Martin Schillinger

Balloon angioplasty versus implantation of nitinol stents in the superficial femoral artery

BACKGROUND Because stent implantation for disease of the superficial femoral artery has been associated with high rates of late clinical failure, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty is preferred for endovascular treatment, and stenting is recommended only in the event of suboptimal technical results. We evaluated whether primary implantation of a self-expanding nitinol (nickel-titanium) stent yielded anatomical and clinical benefits superior to those afforded by percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with optional secondary stenting. METHODS We randomly assigned 104 patients who had severe claudication or chronic limb ischemia due to stenosis or occlusion of the superficial femoral artery to undergo primary stent implantation (51 patients) or angioplasty (53 patients). Restenosis and clinical outcomes were assessed at 6 and 12 months. RESULTS The mean (+/-SD) length of the treated segment was 132+/-71 mm in the stent group and 127+/-55 mm in the angioplasty group. Secondary stenting was performed in 17 of 53 patients (32 percent) in the angioplasty group, in most cases because of a suboptimal result after angioplasty. At 6 months, the rate of restenosis on angiography was 24 percent in the stent group and 43 percent in the angioplasty group (P=0.05); at 12 months the rates on duplex ultrasonography were 37 percent and 63 percent, respectively (P=0.01). Patients in the stent group were able to walk significantly farther on a treadmill at 6 and 12 months than those in the angioplasty group. CONCLUSIONS In the intermediate term, treatment of superficial-femoral-artery disease by primary implantation of a self-expanding nitinol stent yielded results that were superior to those with the currently recommended approach of balloon angioplasty with optional secondary stenting. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00281060.).

Capillary Deposition of Complement Split Product C4d in Renal Allografts is Associated with Basement Membrane Injury in Peritubular and Glomerular Capillaries: A Contribution of Humoral Immunity to Chronic Allograft Rejection

Endothelial deposition of the complement split product C4d is an established marker of antibody-mediated acute renal allograft rejection. A contribution of alloantibody-dependent immune reactions to chronic rejection is under discussion. In this study, the association of immunohistochemically detected endothelial C4d deposition in peritubular capillaries (PTC) with morphologic features of chronic renal allograft injury was investigated in a large study cohort. C4d deposits in PTC were detected in 73 (34%) of 213 late allograft biopsies performed in 213 patients more than 12 mo after transplantation (median, 4.9 yr) because of chronic allograft dysfunction. Endothelial C4d deposition was found to be associated with chronic transplant glomerulopathy (CG) (P < 0.0001), with basement membrane multilayering in PTC (P = 0.01), and with an accumulation of mononuclear inflammatory cells in PTC (P < 0,001). Furthermore, C4d deposits in PTC (in biopsies with normal glomerular morphology) were associated with development of CG in follow-up biopsies. Other morphologic features of chronic allograft nephropathy (with exception of tubular atrophy) were not associated with C4d deposits in PTC. Analyses of previous and follow-up biopsies revealed that C4d deposits may occur de novo and may also disappear at any time after transplantation. In conclusion, the data suggest that complement activation in renal microvasculature, indicating humoral alloreactivity, contributes to chronic rejection characterized by chronic transplant glomerulopathy and basement membrane multilayering in PTC.

Mean platelet volume is an independent risk factor for myocardial infarction but not for coronary artery disease.

Summary.  After rupture of an arteriosclerotic plaque in a coronary artery, platelets play a crucial role in the subsequent thrombus formation, leading to myocardial infarction. An increased mean platelet volume (MPV), as an indicator of larger, more reactive platelets, may represent a risk factor for myocardial infarction. However, this hypothesis is still controversial and most studies addressing the role of MPV were performed comparing patients suffering from myocardial infarction with healthy controls. We intended to identify patients at high risk of suffering myocardial infarction in a group of patients with known coronary artery disease. One hundred and eighty‐five consecutive patients with stable coronary artery disease were compared with 188 individuals who had suffered myocardial infarction. Patients within the highest quintile of MPV (≥ 11·6 fl) had a significantly higher risk of experiencing a myocardial infarction compared with patients within the lowest quintile (OR = 2·6, 95% CI 1·3–5·1) in a multivariate analysis that included sex, age, body mass index, hyperlipidaemia, hypertension, smoking and diabetes mellitus. Our results indicate that patients with pre‐existing coronary artery disease and an increased MPV (≥ 11·6 fl) are at higher risk of myocardial infarction. These patients can be easily identified during routine haematological analysis and could possibly benefit from preventive treatment.

