin E. Davies

Objectives To evaluate the first experience of real-time instantaneous wave–free ratio (iFR) measurement by clinicians. Background The iFR is a new vasodilator-free index of coronary stenosis severity, calculated as a trans-lesion pressure ratio during a specific period of baseline diastole, when distal resistance is lowest and stable. Because all previous studies have calculated iFR offline, the feasibility of real-time iFR measurement has never been assessed. Methods Three hundred ninety-two stenoses with angiographically intermediate stenoses were included in this multicenter international analysis. Instantaneous wave–free ratio and fractional flow reserve (FFR) were performed in real time on commercially available consoles. The classification agreement of coronary stenoses between iFR and FFR was calculated. Results Instantaneous wave–free ratio and FFR maintain a close level of diagnostic agreement when both are measured by clinicians in real time (for a clinical 0.80 FFR cutoff: area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [ROCAUC] 0.87, classification match 80%, and optimal iFR cutoff 0.90; for a ischemic 0.75 FFR cutoff: iFR ROCAUC 0.90, classification match 88%, and optimal iFR cutoff 0.85; if the FFR 0.75-0.80 gray zone is accounted for: ROCAUC 0.93, classification match 92%). When iFR and FFR are evaluated together in a hybrid decision-making strategy, 61% of the population is spared from vasodilator while maintaining a 94% overall agreement with FFR lesion classification. Conclusion When measured in real time, iFR maintains the close relationship to FFR reported in offline studies. These findings confirm the feasibility and reliability of real-time iFR calculation by clinicians.


Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine | 2005

Fluvastatin in the therapy of acute coronary syndrome: Rationale and design of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (The FACS Trial)[ISRCTN81331696].

Petr Ostadal; David Alan; Petr Hájek; Jiri Vejvoda; Martin Mates; Peter Blasko; Josef Veselka; Milan Kvapil; Jiri Kettner; Martin Wiendl; Ondrej Aschermann; Josef Slaby; Eduard Nemecek; Frantisek Holm; Marek Rac; Milan Macek; Jana Cepova

BackgroundActivation of inflammatory pathways plays an important contributory role in coronary plaque instability and subsequent rupture, which can lead to the development of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Elevated levels of serum inflammatory markers such as C-reactive protein (CRP) represent independent risk factors for further cardiovascular events. Recent evidence indicates that in addition to lowering cholesterol levels, statins also decrease levels of inflammatory markers. Previous controlled clinical trials reporting the positive effects of statins in participants with ACS were designed for very early secondary prevention. To our knowledge, no controlled trials have evaluated the potential benefits of statin therapy, beginning immediately at the time of hospital admission. A previous pilot study performed by our group focused on early initiation of cerivastatin therapy. We demonstrated a highly significant reduction in levels of inflammatory markers (CRP and interleukin-6). Based on these preliminary findings, we are conducting a clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of another statin, fluvastatin, as an early intervention in patients with ACS.MethodsThe FACS-trial (Fluvastatin in the therapy of Acute Coronary Syndrome) is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluating the effects of fluvastatin therapy initiated at the time of hospital admission. The study will enroll 1,000 participants admitted to hospital for ACS (both with and without ST elevation). The primary endpoint for the study is the influence of fluvastatin therapy on levels of inflammatory markers (CRP and interleukin-6) and on pregnancy associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A). A combined secondary endpoint is 30-day and one-year occurrence of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, recurrent symptomatic ischemia, urgent revascularization, and cardiac arrest.ConclusionThe primary objective of the FACS trial is to demonstrate that statin therapy, when started immediately after hospital admission for ACS, results in reduction of inflammation and improvement of prognosis. This study may contribute to new knowledge regarding therapeutic strategies for patients suffering from ACS and may offer additional clinical indications for the use of statins.


