Martin W. Schoen

Cholesterol Treatment and Changes in Guidelines in an Academic Medical Practice

BACKGROUND National guidelines are intended to influence physician cholesterol treatment practices, yet few studies have documented the effect of new guidelines on actual prescribing behaviors and impacts on patient eligibility for treatment. We describe current cholesterol treatment in an academic practice of Family and Internal Medicine physicians as well the effect of a change in cholesterol treatment guidelines from 2001 Adult Treatment Panel III (ATPIII) to 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines. METHODS Medical records were extracted from primary care patients aged 40-75 years with at least one outpatient visit from January 1, 2012 to July 31, 2013; patients were included if they had records of cholesterol testing, blood pressure measurement, sex, race, and smoking status. Patients were classified into ATPIII and ACC/AHA categories based on clinical variables (eg, diabetes, hypertension, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease), Framingham Risk Score, and 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk. RESULTS There were 4536 patients included in the analysis. Of these, 71% met ATPIII goals and 56% met ACC/AHA guidelines, a 15% decrease. Forty-three percent of high-risk patients met their low-density lipoprotein goals and 46% were on statins. Overall, 32% of patients would need to be started on a statin, 12% require an increased dose, and 6% could stop statins. Of patients considered low risk by ATPIII guidelines, 271 would be eligible for treatment by ACC/AHA guidelines, whereas 129 patients were shifted from intermediate risk to low risk with the change in guidelines. CONCLUSIONS The ACC/AHA guidelines expand the number of patients recommended to receive statins, particularly among patients who were previously thought to be at moderate risk, and would increase the intensity of treatment for many patients at high risk. Significant numbers of patients at risk for cardiovascular events were not receiving guideline-based treatment. New cholesterol guidelines may make treatment decisions easier.

False Bed Alarms: A Teachable Moment.

Story From the Front Lines A 67-year-old woman presented to outpatient interventional radiology for computed tomography (CT)guided biopsy of a suspicious lung nodule found on screening CT. The procedure was complicated by a pneumothorax requiring chest tube placement, and she was admitted to the hospital. Prior to admission, the patient was independent in all daily activities, lived in an apartment alone, and had no history of falls. As part of the admission process, the nursing staff assessed the patient’s risk for falling with the Morse Fall Scale, scoring her at 35. With this level, she qualified as “at risk” for falls, and a bed alarm was instituted. The medicine team entered the room the next day on rounds and found the patient unhappy and frustrated with her hospital stay. She stated “I feel like I’m in jail,” referring to the bed alarm. “I can’t sit up or go to the bathroom without them coming after me.” The patient was soon discharged—no fall or adverse event occurred during hospitalization.

Acute myeloid leukemia induction with cladribine: Outcomes by age and leukemia risk

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) induction traditionally includes seven days of cytarabine and three days of an anthracycline (7 + 3). Because of evidence of increased efficacy of cladribine combined with this regimen, we conducted a retrospective analysis of 107 AML patients treated with idarubicin, cytarabine and cladribine (IAC) at our institution. Complete remission (CR) occurred in 71%, with overall response of 79%. One-year survival overall was 59%, with 47% (27/57) among patients ≥60 years old and 72% (36/50) in those <60 (Relative Risk [RR] 1.9, 95% CI 1.2-3.2). Median overall survival was 17.3 months in all patients and Cox proportional hazard ratio (HR) for death was 2.2 (95% CI 1.3-3.6) for age ≥60 years compared to <60 years. One year survival was 100% among favorable NCCN risk patients versus 64% in intermediate-risk and 35% in poor-risk patients (p < 0.001). HR for death in intermediate- risk (4.2, 95% CI 1.5-12) and poor-risk (8.4, 95% CI 3.0-24) compared to favorable risk AML was higher than that associated with age ≥60 years (HR 2.2). We conclude that IAC is an effective AML induction regimen, NCCN leukemia risk predicts survival better than age in our population, and high intensity regimens can be justified in selected older patients.

Autologous Graft-Versus-Host Disease of the Gastrointestinal Tract in Patients With Multiple Myeloma and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Multiple myeloma (MM) is the most common indication for autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in North America. Despite occurring in up to 50% of patients undergoing allogeneic HSCT, the incidence of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after autologous HSCT is reportedly only 5-20%. Gastrointestinal involvement with graft-versus-host disease (GI GVHD) is a common and serious complication of allogeneic HSCT. GI GVHD after autologous transplant, which is referred to as autologous GVHD (auto-GVHD), has also been described. Auto-GVHD is usually less severe than allogeneic GVHD, and it can be one of the manifestations of engraftment syndrome with release of inflammatory cytokines and infiltration of auto-reactive T cells into affected tissue. Seventy-nine percent of patients respond well to corticosteroids without evidence of recurrence. However, cases of severe auto-GVHD lacking good response to corticosteroids have been reported, most notably in MM patients. Here we present two cases of autologous GI GVHD in recipients of autologous HSCT for treatment of MM. Our cases demonstrate two distinct clinical and endoscopic presentations of this uncommon entity. In the first case, the patient had more severe clinical symptoms accompanied by radiographic, endoscopic, and pathologic findings. The hospital course was complicated by cryptosporidium enteritis and acute cholecystitis in the setting of increased immunosuppression with a corticosteroid for presumed auto-GVHD. In contrast, the second case presented a patient with normal radiologic and endoscopic findings. Pathology revealing frequent apoptotic bodies led to auto-GVHD as a diagnosis. Both our patients received similar courses of chemotherapy prior to autologous HSCT (four cycles of a proteasome inhibitor, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone). Our work highlights the importance of maintaining a high level of clinical suspicion for auto-GVHD in patients presenting with GI symptoms after autologous HSCT, as it is a potentially treatable pathology that may be easily confused with other conditions. Health care providers should be aware of the potential complications of auto-GVHD after autologous HSCT and should be suspicious of auto-GVHD if GI symptoms occur, especially in patients receiving immunomodulatory therapy for MM, even in the absence of gross endoscopic findings.

Description of Venous Thromboembolism in Hospitalized Patients With Metastatic Cancer: A National Sample

Background: This study aimed to determine patient-, tumor-, and hospital-level characteristics associated with venous thromboembolism (VTE), and to assess the impact of VTE on in-hospital mortality and length of hospital stay in hospitalized patients with metastatic cancer. Methods: Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database, a cross-sectional analysis was performed of patients aged ≥18 years with at least 1 diagnosis of primary solid tumor and subsequent secondary or metastatic tumor between 2008 and 2013. Results: Among 850,570 patients with metastatic cancer, 6.6% were diagnosed with VTE. A significant trend for increasing VTE rates were observed from 2008 to 2013 (5.7%-7.2%; P<.0001). Using an adjusted multilevel hierarchical regression model, higher odds of VTE were seen among women (odds ratio [OR], 1.04; 95% CI, 1.02-1.06), black versus white patients (OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.11-1.18), and those with an Elixhauser comorbidity index score of ≥3 (OR, 2.50; 95% CI, 2.38-2.63). Hospital-level correlates of VTE included treatment in a teaching hospital (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01-1.11) and an urban location (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.09-1.27), and admission to hospitals in the Northeast (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.08-1.24) and West (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.03-1.16) versus the South. Patients with metastasis to the liver, brain, or respiratory organs and those with multiple (≥2) metastatic sites had higher odds of VTE, whereas those with metastasis to lymph nodes and genital organs had lower odds. Patients diagnosed with versus without VTE had higher odds of in-hospital mortality (OR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.38-1.63) and prolonged hospital stay (OR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.57-1.73). Conclusions: The frequency of VTE in patients with metastatic cancer is increasing. Patient characteristics, hospital factors, and site of metastasis independently predict the occurrence of VTE and allow for better stratification of patients with cancer according to their VTE risk.

Perianal Basal Cell Carcinoma: a Case Report

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most commonly diagnosed skin cancer and highest incidence of any malignancy in theUSA [1]. It usually arises in the elderly on sun-exposed areas, such as the head and neck [2]. The most important etiologic factor for the development of BCC is ultraviolet light exposure; thus, it is very rare for BCC to arise within the anogenital region or other non-UV-exposed areas. Here, we describe a case of a 49-year-old patient with a perianal skin lesion that presented with painless bleeding. Immunohistochemical staining for Ber-EP4 and BCL2 was positive which demonstrated that the lesion was BCC and not a basaloid squamous cell carcinoma. There have only been a few previously published reports of perianal BCC. While very rare, it is important to highlight this case as it demonstrates the necessity to biopsy suspicious perianal lesions and how to distinguish between basaloid squamous cell carcinoma and BCC.

Myasthenia Gravis Presenting as Graft versus Host Disease after Allogeneic Blood Stem Cell Transplant

Myasthenia gravis is a very rare manifestation of graft versus host disease after stem cell transplants. Herein, we describe a case of new-onset myasthenia gravis after a stem cell transplant 34 months ago in a patient with myelodysplastic syndrome.