Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Martina Nolte is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Martina Nolte.


Histochemistry and Cell Biology | 1994

Effects of antigen retrieval by microwave heating in formalin-fixed tissue sections on a broad panel of antibodies

R. von Wasielewski; Martin Werner; Martina Nolte; Ludwig Wilkens; A. Georgii

Formaldehyde fixation of biopsy specimens for routine purposes has often been held responsible for the poor reproducibility of immunohistochemical studies. Recently, antigen retrieval (AGR) using microwave irradiation was described as a potential tool to enhance immunostaining. A comparison of conventional staining and staining after microwave heating was performed for 52 markers, using tissues fixed in formaldehyde for 24 h, 1 to 6 weeks and 3 years respectively, as well as consultant case material. After adequate duration of fixation (24 h), only a few markers (17%) showed better results after AGR, but this percentage was increased to 50% when tissues were fixed for longer periods. Maximal enhancement was obtained in the group of consultant cases (58% of tested markers demonstrated better staining results), in which the period of fixation and tissue processing was unknown. To achieve reliable enhancement with AGR, continuous heating (100° C) should not be shorter than 20 min. In conclusion, AGR may become the most important tool to simplify and equalize immunohistochemical techniques, if critically evaluated.


Histochemistry and Cell Biology | 1997

Interphase cytogenetics in pathology: principles, methods, and applications of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)

Martin Werner; Ludwig Wilkens; Michaela Aubele; Martina Nolte; Horst Zitzelsberger; Paul Komminoth

Abstract Characteristic chromosome aberrations have been identified in various tumors. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using specific probes that are generated by vector cloning or in vitro amplification and labeled with fluorescent dyes allow for the detection of these genetic changes in interphase cells. This technique, that is also referred to as ”interphase cytogenetics”, can be performed in cytological preparations as well as in sections of routinely formaldehyde-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue. In cancer research and diagnostics, interphase cytogenetics by FISH is used to detect numerical chromosome changes and structural aberrations, e.g., translocations, deletions, or amplifications. In this technical overview, we explain the principles of the FISH method and provide protocols for FISH in cytological preparations and paraffin sections. Moreover, possible applications of FISH are discussed.


Virchows Archiv | 1995

Trisomy 1 and 8 occur frequently in hepatocellular carcinoma but not in liver cell adenoma and focal nodular hyperplasia. A fluorescence in situ hybridization study

A. Nasarek; Martin Werner; Martina Nolte; Axel Georgii; Jürgen Klempnauer

Conventional cytogenetic studies revealed gains and structural aberrations of chromosome 1 to be the most consistent chromosomal aberrations in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We investigated touch preparations of eight HCC, five cholangiocellular carcinomas (CCC), five liver cell adenomas (LCA), four focal nodular hyperplasias (FNH) as well as nine specimens of normal liver tissue using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with centromere specific probes for chromosomes 1 and 8. Polysomies of chromosome 1, especially trisomy 1, were found in five of eight HCC and four of five CCC but in no normal liver tissue or benign tumour. Only three of seven cases of HCC revealed trisomy 8 whereas the five benign liver tumours and all normal liver tissues examined had disomy 8. Our results confirm conventional cytogenetic findings in terms of chromosome 1 aberrations in HCC although they are not specific for these types of malignant liver tumours. Since α-satellite probes were used in our study, only gains or losses including the centromeric regions of the chromosomes 1 and 8 could be detected. Nevertheless, our findings suggest that FISH may help in the differential diagnosis of malignant versus benign neoplasms of the liver.


Journal of Clinical Pathology | 1998

Expression of proliferation associated antigens and detection of numerical chromosome aberrations in primary human liver tumours : relevance to tumour characteristics and prognosis

Martina Nolte; Martin Werner; A. Nasarek; Hueseyin Bektas; R. von Wasielewski; Jürgen Klempnauer; A. Georgii

AIMS: To assess cell proliferation and the presence of numerical chromosome aberrations involving chromosomes 1 and 8 in benign and malignant liver tumours. METHODS: Cell proliferation was studied immunohistochemically in paraffin wax embedded material from 62 primary liver tumours (20 hepatocellular carcinomas, 16 cholangiocellular carcinomas, 15 liver cell adenomas, 11 focal nodular hyperplasias), and the results were compared with histological characteristics and clinical data. Copy numbers of chromosomes 1 and 8 were assessed by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) with satellite probes in fresh tumour material. RESULTS: The expression of proliferation associated antigen Ki67, using the monoclonal antibody MIB-1, and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), using the antibody PC10, was found to be significantly higher in malignant versus benign liver tumours. Neither Ki67 nor PCNA expression were independent prognostic parameters. However, there was a tendency for a worse outcome (survival < 12 months) for patients with a high MIB-1 labelling index (> 20%) compared with patients having the same tumour stage and a low MIB-1 index. Aneusomy for chromosomes 1 and 8 was demonstrated by FISH in malignant tumours (six of seven hepatocellular carcinomas, four of five cholangiocellular carcinomas) but not in benign tumours (none of nine) or non-neoplastic liver (none of nine). CONCLUSION: Both the determination of the proliferating cell fraction and FISH analysis are useful for distinguishing hepatocellular carcinoma from liver cell adenoma or focal nodular hyperplasia; high fractions of proliferating cells are predictive of an early relapse.