The New England Journal of Medicine | 2018

Five-Year Outcomes with PCI Guided by Fractional Flow Reserve

Panagiotis Xaplanteris; Stephane Fournier; Nico H.J. Pijls; William F. Fearon; Emanuele Barbato; Pim A.L. Tonino; Thomas Engstrøm; Stefan Kääb; Jan-Henk Dambrink; Gilles Rioufol; Gabor G. Toth; Zsolt Piroth; Nils Witt; Ole Fröbert; Petr Kala; Axel Linke; Nicola Jagic; Martin Mates; Kreton Mavromatis; Habib Samady; Anand Irimpen; Keith G. Oldroyd; Gianluca Campo; Martina Rothenbühler; Peter Jüni; Bernard De Bruyne

BACKGROUND We hypothesized that fractional flow reserve (FFR)–guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) would be superior to medical therapy as initial treatment in patients with stable coronary artery disease. METHODS Among 1220 patients with angiographically significant stenoses, those in whom at least one stenosis was hemodynamically significant (FFR, ≤0.80) were randomly assigned to FFR‐guided PCI plus medical therapy or to medical therapy alone. Patients in whom all stenoses had an FFR of more than 0.80 received medical therapy and were entered into a registry. The primary end point was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or urgent revascularization. RESULTS A total of 888 patients underwent randomization (447 patients in the PCI group and 441 in the medical‐therapy group). At 5 years, the rate of the primary end point was lower in the PCI group than in the medical‐therapy group (13.9% vs. 27.0%; hazard ratio, 0.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.34 to 0.63; P<0.001). The difference was driven by urgent revascularizations, which occurred in 6.3% of the patients in the PCI group as compared with 21.1% of those in the medical‐therapy group (hazard ratio, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.18 to 0.41). There were no significant differences between the PCI group and the medical‐therapy group in the rates of death (5.1% and 5.2%, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.55 to 1.75) or myocardial infarction (8.1% and 12.0%; hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.43 to 1.00). There was no significant difference in the rate of the primary end point between the PCI group and the registry cohort (13.9% and 15.7%, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.55 to 1.39). Relief from angina was more pronounced after PCI than after medical therapy. CONCLUSIONS In patients with stable coronary artery disease, an initial FFR‐guided PCI strategy was associated with a significantly lower rate of the primary composite end point of death, myocardial infarction, or urgent revascularization at 5 years than medical therapy alone. Patients without hemodynamically significant stenoses had a favorable long‐term outcome with medical therapy alone. (Funded by St. Jude Medical and others; FAME 2 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01132495.)


Trials | 2010

Fluvastatin in the first-line therapy of acute coronary syndrome: results of the multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (the FACS-trial)

Petr Ostadal; David Alan; Jiri Vejvoda; Jiri Kukacka; Milan Macek; Petr Hájek; Martin Mates; Milan Kvapil; Jiri Kettner; Martin Wiendl; Ondrej Aschermann; Josef Slaby; František Holm; Peter Telekes; David Horák; Peter Blasko; David Zemánek; Josef Veselka; Jana Cepova

BackgroundStatins have been proved to be effective in reduction of mortality and morbidity when started in the early secondary prevention in stabilized patients after acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The safety and efficacy of statin administration directly in the first-line therapy in unstable ACS patients is not clear. The aim of our study was, therefore, to assess the effect of statin treatment initiated immediately at hospital admission of patients with ACS.MethodsThe trial was stopped prematurely after enrollment of one hundred and fifty-six patients with ACS that were randomized at admission to fluvastatin 80 mg (N = 78) or placebo (N = 78). Study medication was administered immediately after randomization and then once daily for 30 days; all patients were then encouraged to continue in open-label statin therapy and at the end of one-year follow-up 75% in the fluvastatin group and 78% in the placebo group were on statin therapy.ResultsWe did not demonstrate any difference between groups in the level of C-reactive protein, interleukin 6, and pregnancy-associated plasma protein A on Day 2 and Day 30 (primary endpoint). Fluvastatin-therapy, however, significantly reduced one-year occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (11.5% vs. 24.4%, odds ratio (OR) 0.40, 95% CI 0.17-0.95, P = 0.038). This difference was caused mainly by reduction of recurrent symptomatic ischemia (7.7% vs. 20.5%, OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.12-0.88, P = 0.037).ConclusionsThis study failed to prove the effect of fluvastatin given as first-line therapy of ACS on serum markers of inflammation and plaque instability. Fluvastatin therapy was, however, safe and it may reduce cardiovascular event rate that supports immediate use of a statin in patients admitted for ACS.Trial registrationNCT00171275


Coronary Artery Disease | 2005

Long-term follow-up after deferral of coronary intervention based on myocardial fractional flow reserve measurement.