Sustained Benefit at 2 Years of Primary Femoropopliteal Stenting Compared With Balloon Angioplasty With Optional Stenting

Background— Primary stenting with self-expanding nitinol stents of the superficial femoral artery yielded improved morphological and clinical results compared with balloon angioplasty with optional stenting until 12 months in a randomized controlled trial. We now report 2-year data on restenosis and clinical outcomes of these patients. Methods and Results— Of 104 patients with chronic limb ischemia and superficial femoral artery obstructions, 98 (94%) could be followed up until 2 years after intervention for occurrence of restenosis (>50%) by duplex ultrasound and for clinical and hemodynamic outcome by treadmill walking distance and ankle brachial index. Restenosis rates at 2 years were 45.7% (21 of 46) versus 69.2% (36 of 52) in favor of primary stenting compared with balloon angioplasty with optional secondary stenting by an intention-to-treat analysis (P=0.031). Consistently, stenting (whether primary or secondary; n=63) was superior to plain balloon angioplasty (n=35) with respect to the occurrence of restenosis (49.2% versus 74.3%; P=0.028) by a treatment-received analysis. Clinically, patients in the primary stent group showed a trend toward better treadmill walking capacity (average, 302 versus 196 m; P=0.12) and better ankle brachial index values (average, 0.88 versus 0.78; P=0.09) at 2 years, respectively. Reintervention rates tended to be lower after primary stenting (17 of 46 [37.0%] versus 28 of 52 [53.8%]; P=0.14). Conclusions— At 2 years, primary stenting with self-expanding nitinol stents for the treatment of superficial femoral artery obstructions yields a sustained morphological benefit and a trend toward clinical benefit compared with balloon angioplasty with optional stenting.

Long-Segment SFA Stenting—The Dark Sides: In-Stent Restenosis, Clinical Deterioration, and Stent Fractures

Purpose: To determine and compare the rates of in-stent restenosis, late clinical deterioration, and stent fractures in nitinol stents versus Wallstents implanted for suboptimal angioplasty in the superficial femoral artery (SFA). Methods: Interrogation of an angioplasty database identified 286 consecutive patients (178 men; mean age 67±10 years, range 44–87) with severe claudication (n=254) or critical limb ischemia (n=32) who had stents implanted after suboptimal angioplasty over a 5-year period. Wallstents with a mean stented lesion length of 107±71 mm were implanted in 116 patients, while nitinol stents were used in 170 patients: 45 SMART stents (mean stented lesion length 139±88 mm) and 125 Dynalink/Absolute stents (mean stented lesion length 125±84 mm). Patients were followed for in-stent restenosis (>50%) by duplex ultrasound, clinical deterioration by at least 1 Fontaine stage compared to baseline, and stent fractures by biplanar radiography. Results: In-stent restenosis rates at 1, 2, and 3 years were 46%, 66%, and 72% for Wallstents compared to 20%, 36%, and 53% for nitinol stents (p < 0.001), respectively, without significant difference between the 2 nitinol stent groups (p=0.59). Clinical deterioration at 1, 2, and 3 years was found in 10%, 15%, and 18% with Wallstents versus 4%, 5%, and 5% with nitinol stents (p=0.014), respectively, without difference between the 2 nitinol stent groups (p=0.47). Fracture rates were 19% for Wallstents after a mean 43±24 months, 28% for SMART stents after mean 32±16 months, and 2% for Dynalink/Absolute stents after a mean 15±9 months. Conclusions: Intermediate-term in-stent restenosis remains a major problem even with current nitinol stent technology; however, clinical deterioration seems no matter of serious concern with SMART and Dynalink/Absolute stents. Stent fractures may be lower with Dynalink/Absolute stents, but randomized head-to-head comparisons are needed to validate these data.

Progressive peripheral arterial occlusive disease and other vascular events during nilotinib therapy in CML

The second generation BCR/ABL kinase inhibitor nilotinib is increasingly used for the treatment of imatinib‐resistant chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). So far, nilotinib is considered a well‐tolerated drug with little if any side effects, although an increase in the fasting glucose level has been reported. We examined a series of 24 consecutive CML patients treated with nilotinib in our center for the development of non‐hematologic adverse events. Three of these 24 CML patients developed a rapidly progressive peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) during treatment with nilotinib. In all three cases, PAOD required repeated angioplasty and/or multiple surgeries within a few months. No PAOD was known before nilotinib‐therapy in these patients, although all three had received imatinib. In two patients, pre‐existing risk factors predisposing for PAOD were known, and one of them had developed diabetes mellitus during nilotinib. In the other 21 patients treated with nilotinib in our center, one less severe PAOD, one myocardial infarction, one spinal infarction, one subdural hematoma, and one sudden death of unknown etiology were recorded. In summary, treatment with nilotinib may be associated with an increased risk of vascular adverse events, including PAOD development. In a subgroup of patients, these events are severe or even life‐threatening. Although the exact mechanisms remain unknown, we recommend screening for pre‐existing PAOD and for vascular risk factors such as diabetes mellitus in all patients before starting nilotinib and in the follow up during nilotinib‐therapy. Am. J. Hematol. 2011.

Balloon angioplasty versus stenting with nitinol stents in intermediate length superficial femoral artery lesions.

Background: Recent randomized trials investigating stent implantation compared with balloon angioplasty for treatment of superficial femoral artery (SFA) disease have given divergent results in short (mean 5 cm) and intermediate (mean 10 cm) lesions. We reinvestigated whether primary nitinol stenting is associated with a morphologic and clinical benefit when compared with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with optional stenting (PTA) in intermediate‐length lesions. Methods: We randomly assigned 73 patients with severe claudication or chronic limb ischemia and average 8 cm long (range 3–20 cm) SFA stenosis or occlusion to primary stent implantation (n = 34) or PTA (n = 39). Restenosis >50% and clinical outcome were assessed at 3, 6, and 12 months postintervention. Results: Average length of the treated segments was 98 ± 54 mm and 71 ± 43 mm in the stent and PTA groups (P = 0.011), respectively. In the PTA group, secondary stenting was performed in 10 of 39 patients (26%) due to a suboptimal result after balloon dilation. Restenosis rates in the stent and PTA groups were 21.9% versus 55.6% (P = 0.005) at 6 months by CT‐angiography, and 2.9% versus 18.9% (P = 0.033), 18.2% versus 50.0% (P = 0.006), and 34.4% versus 61.1% (P = 0.028) at 3, 6, and 12 months by sonography, respectively. Clinically, patients in the stent group reported a significantly higher maximum walking capacity compared with the PTA group at 6 and 12 months. Conclusion: In this randomized multicenter trial, primary stenting with a self‐expanding nitinol stent for treatment of intermediate length SFA disease resulted morphologically and clinically superior midterm results compared with balloon angioplasty with optional secondary stenting.

Inflammation and Carotid Artery—Risk for Atherosclerosis Study (ICARAS)

Background—Compelling evidence suggests that inflammation is fundamentally involved in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis; however, temporal correlation between inflammation and morphological features of atherosclerosis progression has not been demonstrated unequivocally. Methods and Results—We prospectively studied 1268 consecutive patients who were initially asymptomatic with respect to carotid artery disease. Patients underwent serial carotid ultrasound investigations at baseline and after a follow-up interval of a median of 7.5 months (range 6 to 9 months), with measurement of carotid flow velocities and categorization of carotid arteries as 0% to 29%, 30% to 49%, 50% to 69%, 70% to 89%, or 90% to 99% stenosed or occluded. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and serum amyloid A (SAA) were measured at baseline and follow-up. Progression of carotid atherosclerosis was found in 103 (8.1%) of 1268 patients. Hs-CRP and SAA, respectively, at baseline (P=0.004 and P=0.014) and follow-up (P<0.001 and P<0.001) and the change from baseline to follow-up (P<0.001 and P<0.001) were significantly associated with progressive atherosclerosis. Adjusted ORs (95% CI) for atherosclerosis progression with increasing quintiles of baseline hs-CRP were 1.65 (0.71 to 3.84), 1.87 (0.8 to 4.37), 3.32 (1.49 to 7.39), and 3.65 (1.65 to 8.08), and with increasing quintiles of baseline SAA, they were 0.86 (0.38 to 1.92), 0.99 (0.49 to 1.99), 1.72 (0.91 to 3.28), and 2.28 (1.24 to 4.20), respectively, compared with the lowest quintiles. Conclusions—These findings supply evidence for a close temporal correlation between inflammation and morphological features of rapidly progressive carotid atherosclerosis, which suggests that elevation or increase of the inflammatory biomarkers hs-CRP and SAA identifies the presence of active atherosclerotic disease.

