Martin Stefanic
Boehringer Ingelheim
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Martin Stefanic.
Clinical Cancer Research | 2010
Klaus Mross; Martin Stefanic; Daniela Gmehling; Annette Frost; Franziska Baas; Clemens Unger; Ralph Strecker; Jürgen Henning; Birgit Gaschler-Markefski; Peter Stopfer; Lothar de Rossi; Rolf Kaiser
Purpose: BIBF 1120 is an oral, potent angiokinase inhibitor targeting receptors of the vascular endothelial growth factors, platelet-derived growth factors, and fibroblast growth factors. This phase I, accelerated titration study assessed the maximum tolerated dose, safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamic effects of BIBF 1120. Patients and Methods: Sixty-one patients with advanced cancers received BIBF 1120 in successive cohorts. Twenty-five received 50 to 450 mg once daily and 36 received 150 to 300 mg twice daily in 4-week treatment courses interspersed by 1 week of washout. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging assessed antiangiogenic effect in 42 patients. Results: Most frequent BIBF 1120–related adverse events were mostly mild to moderate (Common Toxicity Criteria grade 1-2) nausea (68.9%), vomiting (45.9%), and diarrhea (44.3%). The majority of dose-limiting adverse events of Common Toxicity Criteria grade 3 or 4 were reversible liver enzyme elevations. The maximum tolerated dose was 250 mg of BIBF 1120 for once and twice daily dosing. BIBF 1120 was absorbed moderately fast (tmax = 1-3 hours at steady state), with no deviation from dose linearity and no decrease of exposure over time. The gMean terminal half-life was from 13 to 19 hours. One complete and two partial responses occurred in patients with renal cell cancer (n = 2) and colorectal cancer (n = 1). Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging showed a significant reduction in tumor blood flow in 55% of evaluable patients. Conclusions: BIBF 1120 dosed continuously displayed a favorable safety and pharmacokinetics profile, and first efficacy signals were observed. Twice daily dosing permitted increased drug exposure without additional toxicity. Two hundred milligrams BIBF 1120 twice daily is the recommended dose for phase II monotherapy studies. Clin Cancer Res; 16(1); 311–9
Annals of Oncology | 2011
M. Reck; Rolf Kaiser; C. Eschbach; Martin Stefanic; J. Love; U. Gatzemeier; P. Stopfer; J. von Pawel
BACKGROUNDnTo assess the efficacy, safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of BIBF 1120 in patients with stage IIIB/IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).nnnMETHODSnPatients with locally advanced or metastatic relapsed NSCLC in whom first- or second-line platinum-based chemotherapy failed were randomly allocated to daily 250 mg BIBF 1120 b.i.d. or 150 mg BIBF 1120 b.i.d. Primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) and objective tumour response (RECIST). Incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs) were reported.nnnRESULTSnSeventy-three patients received BIBF 1120. Median PFS was 6.9 weeks, with no significant difference between treatment arms. Median overall survival (OS) was 21.9 weeks. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 0-1 patients (n = 56) had a median PFS of 11.6 weeks and a median OS of 37.7 weeks. Tumour stabilisation was achieved in 46% of patients (ECOG 0-1 patients: 59%), with one confirmed partial response (250 mg b.i.d.). Most commonly reported drug-related AEs were nausea (57.5%), diarrhoea (47.9%), vomiting (42.5%), anorexia (28.8%), abdominal pain (13.7%) and reversible alanine transaminase (13.7%) and aspartate aminotransferase elevations (9.6%). BIBF 1120 displayed dose-linear pharmacokinetic characteristics.nnnCONCLUSIONnContinuous treatment with BIBF 1120 was well tolerated, with no difference in efficacy between treatment arms. PFS and objective response with single-agent treatment in advanced disease warrants further exploration.
Clinical Cancer Research | 2009
Guido Bisping; Doris Wenning; Martin Kropff; Dirk Gustavus; Carsten Müller-Tidow; Matthias Stelljes; Gerd Munzert; Frank Hilberg; Gerald Juergen Roth; Martin Stefanic; Sarah Volpert; Rolf M. Mesters; Wolfgang E. Berdel; Joachim Kienast
Purpose: Novel drugs including targeted approaches have changed treatment paradigms for multiple myeloma (MM) and may also have therapeutic potential in the poor-prognosis t(4;14) subset; t(4;14) results in overexpressed and activated fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3). Blocking this receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) induces apoptosis in t(4;14)+ MM cells and decreases adhesion to bone marrow stromal cells (BMSC). Using combinations of novel drugs, we investigated potential enhancement of single-agent activities within the tumor cells, targeting of the marrow micromilieu, or circumvention of drug resistance in t(4;14)+ MM. Experimental Design: We tested effects on apoptosis and related signaling pathways in the t(4;14)+ MM subset, applying drug combinations including a FGFR3 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (RTKI), the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib, and dexamethasone. Results: RTKI, bortezomib, and dexamethasone were active as single agents in t(4;14)+ MM. RTK inhibition triggered complementary proapoptotic pathways (e.g., decrease of Mcl-1, down-regulation of p44/42 mitogen-activated protein kinase, and activation of proapoptotic stress-activated protein/c-Jun NH2-terminal kinases). Synergistic or additive effects were found by combinations of RTKI with dexamethasone or bortezomib. In selected cases of t(4;14)+ MM, triple combinations were superior to dual combinations tested. Prevention from MM cell apoptosis by BMSC or exogenous interleukin-6 was circumvented by drug combinations. In t(4;14)+, N-ras–mutated NCI-H929 cells, resistance to RTKI was overcome by addition of dexamethasone. Notably, the combination of RTKI and dexamethasone showed additive proapoptotic effects in bortezomib-insensitive t(4;14)+ MM. Conclusions: Combining novel drugs in poor-prognosis t(4;14)+ MM should take into account at least bortezomib sensitivity and probably Ras mutational status.
Blood | 2006
Guido Bisping; Martin Kropff; Doris Wenning; Britta Dreyer; Sergey Bessonov; Frank Hilberg; Gerald Juergen Roth; Gerd Munzert; Martin Stefanic; Matthias Stelljes; Christian Scheffold; Carsten Müller-Tidow; Peter Liebisch; Nicola Lang; Joelle Tchinda; Hubert Serve; Rolf M. Mesters; Wolfgang E. Berdel; Joachim Kienast
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2005
K. Mross; Daniela Gmehling; Annette Frost; F. Baas; Ralph Strecker; Jürgen Hennig; Peter Stopfer; Martin Stefanic; G. Stehle; L. de Rossi
Anticancer Research | 2009
Martin Kropff; Joachim Kienast; Guido Bisping; Wolfgang E. Berdel; Birgit Gaschler-Markefski; Peter Stopfer; Martin Stefanic; Gerd Munzert
Archive | 2003
Gerald Juergen Roth; Armin Heckel; Rainer Walter; Frank Hilberg; Rudolf Hauptmann; Martin Stefanic; Florian Colbatzky; Steffan Ernest
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2005
Chooi Lee; G. Attard; L. Poupard; Paul Nathan; J. S. De Bono; Graham Temple; Martin Stefanic; Anwar R. Padhani; I. Judson; Gordon Rustin
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2007
J. von Pawel; Rolf Kaiser; C. Eschbach; Martin Stefanic; J. Love; U. Gatzemeier; M. Reck
Journal of Thoracic Oncology | 2007
Martin Reck; Rolf Kaiser; C. Eschbach; Martin Stefanic; J. Love; Ulrich Gatzemeier; Joachim von Pawel