Martina Moschini

Use, Attitudes and Knowledge of Complementary and Alternative Drugs (CADs) Among Pregnant Women: a Preliminary Survey in Tuscany.

To explore pregnant womens use, attitudes, knowledge and beliefs of complementary and alternative drugs (CADs) defined as products manufactured from herbs or with a natural origin. A preliminary survey was conducted among 172 pregnant women in their third trimester of pregnancy, consecutively recruited in two obstetrical settings; 15 women were randomly selected to compute a test-to-retest analysis. Response rate was 87.2%. Test-to-retest analysis showed a questionnaires reproducibility exceeding a K-value of 0.7 for all items. Mean age was 32.4 ± 0.4 years; most women were nulliparae (62.7%). The majority of subjects (68%) declared to have used one or more CADs during their lifetime; 48% of pregnant women reported taking at least one CAD previously and during the current pregnancy. Womens habitual use of CADs meant they were at higher risk of taking CADs also during pregnancy (adjusted odds ratio = 10.8; 95% confidence interval: 4.7–25.0). Moreover, 59.1% of the subjects were unable to correctly identify the type of CADs they were using. The majority of women resorted to gynecologists as the primary information source for CADs during pregnancy, while they mainly referred to herbalists when not pregnant. Habitual use of CADs seems to be a strong predictor for their ingestion also during pregnancy; in addition most subjects were unable to correctly identify the products they were taking. In the light of the scanty data concerning the safety of CADs during pregnancy, these preliminary results confirm the need to investigate thoroughly the situation of pregnant women and CADs consumption.

Identifying Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with Drug-Drug Interactions: Data Mining of a Spontaneous Reporting Database in Italy

AbstractBackground: Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) are an important cause of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Many studies have recently considered this issue, but most of them focus only on potential interactions and are often related to the hospital setting. A spontaneous reporting database could be a valuable resource for detection of ADRs associated with DDIs; however, data in the literature are limited. Objective: To detect those patients treated with potentially interacting drugs and the cases where reported adverse reactions are a possible consequence of DDIs, using an Italian spontaneous reporting database. Methods: The data were obtained from a database containing all reports of suspected ADRs from five Italian regions (January 1990 to December 2007) that are the main contributors to the Italian spontaneous reporting system. All reports containing at least two drugs, reported as being suspected of causing the ADR or as concomitant medication, were selected and a list of drug pairs was drawn up. We performed a search to verify which drug pairs are considered a potential DDI, using the Internet version of the DRUGDEX® system. For each report containing a potential DDI, we verified whether the description of the adverse reaction corresponded to the interaction effect. Results: The database contained 45 315 reports, of which 17 700 (39.1%) had at least two reported drugs. We identified 5345 (30.2%) reports with potential DDIs, and in 1159 (21.7%) of these reports a related ADR was reported. The percentage of reports with potential DDIs increased in relation to the number of concomitantly administered drugs, ranging from 9.8% for two drugs to 88.3% for eight or more drugs. The percentages of serious or fatal reports of ADRs associated with a DDI were significantly higher than other reports analysed. The mean age, percentage of male patients and the mean number of drugs were also significantly higher in reports with DDIs than in other reports. In 235 of 1159 reports (20.3%), both interacting drugs were recognized as suspect by the reporter. This percentage varies in relation to the drugs involved, ranging from 2% to about 65%. The most frequently reported interaction was digoxin and diuretics, but no fatal ADRs were reported with this combination. The combination of anticoagulant and antiplatelet agents was responsible for the greatest number of serious reactions and deaths. Conclusions: This study validates that spontaneous reporting, despite its limitations, can be an important resource for detecting ADRs associated with the concomitant use of interacting drugs. Moreover, our data confirm that DDIs could be a real problem in clinical practice, showing that more than one in five patients exposed to a potential DDI experienced a related ADR.

The importance of monitoring adverse drug reactions in pediatric patients: the results of a national surveillance program in Italy

Objective: To gain information on safety of drugs used in pediatrics through a 4-year post-marketing active pharmacovigilance program. The program sampled the Italian population and was termed ‘Monitoring of the Adverse Effects in Pediatric population’ (MEAP). Research design and methods: Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were collected for individuals aged 0 – 17 years treated in hospitals and territorial health services in Lombardy, Tuscany, Apulia and Campania; located to gain an appropriate sampling of the population. ADRs were evaluated using the Adverse Drug Reaction Probability Scale (Naranjo) and analyzed with respect to time, age, sex, category of ADR, seriousness, suspected medicines, type of reporter and off-label use. Results: We collected and analyzed reports from 3539 ADRs. Vaccines, antineoplastic and psychotropic drugs were the most frequently pharmacotherapeutic subgroups involved. Seventeen percent of reported ADRs were serious; of them fever, vomiting and angioedema were the most frequently reported. Eight percent of ADRs were associated with off-label use, and 10% were unknown ADRs. Analysis of these revealed possible strategies of therapy optimization. Conclusions: The MEAP project demonstrated that active post-marketing pharmacovigilance programs are a valid strategy to increase awareness on pediatric pharmacology, reduce underreporting and provide information on drug actions in pediatrics. This information enhances drug therapy optimization in the pediatric patients.