Heme oxygenase-1 gene promoter microsatellite polymorphism is associated with restenosis after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty.

Purpose: To determine if an association exists between postdilation restenosis and heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1), which is induced by balloon injury and inhibits neointimal formation through the action of endogenous carbon monoxide. A dinucleotide repeat in the promoter region of the HO-1 gene shows a length polymorphism that modulates the level of gene transcription. Methods: This cohort study included 96 consecutive patients (64 men; median age 69 years, interquartile range 60–75) who underwent successful balloon dilation in the femoropopliteal segment. Six-month patency was evaluated using oscillography, ankle-brachial index, and duplex sonography. The association of patency and the length of (GT) repeats in the HO-1 gene promoter was assessed in univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: Restenosis was found in 23 (24%) patients within the first 6 months. Patients with short (<25 GT) dinucleotide repeats in the HO-1 gene promoter on either allele had restenosis significantly less often than patients with longer (≥25 GT) dinucleotide repeats (p = 0.01). Multivariate analysis revealed a significantly reduced risk for restenosis in these patients compared to patients without the short allele (odds ratio 0.2, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.70, p = 0.007). Conclusions: Genetic risk factors for restenosis after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty have not been investigated. In this patient population, short repeat alleles of the heme oxygenase-1 gene promoter polymorphism were associated with reduced postdilation restenosis at 6 months. Upregulation of HO-1 may be an important protective factor after balloon angioplasty by inhibition of vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation.

Perioperative -Blockers for Preventing Surgery-Related Mortality and Morbidity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND:Perioperative &bgr;-blockers are suggested to reduce cardiovascular mortality, myocardial–ischemia/infarction, and supraventricular arrhythmias after surgery. We reviewed the evidence regarding the effectiveness of perioperative &bgr;-blockers for improving patient outcomes after cardiac and noncardiac surgery. METHODS:Eleven large databases were searched from the time of their inception until October 2005. Various online-resources were consulted for the identification of unpublished trials and conference abstracts. We included randomized, controlled trials comparing perioperative &bgr;-blockers with either placebo or the standard-of-care. Of the 3680 retrieved titles, 69 met inclusion criteria for analysis. Odds ratios (OR) assuming random effects were computed in the absence of significant clinical heterogeneity. RESULTS:&bgr;-Blockers reduced the frequency of ventricular tachyarrhythmias [OR (cardiac surgery): 0.28, 95% CI 0.13–0.57; OR (noncardiac surgery): 0.56, 95% CI 0.21–1.45], atrial fibrillation/flutter [OR (cardiac surgery): 0.37, 95% CI 0.28–0.48], other supraventricular arrhythmias [OR (cardiac surgery): 0.25, 95% CI 0.18–0.35; OR (noncardiac surgery): 0.43, 95% CI 0.14–1.37], and myocardial ischemia [OR (cardiac surgery): 0.49, 95% CI 0.17–1.4; OR (noncardiac surgery): 0.38, 95% CI 0.21–0.69]. Length of hospitalization was not reduced [weighted mean difference (cardiac surgery): −0.35 days, 95% CI −0.77–0.07; weighted mean difference (noncardiac surgery): −5.59 days, 95% CI −12.22–1.04] and, in contrast to previous reports, &bgr;-blockers did not reduce mortality [OR (cardiac surgery): 0.55, 95% CI 0.17–1.83; OR (noncardiac surgery): 0.78, 95% CI 0.33–1.87], and they had no influence on the occurrence of perioperative myocardial infarction [OR (cardiac surgery): 0.89, 95% CI 0.53–1.5; OR (noncardiac surgery): 0.59; 0.25–1.39]. CONCLUSIONS:&bgr;-Blockers reduced perioperative arrhythmias and myocardial ischemia, but they had no effect on myocardial infarction, mortality, or length of hospitalization.