Martina Porstner

Five-year outcomes in kidney transplant patients converted from cyclosporine to everolimus: the randomized ZEUS study.

ZEUS study was an open‐label, 12‐month, multicenter study in which 300 de novo kidney transplant recipients were randomized to continue receiving cyclosporine (CsA) or convert to everolimus at 4.5 months posttransplant. Five‐year follow‐up data were available for 245/269 patients (91.1%) who completed the core 12‐month study (123 everolimus, 109 CsA). At 5 years, adjusted estimated GFR was 66.2 mL/min/1.73 m2 with everolimus versus 60.9 mL/min/1.73 m2 with CsA; the mean difference was 5.3 mL/min/1.73 m2 in favor of everolimus (95% CI 2.4, 8.3; p < 0.001 [intent‐to‐treat population]). In a post hoc analysis of patients remaining on study drug at 5 years (everolimus 77, CsA 86), mean difference was 8.2 mL/min/1.73 m2 (95% CI 4.3, 12.1; p < 0.001) in favor of everolimus. The cumulative incidence of biopsy‐proven acute rejection postrandomization was 13.6% with everolimus versus 7.5% with CsA (p = 0.095), largely accounted for by grade I rejection (16/21 patients and 7/11 patients, respectively). Postrandomization, graft loss, mortality, serious adverse events and neoplasms were similar in both arms. In conclusion, conversion of kidney transplant patients to everolimus at 4.5 months posttransplant is associated with a significant improvement in renal function that is maintained to at least 5 years. The increase in early mild acute rejection did not affect long‐term graft function.

Renal, efficacy and safety outcomes following late conversion of kidney transplant patients from calcineurin inhibitor therapy to everolimus: the randomized APOLLO study.

AIMS The primary objective of this trial was to demonstrate, based on the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), superior renal function at month 12 after conversion of maintenance kidney transplant patients from calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) therapy to everolimus, compared to continuing a standard CNI regimen. MATERIALS AND METHODS APOLLO was an open-label, 12-month, prospective, multicenter study in which 93 maintenance kidney transplant patients were randomized to convert from CNI to everolimus (n = 46) or remain on standard CNI-based immunosuppression (n = 47). The primary efficacy variable was eGFR (Nankivell formula) 12 months after randomization. The study was terminated prematurely due to slow recruitment and was thus underpowered. RESULTS Mean time post-transplant was 83.5 months with everolimus and 70.1 months with CNI. Adjusted values for eGFR (Nankivell) at month 12 were 61.6 (95% CI 58.1, 65.1) mL/ min/1.73 m² with everolimus and 58.8 (95% CI 55.2, 62.3) mL/min/1.73 m² with CNI, a difference of 2.8 (95% CI -1.0, 6.7) mL/ min/1.73 m² (p = 0.145) i.e., the primary objective was not met. Using the modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) formula, adjusted eGFR at month 12 was significantly higher with everolimus (p = 0.030). In the subpopulation who remained on the study drug (n = 52), the difference in the adjusted change from randomization was 6.6 (95% CI 1.5, 11.6) mL/min/1.73 m² (p = 0.013) in favor of everolimus. There was no biopsyproven acute rejection and no graft losses. Adverse events led to discontinuation of everolimus and CNI in 32.6% and 10.6% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Conversion from CNI to everolimus to preserve renal function can be considered several years after kidney transplantation and does not compromise immunosuppressive efficacy.

The MANDELA study: A multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel group trial to refine the use of everolimus after heart transplantation

In recent years a series of trials has sought to define the optimal protocol for everolimus-based immunosuppression in heart transplantation, with the goal of minimizing exposure to calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) and harnessing the non-immunosuppressive benefits of everolimus. Randomized studies have demonstrated that immunosuppressive potency can be maintained in heart transplant patients receiving everolimus despite marked CNI reduction, although very early CNI withdrawal may be inadvisable. A potential renal advantage has been shown for everolimus, but the optimal time for conversion and the adequate reduction in CNI exposure remain to be defined. Other reasons for use of everolimus include a substantial reduction in the risk of cytomegalovirus infection, and evidence for inhibition of cardiac allograft vasculopathy, a major cause of graft loss. The ongoing MANDELA study is a 12-month multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group study in which efficacy, renal function and safety are compared in approximately 200 heart transplant patients. Patients receive CNI therapy, steroids and everolimus or mycophenolic acid during months 3 to 6 post-transplant, and are then randomized at month 6 post-transplant (i) to convert to CNI-free immunosuppression with everolimus and mycophenolic acid or (ii) to continue reduced-exposure CNI, with concomitant everolimus. Patients are then followed to month 18 post-transplant The rationale and expectations for the trial and its methodology are described herein.

A randomized trial of intensified vs. standard dosing for enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in de novo kidney transplant recipients: results at 1 year.