Martin Mates; Vladimír Hraboš; Petr Hájek; Ondrej Rataj; Jan Vojáček

ObjectiveTo assess long-term results after deferring coronary intervention (percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)) of an intermediate lesion with a value of myocardial fractional flow reserve (FFR) ≥0.75 in a ‘real life’ patient population with no respect to results of stress tests (if performed) or coronary disease extent. MethodsPCI of an intermediate lesion was deferred in a group of 85 consecutive patients (54 men, 61±10 years) on the basis of the result of FFR ≥0.75 (mean FFR, 0.89±0.06%). FFR was measured in 111 stenoses (mean diameter stenosis, 54±8%, left anterior descending coronary artery, 65 (58%), left circumflex coronary artery, 24 (22%), right coronary artery, 22 (20%). Multi-vessel disease (defined as visually assessed diameter reduction of more than 50% in at least two arteries of more than 1.5 mm diameter, supplying at least two of the three major coronary artery perfusion territories) was present in 67% of patients (one-vessel disease, 28 patients (33%), two-vessel disease, 39 patients (46%), three-vessel disease, 18 patients (21%). Recorded events during follow-up were as follows: all-cause death, cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven target lesion transcatheter revascularization (TLR) and coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). Angina class (Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) classification) and the need for anti-anginal drugs were recorded. ResultsFollow-up was completed in 85 patients (100%). Mean duration of follow-up was 22.6±6.6 months (range 4–33 months). Events occurred in 11 patients (13%). Seven patients died; this included two cardiac deaths. A non-fatal myocardial infarction occurred in one patient, one patient needed TLR and three patients underwent CABG. Estimated 33 month cardiac-event-free survival (Kaplan–Meier) was 91±4%. Angina class decreased [1.6±1.2 compared with 0.8±0.8 (P<0.0001)] without difference with respect to the use of anti-anginal drugs (1.7±0.8 compared with 1.7±0.9, P=NS). ConclusionsDeferring coronary interventions of intermediate stenosis based on FFR measurement is safe with respect to long-term follow-up, irrespective of the extent of coronary artery disease.


Echocardiography-a Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound and Allied Techniques | 2005

Fabry disease: percutaneous transluminal septal myocardial ablation markedly improved symptomatic left ventricular hypertrophy and outflow tract obstruction in a classically affected male.

Sudheera Magage; Ales Linhart; Jan Bultas; Jan Vojacek; Martin Mates; Tomas Palecek; Jana Popelová; Jaroslav Tintera; Michael Aschermann; Martin E. Goldman; Robert J. Desnick

Fabry disease (α‐galactosidase A deficiency) is an X‐linked recessive lysosomal storage disease in which left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is common, and if severe, may mimic hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. Alcohol‐induced percutaneous transluminal septal myocardial ablation (PTSMA) has been used as a safe and effective method to alleviate LVH obstruction in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HCM). We describe a case of a classically affected Fabry 53‐year‐old male with symptomatic HCM (NYHA class III with exertional angina) who was treated with PTSMA. The procedure safely and effectively alleviated symptomatic left ventricular outflow tract obstruction at long‐term follow‐up, and the patients NYHA classification was reduced to NYHA class I to II.

Collaboration


Dive into the Martin Mates's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jan Vojáček

Charles University in Prague

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Petr Hájek

Charles University in Prague

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David Horák

Charles University in Prague

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Vladimír Hraboš

Charles University in Prague

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge