Martin N. Raber

Metastatic patterns in adenocarcinoma

Unique metastatic patterns cited in the literature often arise from anecdotal clinical observations and autopsy reports. The authors analyzed clinical data from a large number of patients with histologically confirmed, distant‐stage adenocarcinoma to evaluate metastatic patterns.

Unknown primary carcinoma: natural history and prognostic factors in 657 consecutive patients.

PURPOSE To evaluate the natural history, validate previous observations, and identify prognostic factors in patients with unknown primary carcinoma (UPC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Nine hundred twenty-seven consecutive patients referred to the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center with a preliminary diagnosis of UPC were prospectively identified. A standardized evaluation narrowed the study population to 657 patients with UPC. All data were recorded and computerized for storage, retrieval, and analysis. The primary end point for the study was survival, which was calculated from the first day of patient registration. Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the Cox-Mantel log-rank test. To identify important prognostic factors, univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted. RESULTS The demographics of the UPC patient population mirrored those of the general population of patients referred to our cancer center except for an excess of men among the UPC patients. Most patients had histologic or cytologic evidence of adenocarcinoma and had more than one organ site metastatically involved. Univariate and multivariate analyses identified numerous important prognostic factors with a significant influence on survival, including sex, number of organ sites involved, specific organ sites involved, and pathologic subtypes. CONCLUSION This study validated previously identified important prognostic factors for survival in UPC. Additional variables that had an impact on survival were identified and the complex interaction of the factors was explored. As patient numbers increase, this database will be able to provide further analyses of patient subsets and potentially relate specific clinical features to the evolving molecular and biochemical understanding of these malignancies.

Phase II study of intravenous topotecan as a 5-day infusion for refractory epithelial ovarian carcinoma.

PURPOSE To determine the efficacy and toxicity of topotecan administered as a 5-day intravenous infusion in patients with advanced ovarian cancer refractory to cisplatin-based chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Thirty patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer refractory to cisplatin-based chemotherapy received intravenous infusions of topotecan 1.5 mg/m2 delivered over 30 minutes each day for 5 days. A course was repeated every 21 days. The patient eligibility requirements included age > or = 18 years, Zubrod score < or = 2, measurable disease, adequate hepatic and renal function, neutrophil count > or = 1,500/microL, platelet count > or = 100,000/microL, and anticipated survival > or = 3 months. RESULTS Twenty eight patients were assessable for response and toxicity. All patients were assessable for survival. The major toxicity from administration of topotecan at this dose schedule was myelosuppression; 21 patients required dose reductions. Four patients had neutropenic fever that required hospitalization, and seven patients required platelet transfusions. Maculopapular pruritic exanthema occurred in 20% of patients; gastrointestinal side effects were mild. No deaths were reported on the study. At dose levels of 1.5, 1.25, and 1.0 mg/m2, 61%, 31%, and 25% of patients, respectively, required dose reductions. Of 28 assessable patients, four (14%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4% to 34%) achieved a partial response (PR) at a median of 1.4 months and lasting 8.9 months, and 17 had stable disease (SD). The overall median survival time was 10.0 months (95% CI, 8.1 to 13.5). CONCLUSION Topotecan shows modest clinical activity against cisplatin-refractory ovarian cancer, although the dose-intensity is compromised by the depth of the granulocyte nadir and the duration of granulocytopenia. Further studies of topotecan may necessitate a reevaluation of optimal dose schedule, with the possible incorporation of multilineage cytokines, and its activity in taxane-resistant tumors.

Analysis of a diagnostic strategy for patients with suspected tumors of unknown origin.