In a 6-month prospective, openlabel, multicenter study, 128 de novo kidney transplant patients receiving cyclosporine (CsA) and steroids were randomized to an intensified regimen of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) or to a standard EC-MPS regimen to Week 6 posttransplant, after which the regimen was identical. In a follow-up study to Month 12 post-transplant (49 intensified regimen, 52 standard regimen), the reduced rate of BPAR observed at Month 6 (intensified regimen 3.2%, standard regimen 16.9%, p = 0.016) was maintained at Month 12 (4.8% vs. 18.5%, p = 0.026). Estimated GFR (Cockcroft-Gault) at Month 12 was comparable in the intensified group (mean (SD) 54.8 (22.9) ml/min) vs. the standard group (mean (SD) 57.5 (23.6) ml/min, p = 0.83). The incidence of adverse events and serious adverse events at Month 12 was similar in both treatment groups, although adverse events with a suspected relation to study drug were reported in 69.8% and 50.8% of patients in the intensified and standard regimen groups, respectively (p = 0.032). Infections and hematological parameters were similar between groups. In conclusion, an early regimen of intensified EC-MPS with CsA and steroids achieves a low rate of BPAR over the first year after kidney transplantation with similar renal function to a standard regimen, and without a clinically relevant impact on safety.

Everolimus with cyclosporine withdrawal or low-exposure cyclosporine in kidney transplantation from Month 3: a multicentre, randomized trial

Background. Randomized trials have shown that early adoption of everolimus-based immunosuppressive regimens without a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) improves long-term kidney graft function, but the optimal strategy for CNI minimization remains uncertain. Methods. In a prospective, randomized, multicentre, 12-month trial, 499 de novo kidney transplant patients were randomized at Month 3 to (i) remain on standard CNI (cyclosporine) therapy with mycophenolic acid, (ii) convert to everolimus with mycophenolic acid or (iii) start everolimus with reduced CNI and no mycophenolic acid (clinical trials registry: ClinicalTrials.gov-NCT00514514). Results. The primary endpoint, change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (Nankivell) from randomization to Month 12, was significantly greater in the CNI-free arm versus standard CNI therapy: mean difference 5.6 mL/min/1.73 m 2 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.8-8.3 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , P < 0.001]. The improvement in eGFR in the CNI-free arm was also higher than in the low-CNI group (mean difference 5.5 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , 95% CI 2.8-8.2 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , P < 0.001), while results were similar in the low-CNI and standard CNI arms. The post-randomization incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection was 11.7%, 8.1% and 7.9% in the CNI-free, low-CNI and standard CNI groups, respectively (CNI-free versus standard CNI, P = 0.27; low-CNI versus standard CNI, P = 1.00). Adverse events led to study drug discontinuation in 28.7%, 15.5% and 15.2% of CNI-free, low-CNI and standard CNI patients, respectively. Conclusions. Everolimus initiation with CNI withdrawal at Month 3 after kidney transplantation achieves a significant improvement in renal function at 12 months, with a similar rate of acute rejection.

Early conversion from cyclosporine to everolimus following living-donor kidney transplantation: outcomes at 5 years posttransplant in the randomized ZEUS trial

AIMS To assess 5-year efficacy, renal, and safety outcomes following early conversion from cyclosporine to everolimus vs. a standard cyclosporine-based regimen in living-donor kidney transplant (LDKT) recipients. MATERIALS AND METHODS The ZEUS study was a randomized, open-label, 1-year, multicenter study in which 300 de novo kidney transplant recipients continued to receive cyclosporine or converted to everolimus at 4.5 months post-transplant, with annual follow-up visits to 5 years post-transplant. RESULTS Of the 80 LDKT patients who were randomized, 75 completed the 1-year core study and 60 attended the 5-year follow-up visit. At year 5, 15/31 (48.4%) everolimus patients and 20/29 (69.0%) cyclosporine patients remained on the study drug. Mean adjusted estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) at year 5 in LDKT recipients was 67.2 vs. 60.8 mL/min/1.73m2 for everolimus vs. cyclosporine (mean difference 6.4 mL/min/1.73m2; p = 0.031). For patients who remained on study drug, the mean difference was 13.2 mL/min/1.73m2 (p = 0.003), but no significant difference was seen in patients who switched from study drug (mean -2.6 mL/min/1.73m2, p = 0.701). Patient and graft survival rates were similar with everolimus and cyclosporine. Biopsy-proven acute rejection occurred in 22.0% vs. 7.5% of LDKT patients randomized to everolimus vs. cyclosporine (p = 0.116). Only 1 LDKT patient discontinued everolimus due to adverse events during years 1 - 5. CONCLUSIONS Early initiation of everolimus with calcineurin-inhibitor (CNI) withdrawal after LDKT improved graft function to 5 years post-transplant compared to standard CNI-based therapy. The renal benefit was concentrated in patients who remained on everolimus. An increase in mild acute rejection was not associated with long-term graft loss.

Efficacy and safety of conversion from cyclosporine to everolimus in living-donor kidney transplant recipients: an analysis from the ZEUS study

Conversion of living‐donor kidney transplant patients from calcineurin inhibitor therapy to an mTOR inhibitor is poorly documented. In the prospective, multicentre ZEUS study, 300 kidney transplant recipients without prior rejection (Banff grade >1) and serum creatinine ≤265 μmol/l were randomized to continue cyclosporine or convert to everolimus at 4.5 months post‐transplant. In a post hoc analysis of 80 living‐donor recipients, adjusted estimated GFR (Nankivell) at month 12 (the primary endpoint) was 74.3 (95% CI [70.7, 77.9]) ml/min/1.73 m2 with everolimus versus 63.8 (95% CI [60.0, 67.7]) ml/min/1.73 m2) with cyclosporine, a difference of 10.5 ml/min/1.73 m2 in favour of everolimus (P < 0.001). From randomization to month 12, adjusted estimated GFR increased by a mean of 9.8 (95% CI [6.2, 13.4]) ml/min/1.73 m2 with everolimus versus −0.7 (95% CI [−4.6, 3.1]) ml/min/1.73 m2) (P < 0.001) with cyclosporine. There were six biopsy‐proven acute rejection episodes in everolimus‐treated patients (five Banff grade I) and one episode in cyclosporine‐treated patients (Banff grade 1). Overall safety profile was similar between groups. Discontinuation due to adverse events occurred in three everolimus patients (7.1%) and five cyclosporine patients (13.2%) between randomization and month 12. Initiation of everolimus with early elimination of calcineurin therapy is associated with a significant renal benefit at 12 months post‐transplant that is observed in both living and deceased‐donor recipients. (clinicaltrials.gov NCT00154310)

Onset and progression of diabetes in kidney transplant patients receiving everolimus or cyclosporine therapy: an analysis of two randomized, multicenter trials

BackgroundConversion from calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) therapy to a mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor following kidney transplantation may help to preserve graft function. Data are sparse, however, concerning the impact of conversion on posttransplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) or the progression of pre-existing diabetes.MethodsPTDM and other diabetes-related parameters were assessed post hoc in two large open-label multicenter trials. Kidney transplant recipients were randomized (i) at month 4.5 to switch to everolimus or remain on a standard cyclosporine (CsA)-based regimen (ZEUS, n = 300), or (ii) at month 3 to switch to everolimus, remain on standard CNI therapy or convert to everolimus with reduced-exposure CsA (HERAKLES, n = 497).ResultsThere were no significant differences in the incidence of PTDM between treatment groups (log rank p = 0.97 [ZEUS], p = 0.90 [HERAKLES]). The mean change in random blood glucose from randomization to month 12 was also similar between treatment groups in both trials for patients with or without PTDM, and with or without pre-existing diabetes. The change in eGFR from randomization to month 12 showed a benefit for everolimus versus comparator groups in all subpopulations, but only reached significance in larger subgroups (no PTDM or no pre-existing diabetes).ConclusionsWithin the restrictions of this post hoc analysis, including non-standardized diagnostic criteria and limited glycemia laboratory parameters, these data do not indicate any difference in the incidence or severity of PTDM with early conversion from a CsA-based regimen to everolimus, or in the progression of pre-existing diabetes.Trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov, NCT00154310 (registered September 2005) and NCT00514514 (registered August 2007); EudraCT (2006-007021-32 and 2004-004346-40).

Five-year outcomes in kidney transplant patients randomized to everolimus with cyclosporine withdrawal or low-exposure cyclosporine versus standard therapy

HERAKLES was a 1‐year randomized, multicenter trial. Patients were randomized at 3 months after kidney transplantation to remain on cyclosporine‐based therapy, switch to everolimus without a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI), or switch to everolimus with low‐exposure cyclosporine. Overall, 417 of 497 (83.9%) patients from the core study entered a 4‐year extension study. The randomized regimen was continued to year 5 in 75.9%, 41.9% and 24.6% of patients in the standard‐CNI, CNI‐free and low‐CNI groups, respectively. Adjusted estimated GFR at year 5 was significantly higher in the CNI‐free group versus standard CNI (difference 7.2 mL/min/1.73 m2, P < .001) or low CNI (difference 7.6 mL/min/1.73 m2, P < .001). For patients who continued randomized therapy for 5 years, differences were 14.4 mL/min/1.73 m2 and 10.1 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively. Biopsy‐proven acute rejection occurred during the 4‐year extension study in 7.6%, 8.6%, and 9.0% of patients in the standard‐CNI, CNI‐free and low‐CNI groups, respectively (P = .927). In conclusion, conversion to a CNI‐free everolimus regimen 3 months after kidney transplantation improved long‐term graft function, particularly in patients who continued the CNI‐free regimen. Low CNI with everolimus did not improve renal function. Efficacy was comparable between groups but frequent immunosuppression changes should be taken into account.