Martin Suffert
Stanford University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Martin Suffert.
Physics Letters B | 1978
P. Pavlopoulos; G. Backenstoss; Philipp Blum; K. Fransson; R. Guigas; N. Hassler; M. Izycki; H. Koch; A. Nilsson; H. Poth; Martin Suffert; L. Tauscher; K. Zioutas
Abstract The γ-ray spectrum accompanying the p p annihilation at rest has been measured with a large NaI(Tl) spectrometer. Three γ-lines have been observed with energies of 183 ± 7 MeV, 216 ± 9 MeV, and 420 ± 17 MeV at confidence levels of 99.0%, 97.5%, and 98.2%, respectively. The width of the lines corresponds to the detector resolution.
Nuclear Physics | 1983
G. Backenstoss; Michael David Hasinoff; P. Pavlopoulos; J. Repond; L. Tauscher; D.A. Troster; Philipp Blum; R. Guigas; Hans Koch; M. Meyer; H. Poth; U. Raich; B. Richter; L Adiels; I. Bergström; K. Fransson; A. Kerek; Martin Suffert; K. Zioutas
Proton-antiproton annihilations at rest in liquid hydrogen were investigated through the inclusive γ spectrum, related to the annihilation. The high-energy part of the spectrum was used to deduce branching ratios for the so far unobserved annihilation channels: R(pp→π0ω) = (2.38 ± 0.65)%, R(pp→ π0η) = (0.82 ± 0.10%, Rpp→π0γ) = (0.015 ± 0.007)%, and R(pp → π0π0 = (0.06 ± 0.04)%. An upper limit for the π0η′ channel was deduced to be R(pp → π0η′) < 1.1%.
Nuclear Physics | 1970
W. E. Meyerhof; Martin Suffert; William Feldman
Abstract The 3 H(p,γ) 4 He cross section has been measured at 90° from 3 to 18 MeV proton energy, at 0° from 4 to 14 MeV, and complete angular distributions were taken at 10.5, 12 and 14 MeV. The c.m. angular distributions are consistent with A + B sin 2 θ + C sin 2 θ cos θ + D sin 2 θ cos 2 θ as expected for mixed E1 and E2 radiations. Using our and other results, the integrated 4 He(γ,p) 3 H cross section, computed from the reciprocity relation, is decomposed into E1 and E2 contributions up to E γ ∼ 30 MeV. Extrapolations for the relative contributions are proposed up to E γ ∼ 150 MeV. After removal of kinematic factors, the E1 contribution is shown to be resonant, but the E2 contribution is not resonant. Interpretation of the coefficient ratio A B by Crone and Werntz shows that M2 contributions have an important effect on the magnitude of this coefficient. If the 4 He level scheme of Werntz and Meyerhof is accepted, the singlet strength in the two T = 1,1 − levels appears to lie predominantly in the lower level, in contrast to findings from 3 He(p, p) scattering and polarization measurements.
European Physical Journal C | 1988
A. Kreissl; A. D. Hancock; H. Koch; Th. Köhler; H. Poth; U. Raich; D. Rohmann; A. Wolf; L. Tauscher; A. Nilsson; Martin Suffert; M. Chardalas; Sp. Dedoussis; H. Daniel; T. von Egidy; F. J. Hartmann; W. Kanert; H.S. Plendl; G. Schmidt; J.J. Reidy
AbstractA high-precision measurement of the finestructure splitting in the circular 11→10 X-ray transition of
Physics Letters B | 1983
B. Richter; L. Adiels; G. Backenstoss; I. Bergström; Philipp Blum; K. Fransson; M. Glöckner; R. Guigas; M. Hasinoff; A. Kerek; Hans Koch; Th. Köhler; M. Meyer; P. Pavlopoulos; H. Poth; U. Raich; J. Repond; Martin Suffert; L. Tauscher; D.A. Troster; K. Zioutas
Physics Letters B | 1986
Th. Köhler; Philipp Blum; G. Büche; A. D. Hancock; H. Koch; A. Kreissl; H. Poth; U. Raich; D. Rohmann; G. Backenstoss; Ch. Findeisen; J. Repond; L. Tauscher; A. Nilsson; Staffan Carius; Martin Suffert; S. Charalambus; M. Chardalas; Sp. Dedoussis; H. Daniel; T. von Egidy; F. J. Hartmann; W. Kanert; G. Schmidt; J.J. Reidy; M. Nicholas; A. Wolf
\bar p^{208} Pb
Physics Letters B | 1967
Martin Suffert; W. Feldman
Nuclear Physics | 1968
J.L. Black; H.M. Kuan; W. Gruhle; Martin Suffert; G.L. Latshaw
was performed. The experimental value of 1199(5) eV is in agreement with QED calculations. From that value the magnetic moment of the antiproton was deduced to be −2.8005(90)μnucl. With this result the uncertainty of the previous world average value was reduced by a factor of ≈2. A comparison with the corresponding quantity of the proton now yields:
Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research | 1983
Philipp Blum; R. Guigas; H. Koch; M. Meyer; H. Poth; U. Raich; B. Richter; G. Backenstoss; M. Hasinoff; P. Pavlopoulos; J. Repond; L. Tauscher; D. Tröster; L. Adiels; I. Bergström; K. Fransson; A. Kerek; Martin Suffert; K. Zioutas
Physics Letters B | 1984
R. Guigas; Philipp Blum; Hans Koch; M. Meyer; H. Poth; U. Raich; B. Richter; G. Backenstoss; P. Pavlopoulos; L. Tauscher; L. Adiels; K. Fransson; A Nilsson; Martin Suffert; K. Zioutas
{{\left( {\mu _p - \left| {\left\langle {\mu _{\bar p} } \right\rangle } \right|} \right)} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\left( {\mu _p - \left| {\left\langle {\mu _{\bar p} } \right\rangle } \right|} \right)} {\mu _p }}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {\mu _p }} = \left( { - 2.4 \pm 2.9} \right) \times 10^{ - 3}