PURPOSE Diagnostic strategies designed to identify the underlying primary malignancies in patients with unknown primary tumors (UPTs) have relied on retrospective analyses. We analyzed 879 consecutive patients referred with suspected UPTs to determine the yield and cost of a limited diagnostic evaluation, assess the contribution of specific studies to diagnosis, and analyze the survival patterns of patients in whom the primary tumor was diagnosed. PATIENTS AND METHODS Data from patients with a suspected UPT were entered into a computerized data base, and the patients underwent a predefined limited diagnostic evaluation. Primary malignancies were diagnosed by pathologic review alone or by pathologic criteria plus a physical or radiographic finding. Survival was measured from diagnosis, estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and compared using the Cox-Mantel log-rank test. RESULTS A primary tumor was found in 179 of 879 patients (20%). The survival duration of patients in whom the primary tumor was diagnosed was superior to that of patients in whom the primary tumor remained unknown. Specific patient subsets contributed most to the improved survival duration of the group in which the primary tumor was found, including lymphoma patients diagnosed solely by pathologic criteria and female patients with primary breast or ovarian cancer. The cost of diagnosis was mostly due to the extensive use of computed tomography. Except for ovarian cancer, computed tomography rarely identified treatable primary tumors. CONCLUSION The limited diagnostic evaluation used in this study identified patients with treatable malignancies and increased the survival duration of a population of suspected UPT patients. Primary malignancies with the best survival can be diagnosed through careful pathologic review and focused evaluations for breast and ovarian cancer in women.

The taxoids: paclitaxel (Taxol®) and docetaxel (Taxotere®)☆

The taxoids, paclitaxel (Taxol) and docetaxel (Taxotere), represent a novel class of antineoplastic drugs. Paclitaxel and docetaxel share a similar mechanism of action: the promotion of microtubule assembly and inhibition of microtubule disassembly. The clinical development of paclitaxel was initially hampered by hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs). The use of premedications and prolongation of the infusion time to 24h has reduced these reactions and allowed this drugs clinical development. Although paclitaxels clinical activity has not been fully investigated, clinical trials have demonstrated its activity against ovarian, breast, and bronchial carcinomas. Because phase I studies of docetaxel noted occasional HSRs and these observations increased with further clinical experiences, those premedications employed with paclitaxel have now been instituted in many phase II studies of docetaxel. Docetaxel is currently being investigated in ovarian, breast, and bronchial carcinomas and has shown impressive clinical activity. The dose-limiting toxicity of both these agents is neutropenia; myalgias, mucositis, neuropathies, and alopecia have also been observed with both drugs. Additionally, a fluid retention syndrome and cutaneous toxicities have been noted in patients treated with docetaxel. Future studies of the taxoids will allow further comparisons of the toxicity and efficacy of these agents.

Phase II study of docetaxel for recurrent or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE We conducted a phase II study to determine the response and toxicity of docetaxel (Taxotere; Rhône-Poulenc Rorer Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Collegeville, PA) in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS We treated 41 chemotherapy-naive patients who had stage IIIb or IV non-small-cell lung cancer with 100 mg/m2 of docetaxel intravenously over 1 hour every 3 weeks. Responses were assessed after every one to two treatment courses. Responses of 39 of 41 patients were assessable. The patients median age was 63 years; 90% of patients had a Zubrod performance status of 0 or 1. The predominant histology was adenocarcinoma (54%), and 90% of patients had stage IV disease. RESULTS Thirteen patients (33%) achieved a partial response to treatment, and the median response duration was 14 weeks. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred in 97% of patient; this was usually of brief duration and was associated with serious infection in 17% of patients. Other acute toxic effects included easily treated hypersensitivity reactions (36% of patients) and dermatitis (74%). We also observed fluid retention (with peripheral edema or pleural effusion or both) in 54% of patients. This was a cumulative side effect that generally occurred late in treatment. CONCLUSION Docetaxel administered at 100 mg/m2 intravenously every 3 weeks has significant activity against non-small-cell lung cancer, with a 33% major response rate. Primary toxicities were neutropenia, hypersensitivity, and fluid retention.

Molecular Profiling of Carcinoma of Unknown Primary and Correlation With Clinical Evaluation

PURPOSE To evaluate the feasibility of a 10-gene reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction assay to identify the tissue of origin in patients with carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP) site. PATIENTS AND METHODS Diagnostic biopsy formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) specimens from 120 patients with CUP were collected retrospectively from Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN, and prospectively from The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. Tissue of origin assignments by the assay were correlated with clinical and pathologic features and with response to therapy. RESULTS The assay was successfully performed in 104 patients (87%), and a tissue of origin was assigned in 63 patients (61%). In the remaining 41 patients (39%), the molecular profiles were not specific for the six tumor types detectable by this assay. The tissues of origin most commonly identified were lung, pancreas, and colon; most of these patients had clinical and pathologic features consistent with these diagnoses. Patients with lung and pancreas profiles had poor response to treatment. Patients with colon cancer profiles had better response to colon cancer-specific therapies than they did to empiric CUP therapy with taxane/platinum regimens. Patients with ovarian cancer profiles were atypical, with widespread visceral metastases and a paucity of overt peritoneal involvement. CONCLUSION This gene expression profiling assay was feasible using FFPE biopsy specimens and identified a putative tissue of origin in 61% of patients with CUP. In most patients, the assigned tissue of origin was compatible with clinicopathologic features and response to treatment. Prospective studies in which assay results are used to direct therapy are indicated.