Safety profile of antiviral medications: A pharmacovigilance study using the Italian spontaneous-reporting database

PURPOSE The results of an analysis of suspected antiviral-associated adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in Italy over a 22-year period are presented. METHODS A case/non-case analysis was conducted using ADR reports compiled in the nationwide spontaneous-reporting database through September 2010. All reported events included in the analysis were evaluated and coded by drug safety experts; causality assessments were performed according to the algorithm of Naranjo et al. The association between an adverse reaction and antiviral use was assessed by estimating the reporting odds ratio (ROR), with 95% confidence interval (CI), as a measure of disproportionality. RESULTS Overall, 863 reports of suspected ADRs involving antivirals and 42,430 reports of adverse reactions to other drugs were identified; of those events, 3.3% and 64.3% were determined to be definite or probable ADRs, respectively, and an additional 32.4% were deemed possibly drug related. Several ADRs were disproportionately associated with antivirals relative to other drugs: renal colic (ROR, 25.5; 95% CI, 13.3-49.0), lactic acidosis (ROR, 18.6; 95% CI, 9.2-37.7), depression (ROR, 18.0; 95% CI, 11.6-27.9), anemia (ROR, 15.9; 95% CI, 12.3-20.4), hallucination (ROR, 4.3; 95% CI, 2.7-7.1), neutropenia (ROR, 4.1; 95% CI, 2.9-5.8), acute renal failure (ROR, 3.9; 95% CI, 2.3-6.4), fever (ROR, 3.8; 95% CI, 2.8-5.1), hyperpyrexia (ROR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.7-4.9), and asthenia (ROR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.2-2.8). CONCLUSION Analysis of data from a large Italian database showed that, among antiviral agents, the ribavirin-interferon combination, acyclovir, valacyclovir, indinavir, and zidovudine accounted for the most serious hematologic, neuropsychiatric, and renal ADRs.

Intensive monitoring programme of adverse drug reactions In emergency department (MEREAFaPS Study): the Tuscan experience

Objectives: Individual case safety reports (ICSRs) could be an important source in giving further information to characterize the risk situation and aid in the prevention, diagnosis, management and treatment of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). The aim was to determine whether and where on the ICSRs clinically useful information was specified for rare ADRs in the paediatric population. Methods: ICSR concerning rhabdomyolysis occurring during use of antipsychotic medicines for patients up to 17 years of age were retrieved from the WHO Global ICSR database, VigiBase. The original case reports were requested and received from the national pharmacovigilance centres. We focused on five areas of information specified in a recent guideline for publishing ADRs.[1] Results: Eighteen original cases with an age span from 5 to 17 years were reviewed with the following outcomes. Circumstances preceding the reaction: 9 reports included this information, consisting primarily of abdominal, muscle and back pain. In eight of these reports, the full account of the symptoms and sequence of events were only found in the narratives. Underlying risk factors for rhabdomyolysis: Recorded for four of five patients in the narrative: seizures (n = 1), strenuous physical activity (n = 2), diabetic ketoacidosis (n = 1), alcohol use (n = 1). Four patients had Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome (NMS) co-reported. Physical examination and laboratory tests: All values for patient temperature and laboratory values were given in free text. Elevated creatine phosphokinase (CPK) or myoglobin values were recorded in 14 reports ranging from 1200 to 95 000 IU/L (CPK). Patient temperature was specified for 5 patients, of whom 3 patients were also reported to experience NMS. Drug-reaction time-to-onset: 13 reports included information on the duration from drug start to reaction onset, which ranged from 4 days to 1.5 years. 9 reports included dates in the structured data, so that time to onset could be calculated and in 4 reports the information was specified in the narratives. Treatment of the reaction: Apart from stopping the drug (n = 18) and hospitalization (n = 16), other actions of treatment, such as forced intravenous fluids or resolving spontaneously, was given for 5 cases in the narrative. Conclusions: This study showed that useful clinical information was available to characterize the risk situation for these patients in this subset of reports. This should be regarded in the context that ICSRs are generally considered to be of poor quality. However, access to the free text fields recorded by the reporter was crucial to capture this information. Reference 1. Kelly WN, Arellano FM, Barnes J, et al. Guidelines for submitting adverse event reports for publication. Drug Saf 2007; 30 (5): 367-73