Diagnostic Molecular Pathology | 1999

Cytogenetic aberrations in myelodysplastic syndrome detected by comparative genomic hybridization and fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Ludwig Wilkens; Dagmar Burkhardt; Joelle Tchinda; Guntram Büsche; Martin Werner; Martina Nolte; Arnold Ganser; Axel Georgii

Conventional cytogenetics (CC) is proven as a diagnostic and prognostic factor in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). However, CC may be hampered by insufficient metaphase preparation and cannot analyze interphase nuclei. These problems are solved by using comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). The CGH was applied to samples from 45 patients with MDS, and the results were compared with CC and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). The CC detected aberrations in 12 of 45 samples, including chromosomes 3 (n = 1), 5 (n = 9), 7 (n = 2),8(n = 1), 18(n = 1),21 (n = 1), X (n = 1), and Y(n = 2). In one patient, loss of B and C group chromosomes and a marker chromosome were seen. The CGH revealed chromosomal imbalances in 18 of 45 samples, including chromosomes 5 (n = 11), 7 (n = 2), 8 (n = 1), 18(n = 1), 20(n = 1), 21 (n = 1), X (n = 1), and Y (n = 2). All unbalanced aberrations found by CC were detected by CGH, too. In two patients, the CGH found additional aberrations and redefined the aberrations of the chromosomes of the B and C group in one sample. The FISH confirmed these aberrations. Additionally performed FISH for chromosomes 5, 7, and 8 gave normal findings in all patients found to be normal in CC and CGH. The CGH and FISH confirmed the results obtained by CC. All three techniques showed changes of chromosomes 5 and 7 as the most frequent aberrations, emphasizing the importance of these chromosomes in the development of MDS. Furthermore, the CC is proven as the basic technique for cytogenetic evaluation of MDS.


Human Pathology | 1998

Analysis of hematologic diseases using conventional karyotyping, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and comparative genomic hybridization (CGH)

Ludwig Wilkens; Joelle Tchinda; Dagmar Burkhardt; Martina Nolte; Martin Werner; Axel Georgii

Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) has been proven to be an important tool in interphase cytogenetics of solid tumors. Although, because of methodological implications, balanced aberrations are not detected by CGH, the technique has uncovered a variety of new and interesting imbalanced karyotype changes. However, only a few studies deal with its application to hematologic disorders, although this is a main topic of cytogenetics. The aim of our study was, therefore, to evaluate the usefulness of CGH in the examination of hematologic neoplasms. For this purpose, bone marrow aspirates of 33 patients with different hematologic disorders were examined with CGH and the results compared with conventional cytogenetics (CC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). CGH showed chromosome changes in 8 of 33 cases. CC found balanced aberrations in 4 of 33 and unbalanced changes in 9 of 33 samples. Differences between CGH and CC in unbalanced aberrations were seen in four cases. In these samples, either the number of aberrant cells found by CC was low and, therefore, difficult to detect by CGH, or complex aberrations in different cell clones as seen in CC were lumped together as one karyotype by CGH. In one sample, CC was not capable of giving any results at all, whereas CGH showed trisomy 8. CGH was also helpful in defining the bands involved in the structural aberrations, which was difficult by CC in some cases because of the low quality of metaphase spreads. All results obtained by CGH were confirmed by FISH, whereas CC and FISH were discordant in one case. Although CGH was not able to detect all aberrations, it gave important additional information for the correct localization of the aberrations found in CC, and it was most helpful in samples not processed successfully in CC. These advantages would open up a new field of application for CGH not only for research, but also for diagnostic purposes.


Histopathology | 2007

Demonstration of the Philadelphia translocation by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in paraffin sections and identification of aberrant cells by a combined FISH/immunophenotyping approach

Martina Nolte; Martin Werner; M. Ewig; R. von Wasielewski; Ludwig Wilkens; A. Georgii

The Philadelphia translocation was demonstrated by two‐colour fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in decalcified paraffin sections of bone marrow from patients with chronic myelogenous leukaemia. FISH was combined with immunocytochemical detection of different membrane‐bound or cytoplasmic antigens. With this new technique, the cells bearing the 9;22 translocation can be identified morphologically, as well as immunocyto‐chemically, in tissue sections.


