Martín Romero

A Comparison of the Shear Bond Strength of a Resin Cement and Two Orthodontic Resin Adhesive Systems

The object of this study was to compare the shear bond strength and the quantity of adhesive remaining on the tooth after the debonding of brackets bonded with two light-cured orthodontic resin adhesive systems (Transbond XT and Light-Bond) and a dual-cured resin cement (RelyX Unicem). Seventy-five premolars were divided into three groups. In each group, brackets were bonded with one of the adhesives according to the manufacturers instructions. Shear bond strength was measured using a universal test machine at a crosshead speed of one mm/min, and adhesive remnant was quantified using image analysis equipment. Our results showed that the resin cement produced significantly lower bond strength than the two orthodontic resin adhesive systems. It was also observed that the bond strength produced by Light-Bond was significantly greater than that of Transbond XT. RelyX left significantly less remnant adhesive than Transbond XT and Light-Bond. Between the two orthodontic systems, Light-Bond left significantly less adhesive on the tooth than Transbond XT.

Influence of a Nonrinse Conditioner on the Bond Strength of Brackets Bonded with a Resin Adhesive System

The objective of this study was to compare the effect of a nonrinse conditioner (NRC) and the conventional acid-etch technique on the shear bond strength and the adhesive remnant on the tooth after debonding brackets bonded with the resin orthodontic adhesive system Transbond XT. A total of 40 human premolars were divided into group I, phosphoric Acid/Transbond XT (n = 25) and group II, NRC/ Transbond XT (n = 15). Shear bond strength was measured with a universal test machine with a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. The adhesive remnant was quantified using image analysis equipment. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) observations were also carried out to observe enamel surfaces treated with each product. No significant differences were observed in the bond strengths of the two groups evaluated. The amount of adhesive remnant on the tooth after debonding was significantly less when conditioning the enamel with NRC compared with phosphoric acid. SEM observations showed that the NRC produced a more conservative etch pattern than phosphoric acid.

Bond strength of brackets bonded with an adhesion promoter

Objective Enhance-L.C. is an orthodontic adhesion promoter. Our aim was to find out if this product is material-specific as stated by its manufacturers or whether its effects are similar when the promoter is used with other adhesive systems.Design In vitro study.Setting Dental Clinic. University of Murcia, Spain, 2002.Materials and methods Enhance-L.C. was used with one of the manufacturers recommended adhesives, Light-Bond, and with a second from another manufacturer, Transbond-XT. One hundred premolars were divided into four groups of 25 premolars: 1)Transbond-XT, 2) Transbond-XT/Enhance-L.C., 3) Light-Bond, 4) Light-Bond/Enhance-L.C.Main outcome measures Shear bond strength was evaluated with a universal test machine and the adhesive remaining after debonding was determined using image analysis equipment.Results Enhance-L.C. did not significantly increase the bond strength of either of the two systems (P > 0.008). However, Light-Bond/Enhance-L.C. provided a bond strength significantly greater (P < 0.008) than Transbond-XT and Transbond-XT/Enhance-L.C. Light-Bond also left significantly (P < 0.05) less adhesive remaining on the enamel than Transbond-XT, whether or not either of the systems were used with Enhance-L.C.Conclusions The use of Enhance-L.C with Light-Bond is to be recommended whenever extra bond strength is needed.

Buccal Anomalies, Cephalometric Analysis and Genetic Study of Two Sisters With Orofaciodigital Syndrome Type I

Orofaciodigital syndromes have many clinical and cephalometric anomalies, including facial irregularities, oral cavity abnormalities, and malformations of fingers and toes. In this case of twin girls, buccal exploration, cephalometric examination, and genetic analysis were performed to diagnose Orofaciodigital I or Orofaciodigital II syndrome. Clinically, the twins had several dental and skeletal irregularities. Genetic analysis revealed a DNA segment abnormality corresponding to exon 3 and presence of nucleotide change, 243C>G, leading to the missense mutation H81Q. This causative mutation associated with the OFD1 gene has not been reported previously. Both patients were diagnosed as having Orofaciodigital I syndrome.

Scope of Western surgical techniques to correct cleft lip and palate prior to the 18th century.

Objectives To present the state of knowledge and surgical practice concerning cleft lip and palate leading to the modern era. Design Bibliographical review. Setting Analysis of the scientific medical, surgical, and odontological literature from the 16th to 18th centuries. Results Texts and art confirm the existence of cleft lip and palate from antiquity in all cultures; however, the first certain references in Western scientific literature did not appear until the works of Celsus (ca. 25 BC to AD 50) and Galen (AD 129 to 200). Indications for cleft lip surgery appear in the Middle Ages with Albucasis (936 to 1013) and Yperman (1260 to 1332). From the Renaissance period onward, and with the invention of the printing press, numerous authors described their own surgical methods. Conclusions Given the limitations imposed by pain and infection, the authors of the Modern Age focus on correcting the functional and esthetic defect of the lip with techniques that do not differ greatly from those described in the Middle Ages. The treatment for cleft palate was limited to the creation of “obturators” and surgery for cleft palate was not possible until the 19th century.

Psychosocial predictors of affect in adult patients undergoing orthodontic treatment

In this paper we propose to study the role of psychosocial variables in affect in adult patients undergoing orthodontic treatment, considering that affect is a key variable in treatment adherence. Seventy-four patients (average age 33,24 ± 10,56) with metal multibracket-fixed orthodontic treatment were included. Patients were assessed twice. The first stage, at the beginning of treatment, included assessment of dental impact (Psychosocial Impact of Dental Aesthetics Questionnaire), trait anxiety (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory), self-esteem (Rosenbergs self-esteem scale), and self-efficacy (General Self-efficacy Scale). In the second stage, 6 months later, positive and negative affect towards treatment was assessed using the Positive and Negative Affect Scale. Dental social impact differentiates between patients with high and low negative affect, while self-efficacy differentiates between patients with high and low positive affect. Trait anxiety and self-esteem differentiate between both types of affect (positive and negative). Trait anxiety and self-esteem (when trait anxiety weight is controlled) are significant predictor variables of affective balance. These results have important practical implications, because it seems essential to adopt a bio-psychosocial model incorporating assessment methods focusing on day-to-day changes in mood and well-being.

Orthopedic and Orthodontic Treatment in Central Giant Cell Granuloma Treated With Calcitonin

Central giant cell granuloma of the jaw is a benign lesion of unknown etiology that occurs with very low frequency. It mainly occurs in children and young adults and is more common in the mandible. The most common treatment is surgical removal; however, alternative therapies (intralesional injections of corticosteroids, interferon alpha, and calcitonin) have been used in order to avoid undesirable damage to the jaws and teeth. The lesion may cause root resorption, tooth germ displacement, and other dental problems, as well as malocclusion that must be treated orthodontically. The orthodontic, orthopedic, and calcitonin-based treatments of one of these cases is presented.

Pacifier sucking in a child with cleft palate: occlusal consequences.

Objective The case of a child with a repaired cleft palate and a pacifier habit is presented. The influence of both the cleft and the habit on the malocclusion is discussed. The malocclusion disappeared as the habit ceased.