A phase II trial of taxol in metastatic melanoma

Taxol is an investigational new drug which is currently undergoing Phase II evaluation in various tumors. It is a plant alkaloid extracted from the western Yew, Taxus brevifolia. In this study, patients with metastatic melanoma who were previously untreated, received Taxol at a starting dose of 250 mg/m2 delivered as a continuous intravenous (IV) infusion over 24 hours, at 3‐week intervals. All patients were premedicated with oral dexamethasone and IV diphenhydramine hydrochloride as prophylaxis against allergic reactions. Three of 25 patients had a partial response (PR) for a response rate of 12% (CI, 3%‐31%). In addition four patients had objective regression of tumor that failed to qualify for a PR but these responses were as durable, lasting 6 to 17 months. No patient experienced acute allergic reactions. The major toxicity of Taxol was neutropenia requiring dose reduction to 200 mg/m2 in a majority of the patients. Our data confirm that Taxol has definite although limited activity against metastatic melanoma.

Carcinoma of unknown primary with a colon-cancer profile—changing paradigm and emerging definitions

Carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP), which accounts for about 3-5% of all new cancers, is a challenging heterogeneous entity with an unmet research need. Traditionally, CUP has been managed with broad-spectrum chemotherapy, but with the increasing availability of sophisticated diagnostic techniques and the emergence of new treatments that have been shown to be effective in specific cancers the one-treatment-fits-all approach to CUP might eventually no longer be valid. CUP in association with a colon-cancer profile (CCP-CUP) is an example of an emerging, specific CUP subset that seems to benefit from a tailored approach. CCP-CUP is identified by CK20 and CDX2-positive and CK7-negative immunohistochemistry and a clinical course consistent with that of patients known to have metastatic colon cancer. Our findings suggest that patients with CCP-CUP derive substantial benefit from the use of specific treatments developed for colon cancer and larger clinical trials are warranted to more definitely test this finding. In the era of molecular profiling, we expect that additional work with CCP-CUP and other CUP subsets will provide attractive tailored treatment alternatives, with efficacies that exceed the current one-treatment-fits-all approach.

Phase II study of topotecan in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer previously untreated with chemotherapy.

PURPOSE This study was designed to assess the anti-tumor activity of topotecan (TPT) in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously untreated with chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC with measurable disease in nonradiated fields were eligible. Other eligibility criteria were Zubrod performance status (PS) < or = 2 and adequate renal and liver function. TPT was administered at a dose of 1.5 mg/m2/d for 5 days over 30 minutes every 21 days. Of 48 registered patients, 40 were fully assessable. Nineteen patients had adenocarcinoma (AD), 14 squamous carcinoma (SCC), and seven poorly differentiated carcinoma. RESULTS Six patients (15%) achieved a partial remission (PR) (durations: 8, 14, 18, 28, 56, and 61 weeks) and four patients a minor response; 10 patients had stable disease and 20 patients progressive disease. The PR rate was 36% (five of 14 patients) in patients with SCC versus 4% (one of 26 patients) in those with other histologies (P = .014). The overall median survival time was 38 weeks and 30% of patients were alive at 1 year. Grade 3 to 4 granulocytopenia and thrombocytopenia occurred after 76% and 10% of courses administered, respectively. No grade 3 to 4 nonhematologic toxicities were observed. Grade 1 or 2 nonhematologic toxicities consisted of nausea (46% and 5%), vomiting (31% and 7%), and fatigue (53% and 16%). CONCLUSION TPT at the dose and schedule used has moderate antitumor activity in NSCLC; its activity is mostly limited to patients with SCC. TPT is well tolerated, with myelosuppression of short duration being the most common and limiting toxicity.