Pathology Research and Practice | 1996

Microwave Pretreatment Improves RNA-ISH in Various Formalin-fixed Tissues using a Uniform Protocol

Ludwig Wilkens; R. von Wasielewski; Martin Werner; Martina Nolte; A. Georgii

RNA is situ hybridization technique (RNA-ISH) is hampered by formalin fixation of tissues. This necessitates a pretreatment step of enzymatic digestion. However, to achieve the best results, digestion times and concentrations of enzymes have to be adapted for every specimen in a cumbersome procedure. Microwave pretreatment (MP) of formalin-fixed tissues has developed to become a powerful tool in immunohistochemistry (IHC) in recent years. To evaluate whether MP could also be helpful for RNA-ISH, we compared MP and conventional enzymatic pretreatment systematically using different tissues and various fixation times. As a model for RNA-ISH we chose the detection of kappa/lambda light chain mRNA in tonsils and lymph nodes with follicular hyperplasia and lymph nodes of patients with lymphocyte predominant Hodgkins Disease (LPHD). Signal intensity obtained after MP was at least as good or dramatically enhanced as that obtained with optimized, single case adapted conventional pretreatment, the morphology being much better preserved after MP. These results confirm MP as a suitable method to unify the staining protocols in RNA-ISH, regardless of the duration of formalin fixation. Based on our results we recommend MP as a reliable and inexpensive method to enhance, standardized and simplify RNA-ISH.


Journal of Comparative Pathology | 1993

Different cytogenetic findings in two clinically similar leukaemic dogs

Martina Nolte; Martin Werner; I. Nolte; Axel Georgii

A 4-month-old German Shepherd puppy and a 7-year-old Boxer dog, in which a clinical diagnosis of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia had been made, were investigated cytogenetically. In the puppy a diploid karyotype was found, but the malignant clone in the Boxer was characterized by an extra metacentric chromosome, apparently formed as the result of a Robertsonian translocation of two chromosomes 1. These findings are discussed against the background of similar cases reported in the literature. Possibly, different types of acute canine leukaemic disease, occurring at different ages, can be distinguished by cytogenetic evaluation.


Virchows Archiv | 1996

Megakaryocytes carry the fused bcr-abl gene in chronic myeloid leukaemia: a fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis from bone marrow biopsies.

Martina Nolte; Martin Werner; M. Ewig; R. von Wasielewski; A. Georgii; Hartmut Link; H. Diedrich

Histological examination of bone marrow biopsies shows that about one-third of chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) patients exhibit an increase of megakaryocytes. The megakaryocytic predominance may be so striking that differentiation from other chronic myeloproliferative disorders (CMPD) may be difficult in some CML patients. Megakaryocytes in CML are clonal as demonstrated by loss of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase isoenzymes. The Ph translocation, fusing the abl and bcr genes on chromosomes 9 and 22, however, obviously occurs as a second step in tumour development. So far, the Ph translocation has not been assigned explicitly to megakaryocytes. The question is whether the megakaryocytic cell lineage could harbour the bcr/abl fusion in those CML cases with striking proliferation of megakaryocytes but lack this genetic defect in cases with normal or decreased megakaryocyte counts. We therefore performed triple-colour fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for portions of the bcr and abl genes flanking the breakpoint in CML in paraffin sections of CML cases with normal and with increased numbers of megakaryocytes. This method allows identification of the bcr/abl fusion in single, morphologically intact cells, whereas conventional cytogenetics requires lysis and thus destruction of the cell. Among the 21 CML patients examined by FISH, 10 were informative for bcr and abl genes and displayed distinct hybridization signals within nuclei of bone marrow cells. Besides the granulopoietic cells, megakaryocytes of all those patients (4 without and 6 with varying grades of megakaryocytic increase) displayed bcr/abl fusion signals indiciative of a Ph translocation. The lack of hybridization signals in the remaining 11 cases indicates that this technique is not of value diagnostically and should be reserved for scientific questions. Positive controls consisted of conventional chromosome preparations from bone marrow aspirates demonstrating the Ph chromosome in all patients examined, and negative controls of paraffin sections of bone marrow biopsies from non-CML patients. These showed no fusion signals in bone marrow cells, including megakaryocytes, using FISH. Our results demonstrate clearly that not only the transforming event but also the Ph translocation leading to the bcr/abl fusion happens prior to the differentiation of the pluripotent stem cell into different myeloid lineages. The megakaryocytic proliferation evident in some CML cases is probably a consequence of the disease progress.

Collaboration


Dive into the Martina Nolte's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Martin Werner

Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge